MttFrog13 Posted December 5, 2007 CID Share Posted December 5, 2007 I read that firefox 3 made big improvements with its memory usage compared to firefox 2. I read a guys test that showed the evidence. But then i read something about how it doesn't make any improvements. So i decided to run my own benchmarks comparing the three browser's memory usage. Everything was done twice, cache was cleared between each type of test and each new test. Results were averaged and rounded for 2 zeros BEFORE averaging. Program Startup (homepage msn.com): IE: 32,300 FF2: 19,750 FF3b1: 22,900 Loading of 5 webpages: (msn.com, digg.com, g4tv.com, youtube.com, zdnet.com) IE: 108,350 FF2: 68,100 FF3b1: 75,400 After 2 Minutes: IE: 109,850 +1,500 FF2: 78,300 +10,200 FF3b1: 72,250 -3,150 Loading of 2 websites with browsing (zdnet.com > news > hardware)(digg.com > news > 7 days > dinosaur article): IE: 54,850 FF2: 42,650 FF3b1: 49,550 After 2 Minutes: IE: 54,900 +50 FF2: 45,150 +2500 FF3b1: 49,700 +150 Conclusion: Firefox 3 beta 1 does a much better job of memory management than ff2 or ie7. I was surprised by the bad performance of ie7. The most important thing to notice is that on the test where 5 pages were loaded and left for 2 minutes, ff3 actually DROPPED memory while during the same test ff2 continued to rise(might have hit 100,000 if test were 10 min). Also to notice is the decrease of the last test between ff2 and ff3 when zdnet and digg.com were browsed. On the second run, ff3 actually DROPPED after 2 min. more trials would be required to make sure of this but even without that second run dropping, ff3 still dropped dramatically from where ff2 was. This is not a confirmed success of FF3 but now i have much more hope for FF3 resolving memory issues. I have seen other people's benchmarks but i had to see it happen in front of me to believe it. This is only the beta, can't wait till the final version is released. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brock01 Posted December 6, 2007 CID Share Posted December 6, 2007 nice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ninjageek Posted December 6, 2007 CID Share Posted December 6, 2007 If you ever do that again, throw opera into that mix. Be intresting to see how well it does. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MttFrog13 Posted December 6, 2007 Author CID Share Posted December 6, 2007 yeah half way through the test i remembered that i had installed opera and that it was also a popular brower but i didnt have time. I think i will try opera tomorrow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted December 7, 2007 CID Share Posted December 7, 2007 This is what I get: Browser Mem Useage FF 2.0.0.10 115,016 K FF 3.0b1 97,232 K Opera 9.24 85,960 K using the following sites (tabs): [list] [*][url="www.rr.com"]RR[/url] [*][url="www.cnn.com"]CNN[/url] [*][url="www.youtube.com"]YouTube[/url] [*][url="www.microsoft.com"]M$[/url] [*]TMN [/list] [/html] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MttFrog13 Posted December 9, 2007 Author CID Share Posted December 9, 2007 yeah, its clear firefox 3 has better memory management than ff2. I dont understand why in my benchmarks ie performed to badly sometimes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.