RaulJimenez 0 Posted March 18, 2006 CID Report Share Posted March 18, 2006 I'm not really worried about speed , is the packet loss that is incredible. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
thony 0 Posted March 19, 2006 CID Report Share Posted March 19, 2006 my craplink status :connection firewalled,wireless,utorrent with 7 downloads and high :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1061 Kbps about 1.1 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 130 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: 2006/03/18 - 7:34pm Bottom Line:: 19X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 7.88 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 23.093 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 53.48 % of your hosts average (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-9HGQY1CBK :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1843 Kbps about 1.8 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 225 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/18 - 6:51pm Bottom Line:: 33X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 4.55 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 13.297 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Diagnosis: 90% + Okay : running at 92.89 % of your hosts average (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-KWUJLA56Z Quote Link to post Share on other sites
rammolo 2 Posted March 19, 2006 CID Report Share Posted March 19, 2006 maldita sea la madre de los desgraciados de CRAPLINK llamas y te dicen que 1Mb es bueno, sea la madre de esos cabrones Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Phanto 0 Posted March 23, 2006 CID Report Share Posted March 23, 2006 Yo he estado por llamar, pero mas interesado estoy en hacer un corillo BIEN CABRON e ir para las facilidades de OneLink PR por que ya esto ha ido demasiado lejos, las velocidades son pateticas no esta no corriendo ni a 256Kbps que es la coneccion mas barata de DMax alrededor de $24.95 cuesta. Ya es hora que tomemos accion, quejandonos en foros y hablando mierda no vamos hacer un carajo yo sugiero q formemos un grupo y vayamos a las facilidades de una vez por todas. Estamos pagando por un servicio "La uni Quote Link to post Share on other sites
usoledad 0 Posted March 23, 2006 CID Report Share Posted March 23, 2006 maldita sea la madre de los desgraciados de CRAPLINK llamas y te dicen que 1Mb es bueno, sea la madre de esos cabrones Vamos a ver, hace un tiempo Onelink hizo llegar una carta donde dec Quote Link to post Share on other sites
osva 0 Posted March 23, 2006 CID Report Share Posted March 23, 2006 Vamos a ver, hace un tiempo Onelink hizo llegar una carta donde dec Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Robocop 0 Posted March 23, 2006 CID Report Share Posted March 23, 2006 maldita sea la madre de los desgraciados de CRAPLINK llamas y te dicen que 1Mb es bueno, sea la madre de esos cabrones Por lo menos a ti te dijeron que 1Mb estaba bueno. A mi me lo dijeron cuando le dije que tenia 0.6 en 2 test corridos que le hice en su "cara". So .... that's this crap company for all of us (pr). They are the worst company to hit this stupid monkey island. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Robocop 0 Posted March 23, 2006 CID Report Share Posted March 23, 2006 btw usoledad PR is going back in time. Like others country going up and up in broadband. PR is going backward. Nice future to this island! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
usoledad 0 Posted March 23, 2006 CID Report Share Posted March 23, 2006 Ellos no garantizan la velocidad. Los anuncios son con velocidades "de hasta" 3mb, O sea estan en ley. Es cierto que no garantizan velocidad, sin embargo para todo servicio anunciado debe haber un m Quote Link to post Share on other sites
usoledad 0 Posted March 23, 2006 CID Report Share Posted March 23, 2006 btw usoledad PR is going back in time. Like others country going up and up in broadband. PR is going backward. Nice future to this island! Is sad to know that you are saying is true. PR is going back in time like the ISP's quality of service. We need more offers that can satisfy or necessities at reasonable prices. May be Centennial's participation in the broadband market may help to improve the service of the other IPS's... May be... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
osva 0 Posted March 23, 2006 CID Report Share Posted March 23, 2006 Es cierto que no garantizan velocidad, sin embargo para todo servicio anunciado debe haber un m Quote Link to post Share on other sites
usoledad 0 Posted March 23, 2006 CID Report Share Posted March 23, 2006 El 80% de tu coneccion te lo garantiza DSL, no Cable. Total con todo y lo que esta pasando, no vuelvo a DSL. Quiz Quote Link to post Share on other sites
osva 0 Posted March 23, 2006 CID Report Share Posted March 23, 2006 En mi caso si es MUCHO mas rapido que dsl. Ahora es verdad que cuando era adelphia pues fue mejor. Pero se olvidan de todos los meses que adelphia tuvo problemas que no subia de 200 KBPS. O sea, ahora mismo esta bien estable.. nunca se ha caido. No me quejo. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bacalao1 0 Posted March 24, 2006 CID Report Share Posted March 24, 2006 I just went to the office the other day to buya new modem and the rep. said that now they are upping the download to 4gb/sec. I said to him that they need to improve the connection and of course gave me the same shitty answer "We are working on that" well they have been working on that for the past year that I have had the service. Does anybody in that company know what they are doing? Why would you increase the bandwidth if with the current offer of 3gb/sec cant be fulfilled not evenat 1gb/sec download with a clean steady connection. Someone really needs to get their head out of their ass over there and pronto!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
osva 0 Posted March 24, 2006 CID Report Share Posted March 24, 2006 I just went to the office the other day to buya new modem and the rep. said that now they are upping the download to 4GB/sec. I said to him that they need to improve the connection and of course gave me the same S#!tty answer "We are working on that" well they have been working on that for the past year that I have had the service. Does anybody in that company know what they are doing? Why would you increase the bandwidth if with the current offer of 3GB/sec cant be fulfilled not evenat 1GB/sec download with a clean steady connection. Someone really needs to get their head out of their ass over there and pronto!!! Its 3MB not GB.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
rammolo 2 Posted March 24, 2006 CID Report Share Posted March 24, 2006 Hi, Onelink has improved drastically at least in my area check these speeds test. Not cahed test. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 5642 Kbps about 5.6 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 689 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/19 - 9:38am Bottom Line:: 101X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1.49 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 4.344 seconds to complete Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; Maxthon) Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 183.8 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-T9BWV3QSA :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 5263 Kbps about 5.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 642 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/19 - 9:47am Bottom Line:: 94X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1.6 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 4.657 seconds to complete Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; Maxthon) Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 164.74 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-2NEO3FRUQ :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 5767 Kbps about 5.8 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 704 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/19 - 7:26pm Bottom Line:: 103X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1.45 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 4.25 seconds to complete Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; Maxthon) Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 190.09 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-SVE2OPHD1 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 5986 Kbps about 6 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 731 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/22 - 1:08pm Bottom Line:: 107X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1.4 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 4.094 seconds to complete Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; Maxthon) Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 201.11 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-6E1IB3YAF Obviosly some tweaking Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tommie gorman 130 Posted March 24, 2006 CID Report Share Posted March 24, 2006 I hope you guys never need any other help, i don't understand much of this. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest thecableguy Posted March 24, 2006 CID Report Share Posted March 24, 2006 Is sad to know that you are saying is true. PR is going back in time like the ISP's quality of service. We need more offers that can satisfy or necessities at reasonable prices. May be Centennial's participation in the broadband market may help to improve the service of the other IPS's... May be... Don't feel too sorry for Puerto Rico....they are genius in many things electronic and digital. If it can be hacked, cracked, pirated or otherwise gotten for free they have found the way or will have done so soon.....no matter what it is. Must be all that healthy tropical air.... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
osva 0 Posted March 24, 2006 CID Report Share Posted March 24, 2006 Hi, Onelink has improved drastically at least in my area check these speeds test. Not cahed test. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 5642 Kbps about 5.6 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 689 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/19 - 9:38am Bottom Line:: 101X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1.49 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 4.344 seconds to complete Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; Maxthon) Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 183.8 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-T9BWV3QSA :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 5263 Kbps about 5.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 642 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/19 - 9:47am Bottom Line:: 94X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1.6 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 4.657 seconds to complete Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; Maxthon) Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 164.74 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-2NEO3FRUQ :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 5767 Kbps about 5.8 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 704 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/19 - 7:26pm Bottom Line:: 103X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1.45 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 4.25 seconds to complete Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; Maxthon) Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 190.09 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-SVE2OPHD1 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 5986 Kbps about 6 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 731 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/22 - 1:08pm Bottom Line:: 107X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1.4 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 4.094 seconds to complete Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; Maxthon) Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 201.11 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-6E1IB3YAF Obviosly some tweaking what kind of tweaking you talking? 2992KB test is not a good option. Try with a bigger size test. 5893 or 12160. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
thony 0 Posted March 25, 2006 CID Report Share Posted March 25, 2006 441 kB/s its ok 4 me :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3614 Kbps about 3.6 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 441 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: 2006/03/24 - 10:22pm Bottom Line:: 65X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 2.32 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 6.781 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 82.07 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-JCXKN405L Quote Link to post Share on other sites
krazyrag 0 Posted March 25, 2006 CID Report Share Posted March 25, 2006 hey rammolo and Thony can u post ur cablenut settings? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
rammolo 2 Posted March 25, 2006 CID Report Share Posted March 25, 2006 Im not using cablenut, i use tcp optimizer Quote Link to post Share on other sites
krazyrag 0 Posted March 25, 2006 CID Report Share Posted March 25, 2006 well can u tell me what are ur settings on tcp optimizer then? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
rammolo 2 Posted March 25, 2006 CID Report Share Posted March 25, 2006 Sure, MTU-1500 MSS-1460 RWIN-513920 TTL-64 MTU Discovery-On Sllective Ack's-On Max duplicate Ack's-2 Rwin is the most importanat setting, also try devided by 2, remember if you use a router it can limit your MTU value, if this is the case try updating routers firmware. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
krazyrag 0 Posted March 26, 2006 CID Report Share Posted March 26, 2006 thanks a lot. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.