Jump to content

Moonrider

Members
  • Posts

    36
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never
  • Speed Test

    My Results

Everything posted by Moonrider

  1. Ok u can delete this topic now Dun need any help any more/.
  2. But omg.. Im looking at ur speeds 20mb/s 17mb/s oh my god. And i think ,,Lol theese guys pay's a thousand dollars for that internet" i envy u this speed guys Lol stupid country lithuania.. Faster,faster.
  3. Yo today is a greate day heh my internet speed changed! I said it needed some restarts or something yay :haha: Your connection is: 440 Kbps or 0.4 Mbps You downloaded at: 54 kB/s You are running: 8 times faster than 56K and can download 1 megabyte in 18.96 second(s) Member Ident:Username:Moonrider CompID:178953464957 Test Time:: 2006/12/09 - 1:16am Test Browser and OS info: Opera/9.00 (Windows NT 5.1; U; en) Test ID: 41QY9ZF5U (if this is a screenshot go to testmy.net to see if this is fake) Diagnosis ^info^: Looks Great : 0.46 % faster than the average for host (bnk.lt) This was tested from a 386 kB file and took 7.187 seconds to complete Not 512 but 440 . Sorry guys cant share the info with u Might get caught by police or something. But anyways admin will notice it By the way my internet admin runs the internet Home Alone. No one work for him. Sometimes his friend, wich he spends his all money on cigarettes when he gets it :lol: Oh and by the way cleared my things up now. And i can control the net by my DADS Pc not from my hah Anyway my internet is a small internet, we live in not a very big City's Region and have a small town called Neveronys. There are about only 2000 people. And 251 of them are using internet. And oh i think im not going to mess with the speeds. Afterall today i checked all speeds, some ones have 512 someones 300 someones 256. But they pay exactly the same price but have bigger speeds. So Why can't i have it? )
  4. Raised from 400 to 512. Still no change ( Your connection is: 287 Kbps or 0.3 Mbps You downloaded at: 35 kB/s You are running: 5 times faster than 56K and can download 1 megabyte in 29.26 second(s) Member Ident:Username:Moonrider CompID:178953464957 Test Time:: 2006/12/08 - 1:20pm Test Browser and OS info: Opera/9.00 (Windows NT 5.1; U; en) Test ID: 1QJ06OKWV (if this is a screenshot go to testmy.net to see if this is fake) Diagnosis ^info^: May need help : running at only 65.53 % of your hosts average (bnk.lt) This was tested from a 579 kB file and took 16.547 seconds to complete Lol i pay for my internet let me calculate, x minus +z kidding i pay about 15 dollars that will be 50 LITU in Lithuanian Money. Anyway HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 P.S. LOL thats only i got Login and pwd by accident Guys maby it will change when the Internet restarts, i mean not my old Switch thing but when administrator restart all internet. Then it will change, coz the signal is coming from Main house, and all other people with they antenise's point to the Main antena, coz it gives sygnals that are called ,,The Mighty Oh Internet Spedd" Btw im only 14 and a half year old x)
  5. Lol maby Anyways heh No clues here?
  6. Hey, i have hacked in to my Internet administrators PC, now i can control everyone's speeds. Coz When he instaled Wireless internet on his Acer Laptop, he loged in from IE to his internet control panel, and somehow managed to save his Login Id and Password. So now i can change whatever speeds. We have 281 users in this internet. its called katalita. So lets go to the point. I have raised my Internet speed from 300 to 400 but i dont see any changes. I have reloaded my Internet. Here is my test. Your connection is: 279 Kbps or 0.3 Mbps You downloaded at: 34 kB/s You are running: 5 times faster than 56K and can download 1 megabyte in 30.12 second(s) Member Ident: CompID:178953464957 Test Time:: 2006/12/08 - 12:48pm Test Browser and OS info: Opera/9.00 (Windows NT 5.1; U; en) Test ID: GZBJ5WDHV (if this is a screenshot go to testmy.net to see if this is fake) Diagnosis ^info^: May need help : running at only 58.86 % of your hosts average (bnk.lt) This was tested from a 386 kB file and took 11.344 seconds to complete Something is wrong i think. But with my dads computer, i checked the speed it sayd 1024 and it downloaded about 160kb/s Thats very good for 1024. So please can anyone tweak or somehow help me? What do i need to do to raise my speed. And by the way i dont want to be Caught by my internet administrator. Afterall he is my 2 class uncle [ he marraid my cousin ] So how can i tweak my speed, and get no suspiciuon, Tnx Moon
  7. Well i argued with my friend today, and he sayd: -Whooh dude u can realy change your ip from dynamic to static? I answered HOW, he sayd thru no-ip.com, i wanna make my lineage2 server, but i have static ip , is there any chance to change my dynamic to statick? Srry my english is bad.
  8. Ty VanBuren Lol taram! My ping is now up to 35 And im happy about it , no more connection problems yes! Thank you again Van
  9. Yo hi testmy.net community Im back . And i want to ask you a question about enemy teritory. Its internet game. So i have problem, when i play CS or other games in internet my ping is always about 5-15 its wery low and im happy about it But when i go playing Enemy teritory my pings go up to 500~ Why? I reinstaled game about 20 times, my ports are forwaded 100% coz i contacted my internet administrator and i sayd all the ports , and they were open. But when i play i ALWAYS get very high ping. Why?
  10. i know this thing , this was from begining of my internet, like i IRC i Write down ./dns Moonrider and it says 195.182.95.61 like in Whatsmyip.net , but my ip's not that , my ip is 192.168.0.11 coz my house is numbered 11 . Ant tahat 195.182 is my administrators ip.
  11. I know that Swimmer , to contact my ISP lol ... But he will not give me , actualy he's my brothers BEST friend , and my sister Meried him , but he will not give me Mayby i need other Internet
  12. But this thing don't change my ip from dynamic to static , coz this ip when you like have Mu server or Counter-strike yeah? And your IP is changing after PC restart , or network reload . So you register like BestCs.no-ip.com . And u won't need to change ip for ur server. I will go there and see what they can offer to me!
  13. K people , i know there is something to change my ip from dynamic [not static] to static. So i can run a radio or cs servers or smthng like that. So anyone can tell me how?
  14. K: More details : WEB100 Kernel Variables: Client: localhost/127.0.0.1 AckPktsIn: 125 AckPktsOut: 0 BytesRetrans: 11680 CongAvoid: 48 CongestionOverCount: 0 CongestionSignals: 2 CountRTT: 76 CurCwnd: 11680 CurMSS: 1460 CurRTO: 811 CurRwinRcvd: 32120 CurRwinSent: 5840 CurSsthresh: 10220 DSACKDups: 0 DataBytesIn: 0 DataBytesOut: 293460 DataPktsIn: 0 DataPktsOut: 201 DupAcksIn: 38 ECNEnabled: 0 FastRetran: 2 MaxCwnd: 26280 MaxMSS: 1460 MaxRTO: 1135 MaxRTT: 783 MaxRwinRcvd: 32120 MaxRwinSent: 5840 MaxSsthresh: 13140 MinMSS: 1460 MinRTO: 811 MinRTT: 301 MinRwinRcvd: 32120 MinRwinSent: 5840 NagleEnabled: 1 OtherReductions: 0 PktsIn: 125 PktsOut: 201 PktsRetrans: 8 X_Rcvbuf: 1114624 RcvWinScale: 2147483647 SACKEnabled: 3 SACKsRcvd: 38 SendStall: 0 SlowStart: 26 SampleRTT: 417 SmoothedRTT: 488 X_Sndbuf: 1114624 SndWinScale: 2147483647 SndLimTimeRwin: 0 SndLimTimeCwnd: 10503616 SndLimTimeSender: 37726 SndLimTransRwin: 0 SndLimTransCwnd: 1 SndLimTransSender: 1 SndLimBytesRwin: 0 SndLimBytesCwnd: 293460 SndLimBytesSender: 0 SubsequentTimeouts: 0 SumRTT: 38876 Timeouts: 0 TimestampsEnabled: 0 WinScaleRcvd: 2147483647 WinScaleSent: 2147483647 DupAcksOut: 0 StartTimeUsec: 430746 Duration: 10553072 c2sData: 2 c2sAck: 1 s2cData: 2 s2cAck: 2 half_duplex: 0 link: 100 congestion: 1 bad_cable: 0 mismatch: 0 spd: 0.00 bw: 0.22 loss: 0.009950249 avgrtt: 511.53 waitsec: 0.00 timesec: 10.00 order: 0.3040 rwintime: 0.0000 sendtime: 0.0036 cwndtime: 0.9964 rwin: 0.2451 swin: 8.5039 cwin: 0.2005 rttsec: 0.511526 Sndbuf: 1114624 Checking for mismatch condition (cwndtime > .3) [0.99>.3], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [13140>0], (PktsRetrans/sec > 2) [0.8>2], (estimate > 2) [0.22>2] Checking for mismatch on uplink (speed > 50 [0>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [0.03<5] (rwintime > .9) [0>.9], (loss < .01) [0.00<.01] Checking for excessive errors condition (loss/sec > .15) [9.95>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.99>.6], (loss < .01) [0.00<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [13140>0] Checking for 10 Mbps link (speed < 9.5) [0<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [0>3.0] (xmitspeed < 9.5) [0.03<9.5] (loss < .01) [0.00<.01], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for Wireless link (sendtime = 0) [0.00=0], (speed < 5) [0<5] (Estimate > 50 [0.22>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0>.90] (RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [0/1=1], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link (speed < 2) [0<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0] (SendTime = 0) [0.0036=0], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for half-duplex condition (rwintime > .95) [0>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0>30], (SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30], OR (mylink <= 10) [3.0<=10] Checking for congestion (cwndtime > .02) [0.99>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0] (MaxSsthresh > 0) [13140>0] estimate = 0.22 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 511.53msec, and loss = 0.009950249 The theoretical network limit is 0.22 Mbps The NDT server has a 1088.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 16.62 Mbps Your PC/Workstation has a 31.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 0.47 Mbps The network based flow control limits the throughput to 0.39 Mbps Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'Dial-up' Server Data reports link is 'T1', Server Acks report link is 'T1' Now the Statistics : WEB100 Enabled Statistics: Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 34.51Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 223.41kb/s ------ Client System Details ------ OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1 Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.4.2 ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found. Link set to Full Duplex mode Information: throughput is limited by other network traffic. Good network cable(s) found Normal duplex operation found. Web100 reports the Round trip time = 511.53 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and There were 8 packets retransmitted, 38 duplicate acks received, and 38 SACK blocks received The connection was idle 0 seconds (0%) of the time This connection is network limited 99.64% of the time. Contact your local network administrator to report a network problem Contact your local network admin and report excessive packet reordering Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: OFF Packet size is preserved End-to-End Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address Server says [195.182.95.61] but Client says [192.168.0.11] The speeds : Download: Your connection is: 235 Kbps (about 0.2 Mbps) You downloaded at: 29 kB/s Your TRuSPEED: ^info^ 251 Kbps :: 31 kB/s (7% overhead factored) Bottom Line: You are running: 4 times faster than 56K and can download 1 megabyte in 35.31 second(s) Diagnosis: ^info^ Awesome! 20% + : 45.06 % faster than the average for host (is.lt) Upload : Your connection is: 38 Kbps (about 0 Mbps) You uploaded at: 5 kB/s Your TRuSPEED: ^info^ 41 Kbps :: 5 kB/s (7% overhead factored) Bottom Line: You are running: 1 times faster than 56K and can upload 1 megabyte in 204.8 second(s) Diagnosis: ^info^ Awesome! 20% + : 65.22 % faster than the average for host (is.lt) Results Comparison Rofl I got one thing . That my Download speed is Typical DLS or Cable coz my internet tested the 380++ file in 9,5 seconds . DSL 3-12 . But ! The Upload is like Dial-UP.
  15. I need to post my download and upload speed here or to post that Big test with More Details and Statistics?
  16. KK did that , i couldn't done coz my brownser OPERA couldn't connect with java , so i opened the good olll IE and did the test . Here are the results. In my next post ofcourse
  17. Ohh ok , i got it now : Statistics: WEB100 Enabled Statistics: Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 55.52Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 226.23kb/s ------ Client System Details ------ OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1 Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.4.2 ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found. Link set to Full Duplex mode Information: throughput is limited by other network traffic. Good network cable(s) found Normal duplex operation found. Web100 reports the Round trip time = 439.51 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and There were 9 packets retransmitted, 29 duplicate acks received, and 29 SACK blocks received The connection was idle 0 seconds (0%) of the time This connection is network limited 99.66% of the time. Contact your local network administrator to report a network problem Contact your local network admin and report excessive packet reordering Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: OFF Packet size is preserved End-to-End Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address Server says [195.182.95.61] but Client says [192.168.0.11] More Details : WEB100 Kernel Variables: Client: localhost/127.0.0.1 AckPktsIn: 117 AckPktsOut: 0 BytesRetrans: 13140 CongAvoid: 51 CongestionOverCount: 0 CongestionSignals: 2 CountRTT: 81 CurCwnd: 13140 CurMSS: 1460 CurRTO: 616 CurRwinRcvd: 64240 CurRwinSent: 5840 CurSsthresh: 8760 DSACKDups: 0 DataBytesIn: 0 DataBytesOut: 293460 DataPktsIn: 0 DataPktsOut: 201 DupAcksIn: 29 ECNEnabled: 0 FastRetran: 2 MaxCwnd: 26280 MaxMSS: 1460 MaxRTO: 959 MaxRTT: 642 MaxRwinRcvd: 64240 MaxRwinSent: 5840 MaxSsthresh: 13140 MinMSS: 1460 MinRTO: 614 MinRTT: 301 MinRwinRcvd: 64240 MinRwinSent: 5840 NagleEnabled: 1 OtherReductions: 0 PktsIn: 117 PktsOut: 201 PktsRetrans: 9 X_Rcvbuf: 1114624 RcvWinScale: 2147483647 SACKEnabled: 3 SACKsRcvd: 29 SendStall: 0 SlowStart: 28 SampleRTT: 362 SmoothedRTT: 407 X_Sndbuf: 1114624 SndWinScale: 2147483647 SndLimTimeRwin: 0 SndLimTimeCwnd: 10809887 SndLimTimeSender: 37246 SndLimTransRwin: 0 SndLimTransCwnd: 1 SndLimTransSender: 1 SndLimBytesRwin: 0 SndLimBytesCwnd: 293460 SndLimBytesSender: 0 SubsequentTimeouts: 0 SumRTT: 35600 Timeouts: 0 TimestampsEnabled: 0 WinScaleRcvd: 2147483647 WinScaleSent: 2147483647 DupAcksOut: 0 StartTimeUsec: 203757 Duration: 10857620 c2sData: 2 c2sAck: 1 s2cData: 8 s2cAck: 2 half_duplex: 0 link: 100 congestion: 1 bad_cable: 0 mismatch: 0 spd: 0.00 bw: 0.25 loss: 0.009950249 avgrtt: 439.51 waitsec: 0.00 timesec: 10.00 order: 0.2479 rwintime: 0.0000 sendtime: 0.0034 cwndtime: 0.9966 rwin: 0.4901 swin: 8.5039 cwin: 0.2005 rttsec: 0.439506 Sndbuf: 1114624 Checking for mismatch condition (cwndtime > .3) [0.99>.3], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [13140>0], (PktsRetrans/sec > 2) [0.9>2], (estimate > 2) [0.25>2] Checking for mismatch on uplink (speed > 50 [0>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [0.05<5] (rwintime > .9) [0>.9], (loss < .01) [0.00<.01] Checking for excessive errors condition (loss/sec > .15) [9.95>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.99>.6], (loss < .01) [0.00<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [13140>0] Checking for 10 Mbps link (speed < 9.5) [0<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [0>3.0] (xmitspeed < 9.5) [0.05<9.5] (loss < .01) [0.00<.01], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for Wireless link (sendtime = 0) [0.00=0], (speed < 5) [0<5] (Estimate > 50 [0.25>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0>.90] (RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [0/1=1], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link (speed < 2) [0<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0] (SendTime = 0) [0.0034=0], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for half-duplex condition (rwintime > .95) [0>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0>30], (SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30], OR (mylink <= 10) [3.0<=10] Checking for congestion (cwndtime > .02) [0.99>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0] (MaxSsthresh > 0) [13140>0] estimate = 0.25 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 439.51msec, and loss = 0.009950249 The theoretical network limit is 0.25 Mbps The NDT server has a 1088.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 19.34 Mbps Your PC/Workstation has a 62.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 1.11 Mbps The network based flow control limits the throughput to 0.45 Mbps Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'Dial-up' Server Data reports link is 'OC-48', Server Acks report link is 'T1'
  18. How exatcly to do the tests trogers ?
  19. Your connection is: 233 Kbps (about 0.2 Mbps) You downloaded at: 28 kB/s Your TRuSPEED: ^info^ 249 Kbps :: 30 kB/s (7% overhead factored) Bottom Line: You are running: 4 times faster than 56K and can download 1 megabyte in 36.57 second(s) Diagnosis: ^info^ Awesome! 20% + : 56.38 % faster than the average for host (is.lt) Upload still very bad . I think that ccs file you gave me 32120-32120-1500.ccs is better than this one 64240-6420st.ccs. Coz download speed was better then . No electiric things near my white box.
  20. Download Very Good! : Your connection is: 336 Kbps (about 0.3 Mbps) You downloaded at: 41 kB/s Your TRuSPEED: ^info^ 360 Kbps :: 44 kB/s (7% overhead factored) Bottom Line: You are running: 6 times faster than 56K and can download 1 megabyte in 24.98 second(s) Diagnosis: ^info^ Awesome! 20% + : 145.26 % faster than the average for host (is.lt) Results Comparison Upload : Your connection is: 17 Kbps (about 0 Mbps) You uploaded at: 2 kB/s Your TRuSPEED: ^info^ 18 Kbps :: 2 kB/s (7% overhead factored) Bottom Line: You are running: 0 times faster than 56K and can upload 1 megabyte in 512 second(s) Diagnosis: ^info^ May need help : running at only 80.95 % of your hosts average (is.lt) Upload still bad
  21. K tnx Trogers i will load it and copy upload and download stats .
  22. I don't have modem , and my internet is not connected thru phone , i have antena near the my computer's window outside . And i have a white box with 2 cables connecting with 1 very big whoose connecting to antena . One blue cable connected to the white box and that blue cable goes to computer . The second is black wich connects with the Big one . And that big one connects to antena.
  23. oo and i got a some check file in my D: Disk this what it writes. The current date is: 2006.02.06 The current time is: 18:10:19,35 Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] Pinging testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=697ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=729ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=757ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=711ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=663ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=706ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=717ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=723ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=695ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=850ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=700ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=680ms TTL=47 Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85: Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 663ms, Maximum = 850ms, Average = 719ms Ping Complete. Tracing route to testmy.net [67.18.179.85] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 2 ms 7 ms 2 ms 192.168.0.1 2 531 ms * 563 ms 193.219.14.254 3 554 ms 540 ms 594 ms 193.219.13.5 4 * * * Request timed out. 5 * * * Request timed out. 6 510 ms 518 ms 519 ms 212-59-1-253.ip.takas.lt [212.59.1.253] 7 649 ms 624 ms 673 ms sl-gw10-fra-6-2.sprintlink.net [217.151.254.189] 8 518 ms 620 ms 570 ms 81.198.168.9 9 597 ms 562 ms * s-b3-geth2-0.telia.net [213.248.67.105] 10 * 509 ms 688 ms sl-bb24-nyc-9-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.9.166] 11 535 ms 676 ms 687 ms kbn-bb2-pos0-0-0.telia.net [213.248.65.29] 12 674 ms 808 ms 694 ms sl-bb24-chi-2-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.9.156] 13 693 ms * 693 ms sl-bb22-chi-9-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.26.110] 14 723 ms 731 ms 580 ms so-9-1.car1.newyork1.level3.net [209.244.160.161] 15 606 ms 612 ms 738 ms sl-timewarner-14-0.sprintlink.net [144.223.241.78] 16 716 ms 633 ms 771 ms as-0-0.bbr2.dallas1.level3.net [64.159.0.137] 17 * 685 ms 823 ms ae-23-54.car3.dallas1.level3.net [4.68.122.111] 18 * 658 ms 709 ms 4.78.221.146 19 723 ms 664 ms 657 ms 168.215.241.150 20 628 ms 699 ms 672 ms vl31.dsr02.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.30] 21 * * 739 ms gi1-0-2.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.85] 22 652 ms 593 ms 584 ms gi1-0-2.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.85] 23 694 ms 750 ms 729 ms 85.67-18-179.reverse.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85] Trace complete.
  24. Well i tryed to download a file to a friend who lives next to me with a 512/512 internet but he god only 5kb/s for me , i will test other people to make sure what's up . If i will get a new internet with a good upload and other thins me and my dad and my bro are gonna put my internet admin in judge for scaming that it's normal.
  25. 511.9 KB downloaded in 17.28 seconds. This gives a download speed of 237 kbps or 29.62 KB/s Okay this is better. But still i need to know what's wrong with my upload speed to me. Why i keep sendin the file not more than 5kb/s ?
×
×
  • Create New...