pyrofirewizard Posted September 30, 2006 CID Share Posted September 30, 2006 1. OS: Mac OS X 10.4.8 and a Windows XP With the latest software and updates. 2. Internet Service Provider (ISP): Verizon. I have a Westell 2200 and pay about 30 dollars a month for internet connection 3. No Tweaking Programs yet. Broadband Optimizer is broken (the link is broken, or the download. You see the page but the download doesn't work). Test: SpeedGuide.net TCP/IP Analyzer Browser/OS = Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/418.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/419.3 Notes: Read the Analyzer FAQ if the above is not your IP address. TCP options string = 020405ac010303000101080a68cb05ca0000000004020000 MTU = 1492 MTU is optimized for PPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for optimal throughput. MSS = 1452 MSS is optimized for PPPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising your MTU value. Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 65535 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 65535 Note: TCP 1323 Options need to be enabled for RWIN over 2^16 (65535). Windows 9x might also need the MS Vtcp386 fix. For optimum performance, consider changing RWIN to a multiple of MSS. Other RWIN values that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 511104 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 255552 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4) 127776 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2) 63888 (MSS x 44) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your TCP Window limits you to: 2621.4 Kbps (327.675 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your TCP Window limits you to: 1048.56 Kbps (131.07 KBytes/s) @ 500ms MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 55 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = ON Note: Timestamps add 12 bytes to the TCP header of each packet, reducing the space available for useful data. Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000 (0) 4. Upload Test Here on Testmy: ::::::::::.. Upload Stats ..:::::::::: Upload Connection is:: 233 Kbps about 0.23 Mbps (tested with 386 kB) Upload Speed is:: 28 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/09/30 - 9:35am Bottom Line:: 4X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 36.57 sec Tested from a 386 kB file and took 13.59552 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 29.16 % of your hosts average (verizon.net) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-YPJ3TKW68 User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/418.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/419.3 Download Test: ::::::::::.. Download Stats ..:::::::::: Download Connection is:: 1365 Kbps about 1.37 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB) Download Speed is:: 167 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/09/30 - 9:36am Bottom Line:: 24X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 6.13 sec Tested from a 1496 kB file and took 8.979 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 22.58 % of your hosts average (verizon.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-7TISK1AFZ User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/418.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/419.3 http://nitro.ucsc.edu/ Test WEB100 Enabled Statistics: Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 331.71kB/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 912.19kB/s ------ Client System Details ------ OS data: Name = Mac OS X, Architecture = i386, Version = 10.4.8 Java data: Vendor = Apple Computer, Inc., Version = 1.5.0_06 ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found. Link set to Full Duplex mode No network congestion discovered. Good network cable(s) found Normal duplex operation found. Web100 reports the Round trip time = 502.41 msec; the Packet size = 1440 Bytes; and No packet loss - but packets arrived out-of-order 0.26% of the time This connection is receiver limited 77.77% of the time. Increasing the the client's receive buffer (63.0 KB) will improve performance This connection is network limited 22.18% of the time. Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: ON RFC 1323 Window Scaling: OFF Information: Network Middlebox is modifying MSS variable Server IP addresses are preserved Endual testo-End 5. Not Windows (done that on the windows computer) 6. Not Windows (done that on the windows computer) 7. I do use an NIC card for both computers. 8. Done that. 9. No Spyware 10. No ZoneAlarm 11. I have a firewall (router with ports forwarded) 12. No viruses Remember I use windows and a mac on a router. Even if i disconnect one from the network the results are the same on the tests. I don't use an inexpensive package from my ISP. So I should have a pretty high speed conection, but I only use about 30-50% of the host. If you need more informationm just ask Any help with speeding up? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted September 30, 2006 CID Share Posted September 30, 2006 Welcome to the forum pyrofirewizard What are your advertised speeds from your ISP. If they are around 1.5 download speed, then you are already in the ballpark. That is only giving you an average speed of all packages provided by Verizon. "Download Connection is:: 1365 Kbps about 1.37 Mbps " "Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 22.58 % of your hosts average (verizon.net) " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pyrofirewizard Posted September 30, 2006 Author CID Share Posted September 30, 2006 Yes, it seems I have 1.5 mbps. :/ I'm not satisfied, and there seems to be an upgrade available, so I might do that. Thanks for the help and notification! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
biker9075 Posted September 30, 2006 CID Share Posted September 30, 2006 Looks like the next highest package would be 3.0 Mbps for 29.99/mo, but even that wont get anywhere near 100% because of Verizon FIOS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted October 1, 2006 CID Share Posted October 1, 2006 Yeah danged FIOS, making almost everybody look bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.