Azag Posted March 29, 2005 CID Share Posted March 29, 2005 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3631 Kbps about 3.6 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 443 kB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Mon Mar 28 23:21:46 EST 2005 Bottom Line:: 65X faster than 56K 1MB download in 2.31 sec Diagnosis: Looks Great : 3.71 % faster than the average for host (rr.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-VL3C7S5OF Not to shabby under the circumstances. As for the router it's an old Linksys Wireless-B model: befw11s4v3.2 with the lastest/last firmware release. I have used CableNut with VanBurens v6.0 pack with customized tweaks/mods to one of the files and well as many registry tweaks I have gotten from here and in combing the web for them for (ever since I used to use WinME). I was useing Dr.TCP before CableNut but thanks to reading VanBurens tips and finding this site about 6 or 8 months ago I have realized CableNut has many more options. I run netstumbler to find best positions for my PC to get the maximum I can in signal strength but it is definitely worth the effort. My PC is an old Gateway 1000 Select with 1Ghz Athlon Thunderbird 512MB SDRAM Nic Card: Linksys Instant Wireless PCI Card v2.7 My box runs Windows XP SP1 with all updates except Malware Scanner (I use better stuff for Anti-Virus and Anti-Spyware than most people and don't need MS opinion of my system;)) (because SP2 is crippled garbage so don't even get me started as to why think that...yes I went there.heheh ) I keep all firmware, drivers, and patching up to date 4 the hardware and software installed. My AV of choice:Kaskpersky Anti-Virus Personal Pro v4.9.095 (best on the market and better than v5.0 btw) Secondary AV: ESET NOD32 v2.12.3 (one of the fastest and excellent heuristics for finding new viruses) Other AV's: F-Prot v3.16a (Commandline fast and lota detection(s) excellent heuristics too.) AVP v3.0 Build 133 (also oldy but a goody and same defintions as KAV) Anti-Spyware: Spybot Search & Destroy v1.3 (free very good) Microsoft AntiSpyware v1.0 BETA (ditto) SpyWare Blaster v1.3 (ditto) Ad-Aware SE Professional Also I use a customized hosts file and much more... (You probably think I have an excessive amount of AV and Anti-Spyware but I actually don't run any of it as a monitor only manually since I collect malware and vx ... sure I may get some flames for this but I don't care you need to learn about security by studying that which offends and scares ppl I move around worms, viruses, exploits and malware/spyware ect. and I an not and haven't been infected in 3 years of constantly manipulating files/viewing/decompiling/ect. and I can disinfect my system in 9 out of 10 cases without an AV to help me By no means do I advocate spearding malware or viruses or hacking ppl so don't go there either. There are plenty of ignorant script kiddies and evil ppl in the world and they do a fine enough job without my help. Some people collect stamps but there is no real thrill for me there I apologize in advance if this offends ppl but then again I DON'T infect ppl and I am NOT infected so bite me if u know likey;)) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azag Posted March 29, 2005 Author CID Share Posted March 29, 2005 Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 1.97Mb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 3.21Mb/s Server Fault! Please re-run test. Information: Other network traffic is congesting the link SpeedTest from: http://speedtest.umflint.edu/ WEB100 Kernel Variables: Client: localhost/127.0.0.1 AckPktsIn: 1401 AckPktsOut: 0 BytesRetrans: 1460 CongestionSignals: 1 CountRTT: 1353 CurrentCwnd: 71540 CurrentMSS: 1460 CurrentRTO: 360 CurrentRwinRcvd: 8192000 CurrentRwinSent: 5840 CurrentSsthresh: 33580 DSACKDups: 0 DataBytesIn: 0 DataBytesOut: 4032520 DataPktsIn: 0 DataPktsOut: 2762 DupAcksIn: 47 ECNEnabled: 0 FastRetran: 1 MaxCwnd: 71540 MaxMSS: 1460 MaxRTO: 390 MaxRTT: 210 MaxRwinRcvd: 8192000 MaxRwinSent: 5840 MaxSsthresh: 52560 MinMSS: 1460 MinRTO: 270 MinRTT: 70 MinRwinRcvd: 64000 MinRwinSent: 5840 NagleEnabled: 1 PktsIn: 1401 PktsOut: 2762 PktsRetrans: 1 Rcvbuf: 128000 SACKEnabled: 3 SACKsRcvd: 47 SmoothedRTT: 160 Sndbuf: 128000 SndLimTimeRwin: 0 SndLimTimeCwnd: 10079046 SndLimTimeSender: 8987 SndLimTransRwin: 0 SndLimTransCwnd: 1 SndLimTransSender: 1 SndLimBytesRwin: 0 SndLimBytesCwnd: 4032520 SndLimBytesSender: 0 SumRTT: 184270 Timeouts: 0 TimestampsEnabled: 0 WinScaleRcvd: 7 WinScaleSent: 7 DupAcksOut: 0 StartTime: 2147483647 CurrTime: 10095164 c2sData: -1 c2sAck: -1 s2cData: 6 s2cAck: 3 Checking for mismatch condition (cwndtime > .3) [0.99>.3], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [52560>0], (PktsRetrans/sec > 2) [0.10>2], (estimate > 2) [81.78>2] Checking for mismatch on uplink (speed > 50 [3.19>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [1.97<5] (rwintime > .9) [0>.9], (loss < .01) [1.0E<.01] Checking for excessive errors condition (loss/sec > .15) [1.0E>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.99>.6], (loss < .01) [1.0E<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [52560>0] Checking for 10 Mbps link (speed < 9.5) [3.19<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [3.19>3.0] (xmitspeed < 9.5) [1.97<9.5] (loss < .01) [1.0E<.01], (link > 0) [10>0] Checking for Wireless link (sendtime = 0) [8.90=0], (speed < 5) [3.19<5] (Estimate > 50 [81.78>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0>.90] (RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [0/1=1], (link > 0) [10>0] Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link (speed < 2) [3.19<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0] (SendTime = 0) [8.908575140465936E-4=0], (link > 0) [10>0] Checking for half-duplex condition (rwintime > .95) [0>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0>30], (SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.10>30], OR (link <= 10) [10<=10] Checking for congestion (cwndtime > .02) [0.99>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0] (MaxSsthresh > 0) [52560>0] bw = 81.78 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 136.19msec, and loss = 1.0E-6 The theoretical network limit is 81.78 Mbps The transmit buffer (125.0 KByte) limits the application to 7.17 Mbps Your receive buffer (8000.0 KByte) limits the application to 458.90 Mbps The network based flow control limits the application to 4.00 Mbps Client Data reports link is 'System Fault', Client Acks report link is 'System Fault' Server Data reports link is 'OC-12', Server Acks report link is 'Ethernet' WEB100 Enabled Statistics: Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 1.97Mb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 3.21Mb/s ------ Client System Details ------ OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1 Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.5.0_01 ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ Interprocess communications failed, unknown link type. Link set to Half Duplex mode Information: throughput is limited by other network traffic. Good network cable(s) found Normal duplex operation found. Web100 reports the Round trip time = 136.19 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and There were 1 packets retransmitted, 47 duplicate acks received, and 47 SACK blocks received The connection was idle 0 seconds (0%) of the time This connection is network limited 99.91% of the time. Contact your local network administrator to report a network problem Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: ON Packet size is preserved End-to-End Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address Server says [204.*.*.*] but Client says [192.168.1.100] My download isn't that great I admit but the Upload kickz and this is typical for any of the big .edu/university tests I run almost daily I can't complain.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azag Posted March 29, 2005 Author CID Share Posted March 29, 2005 1. Your Tweakable Settings: Receive Window (RWIN): 8192000 Window Scaling: 7 Path MTU Discovery: ON RFC1323 Window Scaling: ON RFC1323 Time Stamping: OFF Selective Acks: ON MSS requested: 1460 TTL: (less any hops behind firewall) 59 TTL remaining: 49 2. Test 146000 byte download Actual data bytes sent: 146000 Actual data packets: 100 Max packet sent (MTU): 1500 Max packet recd (MTU): 1500 Retransmitted data packets: 0 sacks you sent: 0 pushed data pkts: 1 data transmit time: 0.348 secs our max idletime: 33.1 ms transfer rate: 202233 bytes/sec transfer rate: 1617 kbits/sec This is not a speed test! transfer efficiency: 100% 3. ICMP (ping) check Minimum ping: 20 ms Maximum ping: 30 ms Ping stability: 20 20 20 20 25 20 20 20 30 20 Notes and recommendations: Choose RWIN between 48180 and 125560 (FAQ #586) download/use DRTCP .. (FAQ #578) Read the tweak FAQ Notes and recommendations: Good data stream (no/few rexmits) Notes and recommendations: Looking good Still stuck? copy/paste this url: http://ttester.broadbandreports.com/tweak/block:44e47e9?service=wireless&speed=5000&os=winXP&via=normal if you are seeking forum advice. DO NOT COPY PASTE THE PAGE, JUST THE URL ABOVE. (and please don't forget to explain what you've got, cable, DSL, speed it should be etc) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azag Posted March 29, 2005 Author CID Share Posted March 29, 2005 My real download throughput pic: [url snipped by swimmer Not a fluck since this happens often when i connect to fast servers and no I didn't photoshop it being that I never took the time to get good at using photoshop or any photo manipulaion tools for that matter but believe what u want if your skeptical Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azag Posted March 29, 2005 Author CID Share Posted March 29, 2005 Sorry for bad link u need to go manual from site and scroll down sorry Goto: url snipped by swimmer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.