Jump to content

Flashmaster

Members
  • Posts

    46
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never
  • Speed Test

    My Results

Everything posted by Flashmaster

  1. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3950 Kbps about 4 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 482 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Wed Dec 28 10:10:05 EST 2005 Bottom Line:: 71X faster than 56K 1MB download in 2.12 sec Diagnosis: 90% + Okay : running at 91.16 % of your hosts average (rr.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-NCBMWZO4J :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 361 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Upload Speed is:: 44 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Wed Dec 28 10:11:23 EST 2005 Bottom Line:: 6X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 23.27 sec Diagnosis: Looks Great : 16.08 % faster than the average for host (rr.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-T95UGFMAV Dsl Speed Test 2005-12-28 10:13:59 EST: 4565 / 264 Your download speed : 4565 kbps or 570.7 KB/sec. Your upload speed : 264 kbps or 33 KB/sec. Tweak Test http://www.broadbandreports.com/tweakr/block:1315740?service=cable&speed=5000&os=winXP&via=normal
  2. SpeedGuide.net TCP/IP Analyzer TCP properties for IP = 69.132.212.146 () Browser/OS = Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) Notes: Read the Analyzer FAQ if the above is not your IP address. TCP options string = 020405b40103030401010402 MTU = 1500 MTU is fully optimized for broadband. MSS = 1460 Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which equals MSS. Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 703488 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 4 bits (scale factor of Unscaled Receive Window = 43968 For optimum performance, consider changing RWIN to a multiple of MSS. Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 513920 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 256960 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4) 128480 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2) 64240 (MSS x 44) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your RcvWindow limits you to: 28139.52 kbps (3517.44 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your RcvWindow limits you to: 11255.808 kbps (1406.976 KBytes/s) @ 500ms MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 55 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000 (0) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The current date is: Tue 12/27/2005 The current time is: 18:43:47.79 Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] Pinging testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=48 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=48 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=48 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=48 Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 46ms, Maximum = 48ms, Average = 46ms Ping Complete. Tracing route to testmy.net [67.18.179.85] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 7 ms 8 ms 6 ms 10.66.64.1 2 8 ms 7 ms 8 ms 24.93.66.113 3 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms 24.93.66.229 4 8 ms 7 ms 8 ms 24.93.66.225 5 12 ms 13 ms 14 ms son1-0-3.rlghncrdc-rtr3.nc.rr.com [24.93.64.85] 6 22 ms 23 ms 23 ms so-8-1.car1.Washington1.Level3.net [67.29.172.5] 7 24 ms 29 ms 23 ms ae-1-53.bbr1.Washington1.Level3.net [4.68.121.65] 8 42 ms 42 ms 42 ms as-0-0.bbr2.Dallas1.Level3.net [64.159.0.137] 9 43 ms 43 ms 43 ms ae-13-53.car3.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.68.122.79] 10 47 ms 47 ms 47 ms 4.78.220.10 11 46 ms 45 ms 45 ms vl31.dsr02.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.30] 12 45 ms 48 ms 54 ms vl42.dsr02.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.91] 13 48 ms 47 ms 46 ms gi1-0-2.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.85] 14 50 ms 46 ms 46 ms 85.67-18-179.reverse.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85] Trace complete. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  3. Well Right Now I Posted My Thing In make it Faster Section,, I get 90% of my host average so i thought it was alright we.. find out tho
  4. Hey I know i asked this a long time ago, i tryed those settings again but dident work So heres my information. Spyware, and everything is cleaned,. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3942 Kbps about 3.9 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 481 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Tue Dec 27 18:30:17 EST 2005 Bottom Line:: 70X faster than 56K 1MB download in 2.13 sec Diagnosis: 90% + Okay : running at 90.91 % of your hosts average (rr.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-VWD1TZIA6 Tops Cap is 5000 Upload :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 299 Kbps about 0.3 Mbps (tested with 97 kB) Upload Speed is:: 37 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Tue Dec 27 18:31:13 EST 2005 Bottom Line:: 5X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 27.68 sec Diagnosis: 90% + Okay : running at 96.14 % of your hosts average (rr.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-OXCTDHPL3 I think cap is about 350 Tweak Test http://www.broadbandreports.com/tweakr/block:247399e?service=cable&speed=5000&os=winXP&via=normal
  5. I have the basic package only cause they charge so much, and my system is perfectly tweaked
  6. I hate road runner, I cant even host a game for more than 4 people, and even than it lags. I had Optimum Online back in New York and i could host a 12 person game in with no lag at all and the download speed was great! To bad now
  7. How is that... Its can be any virus sasser or anything
  8. Lol These This Txt Virus Can Be any Virus Such as Sasser, Blaster, and a Simple Keylogger at that! But once in txt form No Virus scanners scan it. Thats todays world they always leave something open Stupied people lol And Linux nobody bother with linux cause everyone uses Windows But I Have a Few Linux Virus Scanners and Some Virus.
  9. But How Can they Be safe still lol? When i tryed it and it gets passed Anti Virus I tested it with 2 Anti virus AVG and Norton I assume they will get past the rest lol
  10. Well I was reading some articles and i found this one here Witch i will not release cause than everbody would wanna use it!!! This is all for your protection so here it goses. DISCLAIMER: I AM NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANYHTING YOU DO WITH THE INFORMATION IN THIS ARTICLE. YOU AGREE TO ABIDE BY THIS CONDITION BY READING THIS ARTICLE. IF YOU DONT AGREE WITH THIS DONT READ THIS ARTICLE. The idea that a user could not get malicious code run on your computer from a .jpg file became false recently. And now for the first time it could be possible to get infected with a text file if it has not allready happened before. So i tryed it as the article explained and i tryed it with a virus i found online, Very Old one was dectected Mostly by all virus scaners So i did the method and what i found out tho is that Virus scanners dont pick it up. I was amazed when is saw this. So now its so easy to get past Anti virus Some one could make a program and stick the virus in ReadMe or some where. It Can BE ANY Old Virus Or Any Old Keyloggers. So Now i told you Be carful Also I tryed it and it dose work so dont tell me it dosent work
  11. Well today is a sad day for my cd rom drive and my disk http://img105.imageshack.us/my.php?image=p10100029jw.jpg Well i was playing my game and all the sudden i heard a very load noise and than boom and look what happened well lucky i have and extra copy of b2 and a whole bunch of hard drives
  12. Well Right Now What I wanna do is Have all my Pcs that have Nic Card be able to connect to the internet. so there for i have like 3 pcs can i do that with the thing i got?
  13. Hey Im getting a ASANTE 10T Ethernet 8-port Hub Now i can use that to network my pcs together with there NIC cards right? And also do i have to set any setings on that? and than i use my own modem cause i look at a picture im not sure if its the same one but it looks like its a modem to. Heres the picture http://i18.ebayimg.com/03/i/03/b1/42/5f_1_b.JPG
  14. Hey I fixed my Download Speed Thanks to you Guies, Heres the Resultes :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 4710 Kbps about 4.7 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 575 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (main) Test Time:: Sat Apr 30 11:46:54 EDT 2005 Bottom Line:: 84X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.78 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 27.82 % faster than the average for host (rr.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-23LIGYC9H Now My Upload speed is this :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 213 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 97 kB) Upload Speed is:: 26 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (main) Test Time:: Sat Apr 30 11:51:01 EDT 2005 Bottom Line:: 4X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 39.38 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 75.8 % of your hosts average (rr.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-Y01S5C6BD Any Ideas?
  15. Hey I tried But it cancles my Test I might thing that 4% loss is from my modem I got another one From when i lived in Ny From Optonline The model Number is Surfboard sb3100 Can I uses That I tryed using it but gave me an ip like 192 and i unpluged it and shit but i dunno.
  16. I already Change it to 10BaseT Also I Installed the p2p thing befor, Also What do you want me to do with http://dslnuts.com/tips_tricks.shtml Can you Help me with that pleases? Max Cap Is 5000 For DOwnload And Max UPload Is like 365
  17. Also My speed Never stays the same Keeps Changing Every Speed Test I know i can get to 4500 But this time only to 1000 2005-02-28 15:33:44 EST: 1876 / 190 Your download speed : 1921509 bps, or 1876 kbps. A 234.5 KB/sec transfer rate. Your upload speed : 194827 bps, or 190 kbps. http://speedtest.cogeco.net/ And the other one http://nitro.ucsc.edu/ TCP/Web100 Network Diagnostic Tool v5.3.3a click START to begin Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 299.61Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 4.17Mb/s Your PC is connected to a Cable/DSL modem Information: Other network traffic is congesting the link click START to re-test WEB100 Enabled Statistics: Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 299.61Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 4.17Mb/s ------ Client System Details ------ OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1 Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.4.2_04 ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found. Link set to Full Duplex mode Information: throughput is limited by other network traffic. Good network cable(s) found Normal duplex operation found. Web100 reports the Round trip time = 163.11 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and There were 21 packets retransmitted, 77 duplicate acks received, and 121 SACK blocks received The connection was idle 0 seconds (0%) of the time This connection is network limited 99.97% of the time. Contact your local network administrator to report a network problem Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: ON Packet size is preserved End-to-End Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Client IP addresses are preserved End-to-End WEB100 Kernel Variables: Client: localhost/127.0.0.1 AckPktsIn: 1845 AckPktsOut: 0 BytesRetrans: 30660 CongAvoid: 1420 CongestionOverCount: 0 CongestionSignals: 1 CountRTT: 1617 CurCwnd: 116800 CurMSS: 1460 CurRTO: 410 CurRwinRcvd: 640000 CurRwinSent: 5840 CurSsthresh: 86140 DSACKDups: 0 DataBytesIn: 0 DataBytesOut: 5305640 DataPktsIn: 0 DataPktsOut: 3634 DupAcksIn: 77 ECNEnabled: 0 FastRetran: 1 MaxCwnd: 172280 MaxMSS: 1460 MaxRTO: 440 MaxRTT: 230 MaxRwinRcvd: 640000 MaxRwinSent: 5840 MaxSsthresh: 86140 MinMSS: 1460 MinRTO: 300 MinRTT: 90 MinRwinRcvd: 40000 MinRwinSent: 5840 NagleEnabled: 1 OtherReductions: 0 PktsIn: 1845 PktsOut: 3634 PktsRetrans: 21 X_Rcvbuf: 103424 RcvWinScale: 7 SACKEnabled: 3 SACKsRcvd: 121 SendStall: 0 SlowStart: 172 SampleRTT: 200 SmoothedRTT: 190 X_Sndbuf: 103424 SndWinScale: 4 SndLimTimeRwin: 0 SndLimTimeCwnd: 10035554 SndLimTimeSender: 2516 SndLimTransRwin: 0 SndLimTransCwnd: 1 SndLimTransSender: 1 SndLimBytesRwin: 0 SndLimBytesCwnd: 5305640 SndLimBytesSender: 0 SubsequentTimeouts: 0 SumRTT: 263750 Timeouts: 0 TimestampsEnabled: 0 WinScaleRcvd: 4 WinScaleSent: 7 DupAcksOut: 0 StartTimeUsec: 89730 Duration: 10045015 c2sData: 2 c2sAck: 2 s2cData: 9 s2cAck: 3 half_duplex: 0 link: 100 congestion: 1 bad_cable: 0 mismatch: 0 spd: 0.00 bw: 4.12 loss: 0.000275179 avgrtt: 163.11 waitsec: 0.00 timesec: 10.00 order: 0.0417 rwintime: 0.0000 sendtime: 0.0003 cwndtime: 0.9997 rwin: 4.8828 swin: 64.0000 cwin: 1.3144 rttsec: 0.163111 Sndbuf: 8388608 Checking for mismatch condition (cwndtime > .3) [0.99>.3], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [86140>0], (PktsRetrans/sec > 2) [2.1>2], (estimate > 2) [4.12>2] Checking for mismatch on uplink (speed > 50 [0>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [0.29<5] (rwintime > .9) [0>.9], (loss < .01) [2.75<.01] Checking for excessive errors condition (loss/sec > .15) [2.75>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.99>.6], (loss < .01) [2.75<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [86140>0] Checking for 10 Mbps link (speed < 9.5) [0<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [0>3.0] (xmitspeed < 9.5) [0.29<9.5] (loss < .01) [2.75<.01], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for Wireless link (sendtime = 0) [3.0E=0], (speed < 5) [0<5] (Estimate > 50 [4.12>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0>.90] (RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [0/1=1], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link (speed < 2) [0<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0] (SendTime = 0) [3.0E-4=0], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for half-duplex condition (rwintime > .95) [0>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0>30], (SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30], OR (mylink <= 10) [3.0<=10] Checking for congestion (cwndtime > .02) [0.99>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0] (MaxSsthresh > 0) [86140>0] estimate = 4.12 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 163.11msec, and loss = 2.75179E-4 The theoretical network limit is 4.12 Mbps The NDT server has a 8192.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 392.37 Mbps Your PC/Workstation has a 625.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 29.93 Mbps The network based flow control limits the throughput to 8.05 Mbps Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'T1' Server Data reports link is '10 Gig', Server Acks report link is 'Ethernet'
  18. I dont have a router It connected directly to the modem i do have another pc connected with Cat 5 wires But thats all
  19. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 4150 Kbps about 4.1 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 507 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Sun Feb 27 09:26:49 EST 2005 Bottom Line:: 74X faster than 56K 1MB download in 2.02 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 29.57 % faster than the average for host (rr.com) There the Speed test
  20. http://ttester.broadbandreports.com/tweak/block:3c6627d?service=cable&speed=&os=winXP&via=normal Also I couldent do a speed check this site is verry slow today and yesterday
  21. Okay Here u go! http://www.broadbandreports.com/quality/nil/1666043 Thats A New Line Test I did And heres The rest OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1 Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.4.2_04 ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found. Link set to Half Duplex mode Information: throughput is limited by other network traffic. Good network cable(s) found Normal duplex operation found. Web100 reports the Round trip time = 115.77 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and There were 17 packets retransmitted, 59 duplicate acks received, and 97 SACK blocks received The connection stalled 1 times due to packet loss The connection was idle 0.33 seconds (3.30%) of the time This connection is network limited 99.95% of the time. Contact your local network administrator to report a network problem Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: ON Packet size is preserved End-to-End Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Client IP addresses are preserved End-to-End WEB100 Kernel Variables: Client: localhost/127.0.0.1 AckPktsIn: 1757 AckPktsOut: 0 BytesRetrans: 24820 CongAvoid: 1505 CongestionOverCount: 0 CongestionSignals: 3 CountRTT: 1686 CurCwnd: 62780 CurMSS: 1460 CurRTO: 330 CurRwinRcvd: 640000 CurRwinSent: 5840 CurSsthresh: 46720 DSACKDups: 0 DataBytesIn: 0 DataBytesOut: 5102700 DataPktsIn: 0 DataPktsOut: 3495 DupAcksIn: 59 ECNEnabled: 0 FastRetran: 1 MaxCwnd: 125560 MaxMSS: 1460 MaxRTO: 600 MaxRTT: 300 MaxRwinRcvd: 640000 MaxRwinSent: 5840 MaxSsthresh: 62780 MinMSS: 1460 MinRTO: 240 MinRTT: 40 MinRwinRcvd: 40000 MinRwinSent: 5840 NagleEnabled: 1 OtherReductions: 0 PktsIn: 1759 PktsOut: 3497 PktsRetrans: 17 X_Rcvbuf: 107520 SACKEnabled: 3 SACKsRcvd: 97 SendStall: 0 SlowStart: 155 SampleRTT: 100 SmoothedRTT: 100 X_Sndbuf: 107520 SndLimTimeRwin: 0 SndLimTimeCwnd: 10051017 SndLimTimeSender: 4483 SndLimTransRwin: 0 SndLimTransCwnd: 1 SndLimTransSender: 1 SndLimBytesRwin: 0 SndLimBytesCwnd: 5105620 SndLimBytesSender: 0 SubsequentTimeouts: 1 SumRTT: 195190 Timeouts: 1 TimestampsEnabled: 0 WinScaleRcvd: 4 WinScaleSent: 7 DupAcksOut: 0 StartTimeUsec: 548194 Duration: 10062345 c2sData: 2 c2sAck: 2 s2cData: 7 s2cAck: 3 Checking for mismatch condition (cwndtime > .3) [0.99>.3], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [62780>0], (PktsRetrans/sec > 2) [1.70>2], (estimate > 2) [3.28>2] Checking for mismatch on uplink (speed > 50 [4.05>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [0.25<5] (rwintime > .9) [0>.9], (loss < .01) [8.57<.01] Checking for excessive errors condition (loss/sec > .15) [8.57>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.99>.6], (loss < .01) [8.57<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [62780>0] Checking for 10 Mbps link (speed < 9.5) [4.05<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [4.05>3.0] (xmitspeed < 9.5) [0.25<9.5] (loss < .01) [8.57<.01], (link > 0) [0>0] Checking for Wireless link (sendtime = 0) [4.45=0], (speed < 5) [4.05<5] (Estimate > 50 [3.28>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0>.90] (RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [0/1=1], (link > 0) [0>0] Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link (speed < 2) [4.05<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0] (SendTime = 0) [4.4582566754512455E-4=0], (link > 0) [0>0] Checking for half-duplex condition (rwintime > .95) [0>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0>30], (SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.10>30], OR (link <= 10) [0<=10] Checking for congestion (cwndtime > .02) [0.99>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0] (MaxSsthresh > 0) [62780>0] bw = 3.28 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 115.77msec, and loss = 8.578781853429973E-4 The theoretical network limit is 3.28 Mbps The transmit buffer (105.0 KByte) limits the application to 7.08 Mbps Your receive buffer (625.0 KByte) limits the application to 42.17 Mbps The network based flow control limits the application to 8.27 Mbps Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'T1' Server Data reports link is 'GigE', Server Acks report link is 'Ethernet'
  22. Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 253.21Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 2.85Mb/s Your PC is connected to a Cable/DSL modem Information: Other network traffic is congesting the link http://netspeed.stanford.edu/ Using that
×
×
  • Create New...