soongteck

nope. it is windows vista's result. yes i haven't run any tweaks raub, pahang. malaysia

it is 1.5Mbps Download with 512kbps Upload on Streamyx SOHO Line

:::.. testmy.net test results ..::: Download Connection is:: 1151 Kbps about 1.15 Mbps (tested with 1013 kB) Download Speed is:: 141 kB/s Upload Connection is:: 446 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 748 kB) Upload Speed is:: 54 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/12/19 - 7:18pm D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-KXUA8GPZR U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-NL7TUO3GS User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506) [!]

erm... before this i can achieve 60++ kbps.. see my record...

my school uses Dell OptiPlex GX500 something like that... with PD 2.8GHz and 512MB... lol...

:::.. testmy.net test results ..::: Download Connection is:: 357 Kbps about 0.36 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Download Speed is:: 44 kB/s Upload Connection is:: 232 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 386 kB) Upload Speed is:: 28 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/10/17 - 6:42pm D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-YSAH8G9XF U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-SOX2Y3NIK User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061010 Firefox/2.0 [!] not much increase over the continent connection, but to server like microsoft, download.com and others, had increased.

Downstream / Upstream (Kbps) 1536/512 before Downstream / Upstream (Kbps) 1024/512 and the speed, up a little bit only.... hehe ^^ wait.. i will run test and paste it here.

just want to say this, the problem is the server is OVERLOADED! as i know, their fiber is connected with 1 available for whole city! attenuation is not problem in my city. distance... in Kuala Lumpur, the capital city, i got a place where attenuation is 0 but it is leave path.... not fast path... 61kbps to testmy.net is counted as FAST for all malaysian... lol... streamyx is a bad ADSL provider

as you can see through my result, the 2xx ip address with PPPoA is faster. i would like to present the 6x ip address result here but it is far too slow than i can wait!

:::.. testmy.net test results ..::: Download Connection is:: 392 Kbps about 0.39 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Download Speed is:: 48 kB/s Upload Connection is:: 145 Kbps about 0.15 Mbps (tested with 386 kB) Upload Speed is:: 18 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/09/08 - 7:02am D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-LRQAEKTON U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-K91HPBY60 User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.6) Gecko/20060728 Firefox/1.5.0.6 [!] local IP address 218.111.xxx.xxx PPPoE Connect with IP Address 218.111.xxx.xxx remote IP address 219.93.218.177 PPPoE Connection Successfully Established PPPoE Connect with Gateway IP Address: 219.93.218.177 primary DNS address 202.188.0.133 secondary DNS address 202.188.1.5

they say the 2xx.xxx.xxx.xxx ip address is faster than 6x.xxx.xxx.xx so i am here for a speed test! streamyx CO provided me Us Rate (Kbps) 512 Ds Rate (Kbps) 1024 US Margin 22 DS Margin 31 Modulation GDMT LOS Errors 0 DS Line Attenuation 42 US Line Attenuation 45 Path Mode Fast Path :::.. testmy.net test results ..::: Download Connection is:: 501 Kbps about 0.5 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Download Speed is:: 61 kB/s Upload Connection is:: 165 Kbps about 0.17 Mbps (tested with 386 kB) Upload Speed is:: 20 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/09/08 - 6:44am D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-NV2FKQAL4 U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-UOBJCDZTA User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.6) Gecko/20060728 Firefox/1.5.0.6 [!] local IP address 219.95.xxx.xxx PPPoA Connect with IP Address 219.95.xxx.xxx remote IP address 219.93.218.177 PPPoA Connection Successfully Established PPPoA Connect with Gateway IP Address: 219.93.218.177 primary DNS address 202.188.0.133 secondary DNS address 202.188.1.5 the reason i use PPPoA is because the PPPoA will be faster than PPPoE... not everyone know this... but our CO does support this...

pahang sure doesn't have this problem.. i am unofficial support technician on this matter...

But i am not using SDSL... isnt it? Async... not sync

erm.. who can give me answer

n o answer?