jackyandjoe

rammolo, what is your default gateway, maybe going through that route is better than some of ours. mine is 70.45.24.1 and really sucks...

wow, look at this tracert, can anyone help me other than my ISP?/?? this is awful, and this supposed to be a 4mb cable connection, been having lots of problems. I am running cable nut settings for cable already... Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. tracert www.tetmy.net Tracing route to www.tetmy.net [64.20.33.4] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 932 ms 1004 ms 1001 ms host-70-45-24-1.onelinkpr.net [70.45.24.1] 2 972 ms 801 ms 1160 ms host-70-45-105-58.onelinkpr.net [70.45.105.58] 3 1042 ms 999 ms 1017 ms host-70-45-94-29.onelinkpr.net [70.45.94.29] 4 1107 ms 810 ms * sl-st20-mia-6-2-2.sprintlink.net [144.223.64.137 ] 5 869 ms * 962 ms sl-bb21-mia-12-0-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.2.196 ] 6 1062 ms * 716 ms sl-bb21-dc-14-0-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.9.27] 7 862 ms 1001 ms 1185 ms sl-st22-ash-12-0-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.9.123 ] 8 1033 ms 789 ms 972 ms sl-tisca1-3-0.sprintlink.net [144.223.246.30] 9 635 ms * * so-0-0-0.nyc33.ip.tiscali.net [213.200.81.90] 10 874 ms * 977 ms wbs-njiix-gw.ip.tiscali.net [213.200.66.222] 11 1273 ms 1056 ms 947 ms core-01-teb1.us.njiix.net [64.20.32.174] 12 * 1203 ms 988 ms edge-01-teb1.us.njiix.net [64.20.32.2] 13 * * * Request timed out. 14 * * * Request timed out. 15 * * * Request timed out. 16 * * * Request timed out. 17 * * * Request timed out. 18 * * * Request timed out. 19 * * * Request timed out. 20 * * * Request timed out. 21 * * * Request timed out. 22 * * * Request timed out. 23 * * * Request timed out. 24 * * * Request timed out. 25 * * * Request timed out. 26 * * * Request timed out. 27 * * * Request timed out. 28 * * * Request timed out. 29 * * * Request timed out. 30 * * * Request timed out. Trace complete.

well, it doesn't really matter whether is capped at 3 or 4 MB if their services sucks, they keep restricting the bandwith and with their new VOIP is worse, we still get sloppy service, that is what no competition does, they get to do whatever they want since we have no where to go to...

:angry4:well, they sucking again, no improvement whatsoever, look at this crazy shit.. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 235 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 386 kB) Download Speed is:: 29 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2007/04/16 - 7:10pm well, maybe an unsatisfied customer walks in tomorrow to their main offices and go nuts like that Virginia guy, then they may start listening and fix this crapy sh*t. they can limit the p2p but why slow down the whole system.... Bottom Line:: 4X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 35.31 sec Tested from a 386 kB file and took 13.437 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 9.99 % of your hosts average (onelinkpr.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-4L35TQ9UB User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1) [!]

also, all the tests i perform most of my ports are closed or blocked

well, all of them are either blocked or closed when i run the tests from various port sniffer sites like whatismyip.com site... and i am not behind a firewall when i test.

thanks elite however it has 1000 features where would i look to see if is blocking ports?? that is, if this modem is capable of it, or maybe turning off DHCP so i can set static ip...

I know they blocking some, however, i would still like to know how to view my cable modem setting to see if this one has a router feature build into it.. cause i am having problems when using my router with it... thanks...

well, here are more test after 4:00pm here at PR.. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 4696 Kbps about 4.7 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB) Download Speed is:: 573 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/02 - 1:29pm Bottom Line:: 84X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1.79 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 123.3 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-3RSL4XT1M :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 4738 Kbps about 4.7 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB) Download Speed is:: 578 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/02 - 1:37pm Bottom Line:: 85X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1.77 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 125.3 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-YKEM68ZLF and yess is true they already changed the routers from adelphia to sprint, i also did a test with virtual route look... ===================================================================================== === VisualRoute ® 2006 Server Edition (v10.0e) report on Mar 3, 2006 4:46:12 PM === ===================================================================================== Report for [host-xx-xx-xx-xx.onelinkpr.net] Analysis: IP packets are being lost past network "San Juan Cable, LLC SJCL-SAN-JUAN" at hop 13. VisualRoute cannot determine the next network at hop 14. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Hop | %Loss | IP Address | Node Name | Location | Tzone | ms | Graph | Network | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 0 | | 205.234.111.185 | DTG316.visualware.com | * | | | | Defender Technologies Group, LLC DEFENDER-1 | | 1 | | 205.234.111.129 | r03-8.iad.defenderhosting.com | Washington, DC, USA | -05:00 | 0 | x | Defender Technologies Group, LLC DEFENDER-1 | | 2 | | 205.234.111.17 | r01.iad.defenderhosting.com | Washington, DC, USA | -05:00 | 1 | x | Defender Technologies Group, LLC DEFENDER-1 | | 3 | | 208.173.50.153 | - | ?Cary, NC, USA | -05:00 | 0 | x | Savvis SAVVIS | | 4 | | 208.173.50.166 | sl-st21-ash-5-1.sprintlink.net | Ashburn, VA, USA | -05:00 | 0 | x | Savvis SAVVIS | | 5 | | 144.232.20.135 | sl-bb26-rly-6-0.sprintlink.net | Relay, MD, USA | -05:00 | 18 | x--- | Sprint SPRINT-INNET9 | | 6 | | 144.232.14.173 | sl-bb22-rly-9-0.sprintlink.net | Relay, MD, USA | -05:00 | 3 | x- | Sprint SPRINT-INNET9 | | 7 | | 144.232.7.253 | sl-bb21-rly-12-0.sprintlink.net | Relay, MD, USA | -05:00 | 6 | x-- | Sprint SPRINT-INNET9 | | 8 | | 144.232.20.176 | sl-bb21-atl-6-0.sprintlink.net | Atlanta, GA, USA | -05:00 | 19 | x- | Sprint SPRINT-INNET9 | | 9 | | 144.232.20.127 | sl-bb20-orl-14-2.sprintlink.net | Orlando, FL, USA | | 36 | x---- | Sprint SPRINT-INNET9 | | 10 | | 144.232.8.22 | sl-st20-mia-4-0.sprintlink.net | Miami, FL, USA | | 63 | -x------- | Sprint SPRINT-INNET9 | | 11 | | 144.223.64.138 | sl-sanju-1-0.sprintlink.net | ?Kansas City, MO | | 32 | x | Sprint/United Information Service SPRINT-INNET | | 12 | | 70.45.94.74 | host-70-45-94-74.onelinkpr.net | ?San Juan, Puerto Rico | -04:00 | 55 | x | San Juan Cable, LLC SJCL-SAN-JUAN | | 13 | 30 | 70.45.94.97 | host-70-45-94-97.onelinkpr.net | ?San Juan, Puerto Rico | -04:00 | 54 | x | San Juan Cable, LLC SJCL-SAN-JUAN | | ... | | | | | | | | | | ? | | xx.xx.xx.xx | host-xx-xx-xx-xx.onelinkpr.net | ?San Juan, Puerto Rico | -04:00 | | | San Juan Cable, LLC SJCL-SAN-JUAN | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ they still having problems here at the island because they only have 2 servers, they need to fix that, one interesting thing is that i hit the link in the host 7 and here is the info it gave me.. Administrative Contact: engleman, jeffrey [email protected] Urb industrial tres monjitas 1 calle manuel camunas san juan, puerto rico 00918 PR 787-717-8080 787-250-7570 there you go now go and attack that dude by phone calls and emails... hehehe

:icon_pale:Is there a software that I can use to get into this specific type of cable modem (Motorola Surfboard SB5100). My problem is that my public IP shown here is different than the IP on my pc. My problem is that i recently purchased a Linsys MRT54G and I can not do Port Forward for online games and filesharing etc. and even without the router the ports are blocked. I suspect that my cablemodem is on of those with router built in features and that my ISP (onelinkpr) is using it to block all these ports. thank you all for your help..

in a flash...

I am not using back button, PHP-- could you pull that page again to c if is not cached... tnx.... advertized speed is up to 4.0 mbps average speed is 2.7...

and another one, and i have filesharing downling stuff.. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 5704 Kbps about 5.7 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 696 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: Thu Mar 2 16:46:46 UTC-0400 2006 Bottom Line:: 102X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.47 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 169.82 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-DFQBXCU2S

another one... :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 9900 Kbps about 9.9 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1208 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: Thu Mar 2 16:33:27 UTC-0400 2006 Bottom Line:: 177X faster than 56K 1MB download in 0.85 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 368.31 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-2VRFBH9AS

jezzz, what a bummer... so what i need to do to get my real speed then??? i have tried againg a few time and look... :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 8710 Kbps about 8.7 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1063 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: Thu Mar 2 16:24:20 UTC-0400 2006 Bottom Line:: 156X faster than 56K 1MB download in 0.96 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 312.02 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-PUTJE106A

Well all I can tell you is that i believe they are working on it, its just taking them some time, B4 I used to be bellow 1.00 mbps this are my results today.... :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 10332 Kbps about 10.3 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1261 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: Thu Mar 2 07:57:24 UTC-0400 2006 Bottom Line:: 185X faster than 56K 1MB download in 0.81 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 388.51 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-X2HQLZ84N Cant complaint about that, one thing i got to say is that I do not achieve this speed on pick hours though... so they still restricting somethings during those hours, and of course i still have problems with the port blocking issue, it seem they blocking everything throuth our cable/modem which I suspect is one of those cablemodems with router built in features.... just my 2 cents...

:::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 12501 Kbps about 12.5 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1526 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: Tue Feb 28 17:21:49 UTC-0400 2006 Bottom Line:: 223X faster than 56K 1MB download in 0.67 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 486.9 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-QJF0I83MC test it 3 times with both browsers, i still can not believe it.... specially with all the problems we are having down here at Puerto Rico with the change from adelphia to onelink...

no i dont have the latest firmawre installed, i am a computer perso so i can go ahead and install it, could you please point me out to where i can get it from?? thank you... ahh, and of course if there is a guide for the check boxes with it,,, thank you... Btw, i also was reading that this router is full duplex, and i think my connection is half duplex, dont know how to verify this, thank you.. also, is there a program that i can view my router and modem settings, thank you..

Hi all, i just got me a Linksys Wireless Router (WRT54G) and connected to my PC, the problem is that my speed now slows down drastically, without the Router my test speed is 3.7 mbps and with it is on 1.2mbps. This is the first time i install a router and also i im running cablenut with a custom MTU 1500 ccs file... What could be the problem??? thank You all....

trogers, thanks for looking into all that crap, cause i sure dont understad it,,, well, my eth card is already set to half duplex since is connected directly to the cable modem which is a motorola sb5100 and is what that link you gave me was basically telling to do... unless it is the modem that is set otherwise, how can i look to the modem settings??? if you need me to....

No, i am at Puerto Rico, current ISP is onelink which just took over adelphia... here is what u asked for... and tnx again... TCP/Web100 Network Diagnostic Tool v5.3.3d click START to begin Another client is currently being served, your test will begin within 45 seconds Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 461.74Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 2.52Mb/s The slowest link in the end-to-end path is a 10 Mbps Ethernet subnet Alarm: Duplex mismatch condition exists: Host set to Full and Switch set to Half duplex click START to re-test WEB100 Enabled Statistics: Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 461.74Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 2.52Mb/s ------ Client System Details ------ OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1 Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.5.0_05 ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ 10 Mbps Ethernet link found. Link set to Full Duplex mode No network congestion discovered. Good network cable(s) found Alarm: Duplex mismatch condition found: Host set to Full and Switch set to Half duplexD Web100 reports the Round trip time = 158.22 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and There were 31 packets retransmitted, 154 duplicate acks received, and 60 SACK blocks received The connection was idle 0 seconds (0%) of the time This connection is network limited 99.95% of the time. Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: ON Packet size is preserved End-to-End Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Client IP addresses are preserved End-to-End WEB100 Kernel Variables: Client: localhost/127.0.0.1 AckPktsIn: 308 AckPktsOut: 0 BytesRetrans: 44608 CongAvoid: 23 CongestionOverCount: 0 CongestionSignals: 1 CountRTT: 146 CurCwnd: 62780 CurMSS: 1460 CurRTO: 390 CurRwinRcvd: 256960 CurRwinSent: 16304 CurSsthresh: 61320 DSACKDups: 0 DataBytesIn: 0 DataBytesOut: 3236528 DataPktsIn: 0 DataPktsOut: 2220 DupAcksIn: 154 ECNEnabled: 0 FastRetran: 1 MaxCwnd: 124100 MaxMSS: 1460 MaxRTO: 610 MaxRTT: 340 MaxRwinRcvd: 256960 MaxRwinSent: 16304 MaxSsthresh: 61320 MinMSS: 1460 MinRTO: 300 MinRTT: 100 MinRwinRcvd: 64240 MinRwinSent: 16304 NagleEnabled: 1 OtherReductions: 0 PktsIn: 308 PktsOut: 2220 PktsRetrans: 31 X_Rcvbuf: 103424 RcvWinScale: 7 SACKEnabled: 3 SACKsRcvd: 60 SendStall: 0 SlowStart: 122 SampleRTT: 110 SmoothedRTT: 140 X_Sndbuf: 103424 SndWinScale: 2 SndLimTimeRwin: 0 SndLimTimeCwnd: 10021560 SndLimTimeSender: 4968 SndLimTransRwin: 0 SndLimTransCwnd: 8 SndLimTransSender: 8 SndLimBytesRwin: 0 SndLimBytesCwnd: 2668228 SndLimBytesSender: 568300 SubsequentTimeouts: 0 SumRTT: 23100 Timeouts: 0 TimestampsEnabled: 0 WinScaleRcvd: 2 WinScaleSent: 7 DupAcksOut: 0 StartTimeUsec: 917719 Duration: 10030049 c2sData: 3 c2sAck: 3 s2cData: 8 s2cAck: 3 half_duplex: 0 link: 100 congestion: 0 bad_cable: 0 mismatch: 1 spd: 0.00 bw: 3.32 loss: 0.000450450 avgrtt: 158.22 waitsec: 0.00 timesec: 10.00 order: 0.5000 rwintime: 0.0000 sendtime: 0.0005 cwndtime: 0.9995 rwin: 1.9604 swin: 64.0000 cwin: 0.9468 rttsec: 0.158219 Sndbuf: 8388608 aspd: 7.21059 Checking for mismatch on uplink (speed > 50 [0>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [0.46<5] (rwintime > .9) [0>.9], (loss < .01) [4.50<.01] Checking for excessive errors condition (loss/sec > .15) [4.50>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.99>.6], (loss < .01) [4.50<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [61320>0] Checking for 10 Mbps link (speed < 9.5) [0<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [0>3.0] (xmitspeed < 9.5) [0.46<9.5] (loss < .01) [4.50<.01], (mylink > 0) [10.0>0] Checking for Wireless link (sendtime = 0) [5.0E=0], (speed < 5) [0<5] (Estimate > 50 [3.32>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0>.90] (RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [0/8=1], (mylink > 0) [10.0>0] Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link (speed < 2) [0<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [8=0] (SendTime = 0) [5.0E-4=0], (mylink > 0) [10.0>0] Checking for half-duplex condition (rwintime > .95) [0>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0>30], (SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.8>30], OR (mylink <= 10) [10.0<=10] Checking for congestion (cwndtime > .02) [0.99>.02], (mismatch = 0) [1=0] (MaxSsthresh > 0) [61320>0] estimate = 3.32 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 158.22msec, and loss = 4.5045E-4 The theoretical network limit is 3.32 Mbps The NDT server has a 8192.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 404.50 Mbps Your PC/Workstation has a 250.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 12.39 Mbps The network based flow control limits the throughput to 5.98 Mbps Client Data reports link is 'Ethernet', Client Acks report link is 'Ethernet' Server Data reports link is 'OC-48', Server Acks report link is 'Ethernet'

Thanks Trogers, dled and applied already, here are my results now from the tcp analizer, and also the dl test,, please let me know if i should do anything else, as you can see is not even reaching 4 mbps although it did get better now with that file thank you... Browser/OS = Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; (none); .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Notes: Read the Analyzer FAQ if the above is not your IP address. TCP options string = 020405b40103030201010402 MTU = 1500 MTU is fully optimized for broadband. MSS = 1460 Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which equals MSS. Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 256960 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 2 bits (scale factor of 4) Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 64240 RWIN is a multiple of MSS Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 513920 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 128480 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2) 64240 (MSS x 44) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your TCP Window limits you to: 10278.4 kbps (1284.8 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your TCP Window limits you to: 4111.36 kbps (513.92 KBytes/s) @ 500ms MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 55 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000 (0) __________________________________________ :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3690 Kbps about 3.7 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 450 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: Sat Feb 11 12:53:38 UTC-0400 2006 Bottom Line:: 66X faster than 56K 1MB download in 2.28 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 69.03 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-PDKBQX809

Trogers - what would be the best cablenut file for me?? my MTU is 1500 and my modem is capped for 8.0mbps... I am currently using Cable & DSL 30000.ccs one from vanbuners.. Here are my results from the tcp analizer Browser/OS = Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; (none); .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Notes: Read the Analyzer FAQ if the above is not your IP address. TCP options string = 020405b40103030301010402 MTU = 1500 MTU is fully optimized for broadband. MSS = 1460 Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which equals MSS. Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 513920 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 3 bits (scale factor of 6) Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 64240 RWIN is a multiple of MSS Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 256960 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4) 128480 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2) 64240 (MSS x 44) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your TCP Window limits you to: 20556.8 kbps (2569.6 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your TCP Window limits you to: 8222.72 kbps (1027.84 KBytes/s) @ 500ms MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 55 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000 (0) what else would you need?? thanks for the help...

Wanna know about packet lost just look here http://www.dslreports.com/badrouters it identifies all the bad routers that are lossing packets on a daily basis from almost all companies,, as u can see, adelphia net and com are the worse ones... only 1 or 2 from onelink.... i hope they get rid of adelphia pronto.....

i believe our problems is the routers from adelphia, look here http://www.dslreports.com/badrouters.... wonder when they gonna fix it or just eliminate them....