Deastbrook Posted February 8, 2006 CID Share Posted February 8, 2006 My system: Windows XP SpyBot AdAware Microsoft anti-spyware CCleaner Opera Browser DSL - advertized 3mbs download Have Cablenut Installed Here is my test: ::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1389 Kbps about 1.4 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 170 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 23:20:01 GMT-0500 Bottom Line:: 25X faster than 56K 1MB download in 6.02 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 29.47 % of your hosts average (verizon.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-6W7BGJMS1 Only 30% of Hosts average. Please help. Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 8, 2006 CID Share Posted February 8, 2006 Post up load speed too. Test here and post: https://www.speedguide.net/analyzer.php Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deastbrook Posted February 8, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 8, 2006 TCP options string = 020405ac01010402 MTU = 1492 MTU is optimized for PPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for optimal throughput. MSS = 1452 MSS is optimized for PPPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising your MTU value. Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 63888 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 63888 RWIN is a multiple of MSS Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 511104 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 255552 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4) 127776 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your TCP Window limits you to: 2555.52 kbps (319.44 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your TCP Window limits you to: 1022.208 kbps (127.776 KBytes/s) @ 500ms MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 57 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000 (0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 8, 2006 CID Share Posted February 8, 2006 Your present setting should give you higher test speed than 1.4 Mbps. Perhaps your system have some other problems. Please test here and post results of STATISTICS and MORE DETAILS: http://nitro.ucsc.edu/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deastbrook Posted February 8, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 8, 2006 TCP/Web100 Network Diagnostic Tool v5.3.3d click START to begin Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 422.68Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 1.26Mb/s Your PC is connected to a Cable/DSL modem Information: The receive buffer should be 137.25 Kbytes to maximize throughput I'm not sure what other details you mean. Could you give me an idea. Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 8, 2006 CID Share Posted February 8, 2006 After the test is completed, you will see 2 buttons below the Test Box. Click them and you will get the 2 reports to post here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deastbrook Posted February 8, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 8, 2006 WEB100 Kernel Variables: Client: localhost/127.0.0.1 AckPktsIn: 559 AckPktsOut: 0 BytesRetrans: 5808 CongAvoid: 438 CongestionOverCount: 0 CongestionSignals: 1 CountRTT: 513 CurCwnd: 53724 CurMSS: 1452 CurRTO: 560 CurRwinRcvd: 63888 CurRwinSent: 16304 CurSsthresh: 31944 DSACKDups: 0 DataBytesIn: 0 DataBytesOut: 1573968 DataPktsIn: 0 DataPktsOut: 1084 DupAcksIn: 43 ECNEnabled: 0 FastRetran: 1 MaxCwnd: 65340 MaxMSS: 1452 MaxRTO: 560 MaxRTT: 340 MaxRwinRcvd: 63888 MaxRwinSent: 16304 MaxSsthresh: 31944 MinMSS: 1452 MinRTO: 380 MinRTT: 120 MinRwinRcvd: 63888 MinRwinSent: 16304 NagleEnabled: 1 OtherReductions: 1 PktsIn: 559 PktsOut: 1084 PktsRetrans: 4 X_Rcvbuf: 103424 RcvWinScale: 2147483647 SACKEnabled: 3 SACKsRcvd: 45 SendStall: 0 SlowStart: 61 SampleRTT: 330 SmoothedRTT: 330 X_Sndbuf: 103424 SndWinScale: 2147483647 SndLimTimeRwin: 592152 SndLimTimeCwnd: 9462804 SndLimTimeSender: 2586 SndLimTransRwin: 1 SndLimTransCwnd: 2 SndLimTransSender: 1 SndLimBytesRwin: 40656 SndLimBytesCwnd: 1533312 SndLimBytesSender: 0 SubsequentTimeouts: 0 SumRTT: 131890 Timeouts: 0 TimestampsEnabled: 0 WinScaleRcvd: 2147483647 WinScaleSent: 2147483647 DupAcksOut: 0 StartTimeUsec: 753126 Duration: 10060242 c2sData: 2 c2sAck: 2 s2cData: 9 s2cAck: 2 half_duplex: 0 link: 100 congestion: 0 bad_cable: 0 mismatch: 0 spd: 0.00 bw: 1.42 loss: 0.000922509 avgrtt: 257.10 waitsec: 0.00 timesec: 10.00 order: 0.0769 rwintime: 0.0589 sendtime: 0.0003 cwndtime: 0.9409 rwin: 0.4874 swin: 0.7891 cwin: 0.4985 rttsec: 0.257096 Sndbuf: 103424 aspd: 4.07543 Checking for mismatch on uplink (speed > 50 [0>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [0.36<5] (rwintime > .9) [0.05>.9], (loss < .01) [9.22<.01] Checking for excessive errors condition (loss/sec > .15) [9.22>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.94>.6], (loss < .01) [9.22<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [31944>0] Checking for 10 Mbps link (speed < 9.5) [0<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [0>3.0] (xmitspeed < 9.5) [0.36<9.5] (loss < .01) [9.22<.01], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for Wireless link (sendtime = 0) [3.0E=0], (speed < 5) [0<5] (Estimate > 50 [1.42>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0.05>.90] (RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [1/2=1], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link (speed < 2) [0<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0] (SendTime = 0) [3.0E-4=0], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for half-duplex condition (rwintime > .95) [0.05>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30], (SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30], OR (mylink <= 10) [3.0<=10] Checking for congestion (cwndtime > .02) [0.94>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0] (MaxSsthresh > 0) [31944>0] estimate = 1.42 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 257.1msec, and loss = 9.22509E-4 The theoretical network limit is 1.42 Mbps The NDT server has a 101.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 3.06 Mbps Your PC/Workstation has a 62.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 1.89 Mbps The network based flow control limits the throughput to 1.93 Mbps Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'T1' Server Data reports link is '10 Gig', Server Acks report link is 'T1' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 8, 2006 CID Share Posted February 8, 2006 "estimate = 1.42 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 257.1msec, and loss = 9.22509E-4 The theoretical network limit is 1.42 Mbps The NDT server has a 101.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 3.06 Mbps Your PC/Workstation has a 62.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 1.89 Mbps The network based flow control limits the throughput to 1.93 Mbps" You are from overseas? Your RTT = 257 ms and RWIN setting at 63888 limits throughput to less than 2 Mbps. Try this ccs file. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deastbrook Posted February 9, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 9, 2006 It doesn't seem to have helped. Here are the results from the latest download test: :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1224 Kbps about 1.2 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 149 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 19:00:32 GMT-0500 Bottom Line:: 22X faster than 56K 1MB download in 6.87 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 25.96 % of your hosts average (verizon.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-WUNVKPGA6 And actually I am not from overseas but from New York. Is my connection that bad? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 9, 2006 CID Share Posted February 9, 2006 Your RTT value is too high for USA. Carry out a Ping and a Traceroute to check where the high delay is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deastbrook Posted February 9, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 9, 2006 I'm sorry for my ignorance but how do you get a ping and traceroute? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 9, 2006 CID Share Posted February 9, 2006 Go to this link and check the box to select the test. Key in 'www.testmy.net' into the white box at the bottom and click 'go' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 9, 2006 CID Share Posted February 9, 2006 Sorry! Here is the link: https://www.speedguide.net/networktools.php Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deastbrook Posted February 9, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 9, 2006 Is this right? The current date is: Wed 02/08/2006 The current time is: 19:43:29.32 Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] Pinging testmy.net [67.18.17] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 67.18.17: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=50 Reply from 67.18.17: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=50 Reply from 67.18.17: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=50 Reply from 67.18.17: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=50 Reply from 67.18.17: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=50 Reply from 67.18.17: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=50 Reply from 67.18.17: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=50 Reply from 67.18.17: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=50 Reply from 67.18.17: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=50 Reply from 67.18.17: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=50 Reply from 67.18.17: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=50 Reply from 67.18.17: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=50 Ping statistics for Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 65ms, Maximum = 67ms, Average = 66ms Ping Complete. Tracing route to testmy.net over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms dslrouter [192.168.1.1] 2 28 ms 26 ms 26 ms 10.32.103.1 3 26 ms 26 ms 26 ms 130.81.10.45 4 33 ms 26 ms 28 ms 130.81.18.90 5 27 ms 27 ms 26 ms so-7-0-0-0.PEER-RTR1.NY111.verizon-gni.net [130.81.17.131] 6 26 ms 28 ms 27 ms 65.59.196.17 7 26 ms 26 ms 27 ms ae-1-53.bbr1.NewYork1.Level3.net [4.68.97.65] 8 65 ms 63 ms 65 ms ae-0-0.bbr1.Dallas1.Level3.net [64.159.1.109] 9 65 ms 65 ms 65 ms ae-13-51.car3.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.68.122.15] 10 65 ms 65 ms 66 ms 4.78.221.146 11 65 ms 65 ms 65 ms vl32.dsr02.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.62] 12 65 ms 66 ms 65 ms vl42.dsr02.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.91] 13 66 ms 65 ms 65 ms gi1-0-2.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.11] 14 66 ms 68 ms 66 ms 85.67-18-179.reverse.theplanet.com [67.18.17] Trace complete. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 9, 2006 CID Share Posted February 9, 2006 Oops! It is a reverse Ping and Traceroute. Do not key in 'www.testmy.net into the white box. When you get to this link, there will be numbers in the white box which is your IP address. This is the IP address you want to Ping and Traceroute to. Before you copy the results and post them into this forum, blank out the last few digits of your IP address. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deastbrook Posted February 9, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 9, 2006 This is my ping results: PING 68.161.1 (68.161.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 68.161.17: icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=106 ms 64 bytes from 68.161.17: icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.7 ms 64 bytes from 68.161.17: icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.4 ms 64 bytes from 68.161.17: icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.5 ms 64 bytes from 68.161.17: icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=33.1 ms --- 68.161.17 ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4046ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.194/48.459/106.389/28.969 ms This is all I get for the tracer test: 1 63-217-30-94.sdsl.cais.net (63.217.30.94) 0.311 ms 0.299 ms 0.242 ms 2 pos8-0.cr05.ash01.pccwbtn.net (63.218.44.53) 0.311 ms 0.226 ms 0.207 ms 3 pos6-2.br02.ash01.pccwbtn.net (63.218.44.74) 0.447 ms 0.364 ms 0.350 ms 4 verizon.ge6-2.br02.ash01.pccwbtn.net (63.218.94.22) 4.865 ms 0.807 ms 0.763 ms 5 so-6-1-0-0.BB-RTR1.RES.verizon-gni.net (130.81.17.176) 1.118 ms 0.799 ms 0.661 ms 6 so-7-2-0-0.BB-RTR1.NY325.verizon-gni.net (130.81.8.254) 7.274 ms 7.675 ms 7.309 ms 7 130.81.18.89 (130.81.18.89) 7.360 ms 11.623 ms 7.570 ms 8 130.81.10.42 (130.81.10.42) 7.637 ms 7.954 ms 7.732 ms 9 * * * 10 * * * 11 * * * 12 * * * 13 * * * 14 * * * 15 * * * 16 * * * 17 * * * 18 * * * 19 * * * 20 * * * 21 * * * 22 * * * 23 * * * 24 * * * 25 * * * 26 * * * 27 * * * 28 * * * 29 * * * 30 * * * Did I do it wrong? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 9, 2006 CID Share Posted February 9, 2006 No. It is just that your ISP has put in routers that will not respond to a ping. We have to locate the problem by elimination. Are you using a modem and router? Is your system a wireless? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deastbrook Posted February 9, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 9, 2006 I don't know about a router but I have an external Westell modem. I am using a dell laptop with verizon dsl. There is a splitter attached to the phone jack with one phone cable to the phone and one attached to a filter and then to the modem. Does that help? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 9, 2006 CID Share Posted February 9, 2006 And the modem is connected directly to your computer through a USB connection? Is your modem placed near any electrical device (eg. sound speakers, telephone/fax, directly on top of your comp tower...)? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deastbrook Posted February 9, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 9, 2006 Its connected through an ethernet cable. Actually, there was a cordless phone near the modem that I just moved to the other side of the rooom. However, nothing has changed regarding the traceroute test. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 9, 2006 CID Share Posted February 9, 2006 Do this test again and just post the last 2 paragraphs of MORE DETAILS: http://nitro.ucsc.edu/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deastbrook Posted February 9, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 9, 2006 Checking for mismatch on uplink (speed > 50 [0>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [0.42<5] (rwintime > .9) [0.86>.9], (loss < .01) [1.0E<.01] Checking for excessive errors condition (loss/sec > .15) [1.0E>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.13>.6], (loss < .01) [1.0E<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [0>0] Checking for 10 Mbps link (speed < 9.5) [0<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [0>3.0] (xmitspeed < 9.5) [0.42<9.5] (loss < .01) [1.0E<.01], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for Wireless link (sendtime = 0) [3.0E=0], (speed < 5) [0<5] (Estimate > 50 [29.73>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0.86>.90] (RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [1/1=1], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link (speed < 2) [0<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0] (SendTime = 0) [3.0E-4=0], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for half-duplex condition (rwintime > .95) [0.86>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30], (SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30], OR (mylink <= 10) [3.0<=10] Checking for congestion (cwndtime > .02) [0.13>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0] (MaxSsthresh > 0) [0>0] estimate = 29.73 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 372.65msec, and loss = 1.0E-6 The theoretical network limit is 29.73 Mbps The NDT server has a 101.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 2.11 Mbps Your PC/Workstation has a 62.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 1.30 Mbps The network based flow control limits the throughput to 1.33 Mbps Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'T1' Server Data reports link is '10 Gig', Server Acks report link is 'T1' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 9, 2006 CID Share Posted February 9, 2006 RTT = 372.65msec This value has got higher than the earlier 257 ms. Seems to me that you have problem in line quality. Most common source is from some form of electromagnetic interference (EMI) affecting your phone and connection lines or modem. Check to see if you have anything that may give out strong source of EMI? Last week, we had a guy here whose line was affected by his heat pump located on the other side of the wall. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deastbrook Posted February 9, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 9, 2006 The desk the computer is on is by an empty wall. There really is nothing that I can see that could be a source of EMI. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 9, 2006 CID Share Posted February 9, 2006 what is on the other side of the wall? To test if there is EMI near to your modem and connection, turn off your comp, monitor and modem and then use a cordless phone near to your connection and modem and listen if your phone gives out static hiss. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.