Mattisin
-
Posts
17 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Never -
Speed Test
My Results
Posts posted by Mattisin
-
-
No it's coaxil cable. it goes from the back alley to a splitter then a 50 foot coaxil cord to my modem. Advertised 5000kbts.
-
:::.. Download Stats ..:::
Connection is:: 1244 Kbps about 1.2 Mbps (tested with 1013 kB)
Download Speed is:: 152 kB/s
Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server1)
Test Time:: Tue Aug 9 17:11:49 MST 2005
Bottom Line:: 22X faster than 56K 1MB download in 6.74 sec
Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 43.31 % of your hosts average (shawcable.net)
Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-342ZK8X7R
-
I have cable internet and i was wondering if my long cable from the back of my house to the front over the roof is creating my poor connection. I running at less then half my advertised speed. I think the cable is a 50 foot one.
-
I'm pretty sure that gateway is for when your using a router. Your using one right?
thanks anyway. -
I have this modom
If you could explain how to get into the control panel i would appretiate it.
-
Santa Cruz
TCP/Web100 Network Diagnostic Tool v5.3.3d
click START to begin
Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done
running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 446.61Kb/s
running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 2.24Mb/s
Your PC is connected to a Cable/DSL modem
Information: Other network traffic is congesting the link
-
-
Honestly i just shoved it back in, kinda hard cause i'm getting a little mad. Don't worry, i'm feeling better.
Finnaly getting some real help with this forum. -
I did bypass my router. It seemed to help a lot.
Advertised Speed - 5000kbits.
Tweaks - http://ttester.broadbandreports.com/tweak/block:5072d4?service=cable&speed=5000&os=winXP&via=normal
Spybot and Ad-ware done. Have Sygate.
CCleaner also used.
Thanks for your help.
-
HEY!
I just got it to work again. I think this onboard card is a real piece. Does anyone really recommend not using onboard network cards? -
:::.. Download Stats ..:::
Connection is:: 1697 Kbps about 1.7 Mbps (tested with 1013 kB)
Download Speed is:: 207 kB/s
Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server1)
Test Time:: Sun Aug 7 11:31:11 MST 2005
Bottom Line:: 30X faster than 56K 1MB download in 4.95 sec
Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 59.59 % of your hosts average (shawcable.net)
Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-5RMU4CP8X
On the right track.
Anything else? -
I've done ad-ware, spybot, ccleaner.
:::.. Download Stats ..:::
Connection is:: 1378 Kbps about 1.4 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB)
Download Speed is:: 168 kB/s
Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2)
Test Time:: Sun Aug 07 2005 11:17:35 GMT-0700 (Mountain Standard Time)
Bottom Line:: 25X faster than 56K 1MB download in 6.1 sec
Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 48.35 % of your hosts average (shawcable.net)
Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-XML9E5H8T
http://img132.imageshack.us/my.php?image=values7lm.png
Largest MTU
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 40 bytes ->bytes=40 time=119ms TTL=51
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 750 bytes ->bytes=750 time=184ms TTL=51
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 1125 bytes ->bytes=1125 time=237ms TTL=52
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 1312 bytes ->bytes=1312 time=263ms TTL=51
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 1406 bytes ->bytes=1406 time=276ms TTL=52
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 1453 bytes ->bytes=1453 time=280ms TTL=51
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 1476 bytes -> ..fragmented
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 1465 bytes ->bytes=1465 time=282ms TTL=51
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 1470 bytes ->bytes=1470 time=273ms TTL=51
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 1473 bytes -> ..fragmented
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 1472 bytes ->bytes=1472 time=276ms TTL=51
The largest possible non-fragmented packet is 1472 (1500 - 28 ICMP & IP headers).
You can set your MTU to 1500
Letency
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=51
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=51
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=51
Pinging [66.94.230.40] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=54
Pinging [66.94.230.40] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=54
Pinging [66.94.230.40] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=54
Ping statistics for above hosts:
Packets: Sent = 6, Received = 6, Lost = 0 (0% loss)
Approximate round trip times (RTT) in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 68ms, Maximum = 111ms, Average = 83ms
-
I used to be able to plug the network cable straight into my comp's built-in network card. Yesterday i messed around with the properties and changed the media type to another setting rather that leave it at auto-detect, just to see what whould happen. Well, no more connection is what happend. could it be a power issue? Or is my comp's built in network card just a piece?
Card - SiS 900-Based PCI Fast Ethernet Ad
-
Thanks. I'll give that a go. Any thought on how to speed up my connection? I'll post any stats you want. Thanks for you time.
-
I don't know how to tell the difference. I was also using the same cord yesterday before trying to fix my connection and it was working fine. God i need help.
Largest MTU
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 40 bytes ->bytes=40 time=119ms TTL=51
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 750 bytes ->bytes=750 time=184ms TTL=51
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 1125 bytes ->bytes=1125 time=237ms TTL=52
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 1312 bytes ->bytes=1312 time=263ms TTL=51
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 1406 bytes ->bytes=1406 time=276ms TTL=52
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 1453 bytes ->bytes=1453 time=280ms TTL=51
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 1476 bytes -> ..fragmented
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 1465 bytes ->bytes=1465 time=282ms TTL=51
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 1470 bytes ->bytes=1470 time=273ms TTL=51
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 1473 bytes -> ..fragmented
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 1472 bytes ->bytes=1472 time=276ms TTL=51
The largest possible non-fragmented packet is 1472 (1500 - 28 ICMP & IP headers).
You can set your MTU to 1500
Letency
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=51
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=51
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=51
Pinging [66.94.230.40] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=54
Pinging [66.94.230.40] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=54
Pinging [66.94.230.40] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=54
Ping statistics for above hosts:
Packets: Sent = 6, Received = 6, Lost = 0 (0% loss)
Approximate round trip times (RTT) in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 68ms, Maximum = 111ms, Average = 83ms
-
I've been trying for hours to get my cable internet up to speed. When i plud my modem directly into my comp it says there is no cable connected, but when i go through my router my bad connection works. My connection is advertised at 5000 kbits.
:::.. Download Stats ..:::
Connection is:: 1230 Kbps about 1.2 Mbps (tested with 1013 kB)
Download Speed is:: 150 kB/s
Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server1)
Test Time:: Sun Aug 7 10:32:00 MST 2005
Bottom Line:: 22X faster than 56K 1MB download in 6.83 sec
Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 43.14 % of your hosts average (shawcable.net)
Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-5CWMS7XR
thanks anyway.
Finnaly getting some real help with this forum.
Anything else?
How long is too long?
in Make it Faster...
Posted
that's probably it. i got the cheapest cable i could get. Thanks for your input.