TheTroll Posted January 5, 2006 CID Share Posted January 5, 2006 I just moved into a new house and here I have Lightspeed broadband (slow cable) but the speeds are advertised at around 64kb/s, and I'm only getting about 29kb/s. I've restarted in safe mode, ran avast antivirus, scandisk, defrag, spybot S&D, etc.... I've reset my modem (by using both the reset switch and disconnecting the power supply for 30 secs.) I removed ZoneAlarm and still had the same speed. Here is my info.. I dont really care about upload speeds, i'm just trying to get my download speeds up a bit. I realize that even 64kb/s is painfully slow, but i'm not worried about it, I usually just download stuff while i sleep anyways. Anyways, here's my info. Any help would be greatly appreciated. OS: Win ME ISP: Access Communications Advertised speed: 64kb/second (up and down) I've tried cablenut and it's made no difference. www.speedguide.net TCP/IP Analyzer info: TCP options string = 020405b401010402 MTU = 1500 MTU is fully optimized for broadband. MSS = 1460 Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which equals MSS. Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 17520 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits Unscaled Receive Window = 17520 RWIN is a multiple of MSS Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 513920 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 256960 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4) 128480 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2) 64240 (MSS x 44) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your RcvWindow limits you to: 700.8 kbps (87.6 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your RcvWindow limits you to: 280.32 kbps (35.04 KBytes/s) @ 500ms Consider increasing your RWIN value to optimize TCP/IP for broadband. MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 121 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000 (0) Testmy.net results: Connection is:: 238 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Download Speed is:: 29 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Wed Jan 4 19:14:39 CST 2006 Bottom Line:: 4X faster than 56K 1MB download in 35.31 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 14.03 % of your hosts average (accesscomm.ca) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-BRIJOG2H1 http://nitro.ucsc.edu/ UCSC Web100 based Network Diagnostic Tool results: TCP/Web100 Network Diagnostic Tool v5.3.3d click START to begin Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 127.50Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 246.09kb/s Your PC is connected to a Cable/DSL modem Information: Other network traffic is congesting the link Information: The receive buffer should be 65.00 Kbytes to maximize throughput Check.bat Results: urrent date is Wed 04/01/2006 Current time is 19:24:40.27 Windows Millennium [Version 4.90.3000] Pinging testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data:Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=47Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=47Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=47Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=47Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 109ms, Maximum = 110ms, Average = 109ms Ping Complete. Tracing route to testmy.net [67.18.179.85]over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <10 ms 13 ms <10 ms 10.32.1.1 2 14 ms 13 ms 14 ms docsis-interconnect.regina.accesscomm.ca [24.72.99.249] 3 28 ms 13 ms 14 ms A-p10-0-0-S1.gw2.cal1.rogerstelecom.net [204.50.53.65] 4 27 ms 14 ms 14 ms g11-0-4-S1.bb1.cal1.rogerstelecom.net [204.50.251.193] 5 55 ms 55 ms 55 ms p4-0-S1.bb1.tor1.rogerstelecom.net [204.50.128.61] 6 54 ms 55 ms 55 ms p2-1-S1.bb1.mtl1.rogerstelecom.net [209.5.21.50] 7 97 ms 82 ms 82 ms sl-gw1-pen-13-3.sprintlink.net [144.228.166.13] 8 83 ms 96 ms 82 ms sl-bb20-pen-5-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.5.1] 9 110 ms 109 ms 110 ms sl-bb27-fw-13-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.8.65] 10 110 ms 110 ms 110 ms sl-st20-dal-1-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.9.136] 11 109 ms 110 ms 110 ms sl-theplanet-5-0.sprintlink.net [144.223.244.142] 12 110 ms 110 ms 110 ms vl31.dsr02.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.30] 13 137 ms 110 ms 124 ms vl41.dsr01.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.83] 14 137 ms 110 ms 123 ms gi1-0-1.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.69] 15 110 ms 109 ms 124 ms 85.67-18-179.reverse.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85] Trace complete. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jkandra Posted January 5, 2006 CID Share Posted January 5, 2006 Hi Troll Welcome to the forum. Have you looked at this yet? Sticky http://www.testmy.net/forum/index.php?topic=2097.0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTroll Posted January 5, 2006 Author CID Share Posted January 5, 2006 Actually, i just found all the same websites and programs randomly on my own like http://nitro.ucsc.edu/ and I actually wrote my own version of check.bat to check my ping and tracert info. Lol, please note the sarcasm . No offense or anything, but If you would have read my post you would have noticed that. so, yes I did read that post, and I tried everything on it before I posted. Oh yeah, I should have added I'm using a direct connection through my SMC networks cable modem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted January 6, 2006 CID Share Posted January 6, 2006 Pinging testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=47 Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTroll Posted January 6, 2006 Author CID Share Posted January 6, 2006 I was in contact with Access Communications, and they informed me that 30kb/s download and 12kb/s for uploads is average for my type of connection... I double checked their website and it did say 64kb/s for both up and down........ So it turns out it's just a simple case of false advertising.... Thanks for the help anyways. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted January 6, 2006 CID Share Posted January 6, 2006 Average does not mean cap. I would still tweak away. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.