darze Posted March 9, 2005 CID Share Posted March 9, 2005 This is my internet connection status :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 548 Kbps about 0.5 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Upload Speed is:: 67 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Fri Mar 11 17:53:46 UTC-0300 2005 Bottom Line:: 10X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 15.28 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 238.27 % faster than the average for host (com.br) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-BZOYRW62H :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 526 Kbps about 0.5 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Download Speed is:: 64 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Fri Mar 11 17:54:46 UTC-0300 2005 Bottom Line:: 9X faster than 56K 1MB download in 16 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 57.01 % faster than the average for host (com.br) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-5QPIM8ER7 I would like that somebody helps me with cablenut settings, because this is the first time i use this program. THX Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted March 9, 2005 CID Share Posted March 9, 2005 hey darze and welcome to the forum follow ALL these steps and post again https://testmy.net/topic-2097 VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darze Posted March 9, 2005 Author CID Share Posted March 9, 2005 MY OS: Windows XP professional edition tweakprograms: I have only cablenut installed but i never used it I did almost everything you told me to do, except install firewall THX Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REV0LUTI0NIZED Posted March 9, 2005 CID Share Posted March 9, 2005 Well...are you going to use Cablenut And if you are, what is your advertised speeds Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darze Posted March 9, 2005 Author CID Share Posted March 9, 2005 Yes i wolud like to Advertised speed 600/600 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REV0LUTI0NIZED Posted March 9, 2005 CID Share Posted March 9, 2005 Okay then. Open the Adjuster and "Clear All Boxes", when you have cleared all the boxes click "Save To Registry", and reboot your system. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REV0LUTI0NIZED Posted March 9, 2005 CID Share Posted March 9, 2005 Once you have done that download Cablenut Settings Version 6 here is the link https://testmy.net/forum/index.php?topic=1013.0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darze Posted March 9, 2005 Author CID Share Posted March 9, 2005 I did it , what now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REV0LUTI0NIZED Posted March 9, 2005 CID Share Posted March 9, 2005 You did what? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darze Posted March 9, 2005 Author CID Share Posted March 9, 2005 Open the Adjuster and "Clear All Boxes", when you have cleared all the boxes click "Save To Registry", and reboot your system. i did it, now im going to next step, sorry im a newbie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REV0LUTI0NIZED Posted March 9, 2005 CID Share Posted March 9, 2005 Quote Once you have done that download Cablenut Settings Version 6 here is the link https://testmy.net/forum/index.php?topic=1013.0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darze Posted March 9, 2005 Author CID Share Posted March 9, 2005 I did it but wich one is the best for my internet Cable 600/600 :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 548 Kbps about 0.5 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Upload Speed is:: 67 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Fri Mar 11 17:53:46 UTC-0300 2005 Bottom Line:: 10X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 15.28 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 238.27 % faster than the average for host (com.br) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-BZOYRW62H :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 526 Kbps about 0.5 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Download Speed is:: 64 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Fri Mar 11 17:54:46 UTC-0300 2005 Bottom Line:: 9X faster than 56K 1MB download in 16 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 57.01 % faster than the average for host (com.br) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-5QPIM8ER7 TCP options string = 020405b401010402 MTU = 1500 MTU is fully optimized for broadband. MSS = 1460 Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which equals MSS. Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 17520 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits Unscaled Receive Window = 17520 RWIN is a multiple of MSS Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 513920 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 256960 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4) 128480 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2) 64240 (MSS x 44) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your RcvWindow limits you to: 700.8 kbps (87.6 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your RcvWindow limits you to: 280.32 kbps (35.04 KBytes/s) @ 500ms Consider increasing your RWIN value to optimize TCP/IP for broadband. MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 114 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000 Help me . THX Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darze Posted March 9, 2005 Author CID Share Posted March 9, 2005 Help Me, plz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REV0LUTI0NIZED Posted March 9, 2005 CID Share Posted March 9, 2005 Use whatever setting. You know what use the T1 setting, for right now. Then when Van Buren comes back he will make you a custom setting for a 600/600 connection. Sorry... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darze Posted March 10, 2005 Author CID Share Posted March 10, 2005 K, thx anyway Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted March 10, 2005 CID Share Posted March 10, 2005 try this attachedfile VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darze Posted March 10, 2005 Author CID Share Posted March 10, 2005 Thx for the help... Van Bauren look, this is the test before the changes in cablenut. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 524 Kbps about 0.5 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Download Speed is:: 64 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Thu Mar 10 17:53:14 UTC-0300 2005 Bottom Line:: 9X faster than 56K 1MB download in 16 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 54.57 % faster than the average for host (com.br) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-N2H5D839P :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 559 Kbps about 0.6 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Upload Speed is:: 68 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Thu Mar 10 17:54:47 UTC-0300 2005 Bottom Line:: 10X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 15.06 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 219.43 % faster than the average for host (com.br) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-VW481JRIC Is that good or can be better? My internet: cable 600/600 TCP options string = 020405b40103030101010402 MTU = 1500 MTU is fully optimized for broadband. MSS = 1460 Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which equals MSS. Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 76800 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 1 bits (scale factor of 2) Unscaled Receive Window = 38400 RWIN is not fully optimized (even though it is a comparatively large number). The unscaled RWIN value is lower than it should be, which can affect your connection to some servers. Also, RWIN being close above 65535 does not justify the header overhead of scaling. You might want to use one of our recommended RWIN values below. For optimum performance, consider changing RWIN to a multiple of MSS. Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 513920 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 256960 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4) 128480 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2) 64240 (MSS x 44) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your RcvWindow limits you to: 3072 kbps (384 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your RcvWindow limits you to: 1228.8 kbps (153.6 KBytes/s) @ 500ms MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 50 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 11110000 Precedence (priority) = 000 (routine) Delay = 0 (normal delay) Throughput = 1 (high throughput) Reliability = 1 (high reliability) Cost = 1 (low cost) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted March 10, 2005 CID Share Posted March 10, 2005 Quote Thx for the help... Van Bauren look, this is the test before the changes in cablenut. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 524 Kbps about 0.5 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Download Speed is:: 64 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Thu Mar 10 17:53:14 UTC-0300 2005 Bottom Line:: 9X faster than 56K 1MB download in 16 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 54.57 % faster than the average for host (com.br) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-N2H5D839P :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 559 Kbps about 0.6 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Upload Speed is:: 68 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Thu Mar 10 17:54:47 UTC-0300 2005 Bottom Line:: 10X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 15.06 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 219.43 % faster than the average for host (com.br) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-VW481JRIC Is that good or can be better? My internet: cable 600/600 TCP options string = 020405b40103030101010402 MTU = 1500 MTU is fully optimized for broadband. MSS = 1460 Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which equals MSS. Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 76800 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 1 bits (scale factor of 2) Unscaled Receive Window = 38400 RWIN is not fully optimized (even though it is a comparatively large number). The unscaled RWIN value is lower than it should be, which can affect your connection to some servers. Also, RWIN being close above 65535 does not justify the header overhead of scaling. You might want to use one of our recommended RWIN values below. For optimum performance, consider changing RWIN to a multiple of MSS. Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 513920 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 256960 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4) 128480 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2) 64240 (MSS x 44) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your RcvWindow limits you to: 3072 Kbps (384 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your RcvWindow limits you to: 1228.8 Kbps (153.6 KBytes/s) @ 500ms MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 50 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 11110000 Precedence (priority) = 000 (routine) Delay = 0 (normal delay) Throughput = 1 (high throughput) Reliability = 1 (high reliability) Cost = 1 (low cost) most likely no, it wont go faster cos your already getting around 90% of your speed but if your lucky, your cap is higher then your advertised speed VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darze Posted March 10, 2005 Author CID Share Posted March 10, 2005 Van bauren just one last thing, I dont know if this is the right place to ask you that, but do you know the best configuration to play cs on net with this connection? Configuration like cl_cmdrate , cl_updaterate, rate ...... THX A LOT MAN Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.