markgot
-
Posts
5 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Speed Test
My Results
Posts posted by markgot
-
-
Hey Jose Rizal
What does that program do?
VanBuren, I just finished doing all those listed...finally...but still no change...I also did the TCP optimizer config, still going to do another speed test though...just to see any difference...
-Mark G.
-
Ok, apparently, my ISP is running at 1mbps, and my friend doesn't really believe in those accelerators cuz he thinks that they're just RAM eaters.
And the results...
TCP options string = 020405ac0103030001010402
MTU = 1492
MTU is optimized for PPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for optimal throughput.
MSS = 1452
MSS is optimized for PPPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising your MTU value.
Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 65340
RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits
Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 65340
RWIN is a multiple of MSS
Other RWIN values that might work well with your current MTU/MSS:
511104 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of
255552 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4)
127776 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2)
63888 (MSS x 44)
bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test):
Your TCP Window limits you to: 2613.6 kbps (326.7 KBytes/s) @ 200ms
Your TCP Window limits you to: 1045.44 kbps (130.68 KBytes/s) @ 500ms
MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON
Time to live left = 121 hops
TTL value is ok.
Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF
Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON
IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000 (0)
As for the D/L Speed...it became faster...a bit
Your connection is: 158 Kbps or 0.16 Mbps
You Downloaded at: 19 kB/s
You are running: 3 times faster than 56K and can Download 1 megabyte in 53.89 second(s)
Member Ident: CompID:19277445143524
Test Time:: 2006/07/26 - 7:21am
Test Browser and OS info: Opera/9.00 (Windows NT 5.1; U; en)
Test ID: 4X9A81BVS (if this is a screenshot go to testmy.net to see if this is fake)
Diagnosis ^info^: May need help : running at only 27.38 % of your hosts average (pldt.net)
This was tested from a 386 kB file and took 20.015 seconds to complete
Thanks again for helping
-Mark G.
-
I did what you said, and this was the result, and, btw, thanks for the welcoming. Sorry if I'm still noob to these things... Oh, and the asterix disappeared
Pinging testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=273ms TTL=51
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=275ms TTL=51
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=273ms TTL=51
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=274ms TTL=51
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=274ms TTL=51
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=272ms TTL=51
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=273ms TTL=51
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=274ms TTL=51
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=272ms TTL=51
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=275ms TTL=51
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=274ms TTL=51
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=272ms TTL=51
Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85:
Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 272ms, Maximum = 275ms, Average = 273ms
Ping Complete.
Tracing route to testmy.net [67.18.179.85]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1
2 53 ms 52 ms 49 ms 210.213.128.1.pldt.net [210.213.128.1]
3 51 ms 49 ms 50 ms 210.1.65.49
4 50 ms 50 ms 49 ms 58.71.0.143
5 52 ms 52 ms 49 ms 58.71.0.76
6 226 ms 225 ms 228 ms POS5-3.IG3.SAC1.ALTER.NET [157.130.214.149]
7 223 ms 224 ms 225 ms 0.so-2-2-0.XL2.SAC1.ALTER.NET [152.63.54.126]
8 275 ms 276 ms 277 ms 0.so-3-0-0.XL2.DFW13.ALTER.NET [152.63.96.26]
9 273 ms 275 ms 272 ms POS7-0.GW1.DFW13.ALTER.NET [152.63.103.89]
10 274 ms 271 ms 272 ms theplanet-gw.customer.alter.net [157.130.143.226]
11 276 ms 274 ms 276 ms vl31.dsr01.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.29]
12 274 ms 272 ms 276 ms vl41.dsr01.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.83]
13 271 ms 275 ms 273 ms gi1-0-1.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.69]
14 274 ms 271 ms 275 ms 55.b3.1243.static.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85]
Trace complete.
- Mark G.
-
My computer's running on Windows XP SP2 and my ISP is PLDT DSL (Philippines) with an average of more or less 512kbps.
Apparently, I'm only running at
Your connection is: 81 Kbps or 0.08 Mbps
You Downloaded at: 10 kB/s
You are running: 1 times faster than 56K and can Download 1 megabyte in 102.4 second(s)
Member Ident: CompID:19277445514559
Test Time:: 2006/07/25 - 12:20am
Test Browser and OS info: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1)
Test ID: IMK00AF5B (if this is a screenshot go to testmy.net to see if this is fake)
Diagnosis ^info^: May need help : running at only 14.36 % of your hosts average (pldt.net)
This was tested from a 97 kB file and took 9.734 seconds to complete
But my friend's result, with the same ISP and plan is
Your connection is: 4375 Kbps or 4.38 Mbps
You Downloaded at: 534 kB/s
You are running: 76 times faster than 56K and can Download 1 megabyte in 1.92 second(s)
Member Ident: CompID:19277451377581
Test Time:: 2006/07/25 - 12:20am
Test Browser and OS info: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; en) Opera 8.52
Test ID: 38HVG4YW7 (if this is a screenshot go to testmy.net to see if this is fake)
Diagnosis ^info^: Awesome! 20% + : 675.71 % faster than the average for host (pldt.net)
This was tested from a 5983 kB file and took 11.203 seconds to complete
which just makes me so frustrated with my download speed
I tried using TCP Optimizer, but I'm not sure how to use it....
And the analyzers' results are:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TCP options string = 020405ac01010402
MTU = 1492
MTU is optimized for PPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for optimal throughput.
MSS = 1452
MSS is optimized for PPPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising your MTU value.
Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 15972
RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits
Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 15972
RWIN seems to be set to a very small number. If you're on a broadband connection, consider using a larger value.
RWIN is a multiple of MSS
Other RWIN values that might work well with your current MTU/MSS:
511104 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of
255552 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4)
127776 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2)
63888 (MSS x 44)
bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test):
Your TCP Window limits you to: 638.88 kbps (79.86 KBytes/s) @ 200ms
Your TCP Window limits you to: 255.552 kbps (31.944 KBytes/s) @ 500ms
Consider increasing your RWIN value to optimize TCP/IP for broadband.
MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON
Time to live left = 57 hops
TTL value is ok.
Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF
Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON
IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 11110000 (240)
Precedence (priority) = 111 (Network Control)
Delay = 1 (low delay)
Throughput = 0 (normal throughput)
Reliability = 0 (normal reliability)
Cost = 0 (normal cost)
Check bit = 0 (correct, 8th checking bit must be zero)
DiffServ (RFC 2474) = No valid DiffServ equivalent. See the TCP Optimizer documentation, or RFCs 2474, 2475, 2597, 2598, 2873.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pinging testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=268ms TTL=51
Request timed out.
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=269ms TTL=51
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=269ms TTL=51
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=276ms TTL=51
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=268ms TTL=51
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=269ms TTL=51
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=268ms TTL=51
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=267ms TTL=51
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=268ms TTL=51
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=269ms TTL=51
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=268ms TTL=51
Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85:
Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 11, Lost = 1 (8% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 267ms, Maximum = 276ms, Average = 269ms
Ping Complete.
Tracing route to testmy.net [67.18.179.85]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1
2 * 46 ms 44 ms 210.213.128.1.pldt.net [210.213.128.1]
3 * 41 ms 41 ms 210.1.65.49
4 43 ms 42 ms * 58.71.0.79
5 40 ms 40 ms 46 ms 58.71.0.140
6 * * 218 ms POS5-3.IG3.SAC1.ALTER.NET [157.130.214.149]
7 217 ms 218 ms 234 ms 0.so-2-2-0.XL2.SAC1.ALTER.NET [152.63.54.126]
8 266 ms 267 ms 268 ms 0.so-3-0-0.XL2.DFW13.ALTER.NET [152.63.96.26]
9 267 ms 266 ms 267 ms POS7-0.GW1.DFW13.ALTER.NET [152.63.103.89]
10 * 268 ms * theplanet-gw.customer.alter.net [157.130.143.226]
11 268 ms 267 ms 266 ms vl32.dsr01.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.61]
12 267 ms * 267 ms vl41.dsr01.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.83]
13 268 ms 268 ms 267 ms gi1-0-1.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.69]
14 * 268 ms 267 ms 55.b3.1243.static.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85]
Trace complete.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So, please, if you have any suggestions on making my DSL optimized feel free to say them to me....
Thanks In Advance
I need help with my (PLDT) DSL...badly...
in Make it Faster...
Posted
At last, my connection's better!!! It seems the problem was in our modem...it was just too old I guess....
After the replacement, I just did what you guys posted, since it was still slow, and now here's the new result
Thank you for your help Van.
::::::::::.. Download Stats ..::::::::::
Download Connection is:: 1672 Kbps about 1.67 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)
Download Speed is:: 204 kB/s
Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1)
Test Time:: 2006/08/12 - 12:02am
Bottom Line:: 29X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 5.02 sec
Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 14.657 seconds to complete
Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 171.87 % faster than the average for host (pldt.net)
D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-WUSO8YB9D
User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.6) Gecko/20060728 Firefox/1.5.0.6
-Mark G.