Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Today
  3. Yesterday
  4. Last week
  5. Hi CA3LE, While I got the credit for the solution your link & suggestion sure led me to it. This is a "Warning" I still get in Event Viewer. I thought I would get the "Errors" fixed first. There are some "registry handles" that are not closing. I've tried some suggestions I found on the Internet but none of those worked. So again I will check out any suggestions. This is the information from Windows Event Viewer: Warning 3/14/2024 11:34:34 AM User Profile Service 1530 Log Name: Application Source: Microsoft-Windows-User Profiles Service Date: 3/14/2024 11:34:34 AM Event ID: 1530 Task Category: None Level: Warning Keywords: User: SYSTEM Computer: MY-PC Description: Windows detected your registry file is still in use by other applications or services. The file will be unloaded now. The applications or services that hold your registry file may not function properly afterwards. DETAIL - 3 user registry handles leaked from \Registry\User\S-1-5-21-2165380602-1430432178-1808743609-1000: Process 3300 (\Device\HarddiskVolume3\Program Files\Common Files\microsoft shared\Windows Live\WLIDSVC.EXE) has opened key \REGISTRY\USER\S-1-5-21-2165380602-1430432178-1808743609-1000 Process 1060 (\Device\HarddiskVolume3\Windows\System32\winlogon.exe) has opened key \REGISTRY\USER\S-1-5-21-2165380602-1430432178-1808743609-1000 Process 812 (\Device\HarddiskVolume3\Program Files\Avast Software\Avast\aswToolsSvc.exe) has opened key \REGISTRY\USER\S-1-5-21-2165380602-1430432178-1808743609-1000\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall Event Xml: <Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event"> <System> <Provider Name="Microsoft-Windows-User Profiles Service" Guid="{89B1E9F0-5AFF-44A6-9B44-0A07A7CE5845}" /> <EventID>1530</EventID> <Version>0</Version> <Level>3</Level> <Task>0</Task> <Opcode>0</Opcode> <Keywords>0x8000000000000000</Keywords> <TimeCreated SystemTime="2024-03-14T16:34:34.162109300Z" /> <EventRecordID>168</EventRecordID> <Correlation ActivityID="{86A66C9C-CE07-0005-834C-D7221276DA01}" /> <Execution ProcessID="1572" ThreadID="3660" /> <Channel>Application</Channel> <Computer>MY-PC</Computer> <Security UserID="S-1-5-18" /> </System> <EventData Name="EVENT_HIVE_LEAK"> <Data Name="Detail">3 user registry handles leaked from \Registry\User\S-1-5-21-2165380602-1430432178-1808743609-1000: Process 3300 (\Device\HarddiskVolume3\Program Files\Common Files\microsoft shared\Windows Live\WLIDSVC.EXE) has opened key \REGISTRY\USER\S-1-5-21-2165380602-1430432178-1808743609-1000 Process 1060 (\Device\HarddiskVolume3\Windows\System32\winlogon.exe) has opened key \REGISTRY\USER\S-1-5-21-2165380602-1430432178-1808743609-1000 Process 812 (\Device\HarddiskVolume3\Program Files\Avast Software\Avast\aswToolsSvc.exe) has opened key \REGISTRY\USER\S-1-5-21-2165380602-1430432178-1808743609-1000\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall </Data> </EventData> </Event>
  6. With an advertised speed of 100 Mbps, a wired updated laptop I get these results: As a reference: Speedtest.net 100.92 Mbps M-lab 98.27 Mbps (they have done better in the past, they are now running an experiment) Highest value of TestMy.net: 98.4 Mbps, median: 96.8 Mbps, stdev: 0.63. I only did the download test. All tests completed within 15 seconds, which is nice. Although I think it must be possible to test the download speed within 7 seconds. http://speed.googlefiber.net/ is able to do that, so it will be great if you are also able to perform an accurate download test in 7 seconds. The interface is looking good. IMHO this new test is showing a lower result as expected. I also tested once normally and the I measured 100.05 Mbps In 2023 I tested TestMy.net. At that moment in time the median was 101.3 Mbps which is better because I considered 100.8 Mbps as the correct value to measure. Speed tests which give a result lower than the advertised speed fail in my opinion. See: https://speedtesttest.zomdir.com/2023/one-hundred-point-eight.html If you make an adjustment, let me know and I'll test it again. Best regards, Hans Results could be found at: https://testmy.net/quickstats/ZOMDir
  7. Earlier
  8. @ixiz you're now in the beta crew, read the beta welcome topic for more details.
  9. Were you signed in when your IP changed? Usually this doesn't interrupt the test but the user may lose their results if they aren't signed in because the computer ID changes when your IP changes. When you came back to the test, what did it say in the browser? I have a beta that was originally for something else. It has some logic in it that would definitely make it much more difficult for any stoppage to happen. I plan to develop that new logic into the automatic speed test.
  10. Today my 24 hour @15minute intervals (100x) test stopped when my public IP changed... How does the test avoid stoppages for CGNAT users ??
  11. I have fixed the SChannel errors. I started with unchecking all of these in Internet Options/Advanced. SSL 2.0 SSL 3.0 TLS 1.0 TLS 1.1 TLS 1.2 This worked to fix the error but my email images were now all the small black box with a X inside. Not what I wanted. So I checked them one at a time & tested with a reboot in between. All need to be checked. But that is not all. I had to go into the Registry & change the settings. This made the settings permanent. This is the registry location. HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet002\Control\SecurityProviders\SCHANNEL\Protocols Two days now & NO SChannel; errors. This could make my OS less secure. I use Avast email scanner & I do not use IE or Edge. So I believe I"m OK
  12. There’s an Export button under the plots on the Results page
  13. Yes I would like to test BETA - Currently using and running 3 ISP tests as we speak
  14. GM forum, I am new to using this testmy.net to test my internet service for consistency and speed. I was able to run a 15min interval tests 100x (to get approx 24hr test.). I was able to view the data and unfortunately the data has some crossover which is ok. But i want to get the raw data results like in the table of "MyResults" - Is that possible ? TIA
  15. The second error has been fixed by using the link. Two of the Services settings were already set to Automatic, I set Security Accounts Manager to Automatic. The errors stopped for the second error.. I'm still working on the first one. I checked both browsers I use Firefox & Opera. Both are using TLS 1.3. To add to that I cleared Event Viewer & opened & used both browsers with zero errors. The errors are caused by Windows Live Mail the email client I use. Opening Windows Live Mail does not cause the errors. When just opened No errors. It is when an email is opened the error appear. The errors started some time ago when Suddenlink became Optimum. Optimum left in place the old suddenlink.net as the email addresses for suddenlink email accounts. This may or may not be the cause but here is the information I have: Optimum POP3 Incoming mail server: mail.optimum.net 110, requires SSL 995, non-secure Optimum SMTP Outgoing mail server: mail.optimum.net 465, requires SSL 587, non-secure suddenlink.net POP3 Server pop.suddenlink.net suddenlink.net POP3 Port 995 POP3 Security SSL suddenlink.net SMTP Server smtp.suddenlink.net suddenlink.net SMTP Port 465 SMTP Security SSL Optimim states use 110 for SSL while 995 is non-secure. Suddenlink which are the settings I have states Port 995 for SSL. This is where I suspect the errors come from. Funny thing Windows Live Mail works fine as far as I can tell & I receive all my email as far as I can tell. Even a gmail acountI have coming into WLM. If I find more information I will post it.
  16. @jpknuuti I also added you to the beta testers group if you'd like to try the beta.
  17. @jpknuuti -- I like that use case. You now have special access to 1 auto minute testing. Please let me know if this helps! As long as you're signed in this will work.
  18. Here's what I found. Schannel error 40 means: SSL3_ALERT_HANDSHAKE_FAILURE -- you may be using outdated cyphers in your browser. Service Control Manager Event ID: 7001 -- maybe look at this article. >> How to Solve Service Control Manager Error 7001 Effectively If this helps let me know.
  19. Hi all. Seems a bit slow in the forum these days so I have a couple of more consistent errors. They are not causing me any problems except filling up my EventViewer. I have a .bat file for clearing it but it is a daily procedure. If anyone has any information to stop these I would appreciate it. The first is : Schannel Event ID: 36887 The following fatal alert was received: 40. ProcessID=1128 The second is: Service Control Manager Event ID: 7001 ProcessID=1112 Description: The Background Intelligent Transfer Service service depends on the COM+ Event System service which failed to start because of the following error: The service cannot be started, either because it is disabled or because it has no enabled devices associated with it. I do have BITS disabled in Services. I plan to keep it disabled .I would like to find a way to stop the error.
  20. Hi Ca3le, The reason why I am asking is that I have been looking for an app or SW for poor network connection testing on the train. Quite often data connection on trains is not perfect and our start-up has developed a solution to improve the data connection. In order to be able to do a benchmark test, we would need a testing solution with 1 minute test interval. What is your opinion, could Testmy.net be used in this kind of test scenario?
  21. Hi Janne, Welcome! You could test more frequently, but do you really want to? As @xs1 is saying, it can become counter productive if you're testing every minute. TMN is designed to utilize your data heavily. Depending on the speed of your connection; fully open, testing every minute it can quickly eat up your data and mine. If your use case could benefit from that functionality let me know, I sometimes allow more frequent testing on a case by case basis.
  22. Sorry for the delay, a little overwhelmed over the last week. You're in! Read the beta welcome topic for more details.
  23. All this would do would eat significantly more bandwidth... 5 min. minimum is pretty generous imo;
  24. Hi, Is there a way to test internet speed every minute? Now the minimum seems to be 5 minutes. Regards, Janne
  25. Yes, I want to test the new beta version
  26. Yes as above it's fast enough for two or three devices with no gaming. Having said that, if they were to do a social tariff which is FTTP I might reconsider 😀
  27. Hey, if it works it works 👌🥸
  28. Recently moved to these as they piggyback Vodafone
  29. Social tariff they do, it's fine for what I need. 🙂
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...