theelviscerator

So you are getting that much down and https://testmy.net/stats/id-AY391U6MR'>https://testmy.net/stats/id-AY391U6MR this much up? You are getting ripped.

What did you do search my worst test out during network issues?

WTF?

this is RIGHT NOW

Dont be such a troll

:::.. Upload Stats ..:::

Upload Connection is:: 745 Kbps about 0.75 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB)

Upload Speed is:: 91 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2006/07/29 - 11:04am

Bottom Line:: 13X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 11.25 sec

Tested from a 1496 kB file and took 16.4544 seconds to complete

Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 74.07 % faster than the average for host (comcast.net)

U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-RC8WHDYA3

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) [!]

Someones a lil defensive. We are getting alot of twisted panty people lately.

Wonder why?

its mostly likely not cached, he is probally on Comcasts "boost" stuff. he just cant get a good enough result because the test file isn't big enough.

thats the 20 meg file..

You guys need 100 meg file tests now...

Cached test posts never get old to me. They always make me snicker.

Its not cached SNICKER That!

I lived in Plainfield till 3 years ago...Behind the kroger in that hood!

from that test

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 24008 Kbps about 24.01 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB)

Download Speed is:: 2931 kB/s

Tested From:: http://s2.testmy.net

Test Time:: 2006/07/29 - 10:47am

Bottom Line:: 419X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.35 sec

Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 7.156 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 349.93 % faster than the average for host (comcast.net)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-LAD3R4TX8

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) [!]

Guess not

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 27479 Kbps about 27.48 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB)

Download Speed is:: 3354 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2006/07/29 - 10:45am

Bottom Line:: 479X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.31 sec

Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 3.625 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 414.97 % faster than the average for host (comcast.net)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-EL6GMDNYB

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) [!]

I bought that same router. It sits on the shelf because it kills my throughput..

my older netgear 54mb wgr614 works FINE

(27 meg dl speed)

Tried everything....Netgear forums are full of people with same issue and Netgear gives no fix..

can it.

An engineer....

Powerboost is the cause..

This test was run right after clearing cache..

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 26345 Kbps about 26.35 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB)

Download Speed is:: 3216 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2006/07/22 - 8:30am

Bottom Line:: 459X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.32 sec

Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 3.781 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 396.89 % faster than the average for host (comcast.net)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-LWOTMPBDI

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) [!]

thats the standard upload. what were you expecting?

Powerboost looks more like this..

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 23350 Kbps about 23.35 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB)

Download Speed is:: 2850 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2006/07/22 - 8:26am

Bottom Line:: 407X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.36 sec

Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 4.266 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 340.4 % faster than the average for host (comcast.net)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-DTI968AYJ

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) [!]

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 22608 Kbps about 22.61 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB)

Download Speed is:: 2760 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2006/07/20 - 6:14pm

Bottom Line:: 394X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.37 sec

Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 4.406 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 327.37 % faster than the average for host (comcast.net)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-B0HP52CGF

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) [!]

prob boosted def not cached

fluke?

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 26338 Kbps about 26.34 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB)

Download Speed is:: 3215 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2006/07/13 - 11:38am

Bottom Line:: 459X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.32 sec

Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 3.782 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 401.29 % faster than the average for host (comcast.net)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-UQ03CTXMO

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) [!]

well 2 miles south of michigan..

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 9712 Kbps about 9.71 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)

Download Speed is:: 1186 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net  (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2006/05/21 - 5:03pm

Bottom Line:: 169X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.86 sec

Tested from a 5983 kB file and took 5.047 seconds to complete

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)

Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 93.27 % faster than the average for host (comcast.net)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-R58H2EG39

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 10054 Kbps about 10.05 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)

Download Speed is:: 1227 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net  (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2006/05/15 - 9:38pm

Bottom Line:: 175X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.83 sec

Tested from a 5983 kB file and took 4.875 seconds to complete

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)

Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 100.52 % faster than the average for host (comcast.net)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-Z5DCKO1WJ

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 9864 Kbps about 9.86 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)

Download Speed is:: 1204 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net  (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2006/05/11 - 3:31pm

Bottom Line:: 172X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.85 sec

Tested from a 5983 kB file and took 4.969 seconds to complete

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)

Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 97.04 % faster than the average for host (Comcast.net)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-6GSBD897O

:::.. Upload Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 700 Kbps about 0.7 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB)

Upload Speed is:: 85 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net  (Server 1)

Test Time:: 2006/05/11 - 3:33pm

Bottom Line:: 12X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 12.05 sec

Tested from a 1496 kB file and took 17.5056 seconds to complete

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)

Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 87.67 % faster than the average for host (comcast.net)

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-9DKINTLHY

8/768 Tier

no need to run accelerators really ...

He was thinking, how do you unshoot a modem right?...

what was wrong with the 5120 thats not exactly OLD...

Every day is doomsday for thousands of people though, maybe your or I am next?

What is the rated line speed and what does granny get on her puter?

I have an older RCA (DCM-226) and it gets the same speeds as the new one DCM-315) they temporarily leased to me to try to solve some issues.  I've been complaining for seven months about service drops and connectivity issues and they always blame it on the modem, but this time, it's their problem, not mine.

Bottom line is that they have too much noise on the line I'm on.  I was told that my Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) was 22.7 and I was told anything under 25 gets fixed.  The connection keeps dropping with the 226, and the 315 lags occasionally, and dropped once so far in the past three days.  They're coming out Monday to diagnose the situation again and actually fix it.

I don't think RCAs are bad at all.  I actually prefer and trust them more than the others that are out there.

On either modem, I still pull 6200/360.  Plenty fine for me.  The system around here just can't handle much more than that anyways.  I know people that have the 8/768 package and are getting about the same DL as I am, but their UL is pretty typical around 690.

Your line levels are obviously bad, I had a 37db snr and couldn only get 4.4 on my DCM315 switched to SB5120 and speeds tripled...

I used to install cable modems for a living and all my cable from pole to the modem is brand new including hw, modem itself was the problem.

Like I said, choosing the correct file.......tested 4, 6, and 10 all same results with hitching..

Those are good speeds, where are you testing from?

Northern Indiana, I get good speeds to NY from here on Speakeasy too..

I will be the first to admit that VanB's Cablenut settings net me a speed increase on my connection, but I have noticed something strange during testing and playing BF2.

Running the correct cablenut file for my connection I get higher total speeds but the larger files always hitch in the middle for a second, then continue.

During gaming I would get these same hitches.

Taking the Cablenut tweaks OFF the system the scores would drop slightly, but the dl would progress seamlessly across on the bar, and the hitch is gone online.

Needless to say on my 8 meg tier now I have plenty of speed, and NO HITCHING is def what you want online gaming..

Any ideas why this is doing this?

Any one else gettting this ?