OK Van Buren I found that setting the RWIN to 29200 resulted in:
WEB100 Enabled Statistics:
Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done
running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 373.55Kb/s
running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 4.03Mb/s
------ Client System Details ------
OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1
Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.4.2_04
------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------
Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found.
Link set to Half Duplex mode
No network congestion discovered.
Good network cable(s) found
Normal duplex operation found.
Web100 reports the Round trip time = 53.58 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and
There were 2 packets retransmitted, 37 duplicate acks received, and 38 SACK blocks received
The connection was idle 0 seconds (0%) of the time
This connection is receiver limited 70.62% of the time.
Increasing the current receive buffer (28.0 KB) will improve performance
This connection is network limited 29.32% of the time.
Contact your local network administrator to report a network problem
Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to:
RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON
RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON
RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF
RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF
RFC 1323 Window Scaling: OFF
Packet size is preserved End-to-End
Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End
Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address
But my download speeds suffer bigtime with the lower rwin. Shouldn't it be quicker with less re-transmitted packets? Is having low re-transmission a trade off for higher d/l speeds?
:::.. Download Stats ..:::
Connection is:: 2791 Kbps about 2.8 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB)
Download Speed is:: 341 KB/s
Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/
Test Time:: Sun Jan 30 2005 13:36:58 GMT-0800 (Pacific Standard Time)
Bottom Line:: 50X faster than 56K 1MB download in 3 sec
Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/id-NTY53EZHU
thanks!