bwt1953 Posted March 13, 2005 CID Share Posted March 13, 2005 I've spent the last couple of hours playing with settings on this box. I have run thru several of the cablenut tweaks, even trieds some of the fiber full duplex and sat settings. All basically delivered acceptable performance. Though the sat settings ran the upload into the gutter. I am paying for 'up to' 1500/512. But my service provider has been working to up the speeds and I don't really know that there is any real cap imposed. I am guessing that they are preping for the competition that is about to be thrown upon them. Verizon is in the neighborhood with giant spools of fiber, going house to house. My main concern is keeping my upload as high as possible. I tie into our servers 20 miles away via Win2k3 RTS, move alot of large graphics files up and down the pipe, and dabble in video. I haven't been at this optimizing long enough to know what to look for. Any help is surely appreciated One other thing, I use this smaller machine to access the web, homemade AMD XP2400 w/512 on an ASUS board. My workstation, which is a dual P4 2.8HT XEON Supermicro is hidden within the network, doesn't get out to the net. Will the larger faster machine do better, or does it matter? Win2KPro SP4 Linksys WRT54G Telex LOS SkyNetAccess a LOS Wireless provider via TELEX equip. static IP 1500/512 with cablenut tweaks for ADSL fast 2k :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 2821 Kbps about 2.8 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 344 kB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Sun Mar 13 10:42:05 EST 2005 Bottom Line:: 50X faster than 56K 1MB download in 2.98 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 90.74 % faster than the average for host (56.154) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-FCY054S3U :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 620 Kbps about 0.6 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Upload Speed is:: 76 kB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Sun Mar 13 10:43:33 EST 2005 Bottom Line:: 11X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 13.47 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 110.17 % faster than the average for host (56.154) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-2F0KCY5L4 Log created by Check.bat on Sun 03/13/2005 Pinging 67.19.36.6 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=55 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=55 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=55 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=55 Ping statistics for 67.19.36.6: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 47ms, Maximum = 63ms, Average = 51ms Ping Complete. Tracing route to 6.67-19-36.reverse.theplanet.com [67.19.36.6] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms 192.168.1.1 2 * 63 ms 15 ms 10.2.1.1 3 <10 ms 16 ms 16 ms fe3-5.b2.iad.scnet.net [64.202.119.45] 4 16 ms 15 ms 16 ms ae-0-50.j2.iad.sc.net [64.202.119.118] 5 594 ms 16 ms 15 ms unknown.iad.scnet.net [66.225.244.170] 6 16 ms 15 ms 16 ms 0.ge-0-0-0.gbr1.ash.nac.net [209.123.11.41] 7 <10 ms 16 ms 15 ms ge-2-3-0.r02.asbnva01.us.bb.verio.net [206.223.115.112] 8 <10 ms 32 ms <10 ms p16-1-0-0.r20.asbnva01.us.bb.verio.net [129.250.2.82] 9 47 ms 31 ms 62 ms p16-0-1-1.r21.dllstx09.us.bb.verio.net [129.250.5.34] 10 47 ms 47 ms 47 ms ge-1-0-0.a00.dllstx09.us.ra.verio.net [129.250.28.167] 11 31 ms 47 ms 47 ms ge-1-2.a00.dllstx04.us.ra.verio.net [129.250.28.186] 12 47 ms 47 ms 47 ms ge-9-3.a00.dllstx04.us.ce.verio.net [157.238.228.38] 13 109 ms 63 ms 47 ms dist-vlan31.dsr3-1.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.29] 14 47 ms 62 ms 63 ms dist-vlan41.dsr2-1.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.83] 15 47 ms 63 ms 62 ms gig1-0-1.tp-car9-1.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.69] 16 47 ms 63 ms 47 ms 6.67-19-36.reverse.theplanet.com [67.19.36.6] Trace complete. all tweaks removed :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 2837 Kbps about 2.8 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 346 kB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Sun Mar 13 12:04:30 EST 2005 Bottom Line:: 51X faster than 56K 1MB download in 2.96 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 79.9 % faster than the average for host (56.154) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-428I9U6PS :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 713 Kbps about 0.7 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Upload Speed is:: 87 kB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Sun Mar 13 12:03:46 EST 2005 Bottom Line:: 13X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 11.77 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 141.69 % faster than the average for host (56.154) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-OXTL5B379 Log created by Check.bat on Sun 03/13/2005 Pinging 67.19.36.6 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=55 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=55 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=55 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=55 Ping statistics for 67.19.36.6: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 47ms, Maximum = 63ms, Average = 51ms Ping Complete. Tracing route to 6.67-19-36.reverse.theplanet.com [67.19.36.6] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms 192.168.1.1 2 <10 ms 16 ms 15 ms 10.2.1.1 3 16 ms 16 ms <10 ms fe3-5.b2.iad.scnet.net [64.202.119.45] 4 <10 ms 15 ms 16 ms ae-0-50.j2.iad.sc.net [64.202.119.118] 5 16 ms 15 ms 16 ms unknown.iad.scnet.net [66.225.244.170] 6 <10 ms 32 ms 15 ms 0.ge-0-0-0.gbr1.ash.nac.net [209.123.11.41] 7 16 ms 16 ms 15 ms ge-2-3-0.r02.asbnva01.us.bb.verio.net [206.223.115.112] 8 * <10 ms 16 ms p16-1-0-0.r20.asbnva01.us.bb.verio.net [129.250.2.82] 9 47 ms 32 ms 46 ms p16-0-1-1.r21.dllstx09.us.bb.verio.net [129.250.5.34] 10 47 ms 47 ms 31 ms ge-1-0-0.a00.dllstx09.us.ra.verio.net [129.250.28.167] 11 46 ms 32 ms 47 ms ge-1-2.a00.dllstx04.us.ra.verio.net [129.250.28.186] 12 47 ms 46 ms 63 ms ge-9-3.a00.dllstx04.us.ce.verio.net [157.238.228.38] 13 157 ms 250 ms 203 ms dist-vlan31.dsr3-1.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.29] 14 62 ms 47 ms 63 ms dist-vlan41.dsr2-1.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.83] 15 47 ms 47 ms 63 ms gig1-0-1.tp-car9-1.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.69] 16 47 ms 62 ms 47 ms 6.67-19-36.reverse.theplanet.com [67.19.36.6] Trace complete. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted March 13, 2005 CID Share Posted March 13, 2005 hey bwt1953 you have some timeouts in your traceroute try this start-run-cmd ping -n 100 64.202.119.45 and hit enter when you get result, right click choose all and hit enter paste it here VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bwt1953 Posted March 13, 2005 Author CID Share Posted March 13, 2005 C:Documents and SettingsAdministrator>ping -n 100 64.202.119.45 Pinging 64.202.119.45 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Request timed out. Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Request timed out. Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Reply from 64.202.119.45: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=253 Ping statistics for 64.202.119.45: Packets: Sent = 100, Received = 98, Lost = 2 (2% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 16ms, Average = 2ms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted March 13, 2005 CID Share Posted March 13, 2005 2% loss is not good but acceptable try this download this and unzip it to C:ProgramCablenut https://testmy.net/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=1013.0;id=1345 open cablenut adjuster, in top left corner, click file, load custom settings file, browse to C:ProgramCablenutVanBurens_cablenut_settings_version_6_ALL_WIN_OS_AND_SATCABLE_DSL_FIBER_DIAL-UPWinXP_2K_CABLE_DSLMSS1460 dubbleclick on Cable & DSL 3000 768.ccs and click save to registry now reboot make a new speed test VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bwt1953 Posted March 13, 2005 Author CID Share Posted March 13, 2005 that seems to pick it up a bit: :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 2988 Kbps about 3 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 365 kB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Sun Mar 13 14:01:19 EST 2005 Bottom Line:: 53X faster than 56K 1MB download in 2.81 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 84.33 % faster than the average for host (56.154) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-ST4XDAWBN :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 729 Kbps about 0.7 Mbps (tested with 1013 kB) Upload Speed is:: 89 kB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Sun Mar 13 14:01:56 EST 2005 Bottom Line:: 13X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 11.51 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 139.8 % faster than the average for host (56.154) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-U2BSE84LC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REV0LUTI0NIZED Posted March 13, 2005 CID Share Posted March 13, 2005 Nice Speeds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bwt1953 Posted March 13, 2005 Author CID Share Posted March 13, 2005 packet loss is still at 2%. My ISP has owned up to the packet loss issue and is addressing it. Things have gotten better over the past couple of months Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted March 13, 2005 CID Share Posted March 13, 2005 also try this file VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bwt1953 Posted March 13, 2005 Author CID Share Posted March 13, 2005 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 2822 Kbps about 2.8 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB) Download Speed is:: 344 kB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Sun Mar 13 14:17:50 EST 2005 Bottom Line:: 50X faster than 56K 1MB download in 2.98 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 72.49 % faster than the average for host (56.154) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-9PTU08AW3 subsequent testing (restarting the browser each time) seems to 'clean out the pipe' or warm it up....LOL test scores increase! :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 359 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Upload Speed is:: 44 kB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Sun Mar 13 14:18:30 EST 2005 Bottom Line:: 6X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 23.27 sec Diagnosis: Looks Great : 17.7 % faster than the average for host (56.154) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-IU8VXGC4T :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 565 Kbps about 0.6 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Upload Speed is:: 69 kB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Sun Mar 13 14:18:55 EST 2005 Bottom Line:: 10X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 14.84 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 84.04 % faster than the average for host (56.154) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-MGR6V5LSX :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 637 Kbps about 0.6 Mbps (tested with 1013 kB) Upload Speed is:: 78 kB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Sun Mar 13 14:19:30 EST 2005 Bottom Line:: 11X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 13.13 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 106.15 % faster than the average for host (56.154) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-LMNKC4UFT :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 706 Kbps about 0.7 Mbps (tested with 1013 kB) Upload Speed is:: 86 kB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Sun Mar 13 14:21:31 EST 2005 Bottom Line:: 13X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 11.91 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 129.97 % faster than the average for host (56.154) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-ZH6TDKFEC and then the download has fallen: :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1701 Kbps about 1.7 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 208 kB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Sun Mar 13 14:24:05 EST 2005 Bottom Line:: 30X faster than 56K 1MB download in 4.92 sec Diagnosis: Looks Great : 4.16 % faster than the average for host (56.154) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-C6HJXTEFV and then back up again :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3057 Kbps about 3.1 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 373 kB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Sun Mar 13 14:25:07 EST 2005 Bottom Line:: 55X faster than 56K 1MB download in 2.75 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 86.06 % faster than the average for host (56.154) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-5Y0IMQEA6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted March 13, 2005 CID Share Posted March 13, 2005 change back to 3000/768 file, thats probl your cap VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bwt1953 Posted March 13, 2005 Author CID Share Posted March 13, 2005 packet loss was at 6% Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bwt1953 Posted March 13, 2005 Author CID Share Posted March 13, 2005 This ISP is talking about offering what I think he hinted at to be 7000/3000 service. Cost a few more duckettes, but I didn't even want to enetrtain the idea unitl I was able to see some stability in service over this wireless net. This is all shared bandwidth. Goes up and down as others get online in the community. But these speeds here are during what is condsidered peak useage times. I just may try out some of his dedicated service packages. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.