Jump to content

therockscott

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    14

  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

  • Speed Test

    My Results

 Content Type 

Posts posted by therockscott

    Netfile

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    Does anyone know the correct way to setup NetfileServer? I'm not a dummy but I must be missing a step or something. I have an http server and an ftp server running separately. But this one incorporates both in the same program. Thanks in advance for the help. :D

    WOW!!!

    in Show off your speed

    Posted

    :::.. Download Stats ..:::

    Connection is:: 5177 Kbps about 5.2 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

    Download Speed is:: 632 kB/s

    Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/

    Test Time:: Sat Apr 2 09:00:23 EST 2005

    Bottom Line:: 92X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.62 sec

    Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 45.42 % faster than the average for host (rr.com)

    Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-WGXQSUK26

    My cap is set at 5000/300. This is the best that I've ever gotten

    What the hell?

    in Make it Faster...

    Posted

    Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]

    © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

    C:Documents and Settingsscott>ping -n 100 24.95.224.65

    Pinging 24.95.224.65 with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=251

    Request timed out.

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=134ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=245ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=255ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=267ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=284ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=303ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=257ms TTL=251

    Reply from 24.95.224.65: bytes=32 time=269ms TTL=251

    Ping statistics for 24.95.224.65:

        Packets: Sent = 100, Received = 99, Lost = 1 (1% loss),

    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

        Minimum = 7ms, Maximum = 303ms, Average = 29ms

    C:Documents and Settingsscott>

    What the hell?

    in Make it Faster...

    Posted

    Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]

    © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

    C:Documents and Settingsscott>pathping testmy.net

    Tracing route to testmy.net [67.19.36.6]

    over a maximum of 30 hops:

      0  coco [192.168.2.3]

      1  192.168.2.1

      2  10.110.112.1

      3  pos2-0.orldflstcd-ubr1.cfl.rr.com [24.95.226.74]

      4  24.95.224.97

      5  srp2-0.orldflwrpk-rtr1.cfl.rr.com [24.95.224.65]

      6  24.95.224.165

      7  p1-0.hsa2.orl1.bbnplanet.net [63.209.120.29]

      8  ge-6-0-1.mp1.Orlando1.Level3.net [64.159.0.37]

      9  as-1-0.bbr1.Dallas1.Level3.net [209.247.9.102]

    10  ge-1-2-56.car3.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.68.122.166]

    11  4.78.220.10

    12  dist-vlan31.dsr3-2.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.30]

    13  dist-vlan41.dsr2-1.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.83]

    14  gig1-0-1.tp-car9-1.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.69]

    15  6.67-19-36.reverse.theplanet.com [67.19.36.6]

    Computing statistics for 375 seconds...

                Source to Here  This Node/Link

    Hop  RTT    Lost/Sent = Pct  Lost/Sent = Pct  Address

      0                                          coco [192.168.2.3]

                                    0/ 100 =  0%  |

      1    0ms    0/ 100 =  0%    0/ 100 =  0%  192.168.2.1

                                    0/ 100 =  0%  |

      2  10ms    1/ 100 =  1%    1/ 100 =  1%  10.110.112.1

                                    0/ 100 =  0%  |

      3  11ms    0/ 100 =  0%    0/ 100 =  0%  pos2-0.orldflstcd-ubr1.cfl.rr.com

    [24.95.226.74]

                                    0/ 100 =  0%  |

      4    9ms    0/ 100 =  0%    0/ 100 =  0%  24.95.224.97

                                    0/ 100 =  0%  |

      5  10ms    2/ 100 =  2%    2/ 100 =  2%  srp2-0.orldflwrpk-rtr1.cfl.rr.com

    [24.95.224.65]

                                    0/ 100 =  0%  |

      6  13ms    0/ 100 =  0%    0/ 100 =  0%  24.95.224.165

                                    0/ 100 =  0%  |

      7  13ms    0/ 100 =  0%    0/ 100 =  0%  p1-0.hsa2.orl1.bbnplanet.net [63.2

    09.120.29]

                                    0/ 100 =  0%  |

      8  17ms    0/ 100 =  0%    0/ 100 =  0%  ge-6-0-1.mp1.Orlando1.Level3.net [

    64.159.0.37]

                                    0/ 100 =  0%  |

      9  42ms    2/ 100 =  2%    2/ 100 =  2%  as-1-0.bbr1.Dallas1.Level3.net [20

    9.247.9.102]

                                    0/ 100 =  0%  |

    10  43ms    0/ 100 =  0%    0/ 100 =  0%  ge-1-2-56.car3.Dallas1.Level3.net

    [4.68.122.166]

                                    0/ 100 =  0%  |

    11  ---    100/ 100 =100%  100/ 100 =100%  4.78.220.10

                                    0/ 100 =  0%  |

    12  ---    100/ 100 =100%  100/ 100 =100%  dist-vlan31.dsr3-2.dllstx3.theplan

    et.com [70.85.127.30]

                                    0/ 100 =  0%  |

    13  ---    100/ 100 =100%  100/ 100 =100%  dist-vlan41.dsr2-1.dllstx4.theplan

    et.com [70.85.127.83]

                                    0/ 100 =  0%  |

    14  51ms    0/ 100 =  0%    0/ 100 =  0%  gig1-0-1.tp-car9-1.dllstx4.theplan

    et.com [67.18.116.69]

                                    1/ 100 =  1%  |

    15  42ms    1/ 100 =  1%    0/ 100 =  0%  6.67-19-36.reverse.theplanet.com [

    67.19.36.6]

    Trace complete.

    What the hell?

    in Make it Faster...

    Posted

    My d/l speed absolutely sucks. :evil: Last week i was getting 4.9mbps consistently, with a cap limit of 5mbps. Now I'm barely hitting 3.5, even at different parts of the day. I even formatted my entire drive and installed XP Pro clean. Same thing. My upload is operating normally. My cap is 5000/300 from RR. I'm hoping that some tweaks will help. i was trying VanBuren's cable 5000/384 but i wiped everything clean and I've installed SP2 with all of the updates. thanks in advance.

    :::.. Download Stats ..:::

    Connection is:: 2681 Kbps about 2.7 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

    Download Speed is:: 327 kB/s

    Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/

    Test Time:: Mon Mar 14 21:48:18 EST 2005

    Bottom Line:: 48X faster than 56K 1MB download in 3.13 sec

    Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 79.53 % of your hosts average (rr.com)

    Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-NXSFIM893

    TCP/Web100 Network Diagnostic Tool v5.3.3a

    click START to begin

    Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    half-duplex

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    SO THERE WILL BE ABSOLUTELY NO WAY OFF SETTING IT UP IN FULL DUPLEX MODE FROM INCOMING TRAFFIC? IF SO, THEN THAT KINDA SUCKS.  :evil: WHEN I'M ON MY LAN, TRANSFERRING TO COMPUTERS, IT ROCKS. SO MAYBE I CAN CALL THE CABLE COMPANY AND SEE IF THERE'S ANYTHING THAT I CAN DO? ANY SUGGESTIONS ARE WELCOME. AND THANKS AGAIN VAN BUREN. :D I'M USING YOUR LATEST CCS SETTINGS. PROBABLY WOULD GO ALOT FASTER IN FULL MODE THOUGH.

    half-duplex

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    more info:

    WEB100 Kernel Variables:

    Client: localhost/127.0.0.1

    AckPktsIn: 1552

    AckPktsOut: 0

    BytesRetrans: 40880

    CongAvoid: 1028

    CongestionOverCount: 0

    CongestionSignals: 3

    CountRTT: 1225

    CurCwnd: 42340

    CurMSS: 1460

    CurRTO: 290

    CurRwinRcvd: 687104

    CurRwinSent: 5840

    CurSsthresh: 30660

    DSACKDups: 0

    DataBytesIn: 0

    DataBytesOut: 4152240

    DataPktsIn: 0

    DataPktsOut: 2844

    DupAcksIn: 303

    ECNEnabled: 0

    FastRetran: 3

    MaxCwnd: 166440

    MaxMSS: 1460

    MaxRTO: 420

    MaxRTT: 260

    MaxRwinRcvd: 687104

    MaxRwinSent: 5840

    MaxSsthresh: 83220

    MinMSS: 1460

    MinRTO: 280

    MinRTT: 80

    MinRwinRcvd: 42944

    MinRwinSent: 5840

    NagleEnabled: 1

    OtherReductions: 1

    PktsIn: 1552

    PktsOut: 2844

    PktsRetrans: 28

    X_Rcvbuf: 103424

    RcvWinScale: 7

    SACKEnabled: 3

    SACKsRcvd: 347

    SendStall: 0

    SlowStart: 174

    SampleRTT: 90

    SmoothedRTT: 90

    X_Sndbuf: 103424

    SndWinScale: 4

    SndLimTimeRwin: 0

    SndLimTimeCwnd: 10095596

    SndLimTimeSender: 2591

    SndLimTransRwin: 0

    SndLimTransCwnd: 1

    SndLimTransSender: 1

    SndLimBytesRwin: 0

    SndLimBytesCwnd: 4152240

    SndLimBytesSender: 0

    SubsequentTimeouts: 0

    SumRTT: 143500

    Timeouts: 0

    TimestampsEnabled: 0

    WinScaleRcvd: 4

    WinScaleSent: 7

    DupAcksOut: 0

    StartTimeUsec: 349071

    Duration: 10101485

    c2sData: 2

    c2sAck: 2

    s2cData: 9

    s2cAck: 3

    half_duplex: 1

    link: 0

    congestion: 1

    bad_cable: 0

    mismatch: 0

    spd: 0.00

    bw: 2.93

    loss: 0.001054852

    avgrtt: 117.14

    waitsec: 0.00

    timesec: 10.00

    order: 0.1952

    rwintime: 0.0000

    sendtime: 0.0003

    cwndtime: 0.9997

    rwin: 5.2422

    swin: 64.0000

    cwin: 1.2698

    rttsec: 0.117143

    Sndbuf: 8388608

    aspd: 9.71805

    Checking for mismatch on uplink

    (speed > 50 [0>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [0.41<5]

    (rwintime > .9) [0>.9], (loss < .01) [0.00<.01]

    Checking for excessive errors condition

    (loss/sec > .15) [1.05>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.99>.6],

    (loss < .01) [0.00<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [83220>0]

    Checking for 10 Mbps link

    (speed < 9.5) [0<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [0>3.0]

    (xmitspeed < 9.5) [0.41<9.5] (loss < .01) [0.00<.01], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0]

    Checking for Wireless link

    (sendtime = 0) [3.0E=0], (speed < 5) [0<5]

    (Estimate > 50 [2.93>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0>.90]

    (RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [0/1=1], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0]

    Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link

    (speed < 2) [0<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0]

    (SendTime = 0) [3.0E-4=0], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0]

    Checking for half-duplex condition

    (rwintime > .95) [0>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0>30],

    (SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30], OR (mylink <= 10) [3.0<=10]

    Checking for congestion

    (cwndtime > .02) [0.99>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0]

    (MaxSsthresh > 0) [83220>0]

    estimate = 2.93 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 117.14msec, and loss = 0.001054852

    The theoretical network limit is 2.93 Mbps

    The NDT server has a 8192.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 546.34 Mbps

    Your PC/Workstation has a 671.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 44.75 Mbps

    The network based flow control limits the throughput to 10.83 Mbps

    Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'T1'

    Server Data reports link is '10 Gig', Server Acks report link is 'Ethernet'

    stats:

    WEB100 Enabled Statistics:

    Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  Done

    running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 412.21Kb/s

    running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 3.28Mb/s

    ------  Client System Details  ------

    OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1

    Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.5.0_01

    ------  Web100 Detailed Analysis  ------

    Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found.

    Link set to Half Duplex mode

    Information: throughput is limited by other network traffic.

    Good network cable(s) found

    Normal duplex operation found.

    Web100 reports the Round trip time = 117.14 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and

    There were 28 packets retransmitted, 303 duplicate acks received, and 347 SACK blocks received

    The connection was idle 0 seconds (0%) of the time

    This connection is network limited 99.97% of the time.

    Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to:

    RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON

    RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON

    RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF

    RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF

    RFC 1323 Window Scaling: ON

    Packet size is preserved End-to-End

    Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End

    Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address

    Server says [65.33.114.140] but Client says [192.168.2.3]

    TCP/Web100 Network Diagnostic Tool v5.3.3d

    click START to begin

    Another client is currently being served, your test will begin within 90 seconds

    Another client is currently being served, your test will begin within 45 seconds

    Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  Done

    running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 412.21Kb/s

    running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 3.28Mb/s

    Your PC is connected to a Cable/DSL modem

    Information: Other network traffic is congesting the link

    half-duplex

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    here's the info :

    TCP/Web100 Network Diagnostic Tool v5.3.3d

    click START to begin

    Another client is currently being served, your test will begin within 90 seconds

    Another client is currently being served, your test will begin within 45 seconds

    Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  Done

    running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 412.21Kb/s

    running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 3.28Mb/s

    Your PC is connected to a Cable/DSL modem

    Information: Other network traffic is congesting the link

    half-duplex

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    docsdiag is a diagnostic tool that reads information from the modem and it says that i'm still running in half-duplex even when i've changed it to full and did a reboot. I didn't notice very much change but I'm not sure if the network adapter is capable of being changed to full duplex since it's on an older computer and integrated into the motherboard.

    half-duplex

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    This is my first post on this site. I absolutely have become addicted to this site. I'm using an old computer as an FTP server. It's a Compaq PIII 700mhz with the adapter being integrated into the motherboard. It's worked fine but I've been reading about the half and full duplex modes. Mine was in auto-detect. I ran docsdiag and it said that I was at half-duplex. I went to properties and changed it to full, rebooted and ran docsdiag again and it still said half-duplex. My adapter is an Intel Pro/100 VM. I went on Intel's website to see if this adapter only supported half-duplex but didn't get any info. So do I need to get another adapter to make my tweaks faster? I'm also behind a Belkin router and I'm using RR with 5000/384. Thanks in advance.

×
×
  • Create New...