adelphia in puerto rico

[osva]

Hmm.. Motorola should be capped to..

Also it's illegal to uncapped.

Try a higher test and it should be more close to 4mb.

http://www.testmy.net/tools/test/d_load.php?ni=1&tt=1&s=12160&st=st&ta=&top=

[RaulJimenez]

My modem is not uncapped so I'm not doing anything illegal, and terayon modem has a restricted cap at 4mb, getting another modem is a good idea for the future if they decide to upgrade the packages as i've heard they bought more bandwidth and will start offering more bandwidth in the future.

[resopalrabotnick]

my terayon used to be capped at over 5, when they changed ownership the cap went down, just like the up, went from 460000 to 384000

[osva]

Yes but the capping its done in the config file they sent when connecting. No t the modem itself.

[mj_basketb]

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 3961 Kbps about 3.96 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

Download Speed is:: 484 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net  (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2006/04/10 - 2:57pm

Bottom Line:: 69X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 2.12 sec

Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 6.187 seconds to complete

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1

Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 92.47 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-7I9D3WPM5

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 2969 Kbps about 2.97 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB)

Download Speed is:: 362 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net  (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2006/04/10 - 3:00pm

Bottom Line:: 52X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 2.83 sec

Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 33.547 seconds to complete

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1

Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 44.27 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-E3AK9PHUY

Hmmm....

[resopalrabotnick]

Yes but the capping its done in the config file they sent when connecting. No t the modem itself.

exactly. which is why i was wondering about the >4mbit speed on that test. it wouldn't surprise me if they had different config files for different modems... or didn't think anyone would use a different modem than what they send out with the installer... or any of a number of possible reasons why.

[RaulJimenez]

I know I asked them to update their config file for my new modem, maybe that has something to do with it.

[osva]

Test again with a higher size test.. to see the results.

[RaulJimenez]

Your connection is: 4614 Kbps or 4.61 Mbps

You Downloaded at: 563 kB/s

You are running: 80 times faster than 56K and can Download 1 megabyte in 1.82 second(s)

Member Ident: Username:RaulJimenez CompID:6461011105

Test Time:: 2006/04/10 - 7:39pm

Test Browser and OS info: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1

Test ID: K41ATZ0MX (if this is a screenshot go to testmy.net to see if this is fake)

Diagnosis ^info^: Awesome! 20% + : 123.98 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net)

This was tested from a 2992 kB file and took 5.312 seconds to complete

[osva]

Test again with a higher size test.. to see the results.

Like 12160 KB

[RaulJimenez]

This was a 20mb file i tested:

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 3251 Kbps about 3.25 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB)

Download Speed is:: 397 kB/s

Tested From:: http://demonlegion.net

Test Time:: 2006/04/10 - 7:52pm

Bottom Line:: 57X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 2.58 sec

Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 52.843 seconds to complete

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1

Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 57.82 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-XGRJK49O8

[drebel]

do you have any packet loss? the motorola 5120 is notorious for having packetloss in onelink's network.  Personally i'm using a linksys modem which I bought today and will be testing for the next 24 hours to see if it's worth replacing the terayong.

[osva]

do you have any packet loss? the motorola 5120 is notorious for having packetloss in onelink's network.  Personally i'm using a linksys modem which I bought today and will be testing for the next 24 hours to see if it's worth replacing the terayong.

Drebel please let us know after testing.. Is it worth, im buying a new modem.

[osva]

This was a 20mb file i tested:

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 3251 Kbps about 3.25 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB)

Download Speed is:: 397 kB/s

Tested From:: http://demonlegion.net

Test Time:: 2006/04/10 - 7:52pm

Bottom Line:: 57X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 2.58 sec

Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 52.843 seconds to complete

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1

Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 57.82 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-XGRJK49O8

Now it's not 4.7 Mbps..

but your speeds are good

This are my results with a 20MB speed test..

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 3794 Kbps about 3.79 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB)

Download Speed is:: 463 kB/s

Tested From:: http://s2.testmy.net

Test Time:: 2006/04/10 - 8:37pm

Bottom Line:: 66X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 2.21 sec

Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 45.281 seconds to complete

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1

Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 84.17 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-ANDR3XG4Y

[RaulJimenez]

So far im testing my packet loss from pingplotter and dslreport and is working very good, If you guys want a good modem get the old SB5100 MOTOROLA

do you have any packet loss? the motorola 5120 is notorious for having packetloss in onelink's network.  Personally i'm using a linksys modem which I bought today and will be testing for the next 24 hours to see if it's worth replacing the terayong.

[RaulJimenez]

linksys : let us know how the linksys works.

do you have any packet loss? the motorola 5120 is notorious for having packetloss in onelink's network.  Personally i'm using a linksys modem which I bought today and will be testing for the next 24 hours to see if it's worth replacing the terayong.

[drebel]

well so far so good, it's more or less on par with my old terayon.  However for some reason my area cannot get more than 600k on speed tests.  If I don't use a download accelerator the max speed I get is 75k.  This is the symptoms I had with the terayon and now the linksys so this must be a node related issue. 

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 659 Kbps about 0.66 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

Download Speed is:: 80 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net  (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2006/04/10 - 9:02pm

Bottom Line:: 11X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 12.8 sec

Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 37.203 seconds to complete

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1

Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 31.99 % of your hosts average (onelinkpr.net)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-SRNQ2P1FB

This is my connection 24/7. The modem change did improve latency, it does not fluctuate as much and battlefield 2 remains always in the same 55ms ping and does not fluctuate much this could be a backbone issue as well. 

[drebel]

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 833 Kbps about 0.83 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

Download Speed is:: 102 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net  (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2006/04/10 - 9:04pm

Bottom Line:: 15X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 10.04 sec

Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 29.438 seconds to complete

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1

Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 40.44 % of your hosts average (onelinkpr.net)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-H5Y0SX4E6

another speed test.  This area was working fine last saturday as you can see on my post above.

[osva]

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 833 Kbps about 0.83 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

Download Speed is:: 102 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net  (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2006/04/10 - 9:04pm

Bottom Line:: 15X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 10.04 sec

Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 29.438 seconds to complete

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1

Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 40.44 % of your hosts average (onelinkpr.net)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-H5Y0SX4E6

another speed test.  This area was working fine last saturday as you can see on my post above.

Last saturday I was without service two times for about 5-6 hours. When my service came back. Latencies are better and stable speed.

[drebel]

I can hope that will happen here but i'm not expecting much. 

[SpeedChaser]

The Cover-Up

Since Centennial started their promo on TV for their  Instant Internet service with 2.4 Mbps, OneLink PR stopped  their illegal practices against  their customers. But not at all ,because they began using a new technique.

Now we have a  2.8 Mbps almost anytime.

In order to get more money from their customers they decide to increase the price for their premium channels. So if you have a 4 premium pack in order to get a discount on your PowerLink price this is just an illusion. We should call it The 4  Pack Trap The reality is that they are increasing their PowerLink price. This is an indirect way to increase a product price thinking that their customers will not notice their real intentions.

I recall when they call me by phone in a desperate way the same day the new prices started -April 1(evening). When a serious company is making plans for an change in prices they notify their customers 1-3 months before the changes takes on effect. Immediately this lead me to think that they are having problems and their first quarter revenues report for this year is not well, that's why they call everyone in such a desperate way.

This is the typical case of company that arrive to Puerto Rico and start doing strange things to make more money in the fastest way possible.

They are still limiting bandwidth in many ways.Their promos still said -almost 71 times faster than dial-up (4 Mbps). Maybe they have some fear about saying 4Mbps directly. The word almost give them some sense of legal security on their cover up.

What about their P2P limitations? Their worst reality. If they do not correct this problem soon they will continue losing market. The P2P softwares are here to stay and the main reason for everyone to use broadband.

Because I know they read this forum.

For OneLink Digital: Don't try to surf against the waves.

-Use a little wisdom and logic to make money-

If Centennial is not limiting P2P, this would be the best choice in the coming months.

If you have any comments about Centennial Instant Internet please let us know.

[osva]

They are not limiting p2p anymore. And also they haven't called me.

[drebel]

New modem or not these are my speed results:

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 918 Kbps about 0.92 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

Download Speed is:: 112 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net  (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2006/04/11 - 7:27am

Bottom Line:: 16X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 9.14 sec

Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 26.687 seconds to complete

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1

Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 44.52 % of your hosts average (onelinkpr.net)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-OAI50MYR9

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 1296 Kbps about 1.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

Download Speed is:: 158 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net  (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2006/04/11 - 7:28am

Bottom Line:: 23X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 6.48 sec

Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 18.906 seconds to complete

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1

Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 62.85 % of your hosts average (onelinkpr.net)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-0GOIYEXKS

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 620 Kbps about 0.62 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

Download Speed is:: 76 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net  (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2006/04/11 - 7:29am

Bottom Line:: 11X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 13.47 sec

Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 39.5 seconds to complete

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1

Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 30.07 % of your hosts average (onelinkpr.net)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-C73AZ1SXJ

See, new modem or not that is my best speed. 

[RaulJimenez]

Rebel im worried about your speeds bro, do you have spyware/adware ?? I would recommend u scan ur pc and try to keep it as fresh as possible, have you tried using cablenut to optimize speed??

[drebel]

trust me the speeds are the same on a formatted PC or not, in fact I connect my mac directly to the network and that's the most speed I get.  I already tried network card, cable modem, computer, I even test my work laptop to see if it has the same speed issues and yes.  I'm calling them again now to re-activate my old terayon modem and taking back the linksys for my money back.  It does work and latencies seem pretty stable but now i'm 100% sure it's not my computer or equipment.

And I cannot use cablenut because my speeds fluctuate too much.