VampireXxX

Did all the sticky's post advised, run cablenut and drtcp, powercycle router etc still no improvement......wonder why  :icon_scratch:

Here's result from nitro.usc.edu

WEB100 Enabled Statistics:

Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  Done

running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 30.13Kb/s

running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 57.52kb/s

------  Client System Details  ------

OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1

Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.5.0_02

------  Web100 Detailed Analysis  ------

Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found.

Link set to Full Duplex mode

No network congestion discovered.

Good network cable(s) found

Normal duplex operation found.

Web100 reports the Round trip time = 1428.18 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and

There were 6 packets retransmitted, 10 duplicate acks received, and 14 SACK blocks received

The connection was idle 0 seconds (0%) of the time

This connection is receiver limited 34.29% of the time.

  Increasing the the client's receive buffer (17.0 KB) will improve performance

This connection is network limited 65.69% of the time.

Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to:

RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON

RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON

RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF

RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF

RFC 1323 Window Scaling: OFF

Packet size is preserved End-to-End

Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End

Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address

Server says [202.52.200.133] but Client says [192.168.4.114]

:roll: :roll:

Please advise........

looks like you may need to do some tweaking/stuff

Yep, just downloaded cablenut and drtcp. hope can make my connection faster. d/l 8 kb/s , u/l 2kb/s is the best i got so far before tweaking.

Here's my result from testmy.net and hem.bredband.net from a continent far far away 

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 54 Kbps about 0.1 Mbps (tested with 1013 kB)

Download Speed is:: 7 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2)

Test Time:: Thu Jun 23 15:38:06 UTC+0700 2005

Bottom Line:: 1X faster than 56K 1MB download in 146.29 sec

Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 71.05 % of your hosts average (web.id)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-915FHWEPM

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 52 Kbps about 0.1 Mbps (tested with 1075 kB)

Download Speed is:: 6 kB/s

Tested From:: http://hem.bredband.net

Test Time:: 

Bottom Line:: 1X faster than 56K 1MB download in 170.67 sec

Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 68.42 % of your hosts average (web.id)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-RCXK1JLSE

The test seems fine with me. I forgot which article but i do remember reading one. If you're using tweaking or firewall sometimes you got a fake one. Sorry if i'm wrong...i'm still a newbie  :)

Today when i  did my routine scan with ad aware SE personal, microsoft anti syware and mcafee anti virus, microsoft found saritars.adult.dialer and some Trojan virus while ad aware as usual found win32.dialer.saritar and mcafee found none. Question is why my mcafee couldn't find this Trojan and ad aware couldn't find these saritars.adult.dialer while microsoft anti spyware could? I regularly update my softwares and using xp sp2 and norton firewall. Where did this saritars.adult.dialer come from? 'Coz i never open an adult site with this pc and nobody can access my pc. Btw FallowEarth, i did as advised and run ad aware in safe mode dan i deleted this damn win32.dialer.saritar still xp tells me win32 error.Look likes i really must read all the win32.dialer.saritar info  Forgive me for i am lazy  Thanks

I preferred Maxtor than Seagate. I always had bad sectors with Seagate I used to be Quantum fan till they merged with Maxtor. Never had problem with Maxtor. If you are a hardcore gamer then i suggest hdd with 7200 rpm. Right now i use TViX to store my movies and musics, 2 40 Gigs Maxtor for applications and games  If you're on a tight budget buy 5400 rpm instead 7200 rpm. Xp really take lots of space and RAM so 40 Gigs minimal...i guess 

a whole day ???  Ok will take the test again.Thanks

Ok will do....thanks again...still don't understand what this win32.dialler.saritar do...read alot about them as advised by WebUser but it's made my head spinning  really likes 98SE better than XP...wish longhorn better than xp without microsoft spying on my pc 

Errr Van Burden....I took line quality test from dslreports and it took me 5 hours so i canceled it and retest, still took me hours to complete.  Is my connection bad then? Or am i too far from their server? Thanks

Thanks for the advise, but i still a bit confused about hijack this. What this software do? 'Coz helloimtim's post really scares me, I don't know a bit about this 'hijack this'. Can anyone tell me? Thanks. You guys are really GREAT as my friend said  and i still amased that 2 days ago there's ONLY 10600++ and now already 10758 

Thanks for the info....In some cases like this, instead of checking...i deleted them 

Hi, I'm in Indonesia and using DSL Connection,Here my testmy result :

:::.. Upload Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 11 Kbps about 0 Mbps (tested with 97 kB)

Upload Speed is:: 1 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server1)

Test Time:: Mon Jun 20 07:50:33 UTC+0700 2005

Bottom Line:: 0X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 1024 sec

Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 34.38 % of your hosts average (web.id)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-71ACU62LK

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 66 Kbps about 0.1 Mbps (tested with 97 kB)

Download Speed is:: 8 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2)

Test Time:: Mon Jun 20 07:51:23 UTC+0700 2005

Bottom Line:: 1X faster than 56K 1MB download in 128 sec

Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 86.84 % of your hosts average (web.id)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-PV1GUFSN4

As you can see my upload sucks. It's like using a dial-up connection

Hi, as you can see this is my 1st msg....I wanna ask about ad-aware, after scanned i got 127 critical objects, I quarantine all and delete them....the problem is window xp keep telling me win32 error....after i restored win32.dialler.saristar (102 objects total) then it works normal again. Is it safe if i delete them 'coz they have TAC rating of 7? What is win32.dialler.saristar? thx