Jump to content

Arthur1234

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    7

  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

  • Speed Test

    My Results

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Arthur1234

    testing linux on cable modem

    in Make it Faster...

    Posted

    TCP/IP is a protocol suite.  It is platform-independent.

    I also notice a speed increase when booted into Linux.  I believe it is an overall system performance boost, not just specific to networking.

    Yeah, Dude... That linux have automatic turning feature for TCP/IP stack but windows series (early 95 to NT to XP) can not do automatic turning TCP/IP but microsoft have put automatic turner for TCP/IP in windows vista O.S.

    Cox.net users compare your speeds

    in Show off your speed

    Posted

    Here is my adsl ping; that pinging to google.com is very nice...

    PING www.l.google.com (72.14.203.99) 56(84) bytes of data.

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=1 ttl=247 time=26.0 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=2 ttl=247 time=25.4 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=3 ttl=247 time=25.6 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=4 ttl=247 time=25.6 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=5 ttl=247 time=24.9 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=6 ttl=247 time=25.6 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=7 ttl=247 time=25.4 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=8 ttl=247 time=25.2 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=9 ttl=247 time=25.9 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=10 ttl=247 time=25.7 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=11 ttl=247 time=25.6 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=12 ttl=247 time=25.9 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=13 ttl=247 time=25.2 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=14 ttl=247 time=25.7 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=15 ttl=247 time=25.4 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=16 ttl=247 time=25.4 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=17 ttl=247 time=29.8 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=18 ttl=247 time=25.1 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=19 ttl=247 time=25.4 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=20 ttl=247 time=24.9 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=21 ttl=247 time=25.4 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=22 ttl=247 time=24.9 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=23 ttl=247 time=25.1 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=24 ttl=247 time=26.6 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=25 ttl=247 time=25.1 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=26 ttl=247 time=25.4 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=27 ttl=247 time=25.6 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=28 ttl=247 time=25.2 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=29 ttl=247 time=26.4 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=30 ttl=247 time=24.9 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=31 ttl=247 time=25.4 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=32 ttl=247 time=26.1 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=33 ttl=247 time=25.6 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=34 ttl=247 time=25.6 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=35 ttl=247 time=27.1 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=36 ttl=247 time=25.4 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=37 ttl=247 time=25.6 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=38 ttl=247 time=26.9 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=39 ttl=247 time=25.4 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=40 ttl=247 time=24.9 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=41 ttl=247 time=25.6 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=42 ttl=247 time=25.4 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=43 ttl=247 time=27.4 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=44 ttl=247 time=25.7 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=45 ttl=247 time=25.1 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=46 ttl=247 time=25.4 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=47 ttl=247 time=25.6 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=48 ttl=247 time=26.8 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=49 ttl=247 time=25.6 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=50 ttl=247 time=25.9 ms

    --- www.l.google.com ping statistics ---

    50 packets transmitted, 50 received, 0% packet loss, time 49002ms

    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 24.925/25.748/29.882/0.821 ms

    Cox.net users compare your speeds

    in Show off your speed

    Posted

    Why? i don't understand..... at&t is 6Mbps/7XXKbps big drop on dl smal drop on up but ??? :cry:

    Well, that I know a truth about cable media system are share that's what I understand of cable system, on cable so my latency is so-so

    ping www.google.com -c 50

    PING www.l.google.com (72.14.203.99) 56(84) bytes of data.

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=51.0 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=37.5 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=38.0 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=35.3 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=5 ttl=244 time=35.4 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=6 ttl=244 time=37.5 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=7 ttl=244 time=35.4 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=8 ttl=244 time=39.7 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=9 ttl=244 time=35.2 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=10 ttl=244 time=35.9 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=11 ttl=244 time=35.8 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=12 ttl=244 time=37.3 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=13 ttl=244 time=34.9 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=14 ttl=244 time=37.5 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=15 ttl=244 time=35.5 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=16 ttl=244 time=35.4 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=17 ttl=244 time=34.6 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=18 ttl=244 time=34.7 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=19 ttl=244 time=36.9 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=20 ttl=244 time=36.2 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=21 ttl=244 time=38.2 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=22 ttl=244 time=35.2 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=23 ttl=244 time=36.0 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=24 ttl=244 time=37.1 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=25 ttl=244 time=34.9 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=26 ttl=244 time=40.4 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=27 ttl=244 time=37.7 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=28 ttl=244 time=33.4 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=29 ttl=244 time=35.2 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=30 ttl=244 time=34.4 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=31 ttl=244 time=35.7 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=32 ttl=244 time=36.6 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=33 ttl=244 time=35.8 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=34 ttl=244 time=34.0 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=35 ttl=244 time=35.2 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=36 ttl=244 time=36.0 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=38 ttl=244 time=35.4 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=39 ttl=244 time=36.3 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=40 ttl=244 time=37.9 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=41 ttl=244 time=40.2 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=42 ttl=244 time=38.6 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=43 ttl=244 time=43.1 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=44 ttl=244 time=39.0 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=45 ttl=244 time=37.3 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=46 ttl=244 time=40.1 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=47 ttl=244 time=34.5 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=48 ttl=244 time=37.7 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=49 ttl=244 time=36.2 ms

    64 bytes from 72.14.203.99: icmp_seq=50 ttl=244 time=36.6 ms

    --- www.l.google.com ping statistics ---

    50 packets transmitted, 49 received, 2% packet loss, time 49033ms

    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.454/36.956/51.017/2.772 ms

    testing linux on cable modem

    in Make it Faster...

    Posted

    Wow, I am sorry. I just tried the link and it did not work for  me.

    Anybody have the 20 mb test file  :?::?:

    It must have been changed after the redo of the site recently.

    Anyway, nice speeds there. :D

    Thanks... How I wish that everyone would be using linux so they will benefits of higher quality of TCP/IP software within linux (unix-like clone)

    Cox.net users compare your speeds

    in Show off your speed

    Posted

    Here's my downstream and upstream stats

    :::.. testmy.net test results ..:::

    Download Connection is:: 12010 Kbps about 12.01 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB)

    Download Speed is:: 1466 kB/s

    Upload Connection is:: 1117 Kbps about 1.1 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

    Upload Speed is:: 136 kB/s

    Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1)

    Test Time:: 2006/10/20 - 10:07pm

    D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-4HVMPSRGL

    U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-VZJEP3D48

    User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060911 SUSE/1.5.0.7-1.5 Firefox/1.5.0.7 [!]

    Also, on speedtest.net What I get:

    52467182.png

    I will be leave Cox for AT and T for gaming online but I may go back to cox again within 6 months to 1 year or so...  :twisted::)

    testing linux on cable modem

    in Make it Faster...

    Posted

    Nice speeds there Arthur1234 and welcome to the forum  :wave:

    Try this test:

    http://www.testmy.net/tools/test/d_load.php?&st=st&tt=1&ta=1&top=000&out_src=20MB

    Clear you cache first, it will take you directly into the test.  ;)

    Here my speed test, Downstream

    ::::::::::::::::::::::::.. Download Stats ..::::::::::::::::::::::::

    Download Connection is:: 12236 Kbps about 12.2 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB)

    Download Speed is:: 1494 kB/s

    Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1)

    Test Time:: 2006/10/20 - 9:58pm

    Bottom Line:: 213X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.69 sec

    Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 8.141 seconds to complete

    Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 137.5 % faster than the average for host (Cox.net)

    D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-2QYK5F80G

    User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060911 SUSE/1.5.0.7-1.5 Firefox/1.5.0.7

    And here's upstream

    ::::::::::.. Upload Stats ..::::::::::

    Upload Connection is:: 1116 Kbps about 1.1 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

    Upload Speed is:: 136 kB/s

    Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1)

    Test Time:: 2006/10/20 - 10:02pm

    Bottom Line:: 19X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 7.53 sec

    Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 21.96384 seconds to complete

    Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 65.09 % faster than the average for host (Cox.net)

    U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-Z3G2PSXVL

    User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060911 SUSE/1.5.0.7-1.5 Firefox/1.5.0.7

    testing linux on cable modem

    in Make it Faster...

    Posted

    :::.. Download Stats ..:::

    Download Connection is:: 12148 Kbps about 12.1 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB)

    Download Speed is:: 1483 kB/s

    Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1)

    Test Time:: 2006/10/20 - 7:50pm

    Bottom Line:: 212X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.69 sec

    Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 8.2 seconds to complete

    Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 135.88 % faster than the average for host (cox.net)

    D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-C3782TEMN

    User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060911 SUSE/1.5.0.7-1.5 Firefox/1.5.0.7 [!]

    That is much better speedy and healther than windows TCP/IP.

    And here is my other stats speed test on speedtest.net,

    52451581.png

    That's why linux is more powerful than windows  :twisted:

    If I have a four parallels, I would get 40 Mbps to 60 Mbps downsteam under linux OS with load balance that would be demon speedy.

×
×
  • Create New...