Tracert -6 - IPV6 tracert times - please post your times for new prococol

[Guest jeffwalker9999]

Hello to all members

I'm asking that you post your IPV6 tracert resoults here in this post

I'm very involved in testing this new protocol and learning more about

I would like to compair trace route times from different providers

---

tracert -6 xxx.xxxxxx.xxx is the command

---

These are the sites::

www.vsix.net

ipv6.sixxs.net

www.deepspace6.net

ipv6.bt.com

---

WinXp :::::

The stack is very easily manually installed from a command line just by typing ipv6 install

---

Speed Test Site ( japanese / english )

http://www.vsix.net/english/appvsix/appvsix_03.jsp

---

A good  6 to 4 gateway is ...............................

Append ".sixxs.org" or ".ipv6.sixxs.org" to the hostname of the website you want to visit

EX: http://www.google.com.ipv6.sixxs.org"

---

A good site to test the IPV6 config of routers is

http://www.linux-ipv6.org/linux-test-en/linux-20000612/robust/index.html

---

---

Yes IPV6 has features that make it better than Ipv4

It boasts it's technology of long address length by enlarging the existing 32-bit based IPv4 address to almost four times longer(128-bit) and a new suite of standard protocols for the network layer of the Internet and more- to start!

A new protocol :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

As everyone of you knows, TCP/IP is the communication protocol of the Internet. To be precise, TCP/IP is a suite of protocols. The TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) provides a reliable bidirectional connection between two hosts, using the communication facilities provided by the IP (Internet Protocol). In fact, IP is a network layer protocol and its task is to deliver packets of data from a source host to a destination host.

IPv6 is the new version of the Internet Protocol, that is meant to replace IPv4 (which is the version currently in use) in a few years. IPv4 has been used since the Internet was born and has worked very well until now, but it has many serious limits that IPv6 has been designed to overcome. As you may guess, there have been many changes from the definition of the IPv4 protocol to the one of the IPv6 protocol.

First of all, IPv6 provides a larger address space than IPv4. As many of you know, IPv4 supports about 2.000.000.000 addresses. You may think that such a large number of addresses should be more than enough for the actual size of the Internet. This is partly true. In fact, until recent times, IPv4 addresses have only been allocated in blocks of 254, 65534 or 16777214. This has lead to an enormous waste of usable addresses, since many organizations have been forced to ask many more addresses than the ones they really needed. The waste of IPv4 addresses has been of such an order of magnitude that the whole address space will be soon completely exhausted. Now the IETF has developed a wiser address allocation policy: CIDR (Classless Inter-Domain Routing). However, while CIDR has been designed to achieve the minimum waste of the remained IPv4 addresses and to minimize the growth of the routing tables (due to the non-hierarchical organization of the IPv4 address space), it does not solve the problem of the upcoming exhaustion of the IPv4 address space. Here comes IPv6: it provides more than a billion of billions addresses per square meter on the Earth! Besides, IPv6 uses a CIDR-style architecture for address allocation that prevents a big waste of addresses and an uncontrolled growth of the routing tables. So, while CIDR partly addresses the problem, IPv6 represents the long-term solution.

Furthermore, IPv6 has been designed to satisfy the growing need of security experienced by the Internet community. The authentication header mechanism allows the receiver to be reasonably sure about the origin of the data, and the IPSEC privacy facilities provide end-to-end encryption of data at the network layer. IP spoofing attacks and eavesdropping of data will be much more difficult in the Internet of the next millennium. However, as Wietse Venema points out, network-level encryption poses new security problems. In fact decryption puts a considerable overhead on the CPU and this may eventually leave the host more vulnerable to flooding-type DoS attacks. To reduce these risk, a careful implementation of the networking protocols is required.

Moreover, IPv6 has many improvements for mobile networking and real-time communication. In particular, unlike IPv4, IPv6 has robust autoconfiguration capabilities that simplify the system administration of mobile hosts and LANs.

Although IPv6 is superior to IPv4 in everything, it is a common opinion that the transition from IPv4 to IPv6 will be long (perhaps more than a decade) and difficult. In fact, many organizations have made an enourmous investment in IPv4 technology and are not ready nor willing to speed up the transition yet. IPv4 is a well-known, and thoroughly-tested technology; its reliability and its widespread use represent a major slowing-factor in the development of IPv6.

Also i'm adjusting / playing with cablenut settings - trying to find settings that work good for both ipv4 and ipv6 protocols

[Guest jeffwalker9999]

Hello to all members

I'm asking that you post your IPV6 tracert resoults here in this post

I'm very involved in testing this new protocol and learning more about

I would like to compair trace route times from different providers

---

tracert -6 xxx.xxxxxx.xxx is the command

---

These are the sites::

www.vsix.net

noc.sixxs.net

www.deepspace6.net

ipv6.bt.com

---

WinXp :::::

The stack is very easily manually installed from a command line just by typing ipv6 install

---

Speed Test Site ( japanese / english )

http://www.vsix.net/english/appvsix/appvsix_03.jsp

---

A good  6 to 4 gateway is ...............................

Append ".sixxs.org" or ".ipv6.sixxs.org" to the hostname of the website you want to visit

EX: http://www.google.com.ipv6.sixxs.org"

---

A good site to test the IPV6 config of routers is

http://www.linux-ipv6.org/linux-test-en/linux-20000612/robust/index.html

---

---

Yes IPV6 has features that make it better than Ipv4

It boasts it's technology of long address length by enlarging the existing 32-bit based IPv4 address to almost four times longer(128-bit) and a new suite of standard protocols for the network layer of the Internet and more- to start!

A new protocol :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

As everyone of you knows, TCP/IP is the communication protocol of the Internet. To be precise, TCP/IP is a suite of protocols. The TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) provides a reliable bidirectional connection between two hosts, using the communication facilities provided by the IP (Internet Protocol). In fact, IP is a network layer protocol and its task is to deliver packets of data from a source host to a destination host.

IPv6 is the new version of the Internet Protocol, that is meant to replace IPv4 (which is the version currently in use) in a few years. IPv4 has been used since the Internet was born and has worked very well until now, but it has many serious limits that IPv6 has been designed to overcome. As you may guess, there have been many changes from the definition of the IPv4 protocol to the one of the IPv6 protocol.

First of all, IPv6 provides a larger address space than IPv4. As many of you know, IPv4 supports about 2.000.000.000 addresses. You may think that such a large number of addresses should be more than enough for the actual size of the Internet. This is partly true. In fact, until recent times, IPv4 addresses have only been allocated in blocks of 254, 65534 or 16777214. This has lead to an enormous waste of usable addresses, since many organizations have been forced to ask many more addresses than the ones they really needed. The waste of IPv4 addresses has been of such an order of magnitude that the whole address space will be soon completely exhausted. Now the IETF has developed a wiser address allocation policy: CIDR (Classless Inter-Domain Routing). However, while CIDR has been designed to achieve the minimum waste of the remained IPv4 addresses and to minimize the growth of the routing tables (due to the non-hierarchical organization of the IPv4 address space), it does not solve the problem of the upcoming exhaustion of the IPv4 address space. Here comes IPv6: it provides more than a billion of billions addresses per square meter on the Earth! Besides, IPv6 uses a CIDR-style architecture for address allocation that prevents a big waste of addresses and an uncontrolled growth of the routing tables. So, while CIDR partly addresses the problem, IPv6 represents the long-term solution.

Furthermore, IPv6 has been designed to satisfy the growing need of security experienced by the Internet community. The authentication header mechanism allows the receiver to be reasonably sure about the origin of the data, and the IPSEC privacy facilities provide end-to-end encryption of data at the network layer. IP spoofing attacks and eavesdropping of data will be much more difficult in the Internet of the next millennium. However, as Wietse Venema points out, network-level encryption poses new security problems. In fact decryption puts a considerable overhead on the CPU and this may eventually leave the host more vulnerable to flooding-type DoS attacks. To reduce these risk, a careful implementation of the networking protocols is required.

Moreover, IPv6 has many improvements for mobile networking and real-time communication. In particular, unlike IPv4, IPv6 has robust autoconfiguration capabilities that simplify the system administration of mobile hosts and LANs.

Although IPv6 is superior to IPv4 in everything, it is a common opinion that the transition from IPv4 to IPv6 will be long (perhaps more than a decade) and difficult. In fact, many organizations have made an enourmous investment in IPv4 technology and are not ready nor willing to speed up the transition yet. IPv4 is a well-known, and thoroughly-tested technology; its reliability and its widespread use represent a major slowing-factor in the development of IPv6.

Also i'm adjusting / playing with cablenut settings - trying to find settings that work good for both ipv4 and ipv6 protocols

Cox cable las vegas

C:Documents and SettingsOwner>tracert -6 www.vsix.net

Tracing route to www.vsix.net [2001:2b8:1::100]

over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1   161 ms   171 ms   162 ms  2001:2b8:2:fffd:0:5efe:203.254.38.129

  2   162 ms   159 ms   162 ms  2001:2b8:2:fff2::1

  3   162 ms   165 ms   161 ms  2001:2b8::1

  4   162 ms   179 ms   161 ms  2001:2b8:0:160::161

  5   161 ms   175 ms   163 ms  2001:2b8:1::100

Trace complete.

C:Documents and SettingsOwner>tracert -6 www.deepspace6.net

Tracing route to www.deepspace6.net [2001:1418:13:3::1]

over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1   160 ms   169 ms   160 ms  2001:2b8:2:fffd:0:5efe:203.254.38.129

  2   162 ms   159 ms   164 ms  2001:2b8:2:fff2::1

  3   179 ms   162 ms   162 ms  2001:2b8::1

  4   162 ms   161 ms   159 ms  2001:320:1a07::20

  5   165 ms   163 ms   164 ms  2001:320:1a09::2

  6   163 ms   165 ms   165 ms  2001:320:1a05::4

  7   281 ms   165 ms   166 ms  2001:320:1a05::3

  8   280 ms   280 ms   288 ms  2001:320:1b00:1::2

  9   278 ms   281 ms   289 ms  sttlng-pacwave.abilene.ucaid.edu [2001:468:ff:16

c1::1]

10   298 ms   307 ms   297 ms  snvang-sttlng.abilene.ucaid.edu [2001:468:ff:161

7::2]

11   478 ms   474 ms   484 ms  3ffe:80a::c

12   477 ms   479 ms   480 ms  2001:450:1:2001::b0

13   535 ms   527 ms   530 ms  2001:450:1:2001::b1

14   541 ms   537 ms   536 ms  ils-gw.customer.ipv6.ITgate.net [2001:1418:1:400

::6]

15   543 ms   542 ms   539 ms  cadalboia.ferrara.linux.it [2001:1418:13:3::b01a

]

16   543 ms   548 ms   542 ms  deepspace6.net [2001:1418:13:3::1]

Trace complete.

C:Documents and SettingsOwner>tracert -6 ipv6.bt.com

Tracing route to ipv6.bt.com [2001:618:1:8000::2]

over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1   161 ms   159 ms   159 ms  2001:2b8:2:fffd:0:5efe:203.254.38.129

  2   163 ms   161 ms   162 ms  2001:2b8:2:fff2::1

  3   163 ms   170 ms   163 ms  2001:2b8::1

  4   162 ms   167 ms   160 ms  2001:2b8:0:81::82

  5   479 ms   489 ms   473 ms  huxley.uk6x.com [2001:618:1:8000::2]

Trace complete.

C:Documents and SettingsOwner>tracert -6 noc.sixxs.net

Tracing route to noc.sixxs.net [2001:838:1:1:210:dcff:fe20:7c7c]

over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1   161 ms   159 ms   160 ms  2001:2b8:2:fffd:0:5efe:203.254.38.129

  2   163 ms   161 ms   159 ms  2001:2b8:2:fff2::1

  3   160 ms   162 ms   163 ms  2001:2b8::1

  4  Destination net unreachable.

Trace complete.

[Guest jeffwalker9999]

44 viewers , but no posts

please - please post your protocol 6 tracert times

Hello to all members

I'm asking that you post your IPV6 tracert resoults here in this post

I'm very involved in testing this new protocol and learning more about

I would like to compair trace route times from different providers

---

tracert -6 xxx.xxxxxx.xxx is the command

---

These are the sites::

www.vsix.net

noc.sixxs.net

www.deepspace6.net

ipv6.bt.com

---

WinXp :::::

The stack is very easily manually installed from a command line just by typing ipv6 install

---

Speed Test Site ( japanese / english )

http://www.vsix.net/english/appvsix/appvsix_03.jsp

---

A good  6 to 4 gateway is ...............................

Append ".sixxs.org" or ".ipv6.sixxs.org" to the hostname of the website you want to visit

EX: http://www.google.com.ipv6.sixxs.org"

---

A good site to test the IPV6 config of routers is

http://www.linux-ipv6.org/linux-test-en/linux-20000612/robust/index.html

---

---

Yes IPV6 has features that make it better than Ipv4

It boasts it's technology of long address length by enlarging the existing 32-bit based IPv4 address to almost four times longer(128-bit) and a new suite of standard protocols for the network layer of the Internet and more- to start!

A new protocol :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

As everyone of you knows, TCP/IP is the communication protocol of the Internet. To be precise, TCP/IP is a suite of protocols. The TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) provides a reliable bidirectional connection between two hosts, using the communication facilities provided by the IP (Internet Protocol). In fact, IP is a network layer protocol and its task is to deliver packets of data from a source host to a destination host.

IPv6 is the new version of the Internet Protocol, that is meant to replace IPv4 (which is the version currently in use) in a few years. IPv4 has been used since the Internet was born and has worked very well until now, but it has many serious limits that IPv6 has been designed to overcome. As you may guess, there have been many changes from the definition of the IPv4 protocol to the one of the IPv6 protocol.

First of all, IPv6 provides a larger address space than IPv4. As many of you know, IPv4 supports about 2.000.000.000 addresses. You may think that such a large number of addresses should be more than enough for the actual size of the Internet. This is partly true. In fact, until recent times, IPv4 addresses have only been allocated in blocks of 254, 65534 or 16777214. This has lead to an enormous waste of usable addresses, since many organizations have been forced to ask many more addresses than the ones they really needed. The waste of IPv4 addresses has been of such an order of magnitude that the whole address space will be soon completely exhausted. Now the IETF has developed a wiser address allocation policy: CIDR (Classless Inter-Domain Routing). However, while CIDR has been designed to achieve the minimum waste of the remained IPv4 addresses and to minimize the growth of the routing tables (due to the non-hierarchical organization of the IPv4 address space), it does not solve the problem of the upcoming exhaustion of the IPv4 address space. Here comes IPv6: it provides more than a billion of billions addresses per square meter on the Earth! Besides, IPv6 uses a CIDR-style architecture for address allocation that prevents a big waste of addresses and an uncontrolled growth of the routing tables. So, while CIDR partly addresses the problem, IPv6 represents the long-term solution.

Furthermore, IPv6 has been designed to satisfy the growing need of security experienced by the Internet community. The authentication header mechanism allows the receiver to be reasonably sure about the origin of the data, and the IPSEC privacy facilities provide end-to-end encryption of data at the network layer. IP spoofing attacks and eavesdropping of data will be much more difficult in the Internet of the next millennium. However, as Wietse Venema points out, network-level encryption poses new security problems. In fact decryption puts a considerable overhead on the CPU and this may eventually leave the host more vulnerable to flooding-type DoS attacks. To reduce these risk, a careful implementation of the networking protocols is required.

Moreover, IPv6 has many improvements for mobile networking and real-time communication. In particular, unlike IPv4, IPv6 has robust autoconfiguration capabilities that simplify the system administration of mobile hosts and LANs.

Although IPv6 is superior to IPv4 in everything, it is a common opinion that the transition from IPv4 to IPv6 will be long (perhaps more than a decade) and difficult. In fact, many organizations have made an enourmous investment in IPv4 technology and are not ready nor willing to speed up the transition yet. IPv4 is a well-known, and thoroughly-tested technology; its reliability and its widespread use represent a major slowing-factor in the development of IPv6.

Also i'm adjusting / playing with cablenut settings - trying to find settings that work good for both ipv4 and ipv6 protocols