Moonrider Posted February 6, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 6, 2006 oo and i got a some check file in my D: Disk this what it writes. The current date is: 2006.02.06 The current time is: 18:10:19,35 Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] Pinging testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=697ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=729ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=757ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=711ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=663ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=706ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=717ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=723ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=695ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=850ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=700ms TTL=47 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=680ms TTL=47 Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85: Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 663ms, Maximum = 850ms, Average = 719ms Ping Complete. Tracing route to testmy.net [67.18.179.85] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 2 ms 7 ms 2 ms 192.168.0.1 2 531 ms * 563 ms 193.219.14.254 3 554 ms 540 ms 594 ms 193.219.13.5 4 * * * Request timed out. 5 * * * Request timed out. 6 510 ms 518 ms 519 ms 212-59-1-253.ip.takas.lt [212.59.1.253] 7 649 ms 624 ms 673 ms sl-gw10-fra-6-2.sprintlink.net [217.151.254.189] 8 518 ms 620 ms 570 ms 81.198.168.9 9 597 ms 562 ms * s-b3-geth2-0.telia.net [213.248.67.105] 10 * 509 ms 688 ms sl-bb24-nyc-9-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.9.166] 11 535 ms 676 ms 687 ms kbn-bb2-pos0-0-0.telia.net [213.248.65.29] 12 674 ms 808 ms 694 ms sl-bb24-chi-2-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.9.156] 13 693 ms * 693 ms sl-bb22-chi-9-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.26.110] 14 723 ms 731 ms 580 ms so-9-1.car1.newyork1.level3.net [209.244.160.161] 15 606 ms 612 ms 738 ms sl-timewarner-14-0.sprintlink.net [144.223.241.78] 16 716 ms 633 ms 771 ms as-0-0.bbr2.dallas1.level3.net [64.159.0.137] 17 * 685 ms 823 ms ae-23-54.car3.dallas1.level3.net [4.68.122.111] 18 * 658 ms 709 ms 4.78.221.146 19 723 ms 664 ms 657 ms 168.215.241.150 20 628 ms 699 ms 672 ms vl31.dsr02.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.30] 21 * * 739 ms gi1-0-2.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.85] 22 652 ms 593 ms 584 ms gi1-0-2.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.85] 23 694 ms 750 ms 729 ms 85.67-18-179.reverse.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85] Trace complete. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 7, 2006 CID Share Posted February 7, 2006 Do not place your modem and router close together. Keep them a few feet apart. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moonrider Posted February 7, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 7, 2006 I don't have modem , and my internet is not connected thru phone , i have antena near the my computer's window outside . And i have a white box with 2 cables connecting with 1 very big whoose connecting to antena . One blue cable connected to the white box and that blue cable goes to computer . The second is black wich connects with the Big one . And that big one connects to antena. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 7, 2006 CID Share Posted February 7, 2006 Now I understand why you have high latency. You need to use this ccs file instead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moonrider Posted February 8, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 8, 2006 K tnx Trogers i will load it and copy upload and download stats . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moonrider Posted February 8, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 8, 2006 Download Very Good! : Your connection is: 336 Kbps (about 0.3 Mbps) You downloaded at: 41 kB/s Your TRuSPEED: ^info^ 360 Kbps :: 44 kB/s (7% overhead factored) Bottom Line: You are running: 6 times faster than 56K and can download 1 megabyte in 24.98 second(s) Diagnosis: ^info^ Awesome! 20% + : 145.26 % faster than the average for host (is.lt) Results Comparison Upload : Your connection is: 17 Kbps (about 0 Mbps) You uploaded at: 2 kB/s Your TRuSPEED: ^info^ 18 Kbps :: 2 kB/s (7% overhead factored) Bottom Line: You are running: 0 times faster than 56K and can upload 1 megabyte in 512 second(s) Diagnosis: ^info^ May need help : running at only 80.95 % of your hosts average (is.lt) Upload still bad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 8, 2006 CID Share Posted February 8, 2006 I do not think your line is 256/256 Kbps as you can test faster than that. Maybe it is 512/512 like your friend. Check the two cable connections in the white box to see if they are ok. Also make sure there is no electrical devices close to the white box. If yes, move the electrical devices a few feet away from the white box. Try this ccs file. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moonrider Posted February 8, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 8, 2006 Your connection is: 233 Kbps (about 0.2 Mbps) You downloaded at: 28 kB/s Your TRuSPEED: ^info^ 249 Kbps :: 30 kB/s (7% overhead factored) Bottom Line: You are running: 4 times faster than 56K and can download 1 megabyte in 36.57 second(s) Diagnosis: ^info^ Awesome! 20% + : 56.38 % faster than the average for host (is.lt) Upload still very bad . I think that ccs file you gave me 32120-32120-1500.ccs is better than this one 64240-6420st.ccs. Coz download speed was better then . No electiric things near my white box. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 8, 2006 CID Share Posted February 8, 2006 Do this test for me and post results of STATISTICS abd MORE DETAILS: http://farnsworth.uhnet.net:7123/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moonrider Posted February 8, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 8, 2006 How exatcly to do the tests trogers ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moonrider Posted February 8, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 8, 2006 Ohh ok , i got it now : Statistics: WEB100 Enabled Statistics: Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 55.52Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 226.23kb/s ------ Client System Details ------ OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1 Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.4.2 ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found. Link set to Full Duplex mode Information: throughput is limited by other network traffic. Good network cable(s) found Normal duplex operation found. Web100 reports the Round trip time = 439.51 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and There were 9 packets retransmitted, 29 duplicate acks received, and 29 SACK blocks received The connection was idle 0 seconds (0%) of the time This connection is network limited 99.66% of the time. Contact your local network administrator to report a network problem Contact your local network admin and report excessive packet reordering Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: OFF Packet size is preserved End-to-End Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address Server says [195.182.95.61] but Client says [192.168.0.11] More Details : WEB100 Kernel Variables: Client: localhost/127.0.0.1 AckPktsIn: 117 AckPktsOut: 0 BytesRetrans: 13140 CongAvoid: 51 CongestionOverCount: 0 CongestionSignals: 2 CountRTT: 81 CurCwnd: 13140 CurMSS: 1460 CurRTO: 616 CurRwinRcvd: 64240 CurRwinSent: 5840 CurSsthresh: 8760 DSACKDups: 0 DataBytesIn: 0 DataBytesOut: 293460 DataPktsIn: 0 DataPktsOut: 201 DupAcksIn: 29 ECNEnabled: 0 FastRetran: 2 MaxCwnd: 26280 MaxMSS: 1460 MaxRTO: 959 MaxRTT: 642 MaxRwinRcvd: 64240 MaxRwinSent: 5840 MaxSsthresh: 13140 MinMSS: 1460 MinRTO: 614 MinRTT: 301 MinRwinRcvd: 64240 MinRwinSent: 5840 NagleEnabled: 1 OtherReductions: 0 PktsIn: 117 PktsOut: 201 PktsRetrans: 9 X_Rcvbuf: 1114624 RcvWinScale: 2147483647 SACKEnabled: 3 SACKsRcvd: 29 SendStall: 0 SlowStart: 28 SampleRTT: 362 SmoothedRTT: 407 X_Sndbuf: 1114624 SndWinScale: 2147483647 SndLimTimeRwin: 0 SndLimTimeCwnd: 10809887 SndLimTimeSender: 37246 SndLimTransRwin: 0 SndLimTransCwnd: 1 SndLimTransSender: 1 SndLimBytesRwin: 0 SndLimBytesCwnd: 293460 SndLimBytesSender: 0 SubsequentTimeouts: 0 SumRTT: 35600 Timeouts: 0 TimestampsEnabled: 0 WinScaleRcvd: 2147483647 WinScaleSent: 2147483647 DupAcksOut: 0 StartTimeUsec: 203757 Duration: 10857620 c2sData: 2 c2sAck: 1 s2cData: 8 s2cAck: 2 half_duplex: 0 link: 100 congestion: 1 bad_cable: 0 mismatch: 0 spd: 0.00 bw: 0.25 loss: 0.009950249 avgrtt: 439.51 waitsec: 0.00 timesec: 10.00 order: 0.2479 rwintime: 0.0000 sendtime: 0.0034 cwndtime: 0.9966 rwin: 0.4901 swin: 8.5039 cwin: 0.2005 rttsec: 0.439506 Sndbuf: 1114624 Checking for mismatch condition (cwndtime > .3) [0.99>.3], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [13140>0], (PktsRetrans/sec > 2) [0.9>2], (estimate > 2) [0.25>2] Checking for mismatch on uplink (speed > 50 [0>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [0.05<5] (rwintime > .9) [0>.9], (loss < .01) [0.00<.01] Checking for excessive errors condition (loss/sec > .15) [9.95>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.99>.6], (loss < .01) [0.00<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [13140>0] Checking for 10 Mbps link (speed < 9.5) [0<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [0>3.0] (xmitspeed < 9.5) [0.05<9.5] (loss < .01) [0.00<.01], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for Wireless link (sendtime = 0) [0.00=0], (speed < 5) [0<5] (Estimate > 50 [0.25>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0>.90] (RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [0/1=1], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link (speed < 2) [0<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0] (SendTime = 0) [0.0034=0], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for half-duplex condition (rwintime > .95) [0>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0>30], (SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30], OR (mylink <= 10) [3.0<=10] Checking for congestion (cwndtime > .02) [0.99>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0] (MaxSsthresh > 0) [13140>0] estimate = 0.25 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 439.51msec, and loss = 0.009950249 The theoretical network limit is 0.25 Mbps The NDT server has a 1088.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 19.34 Mbps Your PC/Workstation has a 62.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 1.11 Mbps The network based flow control limits the throughput to 0.45 Mbps Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'Dial-up' Server Data reports link is 'OC-48', Server Acks report link is 'T1' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 8, 2006 CID Share Posted February 8, 2006 Go to this site. A smaller window will appear . Click 'START' button and the test will begin. When test is completed, 2 buttons appear at the bottom of the small window. Click "STATISTICS' and a report will come out. Copy report and save to Wordpad. Click 'MORE DETAILS' and another report will come out. Copy report and save with first report inside Wordpad. Then copy the report in Wordpad and post to this forum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moonrider Posted February 8, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 8, 2006 KK did that , i couldn't done coz my brownser OPERA couldn't connect with java , so i opened the good olll IE and did the test . Here are the results. In my next post ofcourse Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 8, 2006 CID Share Posted February 8, 2006 Try this ccs file. Do your speed test and then this link again: http://farnsworth.uhnet.net:7123/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moonrider Posted February 8, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 8, 2006 I need to post my download and upload speed here or to post that Big test with More Details and Statistics? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 8, 2006 CID Share Posted February 8, 2006 Speed and also the Big test. I have to use the info to design the ccs file for you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moonrider Posted February 8, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 8, 2006 K: More details : WEB100 Kernel Variables: Client: localhost/127.0.0.1 AckPktsIn: 125 AckPktsOut: 0 BytesRetrans: 11680 CongAvoid: 48 CongestionOverCount: 0 CongestionSignals: 2 CountRTT: 76 CurCwnd: 11680 CurMSS: 1460 CurRTO: 811 CurRwinRcvd: 32120 CurRwinSent: 5840 CurSsthresh: 10220 DSACKDups: 0 DataBytesIn: 0 DataBytesOut: 293460 DataPktsIn: 0 DataPktsOut: 201 DupAcksIn: 38 ECNEnabled: 0 FastRetran: 2 MaxCwnd: 26280 MaxMSS: 1460 MaxRTO: 1135 MaxRTT: 783 MaxRwinRcvd: 32120 MaxRwinSent: 5840 MaxSsthresh: 13140 MinMSS: 1460 MinRTO: 811 MinRTT: 301 MinRwinRcvd: 32120 MinRwinSent: 5840 NagleEnabled: 1 OtherReductions: 0 PktsIn: 125 PktsOut: 201 PktsRetrans: 8 X_Rcvbuf: 1114624 RcvWinScale: 2147483647 SACKEnabled: 3 SACKsRcvd: 38 SendStall: 0 SlowStart: 26 SampleRTT: 417 SmoothedRTT: 488 X_Sndbuf: 1114624 SndWinScale: 2147483647 SndLimTimeRwin: 0 SndLimTimeCwnd: 10503616 SndLimTimeSender: 37726 SndLimTransRwin: 0 SndLimTransCwnd: 1 SndLimTransSender: 1 SndLimBytesRwin: 0 SndLimBytesCwnd: 293460 SndLimBytesSender: 0 SubsequentTimeouts: 0 SumRTT: 38876 Timeouts: 0 TimestampsEnabled: 0 WinScaleRcvd: 2147483647 WinScaleSent: 2147483647 DupAcksOut: 0 StartTimeUsec: 430746 Duration: 10553072 c2sData: 2 c2sAck: 1 s2cData: 2 s2cAck: 2 half_duplex: 0 link: 100 congestion: 1 bad_cable: 0 mismatch: 0 spd: 0.00 bw: 0.22 loss: 0.009950249 avgrtt: 511.53 waitsec: 0.00 timesec: 10.00 order: 0.3040 rwintime: 0.0000 sendtime: 0.0036 cwndtime: 0.9964 rwin: 0.2451 swin: 8.5039 cwin: 0.2005 rttsec: 0.511526 Sndbuf: 1114624 Checking for mismatch condition (cwndtime > .3) [0.99>.3], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [13140>0], (PktsRetrans/sec > 2) [0.8>2], (estimate > 2) [0.22>2] Checking for mismatch on uplink (speed > 50 [0>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [0.03<5] (rwintime > .9) [0>.9], (loss < .01) [0.00<.01] Checking for excessive errors condition (loss/sec > .15) [9.95>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.99>.6], (loss < .01) [0.00<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [13140>0] Checking for 10 Mbps link (speed < 9.5) [0<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [0>3.0] (xmitspeed < 9.5) [0.03<9.5] (loss < .01) [0.00<.01], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for Wireless link (sendtime = 0) [0.00=0], (speed < 5) [0<5] (Estimate > 50 [0.22>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0>.90] (RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [0/1=1], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link (speed < 2) [0<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0] (SendTime = 0) [0.0036=0], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for half-duplex condition (rwintime > .95) [0>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0>30], (SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30], OR (mylink <= 10) [3.0<=10] Checking for congestion (cwndtime > .02) [0.99>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0] (MaxSsthresh > 0) [13140>0] estimate = 0.22 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 511.53msec, and loss = 0.009950249 The theoretical network limit is 0.22 Mbps The NDT server has a 1088.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 16.62 Mbps Your PC/Workstation has a 31.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 0.47 Mbps The network based flow control limits the throughput to 0.39 Mbps Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'Dial-up' Server Data reports link is 'T1', Server Acks report link is 'T1' Now the Statistics : WEB100 Enabled Statistics: Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 34.51Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 223.41kb/s ------ Client System Details ------ OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1 Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.4.2 ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found. Link set to Full Duplex mode Information: throughput is limited by other network traffic. Good network cable(s) found Normal duplex operation found. Web100 reports the Round trip time = 511.53 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and There were 8 packets retransmitted, 38 duplicate acks received, and 38 SACK blocks received The connection was idle 0 seconds (0%) of the time This connection is network limited 99.64% of the time. Contact your local network administrator to report a network problem Contact your local network admin and report excessive packet reordering Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: OFF Packet size is preserved End-to-End Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address Server says [195.182.95.61] but Client says [192.168.0.11] The speeds : Download: Your connection is: 235 Kbps (about 0.2 Mbps) You downloaded at: 29 kB/s Your TRuSPEED: ^info^ 251 Kbps :: 31 kB/s (7% overhead factored) Bottom Line: You are running: 4 times faster than 56K and can download 1 megabyte in 35.31 second(s) Diagnosis: ^info^ Awesome! 20% + : 45.06 % faster than the average for host (is.lt) Upload : Your connection is: 38 Kbps (about 0 Mbps) You uploaded at: 5 kB/s Your TRuSPEED: ^info^ 41 Kbps :: 5 kB/s (7% overhead factored) Bottom Line: You are running: 1 times faster than 56K and can upload 1 megabyte in 204.8 second(s) Diagnosis: ^info^ Awesome! 20% + : 65.22 % faster than the average for host (is.lt) Results Comparison Rofl I got one thing . That my Download speed is Typical DLS or Cable coz my internet tested the 380++ file in 9,5 seconds . DSL 3-12 . But ! The Upload is like Dial-UP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 8, 2006 CID Share Posted February 8, 2006 You can choose to use any of these 2 ccs files: 32120-32120 this is good for RTT = 500-700 ms 32120-16060 this is good for RTT = 400-500 ms RTT means round trip time. It is the time for a signal to leave your computer until the info from the website reach you. Cablenut settings in these 2 files makes your computer optimum. You have to contact your ISP to ask why upload speed is too bad. The problem is not with your computer. It is with the network of the ISP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.