necrogoldo

I dont pay for the phone line, my mom does, I only pay for the DSL

bueno, ya mande pal #^#%^ a onelink y ahora tengo 2Mbps/512Kbps de DMAX sin restricciones

nvm my last question, it doesnt work either way, I think im screwed until next week when my DMAX modem arrives

ok, done, but do I check "allow incoming legacy connections"?

But why doesn't it convince you?

I'm calling tomorrow to cancel, but I still dont know if I should get the DMAX 2048/512 or the Centennial ii PD, would I get a faster "instalation" from DMAX if I still have my 2Wire modem?

:::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 710 Kbps about 0.7 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 87 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/06 - 4:01pm Bottom Line:: 13X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 11.77 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 35.25 % of your hosts average (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-N07RGOFJK man, cant we get a decent ISP in puerto rico? this is so frustrating

I bet never, thats why I hate them

dude, if I were you I would delete that, you can't post names of ISP employees here, someone was warned about that some time ago.

C:Documents and SettingsNecrogoldo>ping -n 23 www.google.com Pinging www.l.google.com [64.233.161.147] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=116ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=146ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=134ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=242 Ping statistics for 64.233.161.147: Packets: Sent = 23, Received = 23, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 58ms, Maximum = 146ms, Average = 76ms

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:Documents and SettingsNecrogoldo>ping -n 23 www.google.com Pinging www.l.google.com [64.233.161.99] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=100ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=113ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=91ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=101ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=105ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=99ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=82ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=97ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=91ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=239 Ping statistics for 64.233.161.99: Packets: Sent = 23, Received = 23, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 56ms, Maximum = 113ms, Average = 82ms

Tx Power 53.5 dBmV Rx Power -11.6 dBmV Downstream SNR 33.7 dB Downstream MER 31.3 dB Tx Frequency 33000000 Hz Rx Frequency 573000000 Hz can someone tell me what this means?

Just Awesome :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 336 Kbps about 0.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 41 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: Tue Feb 07 2006 22:40:22 GMT-0400 (SA Western Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 6X faster than 56K 1MB download in 24.98 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 15.41 % of your hosts average (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-4CBPHE7JQ I'm in Bayamon btw

:::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 693 Kbps about 0.7 Mbps (tested with 386 kB) Download Speed is:: 85 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server2) Test Time:: Mon Feb 06 2006 22:19:26 GMT-0400 (SA Western Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 12X faster than 56K 1MB download in 12.05 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 31.64 % of your hosts average (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-XUKRNVY47 :whaa:

I agree 100% with this post

a ti y a todos nosotros mi pana

I've had almost no problem with speed, its the P2P/bittorrent blocking that bothers me

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:Documents and SettingsNecrogoldo>tracert www.testmy.net Tracing route to www.testmy.net [67.18.179.85] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 29 ms 11 ms 23 ms host-70-45-64-1.onelinkpr.net [70.45.64.1] 2 128 ms 8 ms 7 ms host-70-45-94-17.onelinkpr.net [70.45.94.17] 3 10 ms 17 ms 7 ms host-70-45-94-61.onelinkpr.net [70.45.94.61] 4 11 ms 8 ms 12 ms host-70-45-94-101.onelinkpr.net [70.45.94.101] 5 181 ms 189 ms 197 ms host-70-45-94-69.onelinkpr.net [70.45.94.69] 6 * 143 ms 148 ms unk-426d0ef9.adelphiacom.net [66.109.14.249] 7 151 ms 155 ms 151 ms a1-00-00-00.c0.mia95.adelphiacom.net [66.109.1.2 25] 8 188 ms 167 ms 168 ms p3-00-01-00.c0.dfw91.adelphiacom.net [66.109.0.2 5] 9 183 ms 191 ms 196 ms g1-02-03-00.p0.dfw91.adelphiacom.net [66.109.3.7 4] 10 214 ms 219 ms 235 ms eq-dallas-1000M.theplanet.com [206.223.118.3] 11 97 ms 60 ms 63 ms vl31.dsr01.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.29] 12 63 ms 60 ms 63 ms vl41.dsr01.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.83] 13 63 ms 70 ms 61 ms gi1-0-1.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.6 9] 14 189 ms 181 ms 182 ms 85.67-18-179.reverse.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85 ] Trace complete.

Yea, but knowing how companies behave here in PR, I dont think they'll unblock UDP no matter what we do.

3 Mbps

well, I just called them and guess what!!!! yep, they told me the same crap they've told you guys

Mine is.... I hate my luck

this people better get it together, I'm so close to going with centennial ii