
markgot
Members-
Posts
5 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Speed Test
My Results
About markgot
- Birthday 01/01/1
Profile Information
-
Gender
Not Telling
markgot's Achievements

New Member (2/10)
0
Reputation
-
At last, my connection's better!!! It seems the problem was in our modem...it was just too old I guess.... After the replacement, I just did what you guys posted, since it was still slow, and now here's the new result Thank you for your help Van. ::::::::::.. Download Stats ..:::::::::: Download Connection is:: 1672 Kbps about 1.67 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 204 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/08/12 - 12:02am Bottom Line:: 29X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 5.02 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 14.657 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 171.87 % faster than the average for host (pldt.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-WUSO8YB9D User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.6) Gecko/20060728 Firefox/1.5.0.6 -Mark G.
-
Hey Jose Rizal What does that program do? VanBuren, I just finished doing all those listed...finally...but still no change...I also did the TCP optimizer config, still going to do another speed test though...just to see any difference... -Mark G.
-
Ok, apparently, my ISP is running at 1mbps, and my friend doesn't really believe in those accelerators cuz he thinks that they're just RAM eaters. And the results... TCP options string = 020405ac0103030001010402 MTU = 1492 MTU is optimized for PPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for optimal throughput. MSS = 1452 MSS is optimized for PPPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising your MTU value. Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 65340 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 65340 RWIN is a multiple of MSS Other RWIN values that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 511104 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 255552 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4) 127776 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2) 63888 (MSS x 44) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your TCP Window limits you to: 2613.6 kbps (326.7 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your TCP Window limits you to: 1045.44 kbps (130.68 KBytes/s) @ 500ms MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 121 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000 (0) As for the D/L Speed...it became faster...a bit Your connection is: 158 Kbps or 0.16 Mbps You Downloaded at: 19 kB/s You are running: 3 times faster than 56K and can Download 1 megabyte in 53.89 second(s) Member Ident: CompID:19277445143524 Test Time:: 2006/07/26 - 7:21am Test Browser and OS info: Opera/9.00 (Windows NT 5.1; U; en) Test ID: 4X9A81BVS (if this is a screenshot go to testmy.net to see if this is fake) Diagnosis ^info^: May need help : running at only 27.38 % of your hosts average (pldt.net) This was tested from a 386 kB file and took 20.015 seconds to complete Thanks again for helping -Mark G.
-
I did what you said, and this was the result, and, btw, thanks for the welcoming. Sorry if I'm still noob to these things... Oh, and the asterix disappeared Pinging testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=273ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=275ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=273ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=274ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=274ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=272ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=273ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=274ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=272ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=275ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=274ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=272ms TTL=51 Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85: Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 272ms, Maximum = 275ms, Average = 273ms Ping Complete. Tracing route to testmy.net [67.18.179.85] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1 2 53 ms 52 ms 49 ms 210.213.128.1.pldt.net [210.213.128.1] 3 51 ms 49 ms 50 ms 210.1.65.49 4 50 ms 50 ms 49 ms 58.71.0.143 5 52 ms 52 ms 49 ms 58.71.0.76 6 226 ms 225 ms 228 ms POS5-3.IG3.SAC1.ALTER.NET [157.130.214.149] 7 223 ms 224 ms 225 ms 0.so-2-2-0.XL2.SAC1.ALTER.NET [152.63.54.126] 8 275 ms 276 ms 277 ms 0.so-3-0-0.XL2.DFW13.ALTER.NET [152.63.96.26] 9 273 ms 275 ms 272 ms POS7-0.GW1.DFW13.ALTER.NET [152.63.103.89] 10 274 ms 271 ms 272 ms theplanet-gw.customer.alter.net [157.130.143.226] 11 276 ms 274 ms 276 ms vl31.dsr01.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.29] 12 274 ms 272 ms 276 ms vl41.dsr01.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.83] 13 271 ms 275 ms 273 ms gi1-0-1.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.69] 14 274 ms 271 ms 275 ms 55.b3.1243.static.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85] Trace complete. - Mark G.
-
My computer's running on Windows XP SP2 and my ISP is PLDT DSL (Philippines) with an average of more or less 512kbps. Apparently, I'm only running at Your connection is: 81 Kbps or 0.08 Mbps You Downloaded at: 10 kB/s You are running: 1 times faster than 56K and can Download 1 megabyte in 102.4 second(s) Member Ident: CompID:19277445514559 Test Time:: 2006/07/25 - 12:20am Test Browser and OS info: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) Test ID: IMK00AF5B (if this is a screenshot go to testmy.net to see if this is fake) Diagnosis ^info^: May need help : running at only 14.36 % of your hosts average (pldt.net) This was tested from a 97 kB file and took 9.734 seconds to complete But my friend's result, with the same ISP and plan is Your connection is: 4375 Kbps or 4.38 Mbps You Downloaded at: 534 kB/s You are running: 76 times faster than 56K and can Download 1 megabyte in 1.92 second(s) Member Ident: CompID:19277451377581 Test Time:: 2006/07/25 - 12:20am Test Browser and OS info: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; en) Opera 8.52 Test ID: 38HVG4YW7 (if this is a screenshot go to testmy.net to see if this is fake) Diagnosis ^info^: Awesome! 20% + : 675.71 % faster than the average for host (pldt.net) This was tested from a 5983 kB file and took 11.203 seconds to complete which just makes me so frustrated with my download speed I tried using TCP Optimizer, but I'm not sure how to use it.... And the analyzers' results are: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TCP options string = 020405ac01010402 MTU = 1492 MTU is optimized for PPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for optimal throughput. MSS = 1452 MSS is optimized for PPPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising your MTU value. Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 15972 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 15972 RWIN seems to be set to a very small number. If you're on a broadband connection, consider using a larger value. RWIN is a multiple of MSS Other RWIN values that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 511104 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 255552 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4) 127776 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2) 63888 (MSS x 44) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your TCP Window limits you to: 638.88 kbps (79.86 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your TCP Window limits you to: 255.552 kbps (31.944 KBytes/s) @ 500ms Consider increasing your RWIN value to optimize TCP/IP for broadband. MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 57 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 11110000 (240) Precedence (priority) = 111 (Network Control) Delay = 1 (low delay) Throughput = 0 (normal throughput) Reliability = 0 (normal reliability) Cost = 0 (normal cost) Check bit = 0 (correct, 8th checking bit must be zero) DiffServ (RFC 2474) = No valid DiffServ equivalent. See the TCP Optimizer documentation, or RFCs 2474, 2475, 2597, 2598, 2873. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Pinging testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=268ms TTL=51 Request timed out. Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=269ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=269ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=276ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=268ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=269ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=268ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=267ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=268ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=269ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=268ms TTL=51 Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85: Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 11, Lost = 1 (8% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 267ms, Maximum = 276ms, Average = 269ms Ping Complete. Tracing route to testmy.net [67.18.179.85] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1 2 * 46 ms 44 ms 210.213.128.1.pldt.net [210.213.128.1] 3 * 41 ms 41 ms 210.1.65.49 4 43 ms 42 ms * 58.71.0.79 5 40 ms 40 ms 46 ms 58.71.0.140 6 * * 218 ms POS5-3.IG3.SAC1.ALTER.NET [157.130.214.149] 7 217 ms 218 ms 234 ms 0.so-2-2-0.XL2.SAC1.ALTER.NET [152.63.54.126] 8 266 ms 267 ms 268 ms 0.so-3-0-0.XL2.DFW13.ALTER.NET [152.63.96.26] 9 267 ms 266 ms 267 ms POS7-0.GW1.DFW13.ALTER.NET [152.63.103.89] 10 * 268 ms * theplanet-gw.customer.alter.net [157.130.143.226] 11 268 ms 267 ms 266 ms vl32.dsr01.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.61] 12 267 ms * 267 ms vl41.dsr01.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.83] 13 268 ms 268 ms 267 ms gi1-0-1.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.69] 14 * 268 ms 267 ms 55.b3.1243.static.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85] Trace complete. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ So, please, if you have any suggestions on making my DSL optimized feel free to say them to me.... Thanks In Advance