bent240LV Posted May 18, 2005 CID Share Posted May 18, 2005 ok for a little while the internet connection was pretty good i should have just elft it alone but we all know you cant just leave it a lone. originaly i was just using VanBurens tweaks and tht worked good ( you should have seen the improvement on my sisters computer OMG) then i got vonage and am using the linksys RT31PT router and i notices that my test scores on ceartain forums especialy testmy.net declined. so i dont know what to do i tried most if not all the tweaks on speegguide as well. oh well here are some test results. oh i keep getting the duplex error on this test so im not sure what setting to use. thanks my connection is 4/256 and runnning on win xp everything updated and virus free adn all that good stuff. WEB100 Enabled Statistics: Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 292.60Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 2.86Mb/s ------ Client System Details ------ OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1 Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.5.0_02 ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found. Link set to Full Duplex mode No network congestion discovered. Good network cable(s) found Alarm: Duplex mismatch condition found: Host set to Full and Switch set to Half duplexD Web100 reports the Round trip time = 195.76 msec; the Packet size = 1380 Bytes; and No packet loss - but packets arrived out-of-order 36.55% of the time This connection is receiver limited 58.86% of the time. This connection is network limited 41.11% of the time. Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: OFF Information: Network Middlebox is modifying MSS variable Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address Server says [68.108.43.129] but Client says [192.168.15.100] WEB100 Kernel Variables: Client: localhost/127.0.0.1 AckPktsIn: 197 AckPktsOut: 0 BytesRetrans: 0 CongAvoid: 0 CongestionOverCount: 0 CongestionSignals: 0 CountRTT: 125 CurCwnd: 64860 CurMSS: 1380 CurRTO: 530 CurRwinRcvd: 64240 CurRwinSent: 5840 CurSsthresh: 2147483647 DSACKDups: 0 DataBytesIn: 0 DataBytesOut: 3625260 DataPktsIn: 0 DataPktsOut: 2627 DupAcksIn: 72 ECNEnabled: 0 FastRetran: 0 MaxCwnd: 64860 MaxMSS: 1380 MaxRTO: 570 MaxRTT: 310 MaxRwinRcvd: 64240 MaxRwinSent: 5840 MaxSsthresh: 0 MinMSS: 1380 MinRTO: 300 MinRTT: 100 MinRwinRcvd: 64240 MinRwinSent: 5840 NagleEnabled: 1 OtherReductions: 0 PktsIn: 198 PktsOut: 2627 PktsRetrans: 0 X_Rcvbuf: 107520 RcvWinScale: 7 SACKEnabled: 3 SACKsRcvd: 0 SendStall: 0 SlowStart: 45 SampleRTT: 150 SmoothedRTT: 210 X_Sndbuf: 107520 SndWinScale: 0 SndLimTimeRwin: 5956464 SndLimTimeCwnd: 4160873 SndLimTimeSender: 2975 SndLimTransRwin: 1 SndLimTransCwnd: 1 SndLimTransSender: 1 SndLimBytesRwin: 2617860 SndLimBytesCwnd: 1007400 SndLimBytesSender: 0 SubsequentTimeouts: 0 SumRTT: 24470 Timeouts: 0 TimestampsEnabled: 0 WinScaleRcvd: 0 WinScaleSent: 7 DupAcksOut: 0 StartTimeUsec: 68335 Duration: 10123331 c2sData: 2 c2sAck: 2 s2cData: 9 s2cAck: 3 half_duplex: 0 link: 100 congestion: 0 bad_cable: 0 mismatch: 1 spd: 0.00 bw: 53.78 loss: 0.000001000 avgrtt: 195.76 waitsec: 0.00 timesec: 10.00 order: 0.3655 rwintime: 0.5886 sendtime: 0.0003 cwndtime: 0.4111 rwin: 0.4901 swin: 0.8203 cwin: 0.4948 rttsec: 0.195760 Sndbuf: 107520 aspd: 11.72675 Checking for mismatch on uplink (speed > 50 [0>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [0.29<5] (rwintime > .9) [0.58>.9], (loss < .01) [1.0E<.01] Checking for excessive errors condition (loss/sec > .15) [1.0E>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.41>.6], (loss < .01) [1.0E<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [0>0] Checking for 10 Mbps link (speed < 9.5) [0<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [0>3.0] (xmitspeed < 9.5) [0.29<9.5] (loss < .01) [1.0E<.01], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for Wireless link (sendtime = 0) [3.0E=0], (speed < 5) [0<5] (Estimate > 50 [53.78>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0.58>.90] (RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [1/1=1], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link (speed < 2) [0<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0] (SendTime = 0) [3.0E-4=0], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for half-duplex condition (rwintime > .95) [0.58>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30], (SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30], OR (mylink <= 10) [3.0<=10] Checking for congestion (cwndtime > .02) [0.41>.02], (mismatch = 0) [1=0] (MaxSsthresh > 0) [0>0] estimate = 53.78 based on packet size = 10Kbits, RTT = 195.76msec, and loss = 1.0E-6 The theoretical network limit is 53.78 Mbps The NDT server has a 105.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 4.19 Mbps Your PC/Workstation has a 62.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 2.50 Mbps The network based flow control limits the throughput to 2.52 Mbps Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'T1' Server Data reports link is '10 Gig', Server Acks report link is 'Ethernet' :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 2555 Kbps about 2.6 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB) Download Speed is:: 312 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (main) Test Time:: Wed May 18 11:29:24 PDT 2005 Bottom Line:: 46X faster than 56K 1MB download in 3.28 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 80.96 % of your hosts average (cox.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-QCRG6H84O Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted May 18, 2005 CID Share Posted May 18, 2005 hey bent240LV try restoring your registry with cablenut open cablenut, click delete cablenut tweaks and click save to registry and reboot also set your NIC to 100Mbps full duplex quote from http://dslnuts.com/tips_tricks.shtml "Windows 2000 or XP: to change to half-duplex: * Open Control Panel. * Double-click Network and Dial-up Connections. * Identify the icon for your cable modem connection: usually Local Area Connection. * Right-click that icon and select Properties. * Under the ethernet adapter icon, click the button Configure. * Click the tab Advanced to bring it to the front: * In the Property box, the property name to be selected varies according to model of ethernet card. Examples are: Network Link Selection, Media Type, Connection Type, Duplex Mode, or any similarly-named property which can have Values looking like Auto-Negotiation, or 10BT, or 10BaseT. * In the Value box, select a value which either (a) explicitly says half-duplex or semi-duplex, or ( at least does not say full-duplex [e.g. 10BaseT on its own is OK]. If there is a choice between 10 and 100 with half-duplex, choose the 10. Do not choose 10Base5, 10Base2, or AUI. * Click OK to exit the Adapter settings. * Click OK to exit the Connection properties. " now make a new test VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bent240LV Posted May 18, 2005 Author CID Share Posted May 18, 2005 ok did all of that, helped on one test hurt on the other :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1607 Kbps about 1.6 Mbps (tested with 748 kB) Download Speed is:: 196 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (main) Test Time:: Wed May 18 12:44:51 PDT 2005 Bottom Line:: 29X faster than 56K 1MB download in 5.22 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 50.92 % of your hosts average (cox.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-HZ30Y4NEI ink set to Full Duplex mode No network congestion discovered. Good network cable(s) found Alarm: Duplex mismatch condition found: Host set to Full and Switch set to Half duplexD Web100 reports the Round trip time = 123.29 msec; the Packet size = 1380 Bytes; and No packet loss - but packets arrived out-of-order 34.48% of the time This connection is receiver limited 76.83% of the time. This connection is network limited 22.98% of the time. Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: OFF Information: Network Middlebox is modifying MSS variable Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address Server says [68.108.43.129] but Client says [192.168.15.100] WEB100 Kernel Variables: Client: localhost/127.0.0.1 AckPktsIn: 641 AckPktsOut: 0 BytesRetrans: 0 CongAvoid: 0 CongestionOverCount: 0 CongestionSignals: 0 CountRTT: 420 CurCwnd: 66240 CurMSS: 1380 CurRTO: 350 CurRwinRcvd: 65535 CurRwinSent: 5840 CurSsthresh: 2147483647 DSACKDups: 0 DataBytesIn: 0 DataBytesOut: 4664400 DataPktsIn: 0 DataPktsOut: 3380 DupAcksIn: 221 ECNEnabled: 0 FastRetran: 0 MaxCwnd: 66240 MaxMSS: 1380 MaxRTO: 390 MaxRTT: 200 MaxRwinRcvd: 65535 MaxRwinSent: 5840 MaxSsthresh: 0 MinMSS: 1380 MinRTO: 280 MinRTT: 80 MinRwinRcvd: 65535 MinRwinSent: 5840 NagleEnabled: 1 OtherReductions: 0 PktsIn: 641 PktsOut: 3380 PktsRetrans: 0 X_Rcvbuf: 107520 RcvWinScale: 2147483647 SACKEnabled: 3 SACKsRcvd: 0 SendStall: 0 SlowStart: 46 SampleRTT: 140 SmoothedRTT: 120 X_Sndbuf: 107520 SndWinScale: 2147483647 SndLimTimeRwin: 7738485 SndLimTimeCwnd: 2314043 SndLimTimeSender: 19198 SndLimTransRwin: 1 SndLimTransCwnd: 1 SndLimTransSender: 1 SndLimBytesRwin: 4072380 SndLimBytesCwnd: 592020 SndLimBytesSender: 0 SubsequentTimeouts: 0 SumRTT: 51780 Timeouts: 0 TimestampsEnabled: 0 WinScaleRcvd: 2147483647 WinScaleSent: 2147483647 DupAcksOut: 0 StartTimeUsec: 651601 Duration: 10079137 c2sData: 2 c2sAck: 2 s2cData: 9 s2cAck: 3 half_duplex: 0 link: 100 congestion: 0 bad_cable: 0 mismatch: 1 spd: 0.00 bw: 85.40 loss: 0.000001000 avgrtt: 123.29 waitsec: 0.00 timesec: 10.00 order: 0.3448 rwintime: 0.7683 sendtime: 0.0019 cwndtime: 0.2298 rwin: 0.5000 swin: 0.8203 cwin: 0.5054 rttsec: 0.123286 Sndbuf: 107520 aspd: 17.19746 Checking for mismatch on uplink (speed > 50 [0>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [0.22<5] (rwintime > .9) [0.76>.9], (loss < .01) [1.0E<.01] Checking for excessive errors condition (loss/sec > .15) [1.0E>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.22>.6], (loss < .01) [1.0E<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [0>0] Checking for 10 Mbps link (speed < 9.5) [0<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [0>3.0] (xmitspeed < 9.5) [0.22<9.5] (loss < .01) [1.0E<.01], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for Wireless link (sendtime = 0) [0.00=0], (speed < 5) [0<5] (Estimate > 50 [85.4>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0.76>.90] (RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [1/1=1], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link (speed < 2) [0<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0] (SendTime = 0) [0.0019=0], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for half-duplex condition (rwintime > .95) [0.76>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30], (SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30], OR (mylink <= 10) [3.0<=10] Checking for congestion (cwndtime > .02) [0.22>.02], (mismatch = 0) [1=0] (MaxSsthresh > 0) [0>0] estimate = 85.4 based on packet size = 10Kbits, RTT = 123.29msec, and loss = 1.0E-6 The theoretical network limit is 85.4 Mbps The NDT server has a 105.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 6.65 Mbps Your PC/Workstation has a 63.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 4.05 Mbps The network based flow control limits the throughput to 4.09 Mbps Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'T1' Server Data reports link is '10 Gig', Server Acks report link is 'Ethernet' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted May 18, 2005 CID Share Posted May 18, 2005 you have some loss and thats what bring down speed run a linequality test here http://www.dslreports.com/tools when you get result, copy URL adress and paste it here VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bent240LV Posted May 18, 2005 Author CID Share Posted May 18, 2005 Test Loss Min Latency Avg Latency Max Latency Pass Fail Simple ping loss check target does not respond to ICMP ping ping tests cancelled low bandwidth stream was not performed medium bandwidth stream was not performed your first hop ping was not performed if you were pingable, cool graphs would appear here From East Coast - USA to YOU Hop Host LOSS Rcv Sent Best Avg Worst 0 100.ge-0-0-0.cr2.wdc1.speakeasy.net 0% 60 60 7.03 7.67 25.48 1 ASHBBBPC01GEX0200A001.R2.NV.COX.NET 0% 60 60 7.16 10.26 26.44 2 dllsdsrc01-pos0000.rd.dl.cox.net 0% 60 60 37.42 37.83 39.36 3 chndbbrc02-pos0300.rd.ph.cox.net 0% 60 60 84.33 84.86 87.40 4 nwstbbrc01-pos0203.rd.lv.cox.net 0% 60 60 84.26 84.76 85.39 5 nwstdsrj01-so000.rd.lv.cox.net 0% 60 60 84.42 85.54 111.64 6 24-234-6-5.ptp.lvcm.net 0% 60 60 84.49 85.24 96.77 7 24-234-6-30.ptp.lvcm.net 0% 60 60 84.62 84.97 85.98 8 24-234-6-54.ptp.lvcm.net 0% 60 60 84.54 85.08 86.75 9 ??? 100% 0 60 0.00 0.00 0.00 Pass: From West Coast - USA to YOU Hop Host LOSS Rcv Sent Best Avg Worst 0 200.ge-0-1-0.cr2.sfo1.speakeasy.net 0% 60 60 0.31 1.36 51.56 1 PALTBBRJ01GEX0201A001.R2.PT.COX.NET 0% 60 60 0.37 2.29 23.39 2 nwstbbrc01-pos0200.rd.lv.cox.net 0% 60 60 22.29 22.45 24.54 3 nwstdsrj02-so010.rd.lv.cox.net 0% 60 60 22.45 22.54 22.79 4 24-234-6-13.ptp.lvcm.net 0% 60 60 22.50 23.10 39.26 5 24-234-6-30.ptp.lvcm.net 0% 60 60 22.55 22.90 36.01 6 24-234-6-58.ptp.lvcm.net 0% 60 60 22.50 22.68 22.83 7 24-234-1-154.ptp.lvcm.net 99% 1 60 23.89 23.89 23.89 8 ??? 100% 0 60 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fail: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted May 18, 2005 CID Share Posted May 18, 2005 copy URL adress and paste it here Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bent240LV Posted May 18, 2005 Author CID Share Posted May 18, 2005 http://www.dslreports.com/quality/nil/1738429 thanks for all the help you do a great deal for these forums Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted May 19, 2005 CID Share Posted May 19, 2005 http://www.dslreports.com/quality/nil/1738429 thanks for all the help you do a great deal for these forums email this link to your ISP, and let them fix the loss VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.