Jump to content

FiberOptic

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    524

  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

  • Speed Test

    My Results

 Content Type 

Posts posted by FiberOptic

    Linux Server Optimization?

    in Linux Help

    Posted

    Oh.. their France Datacenter. Yeah, that looked pretty sh*te to me too.. but they gave me the option to move into one of the ones in Netherlands (mainly for the fact of the torrent business).

    I think its Netrouting or Graffix or something (or it peers through them to the uk).. Not too sure though. But for the price even with the specs at the moment, it doesnt hardly break the bank and imo, seems like an awsome deal! :D (I can watch my ratio fly high  :haha:)

    Linux Server Optimization?

    in Linux Help

    Posted

    Hi D :)

    Thanks for your comments. They have reassured me it is not a shared pipe. I just got thinking about the HDD Read/Write speeds limiting, which you have reaffirmed  :buck2:

    Just installed some apps through wine and running some synchronous downloads and uploads, and I am more closer to the figure (well, closer then before, but then baring in mind the HDD limitations).

    That said, although its not that high, its uber-cool seeing a 5gb movie download in a few minutes  :2funny: now just getting it onto my pc is going to be the hard bit  :uglystupid2:

    -K

    Linux Server Optimization?

    in Linux Help

    Posted

    Heya Guys and Girls. Just a quick question for all you linux experts :)

    Recently, (Actually, Just a couple of days ago), I got a couple of dedi-servers from OVH (http://www.ovh.co.uk/products/mgplus.xml) all is fine. Super-Duper responces etc. However, my main uses were/was going to be a seedbox (where I can seed/leech my torrents from) and then sell a few slots off (use up some of the pipe).

    Both servers claim to be on 1Gbps pipes, yet, I am unable to transfer files at anywhere near those speeds.

    -bash-3.1# wget ftp://dl.xs4all.nl/pub/test/100mb.bin

    --12:52:48--  ftp://dl.xs4all.nl/pub/test/100mb.bin

              => `100mb.bin.1'

    Resolving dl.xs4all.nl... 194.109.21.66

    Connecting to dl.xs4all.nl|194.109.21.66|:21... connected.

    Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in!

    ==> SYST ... done.    ==> PWD ... done.

    ==> TYPE I ... done.  ==> CWD /pub/test ... done.

    ==> SIZE 100mb.bin ... 104857600

    ==> PASV ... done.    ==> RETR 100mb.bin ... done.

    Length: 104857600 (100M)

    80% [==============================================================================================>                      ] 84,910,888  36.7M/s  eta 0s

    ^^I am certain that host server (for the files) is able to max out way more then that. So I was wondering are there any tweaks (or general optimizations) I can apply etc? (I am starting to know a fair bit of Linux and dandy with the commands etc).

    New Dallas, TX Server! Transfer in progress!

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    C:Users08KeiranW>ping 75.125.181.200

    Pinging 75.125.181.200 with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 75.125.181.200: bytes=32 time=98ms TTL=47

    Reply from 75.125.181.200: bytes=32 time=96ms TTL=47

    Reply from 75.125.181.200: bytes=32 time=102ms TTL=47

    Reply from 75.125.181.200: bytes=32 time=98ms TTL=47

    Ping statistics for 75.125.181.200:

        Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

        Minimum = 96ms, Maximum = 102ms, Average = 99ms

    C:Users08KeiranW>ping 74.54.226.170

    Pinging 74.54.226.170 with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 74.54.226.170: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=55

    Reply from 74.54.226.170: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=55

    Reply from 74.54.226.170: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=55

    Reply from 74.54.226.170: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=55

    Ping statistics for 74.54.226.170:

        Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

        Minimum = 76ms, Maximum = 80ms, Average = 79ms

    Great Programs

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    yeh...i too was in a hurry...fingers got stuck in fast forward...i didn't even catch it on the proof read...thx fiber for letting me know...

    Oh.. No worries.. I was just wondering what they were.. "Gen gens" as I thought they were some new invention or something  :haha:

    Virgin DSL (non-cable)

    in Virgin.net (old NTL)

    Posted

    Oh, The days of MaxDSL ("upto 8Mb").

    See my SIG now  :evil6:

    Roco, I think the UK broadband infrastructure is totally screwed. I mean the only hope with getting things sorted was Ofcom (Regulator). However when a regulator sets:

    "100kps or more - acceptable on 512Kbps products

    200kbs or more - acceptable on 1Mb products

    400kbs or more - acceptable on 2Mb, 4Mb & 8Mb products"

    ^^there really isn't any hope anymore.

    Also, What I totally find bizzare is, When an ISP buys up another ISP to create a bigger better service - and does so (taking customers from other ISPs - who are absolutely dreadful) they scream murder and the government gets involved for "unfair competition".

    Ping testmy.net

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    This is pretty interesting, (Unless my ISP has updated its routing/peering).

    C:UsersKeiran>ping testmy.net

    Pinging testmy.net [75.125.181.200] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 75.125.181.200: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=48

    Reply from 75.125.181.200: bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=48

    Reply from 75.125.181.200: bytes=32 time=95ms TTL=48

    Reply from 75.125.181.200: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=48

    Ping statistics for 75.125.181.200:

        Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

        Minimum = 89ms, Maximum = 95ms, Average = 92ms

    C:UsersKeiran>tracert testmy.net

    Tracing route to testmy.net [75.125.181.200]

    over a maximum of 30 hops:

      1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  192.168.0.1

      2    2 ms    3 ms    2 ms  cr0.wmrj.uk.easynet.net [195.189.159.54]

      3    8 ms    8 ms    9 ms  80.238.50.65

      4    22 ms    26 ms    32 ms  easynet-1.r00.londen05.uk.bb.gin.ntt.net [83.231.146.74]

      5    37 ms    38 ms    36 ms  te-3-4.r00.londen05.uk.bb.gin.ntt.net [83.231.146.73]

      6  40 ms  40 ms  41 ms  xe-3-2.r00.londen03.uk.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.3.46]

      7    42 ms    45 ms    49 ms  xe-0-1-0.r22.londen03.uk.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.2.77]

      8  52 ms  55 ms  59 ms  as-0.r20.nycmny01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.3.254]

      9  63 ms  66 ms  67 ms  ae-0.r21.nycmny01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.2.26]

    10  72 ms  73 ms  75 ms  xe-4-1.r03.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.2.229]

    11  76 ms  79 ms  82 ms  ge-1.ev1.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.10.70]

    12  85 ms  89 ms  89 ms  ivhou-207-218-223-126.ev1servers.net [207.218.223.126]

    13  92 ms  94 ms  97 ms  75.125.181.200

    Trace complete.

    Not bad considering its all the way from England.

    New Server Speed Test Result

    in Show off your speed

    Posted

    Here is mine,

    Microsoft Windows [Version 6.0.6000]

    Copyright © 2006 Microsoft Corporation.  All rights reserved.

    C:UsersKeiran Williams>ping testmy.net

    Pinging testmy.net [75.125.181.200] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 75.125.181.200: bytes=32 time=99ms TTL=51

    Reply from 75.125.181.200: bytes=32 time=91ms TTL=50

    Reply from 75.125.181.200: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=50

    Reply from 75.125.181.200: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=50

    Ping statistics for 75.125.181.200:

       Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

       Minimum = 91ms, Maximum = 99ms, Average = 94ms

    ^^Is alot better, It used to be up in the ~120/130s.

    New Server Speed Test Result

    in Show off your speed

    Posted

    Upload is way off, I used to be able to get just under a meg or so before.. :icon_pale:

    :::.. Upload Stats ..:::

    Upload Connection is:: 315 Kbps about 0.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

    Upload Speed is:: 38 kB/s

    Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)

    Test Time:: 2008/02/11 - 6:47am

    Bottom Line:: 5X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 26.95 sec

    Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 77.796 seconds to complete

    Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 25 % faster than the average for host (sky.com)

    U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-JIW7QTRA1

    User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061010 Firefox/2.0 [!]

    This is what I get from "other" sites : Upload Speed: 1638.4 kbps (204.8 KB/sec )

    New Server Speed Test Result

    in Show off your speed

    Posted

    Awesome:

    :::.. Download Stats ..:::

    Download Connection is:: 12140 Kbps about 12.1 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB)

    Download Speed is:: 1482 kB/s

    Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)

    Test Time:: 2008/02/11 - 6:44am

    Bottom Line:: 212X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.69 sec

    Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 8.205 seconds to complete

    Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 316.47 % faster than the average for host (sky.com)

    D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-NRPDAQCKF

    User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061010 Firefox/2.0 [!]

    Used to get about ~10Mb before on TMN! Great work!!

×
×
  • Create New...