RaulJimenez

This was a 20mb file i tested:

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 3251 Kbps about 3.25 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB)

Download Speed is:: 397 kB/s

Tested From:: http://demonlegion.net

Test Time:: 2006/04/10 - 7:52pm

Bottom Line:: 57X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 2.58 sec

Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 52.843 seconds to complete

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1

Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 57.82 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-XGRJK49O8

Your connection is: 4614 Kbps or 4.61 Mbps

You Downloaded at: 563 kB/s

You are running: 80 times faster than 56K and can Download 1 megabyte in 1.82 second(s)

Member Ident: Username:RaulJimenez CompID:6461011105

Test Time:: 2006/04/10 - 7:39pm

Test Browser and OS info: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1

Test ID: K41ATZ0MX (if this is a screenshot go to testmy.net to see if this is fake)

Diagnosis ^info^: Awesome! 20% + : 123.98 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net)

This was tested from a 2992 kB file and took 5.312 seconds to complete

I know I asked them to update their config file for my new modem, maybe that has something to do with it.

My modem is not uncapped so I'm not doing anything illegal, and terayon modem has a restricted cap at 4mb, getting another modem is a good idea for the future if they decide to upgrade the packages as i've heard they bought more bandwidth and will start offering more bandwidth in the future.

parabot : I bought the Motorola SB 5120, but you can get the SB5100 and it will do, yes theterayon is capped at 4mb.

Im rocking Im rocking!!

Your connection is: 4682 Kbps or 4.68 Mbps

You Downloaded at: 572 kB/s

You are running: 82 times faster than 56K and can Download 1 megabyte in 1.79 second(s)

Member Ident: Username:RaulJimenez CompID:6461011105

Test Time:: 2006/04/09 - 8:04pm

Test Browser and OS info: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1

Test ID: HV0DEF8O3 (if this is a screenshot go to testmy.net to see if this is fake)

Diagnosis ^info^: Awesome! 20% + : 127.61 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net)

This was tested from a 2992 kB file and took 5.235 seconds to complete

Yep looking tight, btw nice desktop

yes if they would increase the upload ratio this thing would be flying right now, I'm gonna try and convince some high command people i know to see if they have it on their plan, they made a big bandwidth purchase this week so i expect more speed latencies too

thanks ramolo

www.dslreports.com

go into tools, then 24x7 line monitoring..

Last two days of graph are sweet.

Thanks osva I did it, is looking very good so far

definitely I like your graph osva, someone finally made sense to the chain of command in onelink.

Where you got that graph from brothetr?

Your connection is: 4628 Kbps or 4.63 Mbps

You Downloaded at: 565 kB/s

You are running: 81 times faster than 56K and can Download 1 megabyte in 1.81 second(s)

Member Ident: Username:RaulJimenez CompID:6461011105

Test Time:: 2006/04/06 - 5:35pm

Test Browser and OS info: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1

Test ID: ZFLSWC63O (if this is a screenshot go to testmy.net to see if this is fake)

Diagnosis ^info^: Awesome! 20% + : 127.2 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net)

This was tested from a 2992 kB file and took 5.296 seconds to complete

Yes Onelink is definitely starting to improve 

Im having no problem with online gaming and P2P

Osva whats your usual speed on P2P and what program are you using, somehow onelink is getting better, I see no packet loss except a bit on the route going transatlante which is obvious it will have some but they are blocking my p2p.

I'm not really worried about speed , is the packet loss that is incredible.

sigh... no improvement =(. Im actually getting slower speeds in the day too.

woooo! too bad 

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 3656 Kbps about 3.7 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

Download Speed is:: 446 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net  (main)

Test Time:: 2006/03/07 - 12:28pm

Bottom Line:: 65X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 2.3 sec

Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 82.25 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-X1A6TKVCI

Fuck man where do you live?? I'm nowhere near you on the amount of packet loss im suffering.

:haha: :haha: :haha:

The change to sprint backbone is worse than having adelphia servers on our backbone lol

oh my god lets see... sighs...

you are kidding me right? the latency is nowhere fixed.

gracias voy para alla tamb, thanks im going there too.

Well I havent been here in a while now but I just wanted to say the service is still horrible. the packetloss keep coming up and Im wondering what the fuck they did in order to get all this service straight to hell. I'll keep complaining and calling but complaining to a tech service wont do shit unless you actually tell them to speak to a high command guy. Otherwise you can yell cuss or do whatever u want as soon as you hang up is over.

OMG IS WORST!!!!!!!!!!!!

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]

© Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

tracert www.testmy.net

Tracing route to www.testmy.net [67.18.179.85]

over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1    13 ms    11 ms    12 ms  host-70-45-72-1.onelinkpr.net [70.45.72.1]

  2    12 ms    8 ms    10 ms  host-70-45-94-17.onelinkpr.net [70.45.94.17]

  3    34 ms    30 ms    11 ms  host-70-45-94-61.onelinkpr.net [70.45.94.61]

  4    44 ms    32 ms    12 ms  host-70-45-94-101.onelinkpr.net [70.45.94.101]

  5    48 ms    58 ms    50 ms  host-70-45-94-65.onelinkpr.net [70.45.94.65]

6  495 ms    46 ms    55 ms  nap-edge-01.inet.qwest.net [72.164.248.105] 

  7    42 ms    39 ms    41 ms  tpa-core-02.inet.qwest.net [205.171.27.45]

  8    73 ms    55 ms    50 ms  atl-core-01.inet.qwest.net [205.171.21.153]

  9    70 ms    59 ms    64 ms  atl-brdr-03.inet.qwest.net [205.171.21.106]

10    70 ms    51 ms    58 ms  205.171.1.26

11    89 ms    72 ms    72 ms  tbr2-p013702.attga.ip.att.net [12.123.20.254]

12  839 ms    79 ms    71 ms  tbr1-cl13.dlstx.ip.att.net [12.122.2.89]

13  584 ms    82 ms    82 ms  12.122.82.37                     

14    79 ms    89 ms    86 ms  12.119.136.14

15    70 ms    77 ms    75 ms  vl31.dsr01.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.29]

16    91 ms    87 ms    77 ms  vl41.dsr01.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.83]

17    99 ms    93 ms    92 ms  gi1-0-2.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.8

5]

18    75 ms    93 ms    71 ms  85.67-18-179.reverse.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85

]

Trace complete.

O NOOOOOOO THIS WILL NEVER END! ATT SERVERS ARE WORST THAN A DONKEY DUMP IN THE PAVIMENT!

ohh btw why so many stupid servers?! all that route to go to a website. GOD!

I was asking myself the same question bro, why so many hops to go to a damn website sigh..... =/

I must be dreaming but I can actually surf the net and download better right now lmao, ohh go sprint go sprint lol

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 4418 Kbps about 4.4 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

Download Speed is:: 539 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net  (server1)

Test Time:: Sun Feb 26 2006 14:03:28 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time)

Bottom Line:: 79X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.9 sec

Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 106.35 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-Z6ILN3TUH

Osva I definitely saw a lot of extra hops yes.