anderb Posted February 12, 2006 CID Share Posted February 12, 2006 Hello friends I Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 12, 2006 CID Share Posted February 12, 2006 Do these 2 tests and post your results so that we have the info to help you: https://www.speedguide.net/analyzer.php http://nitro.ucsc.edu/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anderb Posted February 12, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 12, 2006 Hello,here are the results TCP options string = 020405840103030101010402 MTU = 1452 MTU is not fully optimized for broadband. Consider increasing your MTU to 1500 for better throughput. If you are using a router, it could be limiting your MTU regardless of Registry settings. MSS = 1412 MSS is not optimized for broadband. Consider increasing your MTU value. Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 124256 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 1 bits (scale factor of 2) Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 62128 RWIN is a multiple of MSS Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 519616 (MSS x 46 * scale factor of 259808 (MSS x 46 * scale factor of 4) 129904 (MSS x 46 * scale factor of 2) 64952 (MSS x 46) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your TCP Window limits you to: 4970.24 kbps (621.28 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your TCP Window limits you to: 1988.096 kbps (248.512 KBytes/s) @ 500ms MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 35 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 11110000 (240) Precedence (priority) = 111 (Network Control) Delay = 1 (low delay) Throughput = 0 (normal throughput) Reliability = 0 (normal reliability) Cost = 0 (normal cost) Check bit = 0 (correct, 8th checking bit must be zero) DiffServ (RFC 2474) = No valid DiffServ equivalent. See the TCP Optimizer documentation, or RFCs 2474, 2475, 2597, 2598, 2873. TCP/Web100 Network Diagnostic Tool v5.3.3d click START to begin Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 301.83Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 445.82kb/s Your PC is connected to a Cable/DSL modem Information: The receive buffer should be 284.97 Kbytes to maximize throughput Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found. Link set to Full Duplex mode No network congestion discovered. Good network cable(s) found Normal duplex operation found. Web100 reports the Round trip time = 778.18 msec; the Packet size = 1412 Bytes; and There were 37 packets retransmitted, 85 duplicate acks received, and 108 SACK blocks received The connection was idle 0 seconds (0%) of the time This connection is receiver limited 28.86% of the time. Increasing the the client's receive buffer (121.0 KB) will improve performance This connection is network limited 71.11% of the time. Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: ON Information: Network Middlebox is modifying MSS variable Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address Server says [201.10.42.218] but Client says [10.1.1.5] WEB100 Kernel Variables: Client: localhost/127.0.0.1 AckPktsIn: 254 AckPktsOut: 0 BytesRetrans: 52244 CongAvoid: 18 CongestionOverCount: 0 CongestionSignals: 2 CountRTT: 148 CurCwnd: 18356 CurMSS: 1412 CurRTO: 1400 CurRwinRcvd: 124256 CurRwinSent: 16304 CurSsthresh: 15532 DSACKDups: 0 DataBytesIn: 0 DataBytesOut: 632576 DataPktsIn: 0 DataPktsOut: 448 DupAcksIn: 85 ECNEnabled: 0 FastRetran: 2 MaxCwnd: 125668 MaxMSS: 1412 MaxRTO: 2270 MaxRTT: 1860 MaxRwinRcvd: 124256 MaxRwinSent: 16304 MaxSsthresh: 62128 MinMSS: 1412 MinRTO: 680 MinRTT: 260 MinRwinRcvd: 62128 MinRwinSent: 16304 NagleEnabled: 1 OtherReductions: 0 PktsIn: 254 PktsOut: 448 PktsRetrans: 37 X_Rcvbuf: 103424 RcvWinScale: 7 SACKEnabled: 3 SACKsRcvd: 108 SendStall: 0 SlowStart: 99 SampleRTT: 300 SmoothedRTT: 320 X_Sndbuf: 103424 SndWinScale: 1 SndLimTimeRwin: 3019613 SndLimTimeCwnd: 7440087 SndLimTimeSender: 2596 SndLimTransRwin: 1 SndLimTransCwnd: 2 SndLimTransSender: 1 SndLimBytesRwin: 73424 SndLimBytesCwnd: 559152 SndLimBytesSender: 0 SubsequentTimeouts: 0 SumRTT: 115170 Timeouts: 0 TimestampsEnabled: 0 WinScaleRcvd: 1 WinScaleSent: 7 DupAcksOut: 0 StartTimeUsec: 464922 Duration: 10465652 c2sData: 2 c2sAck: 2 s2cData: 9 s2cAck: 2 half_duplex: 0 link: 100 congestion: 0 bad_cable: 0 mismatch: 0 spd: 0.00 bw: 0.21 loss: 0.004464286 avgrtt: 778.18 waitsec: 0.00 timesec: 10.00 order: 0.3346 rwintime: 0.2886 sendtime: 0.0002 cwndtime: 0.7111 rwin: 0.9480 swin: 64.0000 cwin: 0.9588 rttsec: 0.778176 Sndbuf: 8388608 aspd: 1.93318 Checking for mismatch on uplink (speed > 50 [0>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [0.30<5] (rwintime > .9) [0.28>.9], (loss < .01) [0.00<.01] Checking for excessive errors condition (loss/sec > .15) [4.46>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.71>.6], (loss < .01) [0.00<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [62128>0] Checking for 10 Mbps link (speed < 9.5) [0<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [0>3.0] (xmitspeed < 9.5) [0.30<9.5] (loss < .01) [0.00<.01], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for Wireless link (sendtime = 0) [2.0E=0], (speed < 5) [0<5] (Estimate > 50 [0.21>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0.28>.90] (RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [1/2=1], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link (speed < 2) [0<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0] (SendTime = 0) [2.0E-4=0], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for half-duplex condition (rwintime > .95) [0.28>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30], (SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30], OR (mylink <= 10) [3.0<=10] Checking for congestion (cwndtime > .02) [0.71>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0] (MaxSsthresh > 0) [62128>0] estimate = 0.21 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 778.18msec, and loss = 0.004464286 The theoretical network limit is 0.21 Mbps The NDT server has a 8192.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 82.24 Mbps Your PC/Workstation has a 121.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 1.21 Mbps The network based flow control limits the throughput to 1.23 Mbps Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'T1' Server Data reports link is '10 Gig', Server Acks report link is 'T1' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 12, 2006 CID Share Posted February 12, 2006 I believe your subscribed speed is 6000 Kbps down and your setting has been tweaked for MTU 1452. There are 2 items in the test reports that point to the cause of slowdown: Your RTT value of 778 ms is high. Usual value from overseas should not exceed 300 ms. Please do a tracert so that we may try to find where the high latency lies. Your MTU of 1452 is not optimum for DSL. Usual values are 1492 and 1480. We can try to use the TCP Optimizer to set the MTU to its highest value if this value is not a limitation imposed by your modem/router. In the latter case, adjustment has to be made by tweaking the driver of the hardware. Download the TCP Optimizer at www.speedguide.net and do the following: General Settings tab: Custom settings - check Modify All Network Adapters - check network adapter selection - your NIC MTU - 1500 TTL - 64 TCP Receive Window - blank MTU Discovery - Yes Black Hole Detect - No Selective Acks - Yes Max Duplicate ACKs - 2 TCP 1323 Options: Windows Scaling - uncheck Timestamps - uncheck Advanced Settings tab: Max Connections per Server - 10 Max Connections per 1.0 Server - 20 LocalPriority - 5 Host Priority - 6 DNSPriority - 7 NetbtPriority - 8 Lan Browsing speedup - optimized QoS: NonBestEffortLimit - 0 ToS: DisableUserTOSSetting - 0 ToS: DefaultTOSValue - 240 MaxNegativeCacheTtl - 0 NetFailureCacheTime - 0 NegativeSOACache Time - 0 LAN Request Buffer Size - 32768 Then select "Apply Changes" and reboot to take effect Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anderb Posted February 12, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 12, 2006 I Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 12, 2006 CID Share Posted February 12, 2006 Do the tracert and post your results. click 'start' and 'run' and type "cmd" and click 'ok' A DOS black screen will appear and after c: type "tracert www.testmy.net" and press 'enter' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anderb Posted February 12, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 12, 2006 Microsoft Windows XP [vers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 12, 2006 CID Share Posted February 12, 2006 Do you have any speedtest sites in your country? The gateway between Brazil and the US is rather busy. That may be the reason for your low score when testing at USA sites. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 12, 2006 CID Share Posted February 12, 2006 You can do the reverse traceroute from the US to your IP address and see the high latency (>500 ms) at the hop between USA and Brazil. Go to this link for reverse traceroute: http://www.dnsstuff.com/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anderb Posted February 12, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 12, 2006 Here are the results Generated by www.DNSstuff.com at 23:24:50 GMT on 12 Feb 2006. Hop T1 T2 T3 Best Graph IP Hostname Dist TTL Ctry Time 1 0 0 0 0.4 ms 66.36.240.2 AS14361 HOPONE-DCA c-vl102-d1.acc.dca2.hopone.net. 255 US Unknown: 832b76c8 2 0 0 0 0.4 ms [+0ms] 66.36.224.233 AS0 IANA-RSVD-0 gec2.core2.dca2.hopone.net. 0 miles [+0] 254 US Unknown: 83082bc2 3 1 1 1 1.4 ms [+1ms] 66.36.224.34 AS0 IANA-RSVD-0 ge2-0-241.core1.iad1.hopone.net. 0 miles [+0] 253 US Unknown: 85074c95 4 2 1 1 1.6 ms [+0ms] 206.223.115.107 AS0 IANA-RSVD-0 ge-3-0-grtwaseq1.ri.telefonica-data.net. 0 miles [+0] 252 US Unix: 23:24:57.858 5 6 7 6 6.7 ms [+5ms] 213.140.37.210 AS12956 RIPE-ASNBLOCK8 ge2-1-0-0-grtwaseq2.red.telefonica-wholesale.net. 0 miles [+0] 251 ES Unix: 23:24:57.896 6 46 37 77 37 ms [+30ms] 213.140.43.126 AS12956 RIPE-ASNBLOCK8 so-6-1-0-0-grtmiabr4.red.telefonica-wholesale.net. 0 miles [+0] 251 ES Unix: 23:24:58.170 7 148 148 148 132 ms [+94ms] 213.140.36.66 AS12956 RIPE-ASNBLOCK8 so6-1-0-0-grtsaosi2.red.telefonica-wholesale.net. 0 miles [+0] 250 ES Unix: 23:24:58.383 8 180 149 149 132 ms [+0ms] 213.140.51.226 AS12956 RIPE-ASNBLOCK8 te_brasil-6-3-2-0-grtsaosi2.red.telefonica-wholesale.net. 0 miles [+0] 250 ES [Router did not respond] 9 141 132 145 132 ms [+0ms] 200.148.160.134 AS10429 LACNIC-10429 200-148-160-134.bbone.tdatabrasil.net.br. 0 miles [+0] 246 BR [Router did not respond] 10 155 132 135 132 ms [+0ms] 200.221.30.17 AS15201 LACNIC-15201 fr1-border2.ix.uol.com.br. 0 miles [+0] 247 BR [Router did not respond] 11 140 * * 140 ms [+8ms] 200.221.2.45 AS15201 LACNIC-15201 [Reached Destination]home.uol.com.br. 0 miles [+0] 54 BR [Router did not respond] 12 13 14 15 Analysis: Number of hops: 11 Last hop responding to ICMP: 11, UDP: 10, TCP: 10. The destination appears to block unwanted UDP packets. The destination appears to block unwanted TCP packets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anderb Posted February 12, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 12, 2006 Here are the results Generated by www.DNSstuff.com at 23:24:50 GMT on 12 Feb 2006. Hop T1 T2 T3 Best Graph IP Hostname Dist TTL Ctry Time 1 0 0 0 0.4 ms 66.36.240.2 AS14361 HOPONE-DCA c-vl102-d1.acc.dca2.hopone.net. 255 US Unknown: 832b76c8 2 0 0 0 0.4 ms [+0ms] 66.36.224.233 AS0 IANA-RSVD-0 gec2.core2.dca2.hopone.net. 0 miles [+0] 254 US Unknown: 83082bc2 3 1 1 1 1.4 ms [+1ms] 66.36.224.34 AS0 IANA-RSVD-0 ge2-0-241.core1.iad1.hopone.net. 0 miles [+0] 253 US Unknown: 85074c95 4 2 1 1 1.6 ms [+0ms] 206.223.115.107 AS0 IANA-RSVD-0 ge-3-0-grtwaseq1.ri.telefonica-data.net. 0 miles [+0] 252 US Unix: 23:24:57.858 5 6 7 6 6.7 ms [+5ms] 213.140.37.210 AS12956 RIPE-ASNBLOCK8 ge2-1-0-0-grtwaseq2.red.telefonica-wholesale.net. 0 miles [+0] 251 ES Unix: 23:24:57.896 6 46 37 77 37 ms [+30ms] 213.140.43.126 AS12956 RIPE-ASNBLOCK8 so-6-1-0-0-grtmiabr4.red.telefonica-wholesale.net. 0 miles [+0] 251 ES Unix: 23:24:58.170 7 148 148 148 132 ms [+94ms] 213.140.36.66 AS12956 RIPE-ASNBLOCK8 so6-1-0-0-grtsaosi2.red.telefonica-wholesale.net. 0 miles [+0] 250 ES Unix: 23:24:58.383 8 180 149 149 132 ms [+0ms] 213.140.51.226 AS12956 RIPE-ASNBLOCK8 te_brasil-6-3-2-0-grtsaosi2.red.telefonica-wholesale.net. 0 miles [+0] 250 ES [Router did not respond] 9 141 132 145 132 ms [+0ms] 200.148.160.134 AS10429 LACNIC-10429 200-148-160-134.bbone.tdatabrasil.net.br. 0 miles [+0] 246 BR [Router did not respond] 10 155 132 135 132 ms [+0ms] 200.221.30.17 AS15201 LACNIC-15201 fr1-border2.ix.uol.com.br. 0 miles [+0] 247 BR [Router did not respond] 11 140 * * 140 ms [+8ms] 200.221.2.45 AS15201 LACNIC-15201 [Reached Destination]home.uol.com.br. 0 miles [+0] 54 BR [Router did not respond] 12 13 14 15 Analysis: Number of hops: 11 Last hop responding to ICMP: 11, UDP: 10, TCP: 10. The destination appears to block unwanted UDP packets. The destination appears to block unwanted TCP packets. What CCS did you talk about before?is it about TCPOptimizer one? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 12, 2006 CID Share Posted February 12, 2006 This is the value I just received using IP Address (201.3.194.254) from your tracert: 1 0 0 0 0.4 ms 66.36.240.2 AS14361 HOPONE-DCA c-vl102-d1.acc.dca2.hopone.net. 255 US Unknown: 8331a397 2 0 0 0 0.4 ms [+0ms] 66.36.224.232 AS0 IANA-RSVD-0 gec2.core1.dca2.hopone.net. 0 miles [+0] 254 US Unknown: 85213cde 3 0 0 0 0.4 ms [+0ms] 66.36.224.233 AS0 IANA-RSVD-0 gec2.core2.dca2.hopone.net. 0 miles [+0] 254 US Unknown: 830e58ac 4 3 1 1 1.5 ms [+1ms] 66.36.224.185 AS0 IANA-RSVD-0 iar2-ge-2-0-0.washington.savvis.net. 0 miles [+0] 252 US Unix: 23:31:42.546 5 1 1 6 1.6 ms [+0ms] 206.24.226.97 AS3561 SAVVIS bcs1-loopback.washington.savvis.net. 0 miles [+0] 252 US Unix: 23:31:42.617 6 19 2 15 2.6 ms [+1ms] 204.70.192.53 AS3561 SAVVIS dcr1-so-3-0-0.atlanta.savvis.net. 0 miles [+0] 250 US Unix: 23:31:43.356 7 15 28 16 15 ms [+12ms] 204.70.192.57 AS3561 SAVVIS dcr2-so-7-2-0.atlanta.savvis.net. 0 miles [+0] 251 US Unix: 23:31:43.369 8 31 27 27 27 ms [+12ms] 208.172.99.94 AS3561 SAVVIS dpr1-so-1-1-0.miamimit.savvis.net. 0 miles [+0] 248 US Unix: 23:31:43.438 9 38 28 27 27 ms [+0ms] 208.172.97.170 AS3561 SAVVIS dpr1-so-0-1-0.miamimit.savvis.net. 0 miles [+0] 248 US Unix: 23:31:43.479 10 390 28 27 27 ms [+0ms] 208.172.103.66 AS3561 SAVVIS bpr2-as0.miamimit.savvis.net. 0 miles [+0] 246 US Unix: 23:31:43.516 11 452 376 376 376 ms [+348ms] 208.172.108.86 AS3561 SAVVIS unknown.savvis.net 0 miles [+0] 247 US Unix: 23:31:44.171 12 475 * * 475 ms [+99ms] 201.3.194.254 AS8167 LACNIC-8167 [Reached Destination]brt-l10-paemt704-vrres.t.brasiltelecom.net.br. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 12, 2006 CID Share Posted February 12, 2006 Your RWIN is set to 124256 which is your MSS 1412 x 88. This is the optimum tweak setting for your bandwidth 6000 Kbps with latency range not more than 150 ms. Here is a ccs file for latency range up to 300 ms. Download Cablenut Adjuster program from www.cablenut.com and open the ccs file. Click 'Save to Registry', exit and reboot comp to take effect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anderb Posted February 12, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 12, 2006 Thanks dear friend!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.