Jump to content

sucredi

Members
  • Posts

    28
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never
  • Speed Test

    My Results

Posts posted by sucredi

  1. woooo! too bad  :haha:

    :::.. Download Stats ..:::

    Connection is:: 3656 Kbps about 3.7 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

    Download Speed is:: 446 kB/s

    Tested From:: https://testmy.net  (main)

    Test Time:: 2006/03/07 - 12:28pm

    Bottom Line:: 65X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 2.3 sec

    Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 82.25 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net)

    Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-X1A6TKVCI

    ping2bo.th.png

    repeat that test during the evening and during the night.

  2. man at my work we have a packeteer installed since we had issues with a 85% usage of P2P on the network.  We installed packeteer and the usage dropped to less than 1% HOWEVER we did not introduce packetloss into the equation by having packeteer. 

    However packetloss DOES cause problems with throughoutput and Peer to Peer.  You know, encapsulate the data on a packeteer installed network and encrypt it and the packeteer won't know better and you will get high speeds until you see usage from some IP connsuming too much bandwit and you throttle it back manually or block that port so the user has to call in.

    Now encapsulate the data and do this same approach on onelink, same low speeds, now let's throw in another example let's assume they are limiting connections as well.  Well if you do limit connections then when you use a download accelerator you would not be allowed to have (So long as the server you are downloading from allows it) 5 connections downloading full speed.

    So until they replace the routers or fix whatever is wrong with the routers they have we will not know for sure. 

    that is an interesting approach to explain what is happening with onelinkpr. thank you for clarifying the aforementioned info. and no, i am not criticizing, i am actually thanking you for explaining what packeteer does and its usage with onelinkpr.

  3. man my point is that it has been posted here that by march 1rst it will be fixed, fine if you don't believe it however they have said it all along by march 1rst the transition from adelphia to onelink will be complete.

    And you are in the same boat as me I am computer sciences grad, and actually if you complain to the FCC watch how fast the company calls you home asd asks whats going on it's actually funny. Complaining is ok, but c'mon you can't bitch bitch bitch by phone you don't get any place you take the fight elsewhere. 

    And dollars to donuts they have packeteer inside their network someplace but the encpasulation should be getting around packeteer with 0 problems. So packeteer + limiting connections.

    drebel mentions it that post. drebel has inside info. since he knows a couple of onelinkpr employees who provide him with said info.

  4. OK assuming this is true how come people from Adelphia didn't buy this crap of equipment how makes you sure this is true since this people who bought craplink even would bother buy this kind of equipment, one thing for sure is that they have problems local but as of Sprint hell yea they could lease this kind of equipment to craplink but as i always say why bother buying this kind of equipment if they are having so much trouble with their router directly to Sprint??? Do a tracert and see with your eyes !!!

    ok, first thing's first:

    1. the people who bought Onelink is the same people who bought Adelphia. they are called San Juan Cable (a group of investors o inversionistas). it's not exactly buying the company, more like finding a franchise (franquicia) that can run their operations in Puerto Rico.

    2. they still have problems with their servers but it's not from Sprint. remember, the problem comes from Onelinkpr server's in PR.

    3. they use this equipment to discourage people from using p2p and bittorrent. Ellos usan este equipo para disuadir o meterle presion a la gente para que no usen esos programas. Eso es todo. Remember it's cheaper for them to do this than to upgrade their equipments and lines.

  5. they have not capped the gaming.  Not that I know of, i've been able to play weekends with no problems on onelink.  The problem is that during hours in which there is a lot of traffic the routers can't handle the load or we don't have enough bandwidth and thus you can't play.  Simple as that, I've also been able to download torrents with no problems true not running at 300k or 250k it's been some time but i've seen them up to 100k.

    Now you guys are all working on rumors as I said before.  Wait for the fix to be done then test your P2P if it continues then you have all the right to bitch and moan about it.  But since onelink still has issues all you can do is sit tight and wait until they get fixed. March 1st is next week.

    that means it's time to call them even more now people. the majority of you are paying $55 a month and obviously it's not just for simple web browsing and checking your e-mail... so let's start calling them up and force them to provide customer satisfaction. hell, even drebel encourages you (and he usually is pro-Onelink)...

  6. :whaa: I haven't used skype in a wile ... is true that skype is blocked or something funny is happening with the program?

    I just need confirmation.

    *searches for gun and ready*

    yes, a tech support supervisor told me skype was one of the programs being blocked in order to test customer reactions for when they launch (onelink) their own VoiP (voice over ip) service similar to Skype but one they'll charge you for.

  7. judging from what's been happening over the weekend I'd have to agree with a few fellows in the board: time to call up onelinkpr and start bitching:

    1) call them up and request them to uncap the bandwidth. that means everything, from p2p to skype (Voice over IP) and online gaming

    2) request for them to provide real data about current latency (The time between initiating a request for data and the beginning of the actual data transfer.) which means they have tell you when they expect the packet loss problem to be solved.

    3) ask them whether they'll be "experimenting" during the nights so as to prevent frustration during that time because the internet's messed up

    4) tell them you want credit for the nights your connection has been unstable due to latency and timeout problems

  8. Apparently they've now started to fix the problems. The timeouts and packetloss are related to them rerouting their connections to the new backbone. Do a traceroute on your own ip and see it for yourserlves:

    http://www.dnsstuff.com/

    Look in that site at the right side of the page. You'll see the traceroute feature and put in your own ip there and trace it and you'll see. Let's hope the ISP fixes the problems by this weekend or early next week.

    *note: the backbone being shown is Qwest, and not Adelphia (any word on Qwest backbone quality?)

  9. Check out various webpages you will see more and more ISPs are actually throttling bittorrent traffic, and if encryption gets in the way then they just limit the amount of concurrent connections.

    someone here reported that torrents are lately very capped. looks like you know more than you're saying and obviously they (your onelinkpr friends) told you that they're limiting the concurrent connections (or rather the number of connections established per torrent) to limit the bandwidth, slow your torrent down to dial-up levels and monopolize the service exclusively for visiting pages and reading email lol :)

  10. the graph results indicate the severe lag starts during the evening. why? because there are more people using the Intenret in their homes after they get in from work or whatnot. In addition to the problems caused by the Onelinkpr bandwidth capping, this causes lag noticeable by users with a sharp eye - noticing the drop in speed at those hours. obviously Onelinkpr is the culprit, and not the Adelphia routers as some people keep suggesting. do a tracert; you'll notice that Onelinkpr servers are having extreme packet loss, and causing speed problems for Onelinkpr' s clients. this in addition to Onelinkpr's bandwidth capping is severely affecting Onelinkpr's overall Internet service.

  11. by Feb 12 all problems should be fixed , right now half of the servers are from Onelink which are working perfectly fine ,but half of the servers are adelphiacom , those are giving packet loss and speed problems. you must wait , the transition is not over yet.

    Where'd you get this information and how good is it?

    also, what exactly are they going to do on Feb. 12 to solve "all the problems"? Another user, drebel, indicated the transition would be completed the 1st of March.

    i'm a little bit confused here, and everyone else probably is as well. Could you clarify this information for us? thanks.

  12. ok, TheSavior. i just got off the phone and asked about online gaming as well (i play WoW too) and they said online gaming is approached at the same way as with p2p/bittorrent.

    they've limited bandwidth for online gaming as well stating that "online gaming takes too much bandwidth and is second to p2p/bittorrent". dude, what the hell :-/

  13. I called Onelinkpr's tech support, earlier. I asked when they were going to finally finish the transition from Adelphia to Onelink, and why not increase the server farm (2 servers) from many others and uncapping the bandwidth. The techie asked how I got a hold of such confidential information, and then asked for my phone # to see if I had any problems with my line. Obviously he was looking to jot something down on my account. I of course didn't provide it. When I asked why the techie's own Powerlink connections were uncapped (in their homes) he said: "It is a privilege for us to have unrestricted and complete access to the bandwidth.

  14. apparently the techies are planning on permamently blocking p2p and bittorrent. it seems they find it easier to block that and "patch the bandwidth problem" rather than they doing their job instead of hassling the clients with useless restrictions and charging $60/month for web browsing and e-mail only. word on the grapevine is they won't give "credit" (discounts on the monthly bills for those who were affected by the Internet blackouts and internal testing/experimenting) to "abusers" (p2p/bittorrenters) and especially people who complain, who they claim hassle them. They are refusing to give credit to you if you complain? this fascist crap has to stop now! how can we tolerate this crap?

  15. yeah. it's obvious now, after what you said, that they ARE blocking ports. bittorrent specifically needs tcp and udp ports open; if one of them is closed (particularly udp) then your download speeds (and uploads) will suck, which is what's happening now.

    they're being pretty gay about this, and it's pissing me off. we're paying $60/month for crappy service that craps out even more when they start tweaking sh*t.

    what we need to do is ask to be given a credit for each time the service fouled up and we couldn't use the internet. in fact, we should ask to be given a credit for the nights the service has been giving us problems, which has been the last few nights.

    and what's worse, people here still believe the whole problem comes from miami.

    people: the problem is not with the miami line, the problem is with the techies and how, when they start blocking ports (tcp and udp) the lines get fouled up and the bandwidth suffers. i mean, they're blocking too much stuff, and this is what makes the line suffer (during the day, afternoon and well into the night).

    when you guys call the techies, ask to speak to the supervisor in charge. and ask to be given the credit. this will make them think twice about "experimenting" with the lines again and making us the clients suffer for it.

×
×
  • Create New...