TraNsEdgE 01 Posted November 10, 2005 CID Share Posted November 10, 2005 look at your tests though. somedays you get in the 450 range. Post a trace Route to Testmy.net and ping to it also. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xbox_guy Posted November 10, 2005 CID Share Posted November 10, 2005 You are missing over 230 Kbps up and what does it matter that it is DSL? Dsl is so good if you get it from a quality provider. My dsl is amazing!!!! Who is your DSL provider? what speeds are you getting? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TraNsEdgE 01 Posted November 10, 2005 CID Share Posted November 10, 2005 Trace route testmy.net i got Bellsouth and a business line from them to. 3/384 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xbox_guy Posted November 11, 2005 CID Share Posted November 11, 2005 Tracing route to www.testmy.net [67.18.179.85] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 2 ms 1 ms 1 ms home [192.168.1.254] 2 19 ms 19 ms 19 ms adsl-69-226-47-254.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net [69.22 6.47.254] 3 20 ms 19 ms 21 ms dist4-vlan60.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [67.114.50.66] 4 20 ms 19 ms 19 ms bb2-g2-0.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [151.164.41.239] 5 24 ms 21 ms 19 ms core2-p5-0.crrvca.sbcglobal.net [151.164.41.14] 6 19 ms 21 ms 21 ms bb1-p8-0.crrvca.sbcglobal.net [151.164.41.2] 7 24 ms 23 ms 21 ms ex2-p8-0.eqlaca.sbcglobal.net [151.164.41.33] 8 24 ms 23 ms 23 ms bpr2-ge-2-1-0.LosAngelesEquinix.savvis.net [151. 164.248.214] 9 23 ms 25 ms 24 ms dhr1-pos-7-0.Elsegundola1.savvis.net [208.174.19 6.70] 10 24 ms 23 ms 23 ms dhr2-ge-6-0.Elsegundola1.savvis.net [208.172.35. 42] 11 23 ms 23 ms 23 ms dcr2-so-4-0-0.LosAngeles.savvis.net [208.172.35. 65] 12 23 ms 23 ms 23 ms dcr1-as0-0.LosAngeles.savvis.net [204.70.192.117 ] 13 57 ms 57 ms 56 ms bcs2-so-3-3-0.dallas.savvis.net [204.70.192.246] 14 54 ms 56 ms 55 ms bcs1-so-6-0-0.Dallas.savvis.net [204.70.192.49] 15 54 ms 55 ms 55 ms dcr1-as0.Dallas.savvis.net [204.70.193.214] 16 56 ms 54 ms 54 ms aer1-po10.DallasEquinix.savvis.net [204.70.134.1 4] 17 55 ms 57 ms 60 ms 208.175.175.42 18 53 ms 56 ms 55 ms vl32.dsr02.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.62] 19 56 ms 54 ms 55 ms vl42.dsr02.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.91] 20 55 ms 55 ms 55 ms gi1-0-1.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.6 9] 21 56 ms 54 ms 55 ms 85.67-18-179.reverse.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85 ] Trace complete. *Here is my ping to testmy.net: Pinging www.testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=46 Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85: Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 54ms, Maximum = 58ms, Average = 55ms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carbon unit2 Posted November 11, 2005 Author CID Share Posted November 11, 2005 look at your tests though. somedays you get in the 450 range. Post a trace Route to Testmy.net and ping to it also. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TraNsEdgE 01 Posted November 11, 2005 CID Share Posted November 11, 2005 Do you see the ms to your first hop, it is 19 ms, that is not very good and probably why you loose so much speed Also that line looks great and stable, although you are loosing some 200 Kbps and 1000 Kbps down, i would get that line on the fact of it haveing great consistency. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carbon unit2 Posted November 11, 2005 Author CID Share Posted November 11, 2005 It's impossible to get 6MB thoroughput on a 6MB DSL sync. There is a huge overhead encapsulating an ethernet frame with PPPoE and splitting down to ride over ATM cells. Figure about 18% so a 6MB DSL will do 5MB and a 3MB DSL will do 2.5MB. Cablemodems are much more effecient on their transports so if a DSL network and a cablemodem network were both properly sized for the load the cablemodem circuit would kill the DSL circuit by a 20% margin for the same sync rate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tbaker397 Posted November 11, 2005 CID Share Posted November 11, 2005 DSL is dependant on way too many things to insure close to advertised speeds(line length, wiring condition, length of phone line in house, all that happy horse sh*t), ill take my cable line over DSL anyday. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TraNsEdgE 01 Posted November 11, 2005 CID Share Posted November 11, 2005 lol i wouldn't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carbon unit2 Posted November 12, 2005 Author CID Share Posted November 12, 2005 DSL is dependant on way too many things to insure close to advertised speeds(line length, wiring condition, length of phone line in house, all that happy horse sh*t), ill take my cable line over DSL anyday. Not with crappy pings and high latency Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.