daleyb Posted February 8, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 8, 2005 Pinging 208.184.231.65 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 208.184.231.65: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=243 Reply from 208.184.231.65: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=243 Reply from 208.184.231.65: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=243 Reply from 208.184.231.65: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=243 Ping statistics for 208.184.231.65: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 29ms, Maximum = 31ms, Average = 30ms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daleyb Posted February 8, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 8, 2005 http://www.broadbandreports.com/speedresults/c5553363429a/1648436 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted February 8, 2005 CID Share Posted February 8, 2005 Pinging 208.184.231.65 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 208.184.231.65: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=243 Reply from 208.184.231.65: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=243 Reply from 208.184.231.65: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=243 Reply from 208.184.231.65: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=243 Ping statistics for 208.184.231.65: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 29ms, Maximum = 31ms, Average = 30ms thats great, no loss but, the tweaktest said you droped 1000 byte packets and i forgot how to change the default size of 32 byte on that ping tool if anyone know how, please help the linequality test will test 1000 byte packets on your route so you will see where you loose em. VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted February 8, 2005 CID Share Posted February 8, 2005 http://www.broadbandreports.com/speedresults/c5553363429a/1648436 email this to your ISP, and let them fix the loss VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
just- Posted February 8, 2005 CID Share Posted February 8, 2005 ping -l SIZE testmt.net -L its a small L ping -l 100 testmy.net Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:Documents and SettingsAdmin>ping -l 100 testmy.net Pinging testmy.net [67.19.36.6] with 100 bytes of data: Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=100 time=158ms TTL=48 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=100 time=118ms TTL=48 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=100 time=155ms TTL=48 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=100 time=119ms TTL=48 Ping statistics for 67.19.36.6: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 118ms, Maximum = 158ms, Average = 137ms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daleyb Posted February 8, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 8, 2005 C:Documents and Settingshome>ping testmy.net Pinging testmy.net [67.19.36.6] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=128ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=127ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=130ms TTL=45 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=127ms TTL=45 Ping statistics for 67.19.36.6: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 127ms, Maximum = 130ms, Average = 128ms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted February 8, 2005 CID Share Posted February 8, 2005 ping -l SIZE testmt.net -L its a small L ping -l 100 testmy.net Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:Documents and SettingsAdmin>ping -l 100 testmy.net Pinging testmy.net [67.19.36.6] with 100 bytes of data: Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=100 time=158ms TTL=48 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=100 time=118ms TTL=48 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=100 time=155ms TTL=48 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=100 time=119ms TTL=48 Ping statistics for 67.19.36.6: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 118ms, Maximum = 158ms, Average = 137ms thanks daleyb try this start-run-command type ping -l 1000 208.184.231.65 VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
just- Posted February 8, 2005 CID Share Posted February 8, 2005 the result is coming next and the drumsssss rool the result isss Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daleyb Posted February 8, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 8, 2005 i can't get it to recognise the little L say host not found Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daleyb Posted February 8, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 8, 2005 C:Documents and Settingshome>ping 208.184.231.65 Pinging 208.184.231.65 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 208.184.231.65: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=243 Reply from 208.184.231.65: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=243 Reply from 208.184.231.65: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=243 Reply from 208.184.231.65: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=243 Ping statistics for 208.184.231.65: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 27ms, Maximum = 32ms, Average = 28ms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted February 8, 2005 CID Share Posted February 8, 2005 i can't get it to recognise the little L say host not found copy all this ping -l 1000 208.184.231.65 and after you started command go to top left corner c: and choose paste and click enter VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daleyb Posted February 8, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 8, 2005 i did it C:Documents and Settingshome>ping -l 1000 208.184.231.65 Pinging 208.184.231.65 with 1000 bytes of data: Reply from 208.184.231.65: bytes=1000 time=65ms TTL=243 Reply from 208.184.231.65: bytes=1000 time=66ms TTL=243 Reply from 208.184.231.65: bytes=1000 time=67ms TTL=243 Reply from 208.184.231.65: bytes=1000 time=64ms TTL=243 Ping statistics for 208.184.231.65: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 64ms, Maximum = 67ms, Average = 65ms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted February 8, 2005 CID Share Posted February 8, 2005 try this a few times, and see if you get any loss, you dont need to post all tests, just see if you get loss VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daleyb Posted February 8, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 8, 2005 no no loss at all? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted February 8, 2005 CID Share Posted February 8, 2005 email this to your ISP, and let them fix the loss VanBuren you have loss, but it seems to only accure certain times, and under certain conditions http://www.broadbandreports.com/speedresults/c5553363429a/1648436 email the line quality test to your ISP and let them fix it VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daleyb Posted February 8, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 8, 2005 thanks again van Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daleyb Posted February 8, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 8, 2005 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 384 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Download Speed is:: 47 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Tue Feb 8 23:17:27 UTC 2005 Bottom Line:: 7X faster than 56K 1MB download in 21.79 sec Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/id-AXD2N8YQO weird hey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted February 8, 2005 CID Share Posted February 8, 2005 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 384 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Download Speed is:: 47 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Tue Feb 8 23:17:27 UTC 2005 Bottom Line:: 7X faster than 56K 1MB download in 21.79 sec Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/id-AXD2N8YQO weird hey no problem, the traffic load in your residential area is probl less during these hours and that give you less packetloss and faster speeds. i take it you are in GMT +1 or something like that VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daleyb Posted February 8, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 8, 2005 no gmt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.