monsnet2k8

I had a similar problem last night.

I found the problem with my internet security.

I had to reset it and it fixed my problem.

In his case it could be something similar.

btw My speeds are always consistent above 19 MB

Speed with Internet Security before I fixed the problem

Speed with Internet Security after I fixed the problem by turning off and on my security.

I've never used a HDD camcorder. but I'm going to try and help!

I believe that your camcorder records MPEG2 Video and you can open those files with Nero.

You may try the Nero website and download a 30 day trial and buy if you like.

that's what I use for my everyday video..

Today's scores!

:::.. testmy.net test results ..:::

Download Connection is:: 22143 Kbps about 22.14 Mbps (tested with 25600 kB)

Download Speed is:: 2703 kB/s

Upload Connection is:: 4914 Kbps about 4.9 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)

Upload Speed is:: 600 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Main)

Test Time:: 2009/07/27 - 10:07pm

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-E07MTX5WF

U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-TBHMGKC93

User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1) Gecko/20090624 Firefox/3.5 [!]

Here is mine!!

I have a new Dell Studio XPS

Since installation on release day, I've had no issues whatsoever.. It has not crashed on me yet!!

the previous version crashed often!

Go to START / CONTROL PANEL / ADMINISTRATIVE TOOLS / COMPUTER MANAGEMENT / DEVICE MANAGER / NETWORK ADAPTERS.

Right click on drive and select UPDATE DRIVER SOFTWARE

If I'm wrong can someone please correct me.

What OS are you running? XP VISTA or a MAC Computer?

what about your network drive?

your computer might also be infected.

have you scanned your computer for virus infections?

deviloxo

You have a 20mb connection and thats all you get?

have you cleaned your internet files, cookies?

have you updated your network drives?

Still happy with my modest and consistent connection.

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 20004 Kbps about 20 Mbps (tested with 102391 kB)

Download Speed is:: 2442 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)

Test Time:: 2009/07/21 - 12:22am

Bottom Line:: 349X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.42 sec

Tested from a 102391 kB file and took 41.93 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 207.75 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-9YW6P27IT

User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1) Gecko/20090624 Firefox/3.5 [!]

:::.. Upload Stats ..:::

Upload Connection is:: 4863 Kbps about 4.9 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)

Upload Speed is:: 594 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)

Test Time:: 2009/07/19 - 10:50am

Bottom Line:: 85X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 1.72 sec

Tested from a 5983 kB file and took 10.08 seconds to complete

Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 252.14 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)

U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-U1R6BIAXL

User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1) Gecko/20090624 Firefox/3.5 [!]

.

If that were the case, would MS have dumped billions more into another OS just a couple years later for a major release ?

Here are some release dates.. Maybe they didn't spend that much money on all the other non major releases.

:::.. testmy.net test results ..:::

Download Connection is:: 24594 Kbps about 24.59 Mbps (tested with 25600 kB)

Download Speed is:: 3002 kB/s

Upload Connection is:: 4919 Kbps about 4.9 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)

Upload Speed is:: 600 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Main)

Test Time:: 2009/07/15 - 7:16am

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-7OCDIUTXB

U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-1Z2SVFD7R

User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1) Gecko/20090624 Firefox/3.5 [!]

What were your previous and present specs? Maybe Vista is faster because of what you upgraded from.

The specs are sub-par, I wont even post them 'lol

Actually you are right! The machine which I upgraded from is 2003 technology compared to 2009

I kept my computer well maintained and un tweaked. drives up to date and all the good stuff.

I didn't have lots of problems with it as it was very reliable, but XP has never been as reliable as Vista has been for me. That's why I said that my experience with Vista has been great!

If Windows 7 turns out to be the best OS from all previous versions, them I'm in, I can only imagine that if Vista does wonders for me, Windows 7 should amaze me....

I just hope its not a big hype as Vista was back in its beta days.

when everyone tried it and then were disappointed after they got the retail version.

I've tried Windows 7 and didn't see much difference other than the new stuff they added.

I defend Vista cause it has never given me any problems with anything other than the

compatibility issues with older software and other computer add-ons.

I always loved XP Pro, but my experience Vista has been better than XP Pro

I will get Windows 7 one year after its release.

I want to read from the masses when they either bash on it like they did with Vista or praise it

as they do with XP.

Firefox/3.5

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 24061 Kbps about 24.1 Mbps (tested with 25600 kB)

Download Speed is:: 2937 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)

Test Time:: 2009/07/09 - 8:38am

Bottom Line:: 420X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.35 sec

Tested from a 25600 kB file and took 8.716 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 270.57 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-5FXTB9UE7

User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1) Gecko/20090624 Firefox/3.5 [!]

IE8 32 Bit

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 21807 Kbps about 21.8 Mbps (tested with 25600 kB)

Download Speed is:: 2662 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)

Test Time:: 2009/07/09 - 8:45am

Bottom Line:: 380X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.38 sec

Tested from a 25600 kB file and took 9.617 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 235.85 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-R1VTDIQ90

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; Trident/4.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729) [!]

IE8 64 Bit

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 22223 Kbps about 22.2 Mbps (tested with 25600 kB)

Download Speed is:: 2713 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)

Test Time:: 2009/07/09 - 8:49am

Bottom Line:: 388X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.38 sec

Tested from a 25600 kB file and took 9.437 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 242.21 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-5HJNE74DG

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.0; Win64; x64; Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; SLCC1; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729) [!]

Google to enter operating system wars with Chrome OS

Wed Jul 8, 2009 12:51PM EDT

In what is certain to be the biggest tech story of the summer, Google is finally making official what has been rumored for years: It will create its own computer operating system, Chrome OS, slated for release in late 2010.

While the news is stunning in its potential impact on the industry, it hardly arrives without warning. Google already makes its own cell phone OS, the fledgling Android, which continues to slowly gain devotees. And well before the company unleashed its own web browser, Chrome, many had long since assumed that Google had been preparing to release an operating system. When the Chrome browser was released instead, many observers actually saw it as a bit of a letdown in the news department.

Now it's clear what Google has been up to all along: Chrome is simply the centerpiece of a larger table setting, a full-blown operating system that will run without Windows or the MacOS beneath it.

Google is keeping many details close to the vest -- and, with at least a year before the OS comes out, it really has no choice since the OS has miles to go before it's ready -- but the company has made a few details public. Chrome OS will be open source, like Linux operating systems, upon which Chrome will be based; it will be designed to be "fast and lightweight, to start up and get you onto the web in a few seconds;" and it will be designed with security in mind (though, seriously, everybody says that). The OS will run on both ARM and x86 CPUs, the latter being the most common PC chip architecture on the planet, used on virtually every PC produced today.

Despite the hints about Chrome OS, many, many questions remain. Obviously Chrome is designed with the web in mind, and it will undoubtedly be closely tied into Google's extensive suite of services. But what will its offline components look like, if any? With Linux as a base, it will obviously be able to run Linux-based applications, though it won't be compatible with Windows... or will it? Emulator systems exist that could let Chrome run Windows apps, but they're complex and at odds with the goal of creating a streamlined, super-simple operating system. I am immediately curious as to how big of a hard drive a Chrome OS laptop would have, if it will have one at all.

Another big question involves the hardware this operating system will run on. Google obviously has inexpensive, low-power netbooks in mind for Chrome OS, but will tinkerers be able to install it on computers they already own? Driver issues become a major obstacle at that point, as a "simple" OS can't possibly account for the thousands of hardware variations present in modern PCs (printing alone is going to be a headache as it is). My hunch is that a downloadable version will eventually be available, but that it won't be supported by Google at all should you decide to install it on a non-approved PC.

That leads to the question of whether Google is ignoring a key part of the market. Netbooks are great little toys, but they're hardly the tools of choice for those looking to get real work done. By embracing the web and largely ignoring offline applications, Chrome-based netbooks will by necessity remain tools for the low end of the market, playthings for when you're not really being productive. Like the Linux-based netbooks before them, they just won't do enough for many users.

And that's an ominous issue hanging out there for Chrome OS's future. Linux-based netbooks haven't been a rousing success, as Windows fought back with a vengeance after they hit the market, offering buyers a more familiar working environment and compatibility with their other computers while keeping prices down. Consumers have so far warmed up to the idea of having more features on their netbooks, not fewer, relegating Linux on netbooks to the background. Will a spiffy, Googleized version of Linux change consumer opinion? Maybe, but probably not dramatically.

Contrary to public opinion, everything that Google touches does not turn to gold, and to be frank, Google has a serious uphill battle ahead for its OS ambitions. I'm cautiously optimistic that Google will put something brilliant together here, and can't wait to get my eyes on the software, but the challenges it faces are extreme. Put together something too unique and different and consumers may be put off and confused. Or you could make an OS that clings closely to the Windows interface, but what would be the point of that?

http://tech.yahoo.com/blogs/null/146051

Fixed your quote and link

Since  4-15- 2005

Total Time Spent Online: 10 days, 11 hours and 27 minutes.

Total Posts: 1039 posts

Total Topics Started: 38 topics

Number of Polls Created: 6 polls

Number of Votes Cast: 48 votes

Not much change since my last post on this thread,  I didn't log in for a few years!

IE 8.0

:::.. testmy.net test results ..:::

Download Connection is:: 21408 Kbps about 21.41 Mbps (tested with 25600 kB)

Download Speed is:: 2613 kB/s

Upload Connection is:: 4829 Kbps about 4.8 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)

Upload Speed is:: 589 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Main)

Test Time:: 2009/07/06 - 1:00am

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-ZFDLQ9U06

U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-HO7ETJDBQ

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; Trident/4.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729) [!]

:::.. testmy.net test results ..:::

Download Connection is:: 21825 Kbps about 21.83 Mbps (tested with 25600 kB)

Download Speed is:: 2664 kB/s

Upload Connection is:: 4822 Kbps about 4.8 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)

Upload Speed is:: 589 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Main)

Test Time:: 2009/07/06 - 1:05am

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-7MJOG6NEF

U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-X26VTCUSN

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; Trident/4.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729) [!]

Firefox/3.5

:::.. testmy.net test results ..:::

Download Connection is:: 24485 Kbps about 24.49 Mbps (tested with 25600 kB)

Download Speed is:: 2989 kB/s

Upload Connection is:: 4718 Kbps about 4.7 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)

Upload Speed is:: 576 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Main)

Test Time:: 2009/07/06 - 12:55am

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-K40LNFXMV

U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-6RMD9UXIE

User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1) Gecko/20090624 Firefox/3.5 [!]

:::.. testmy.net test results ..:::

Download Connection is:: 22699 Kbps about 22.7 Mbps (tested with 25600 kB)

Download Speed is:: 2771 kB/s

Upload Connection is:: 4904 Kbps about 4.9 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)

Upload Speed is:: 599 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Main)

Test Time:: 2009/07/06 - 1:08am

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-0R9LN82IB

U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-E8VJKFC4L

User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1) Gecko/20090624 Firefox/3.5 [!]

I had a great time with the family!! I ate so much that I have to walk it off.. 

The fireworks looked great from the local high school.

I hope everyone else had a great time too

The real test.

My ridiculous Mirrored test!!

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 74148 Kbps about 74.1 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB)

Download Speed is:: 9051 kB/s

Tested From:: http://nascarkid.home.insightbb.com

Test Time:: 2009/07/04 - 9:57pm

Bottom Line:: 1293X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.11 sec

Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 2.317 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 1042.32 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-AS45BGJYQ

User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1) Gecko/20090624 Firefox/3.5 [!]

Sorry, your score of 28633673 Kbps is over TestMy.net's max of 100000 Kbps.  It is very doubtful your connection is faster than 100000 Kbps..

Well he used to own it all move over for the big daddy. Dadburn if i only had Comcast instead of charter it's crap.course I dont run this speed all the time big brother would quickly track me down and take it back.

                                                        roger

and yes thats a 75 + meg connection

Wow!! Yours is bigger than mine =(

Close, but no cigar!! 

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 75517 Kbps about 75.5 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB)

Download Speed is:: 9218 kB/s

Tested From:: http://nascarkid.home.insightbb.com

Test Time:: 2009/07/03 - 8:53am

Bottom Line:: 1317X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.11 sec

Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 2.275 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 1063.59 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-3XYWIG5JZ

User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1) Gecko/20090624 Firefox/3.5 [!]

I been testing Windows 7 for about an hour and so far so good. my speeds are consistent with those of Vista. no change.

I'm on the FIOS 20/5 package.

Btw: I like the new features on W7  however I'm still happy with Vista I could live with either version!

I use Windows Movie Maker a lot and on vista I can open a 13GB Movie clip almost instantly and on the Windows 7 version

its takes about 3 minutes.. I don't know!

:::.. testmy.net test results ..:::

Download Connection is:: 22303 Kbps about 22.3 Mbps (tested with 25600 kB)

Download Speed is:: 2723 kB/s

Upload Connection is:: 4872 Kbps about 4.9 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)

Upload Speed is:: 595 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Main)

Test Time:: 2009/07/03 - 4:35am

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-5C18WYABQ

U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-QRIW3E2M9

User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1) Gecko/20090624 Firefox/3.5 [!]

Wow, after almost an hour since installation I noticed the improvement... pages load faster and smoother.

This has to be the best browser ever...