antoniwan

Confirmed. It is being Throttled @ 2kbps... hehe f@*#cking Onelink...

Guys, i currently have a LinkSys WRT54G something router [ crap ], i want to upgrade that PoS. hit me up with the best household gear around, modic price tho'. I'll be using it primarily for ethernet [cable] connections. some wireless may occur. The problem with my actual router, is unreliability... it can be working and suddenly it just gives me the cockblock. Peace, kick me something up.

dude...i'm so pissed.... i can play any game... but i get 1000ms ++ pings.... UGHHHHH!! UUUGHHH!!

HAh. i'm running GuildWars, and LimeWire as i did this test. XD. up yours baby. Cupey doing the re-runs. -- :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 2518 Kbps about 2.52 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 307 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/04/06 - 4:42pm Bottom Line:: 44X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 3.34 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 9.734 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 23.61 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-HXRK4VO7S :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 370 Kbps about 0.37 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Upload Speed is:: 45 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/04/06 - 4:43pm Bottom Line:: 6X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 22.76 sec Tested from a 579 kB file and took 12.81024 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 33.09 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-RYQATWMP0 --

oh yeah. Smooth Operators. lol. @ the headings. Somebody must've been A-bored. anybody got a glimpse of what type of content is the site on? (html, php, coldfusion)... lol too lazy to check it myself....

lol. notepad for the win? hahaha. you are a brave guy if you code everything in notepad *bows*. smoothio, keep it up.

a manera de relajo. dudes. this is insane. keep cancelling. it's 5:12pm and check out my runs. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3557 Kbps about 3.6 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 434 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/07 - 2:11pm Bottom Line:: 64X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 2.36 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 77.41 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-7GC3542TB and i tried this 4-5 times, cleared cache and all. amazing.

submitted.

:::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 380 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 386 kB) Download Speed is:: 46 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/05 - 6:28pm Bottom Line:: 7X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 22.26 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 18.14 % of your hosts average (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-X3KHO12PD omfg.

ummm.. sexy -------------------------------------------- :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 2937 Kbps about 2.9 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 359 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: Wed Mar 01 2006 09:48:43 GMT-0400 (SA Western Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 52X faster than 56K 1MB download in 2.85 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 38.8 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-O1VMWE0PC :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 370 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Upload Speed is:: 45 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: Wed Mar 01 2006 09:49:24 GMT-0400 (SA Western Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 7X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 22.76 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 25.42 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-5I6X1WAJ7

on the Database Stats selction. under HOST stats. down the "Enter a domain ** Example: cox.net, sprint.net, verizon.net, comcast.net ". besides the Input Area for the Host :: there is a minor typo. it says "Exact Macth (faster) " it should say "Exact Match (faster) " *** just a little thing.

lol dude. read up the whole thread. DACO, FCC, u name it. one step @ a time.

well... only 1 thing left to do. let's phone those bitches up !

10:52pm mark. this started going on. --- C:Documents and Settingsantoniwan>ping www.google.com -t Pinging www.l.google.com [64.233.161.147] with 32 bytes of da Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=242 Request timed out. Request timed out. Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=147ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=141ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=84ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=242 Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=125ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=242 Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=187ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=82ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=101ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.147: bytes=32 time=142ms TTL=242 Request timed out. Ping statistics for 64.233.161.147: Packets: Sent = 22, Received = 13, Lost = 9 (40% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 79ms, Maximum = 187ms, Average = 115ms ROFL! ... needless to say...

lol. u lucky bastard hahahaha. let's hope thigs are for better o_O

1:25pm (sunday) from cupey... :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1523 Kbps about 1.5 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB) Download Speed is:: 186 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: Sun Feb 26 2006 13:23:26 GMT-0400 (SA Western Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 27X faster than 56K 1MB download in 5.51 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 71.13 % of your hosts average (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-KLN0T8RQW :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1316 Kbps about 1.3 Mbps (tested with 748 kB) Download Speed is:: 161 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: Sun Feb 26 2006 13:24:56 GMT-0400 (SA Western Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 23X faster than 56K 1MB download in 6.36 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 61.47 % of your hosts average (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-W1D73HQ0E ------------------------------------------------------------- :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 346 Kbps about 0.3 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Upload Speed is:: 42 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: Sun Feb 26 2006 13:24:26 GMT-0400 (SA Western Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 6X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 24.38 sec Diagnosis: Looks Great : 17.29 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-OE2AFNMTZ

damned creep. that's gruesome :S i hope those fuckers fix that soon. where are you located? i'm @ cupey --- Pinging www.l.google.com [64.233.161.104] with 32 bytes of dat Reply from 64.233.161.104: bytes=32 time=121ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.104: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.104: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.104: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.104: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.104: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.104: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.104: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.104: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.104: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.104: bytes=32 time=94ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.104: bytes=32 time=102ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.104: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.104: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.104: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.104: bytes=32 time=105ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.104: bytes=32 time=102ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.104: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.104: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.104: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.104: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.104: bytes=32 time=96ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.104: bytes=32 time=99ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.104: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=239 Reply from 64.233.161.104: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.161.104: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=243 Ping statistics for 64.233.161.104: Packets: Sent = 26, Received = 26, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 61ms, Maximum = 121ms, Average = 80ms

lol mazorco. how did you know? i'm so sad now.

lol. do you even know what you are talking about? >.> <.< -.-

i've been having 0 lag for the last 2 days. along with 60 pings on servers which is friggen sexy. downloads = along the 120ishkB/s mark

10k is substantially a big amount of money. heh. 10k is the base fee upon violations for multi-national companies.

lol. dude. resalsjjaklsjabotnickwhatever. ur just a simple conformist. and that YOU don't know how to complain / proceed upon the matter is the real obstacle here, not DACO , nor onelink. lol. ill be on the look for some smart reply on your behalf on this matter. BTW. today @ noon i called in OneLink Customer Support and spent almost 1 hour chatting with an employee, very calm guy, we even exchanged x-fire gaming information. Just so you see, he explained me a lot on the inner workings on oneLink and lots of the WHYes? and HOWs? of the company. Nobody gave me no friggen royal shaft. He even apologized for the inconvenience and told me that there are being stuff worked on , DNS servers, DHCP servers, GATEWAYS, Layer-1 Routers (for those who know what is layer1) among other things.

trogers thanks for the great net diagnostics link. good luck with your conn. bellazdad, hope u get a fix soon .

exactly dude. you just don't bitch by phone (or in a forum that oneLink will ever know off. lol). you gotta take it further as drebel proposed. here's a thought: you call with a coherent design on how and what you are going to say. afterwards you call DACO file in that you called. file in the name of who in customer support handed your call, make a file with all this. warranty, receipts, time of calls, who you talked to, what was talked. dudes. you do this very organized. then u send all this to daco and the fcc = victory, cuz they see a good will from you, and a consistent positive & objective file leads to pwnage. there is no way oneLink can give you the shaft with this kind of diligency. *Do it.*

ya. thanks for the insight. im trying something on that line. encapsulating the overall protocol into a new packet type. But yeah, if they are just limiting the connections it's pointless to do this anyways after all, i can't fool the RIP or IGRP on the routers . they will route or filter anything no matter what packet type is if they limit the connections to known torrent mainframes. it's funny how i can get up to 100kB/s ***upload*** speeds on bitComet. lol. on azureus [latest release with dht and decentralized on] i get 0kB/s ***upload*** tho'. definitely port / packet / connection capping. ---------- as for the DACO issue. just called the FCC and DACO, i opened two accounts under my sweet kiddy name. One for Centennial de Puerto Rico (with some phony bill charges & customer mistreat) and another temptative to OneLink ADvertising misdemeanors. FCC + DACO + a smart consumer doing the right steps, saying the right things = totally powerfull. These multi-national companies need to learn to respect us proletariate. And *this* is the most direct and appropiate manner. as for resoajsjoaojobotnick's reply on complaining. about the Government. Well, what about the government? dude, if u can't complain cuz it won't do anything. Join the government, and make it improve yourself. To tell you a cute story. I study @ the university of rio piedras campus, la yupi. I'm a master networker and programmer. I have complained about the Rio Piedras methods of implementing services for the students and professorate for ages. You wanna know what i did? I graduated from Computer Sciences, made a proposal to the Department of Technologies. Now I am webmaster of the precinct, am working as assistant-networker and am working on the new upgrades on functionality to the system over-all. The moral of this story? I'm fixing that crap step by step, improving it along the way while i get some good money and i write this little piece on this forum. NOTHING is impossible, you just gotta hit the right spots at the correct time with the correct dispositions. BTW i'm only 19. yes. 19 years old. and this is not a joke. i'm not a joke. hehe. antoni, 10-7 out.