amish
-
Posts
103 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Never -
Speed Test
My Results
Posts posted by amish
-
-
802.11b, only 11mbps, and they split it way too much, need atleast 1 T-3 connection here.
-
On a wireless router, with atleast 500-600 other's connected. A dual T-1.
:::.. Download Stats ..:::
Connection is:: 1081 Kbps about 1.08 Mbps (tested with 579 kB)
Download Speed is:: 132 kB/s
Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1)
Test Time:: 2006/05/01 - 7:53am
Bottom Line:: 19X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 7.76 sec
Tested from a 579 kB file and took 4.387 seconds to complete
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 33.93 % of your hosts average (fl.us)
Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-0GODFI9AM
:::.. Upload Stats ..:::
Connection is:: 703 Kbps about 0.7 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 86 kB/s
Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1)
Test Time:: 2006/05/01 - 7:54am
Bottom Line:: 12X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 11.91 sec
Tested from a 1496 kB file and took 17.43936 seconds to complete
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
Diagnosis: 90% + Okay : running at 92.14 % of your hosts average (fl.us)
Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-ONAL5SQXU
-
Same thing with my laptop, really bothers me. Fans are quite loud. It's a Toshiba Satellite with a 3.2Ghz P4HT. So it's probably fine hot. But I always have to put down the speed to 1.8Ghz, otherwise on full 3.2Ghz, it just gets hot and runs even slower. I already have to get a new fan, of the two fans on it.
But check if there's a program taking a lot of processor usage and kill it if there is one.
-
I pay $45 for a 7/512 road runner connection. In Orlando. And I'm right in front of the amplifier for the street also the router for this area is at the end of the street. So I have that going for me.
:::.. Download Stats ..:::
Connection is:: 7881 Kbps about 7.88 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)
Download Speed is:: 962 kB/s
Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 2)
Test Time:: 2006/04/29 - 9:47pm
Bottom Line:: 137X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1.06 sec
Tested from a 5983 kB file and took 6.219 seconds to complete
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060308 Firefox/1.5.0.2
Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 71.62 % faster than the average for host (rr.com)
Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-HQO2IYTMA
:::.. Upload Stats ..:::
Connection is:: 497 Kbps about 0.5 Mbps (tested with 748 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 61 kB/s
Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 2)
Test Time:: 2006/04/29 - 9:49pm
Bottom Line:: 9X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 16.79 sec
Tested from a 748 kB file and took 12.33024 seconds to complete
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060308 Firefox/1.5.0.2
Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 44.48 % faster than the average for host (rr.com)
Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-824U75CA3
-
Okay, thanks.
-
Yeah, it is already split. So you're saying if I were to take away the splitter, I would get more upload speed, or would be it the same?
-
Nice, I like this. I can even see all the bandwidth limits etc.
This is what it says.
Tx Power 50.7 dBmV
Rx Power -1.6 dBmV
Also, it says I can change the down the downstream frequency, what can I do with that? It is set at 609000000.
-
And it's model is TJ 715X.
-
Well now the link, 192.168.100.1, isn't working. I know it worked earlier as I used it. It never prompted for a password and there were only two tabs to see info on it.
-
Yeah, it's 6ft each cable, of radioshack with gold ends (not sure if that really does make a difference, for what it's worth) and a radioshack splitter.
-
I don't have a motorola mode, it's a Teryaon mode, and only says stuff like "operational." Anyone know anything of these modems?
-
I wanted to know if I have one wall outlet go into a splitter, that puts one into a TV, and one into the cable modem. Will this cause any lower speeds? Or would it make no difference?
-
My advertised speeds are 7/512. And I downloaded that file from tampabay test at 2200kB/s.
:::.. Upload Stats ..:::
Connection is:: 496 Kbps about 0.5 Mbps (tested with 748 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 61 kB/s
Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1)
Test Time:: 2006/04/29 - 5:55am
Bottom Line:: 9X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 16.79 sec
Tested from a 748 kB file and took 12.36 seconds to complete
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060308 Firefox/1.5.0.2
Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 44.19 % faster than the average for host (rr.com)
Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-NQ5WFTIOZ
:::.. Download Stats ..:::
Connection is:: 7902 Kbps about 7.9 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)
Download Speed is:: 965 kB/s
Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 2)
Test Time:: 2006/04/29 - 8:01am
Bottom Line:: 138X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1.06 sec
Tested from a 5983 kB file and took 6.203 seconds to complete
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060308 Firefox/1.5.0.2
Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 72.12 % faster than the average for host (rr.com)
Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-7LZ8C1X6P
and on the local road runner speed test, http://speedtest.cfl.rr.com/ I get
Throughput : 1034.0 KB/sec [Kilobyte-per-second]
= 1.03 MB/sec [Megabyte-per-second]
= 8272.0 Kbps [Kilobit-per-second]
= 8.27 Mbps [Megabit-per-second]
-
:::.. Download Stats ..:::
Connection is:: 7669 Kbps about 7.67 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)
Download Speed is:: 936 kB/s
Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 2)
Test Time:: 2006/04/28 - 6:49pm
Bottom Line:: 134X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1.09 sec
Tested from a 5983 kB file and took 6.391 seconds to complete
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060308 Firefox/1.5.0.2
Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 67.04 % faster than the average for host (rr.com)
Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-KC9WD0LAH
:::.. Upload Stats ..:::
Connection is:: 496 Kbps about 0.5 Mbps (tested with 748 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 61 kB/s
Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1)
Test Time:: 2006/04/28 - 4:50pm
Bottom Line:: 9X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 16.79 sec
Tested from a 748 kB file and took 12.34464 seconds to complete
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060308 Firefox/1.5.0.2
Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 44.19 % faster than the average for host (rr.com)
Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-LD87TJYEB
On wireless.
-
I just got a D-Link DGL-4300 wireless router, with 4 gigabit LAN ports. Upgraded from a Netgear WGT624, which was a disaster, having to restart it a couple times a day when I visit an ebay ad with a lot of pictures, or a P2P program. This D-Link has a great web configuration, and a lot of options. But I didn't agree with it being a "gaming" router, the only thing that goes toward that is the gamefuel software built into it. I also get much faster speeds on the wireless, compared to the netgear, (about 3-4 mbits faster). Plus the blue LEDs make it look nice. And so far no problems at all. It even has a heat sink. But it is a little pricy, I paid $150 from CompUSA.
-
Tracing route to testmy.net [67.18.179.85]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms *.*.*.65.cfl.res.rr.com [65.*.*.*]
2 7 ms 8 ms 7 ms 10.107.32.1
3 10 ms 11 ms 10 ms 65.231.95.24.cfl.res.rr.com [24.95.231.65]
4 11 ms 11 ms 11 ms 145.228.95.24.cfl.res.rr.com [24.95.228.145]
5 10 ms 12 ms 11 ms so-8-1.car2.Orlando1.Level3.net [4.79.118.17]
6 11 ms 12 ms 11 ms ge-5-0-0.mp2.Orlando1.Level3.net [4.68.97.205]
7 41 ms 44 ms 44 ms so-4-3-0.bbr1.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.68.144.5]
8 41 ms 42 ms 44 ms ae-13-53.car3.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.68.122.79]
9 50 ms 42 ms 44 ms 4.78.221.146
10 42 ms 46 ms 44 ms vl32.dsr02.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.62]
11 44 ms 43 ms 44 ms vl42.dsr02.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.91]
12 44 ms 41 ms 41 ms gi1-0-2.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.85]
13 43 ms 43 ms 43 ms 85.67-18-179.reverse.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85]
Trace complete.
-
And this on my linux dekstop...
::.. Download Stats ..:::
Connection is:: 7503 Kbps about 7.5 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)
Download Speed is:: 916 kB/s
Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main)
Test Time:: Sat Feb 25 2006 08:47:03 GMT-0500 (EST)
Bottom Line:: 134X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.12 sec
Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 74.61 % faster than the average for host (rr.com)
Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-5AUI0OTRM
:::.. Upload Stats ..:::
Connection is:: 498 Kbps about 0.5 Mbps (tested with 579 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 61 kB/s
Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1)
Test Time:: Sat Feb 25 2006 08:47:35 GMT-0500 (EST)
Bottom Line:: 9X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 16.79 sec
Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 61.69 % faster than the average for host (rr.com)
Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-4FTUNM6BZ
And this is on a normal residential account
-
I just checked it today after a while, and look what I got.
:::.. Download Stats ..:::
Connection is:: 5281 Kbps about 5.3 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)
Download Speed is:: 645 kB/s
Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main)
Test Time:: Sat Feb 25 2006 13:49:58 GMT+0000 (GMT Standard Time)
Bottom Line:: 94X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.59 sec
Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 22.9 % faster than the average for host (rr.com)
Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-AVHLFM53S
:::.. Upload Stats ..:::
Connection is:: 496 Kbps about 0.5 Mbps (tested with 579 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 61 kB/s
Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main)
Test Time:: Sat Feb 25 2006 13:50:59 GMT+0000 (GMT Standard Time)
Bottom Line:: 9X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 16.79 sec
Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 61.04 % faster than the average for host (rr.com)
Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-N15QCBORP
Compared to my 3mbps down, and 300kbps up speed from before. Anyone know anything about this?
Fios Speeds Increased
in Verizon FIOS
Posted
I wish they had it here. Only Bright House Networks (road runner) has this area. And the bellsouth dsl. It's weird how much of a difference the 20mbps down to 30mbps is money wise.