Jump to content

TeamStrike

Members
  • Posts

    13
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never
  • Speed Test

    My Results

Posts posted by TeamStrike

  1. Here is my 5/2 plan on FIOS

    :::.. Download Stats ..:::

    Connection is:: 5101 Kbps about 5.1 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)

    Download Speed is:: 623 kB/s

    Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server2)

    Test Time:: Mon Jan 23 2006 08:28:34 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time)

    Bottom Line:: 91X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.64 sec

    Diagnosis: Looks Great : 8.58 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)

    Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-Q4NBWCR28

    :::.. Upload Stats ..:::

    Connection is:: 1832 Kbps about 1.8 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB)

    Upload Speed is:: 224 kB/s

    Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1)

    Test Time:: Mon Jan 23 2006 08:29:01 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time)

    Bottom Line:: 33X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 4.57 sec

    Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 188.5 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)

    Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-4JUGN5RXP

  2. Try THIS TEST.  Post results.

    SpeedGuide.net TCP/IP Analyzer

    TCP properties for IP = 72.64.136.251 ()

    Browser/OS = Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8) Gecko/20051111 Firefox/1.5

    Notes: Read the Analyzer FAQ if the above is not your IP address.

    TCP options string = 020405ac0103030301010402

    MTU = 1492

    MTU is optimized for PPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for optimal throughput.

    MSS = 1452

    MSS is optimized for PPPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising your MTU value.

    Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 513920

    RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 3 bits (scale factor of 6)

    Unscaled Receive Window = 64240

    For optimum performance, consider changing RWIN to a multiple of MSS.

    Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS:

    511104 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 8)

    255552 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4)

    127776 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2)

    63888 (MSS x 44)

    bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test):

    Your RcvWindow limits you to: 20556.8 kbps (2569.6 KBytes/s) @ 200ms

    Your RcvWindow limits you to: 8222.72 kbps (1027.84 KBytes/s) @ 500ms

    MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON

    Time to live left = 59 hops

    TTL value is ok.

    Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF

    Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON

    IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 11110000 (240)

    Precedence (priority) = 111 (Network Control)

    Delay = 1 (low delay)

    Throughput = 0 (normal throughput)

    Reliability = 0 (normal reliability)

    Cost = 0 (normal cost)

    Check bit = 0 (correct, 8th checking bit must be zero)

    DiffServ (RFC 2474) = No valid DiffServ equivalent. See the TCP Optimizer documentation, or RFCs 2474, 2475, 2597, 2598, 2873.

  3. :::.. Download Stats ..:::

    Connection is:: 49240 Kbps about 49.2 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB)

    Download Speed is:: 6011 kB/s

    Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server2)

    Test Time:: Wed Jan 18 16:33:11 EST 2006

    Bottom Line:: 879X faster than 56K 1MB download in 0.17 sec

    Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 263.58 % faster than the average for host (duke.edu)

    Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-B61NUJ8L2

    that is the wireless connection speeds, upload its about 10Mb on wireless, not shabby.  On my Ethernet connection I average on an NDT Test Server in California (i'm in NC at Duke) I can easily get 80Mb Download and 80Mb Upload.  If it gets less than that for me then it is slow, I have tested out at 100/100 download/upload on an NDT Server before.  I can download on average close to 11.5MB (yes megabytes) a sec from most sites that support that large bandwidth!

    But still 9Mb still isn't bad, try tweaking with cable nut, i'm sure someone here can probably help you out and get you closer to the 15 or 20mb range! :)

    thats one hell of the connection

  4. :::.. Download Stats ..:::

    Connection is:: 4074 Kbps about 4.1 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

    Download Speed is:: 497 kB/s

    Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1)

    Test Time:: Tue Jan 17 16:28:45 EST 2006

    Bottom Line:: 73X faster than 56K 1MB download in 2.06 sec

    Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 86.35 % of your hosts average (verizon.net)

    Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-BL4DC5YNR

    :::.. Upload Stats ..:::

    Connection is:: 857 Kbps about 0.9 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

    Upload Speed is:: 105 kB/s

    Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1)

    Test Time:: Tue Jan 17 16:33:03 EST 2006

    Bottom Line:: 15X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 9.75 sec

    Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 36.03 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)

    Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-U19ZIV8FD

    $35.00 a month 5000/2000 plan

    you might wanna tweak your connection with cablenut b/c i can easily get above 5.2 mb. also you upload looks pretty bad

  5. haven't read the comments but i would figure that the extended support goes for home as well, since any bugs/security iddues in pro will be identical in home or nonexistent in home due to it not having the bugged feature. so i figure they will release the patches for all versions.

    and if not, 2008 is a ways off yet...

    by that time most pc's will be running vista's

  6. I pay 30 bucks/month for verizon fios 5/2 plan

    :::.. Download Stats ..:::

    Connection is:: 5200 Kbps about 5.2 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB)

    Download Speed is:: 635 kB/s

    Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2)

    Test Time:: Tue Jan 17 2006 07:59:39 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time)

    Bottom Line:: 93X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.61 sec

    Diagnosis: Looks Great : 10.22 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)

    Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-KXGJESDRB

    :::.. Upload Stats ..:::

    Connection is:: 1811 Kbps about 1.8 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB)

    Upload Speed is:: 221 kB/s

    Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2)

    Test Time:: Tue Jan 17 2006 08:00:34 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time)

    Bottom Line:: 32X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 4.63 sec

    Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 187 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)

    Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-X1VDAW2Q4

  7. Got the Verizon Fios last week. since then its been pretty rock solid. no speed drops like the roadrunner. I am on 5/2 plan. my download is very good but does anyone had anyl uck with the upload, its always like 1.7 or 1.8. Its still better than the cable.

    :::.. Download Stats ..:::

    Connection is:: 5200 Kbps about 5.2 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB)

    Download Speed is:: 635 kB/s

    Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2)

    Test Time:: Tue Jan 17 2006 07:59:39 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time)

    Bottom Line:: 93X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.61 sec

    Diagnosis: Looks Great : 10.22 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)

    Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-KXGJESDRB

    :::.. Upload Stats ..:::

    Connection is:: 1811 Kbps about 1.8 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB)

    Upload Speed is:: 221 kB/s

    Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2)

    Test Time:: Tue Jan 17 2006 08:00:34 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time)

    Bottom Line:: 32X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 4.63 sec

    Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 187 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)

    Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-X1VDAW2Q4

×
×
  • Create New...