Jump to content

Blako

Skilled Member
  • Posts

    455
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2
  • Speed Test

    My Results

Posts posted by Blako

  1. Let me see if I understand

    You have a 10 Gigabit Ethernet adapter, think of that as your computers speed limit within your building... Your host (level3) sets the limit between your house and the internet.

    example: I have 100Mbps home networking between my computers, while RoadRunner gives me 10Mbps downloads

  2. The motherboard has not been changed since the P4 and mobo install.  My only good news about the computer is that after I increased the northbridge voltage there have only been one computer crash in two months compared to before where it crashed 1-5 times a day. (Much better!)  I have taken the FSB from 200 to 211 before it crashes. (3.16 Ghz OC)  I have found quite a few reviews that found my mobo to be poor.

    My 6800gt can only overclock from 350/1000 to 375/1100 even with 0.1 volt bios increase.  Some where beyond that and the screen goes to a rainbow checkerboard, followed by a black screen, followed by the monitor turning off saying "no signal".  I have found simar problems by other owners of this video card but at least for me, its stable at stock settings.

  3. Well I left home sunday night, and went to a friends place that invited us over.  We awoke to the smell of smoke and ash falling in the street.  So we traveled north of san diego toward clean air.  Im starting the second night sleeping in a friend's house.

    http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2007/10/23/us/20071023_FIRES_GRAPHIC.html#

    http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/20071023-1502-bn23fires1.html

    http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?uid=103734099241550080511&hl=en&gl=us&ptab=2&ie=UTF8&msa=0&msid=107592071260393044446.00043d12d7e7e7af51aaa&z=11&om=1

  4. In my opinion there is comfortable overclocking and extreme.  Comfortable overclocking might be to OC a E2160 (stock 1.8GHz) to 3.0GHz with stock fan, heatsink and voltage.  Thus money is conserved when compared to purchasing a higher priced cpu.  Extreme OC could be spending a thousand dollars to have your cpu run at 4-5GHz.

    To generalize: Are you overclocking to save money or for braging rights?

    Concerning water cooling,  the advantage to water cooling is the rate of the transfer of thermal energy is greater then with air.  :!: Brainstrorm!  A heatsink would perform much better if  there were liquid flowing through the fins and not a gas (air).

  5. What windows applications and games are you planing on?  Give us a feal for what your going to ask your computer to do.

    Video Card Comparison chart

    Single, Dual Or Quad Core? article

    As we see, there are considerable performance differences between a Core 2 processor running on one, two or four cores. You'll experience the least differences with popular games such as Quake IV, Prey or Call of Duty 2, as these haven't been optimized much for multi-core processors. The newer the game title, the better your chances to benefit from dual or quad core processors. At this time, a dual core at high clock speeds is the best (and most reasonable) choice for gaming.

    Professional applications such as the graphics rendering suite 3DStudio Max, Cinebench or Mainconcept's H.264 encoder are the exact opposite - these require as much performance as they can get, and hence were already optimized to make maximum use of dual and quad core processors. All three scale almost linearly, and are close to doubling performance when doubling the core count.

  6. If your cpu is rated for 72 degrees and your getting up to 50 degrees, that sounds fine to me. Do you have a log file to see what the max temp was during gameplay?  Did the cpu come with a maximum recomended ambient temp? 

    I know its a totally different processor but my P4 came with a paper specificing max ambient 38c, and max core 70c.  The ambient sensor reports 34c, while idle 43c core, 58c load.  My P4 is a monster heat producer and requires a heatsink rated at 89 watts of thermal energy.  For comparison your cpu needs to be able to disapate 65 watts of thermal energy.  (I might be using the wrong lingo so here is a link)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_Design_Power

  7. i heard today that there is a new speed available for fios. 20/20 for $65 a month. can anyone confirm this? and if so, what markets will this be available in?

    Not sure on the price, but 20/20 is now available in the NY Metro area.

    Its an example of economics:  Low prices to a square mile of NY metro customers is more profitable then high prices to a square mile of Nebraska.

    http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19244731-Verizon-to-offer-20meg-symetrical-FiOS

  8. Online games like Battlefield 2? or online games like miniclip.com?  I turned off one service using msconfig and all online games worked but not a single website. (The reverse of your question)  A firewall or router would prevent you from hosting a game... but not being able to connect to "battlenet" for example sounds like a firewall could of denied you access.  If the firewall's default answer to "can this program use the internet?", is "no", then its possable that no exception for that game has ever been added to the firewall. (how many nurses pay online games on their coffee break?)  I'm not entirely sure.

  9. http://www.arcticsilver.com/arctic_silver_instructions.htm

    Please try this link.

    Take care not to scratch the surface of the heatsink when removing the pad, a plastic tool is recommended in the removal of thermal pads or other thermal interface material. You can then optimally remove the remnants of the wax or other thermal interface material by using ArctiClean 1 and 2. You can adequately clean the remnants with a xylene based cleaner, (Goof Off and some carburetor cleaners) or high-purity isopropyl alcohol. If you use Goof off or xylene based cleaners always follow up with a cleaning of high-purity isopropyl alcohol afterwards.

    NEVER use any oil or petroleum based cleaners

    High purity isopropyl alcohol likely means 91-99%

    I didn't spread it around since the cpu core is in the center of the heatspreader and only 1/4 of the area.  Once the bond between the cpu heat spreader and the (aluminum or copper) heatsink is broken you will need to reapply the paste or face higher temps as I saw.  Also remember the job of the paste is to make an air tight bond, and the distance between the heat spreader and heatsink is thinner then the width of a human hair.

  10. The recommended latencies of CAS 4-4-4-12 at 800 MHz clock speeds are very good, as the vast majority of "standard" DDR2-800 memory modules on the market run at CAS 5-5-5-18 latencies at this same clock speed. Our testing in the past has shown that CAS 4-4-4 latencies typically deliver about 5% better overall system performance across the board compared to CAS 5-5-5 modules.

    I've searched all over these forums and read that keeping your ram and FSB frequency on a 1:1 ratio is the best for performance. I understand this, but I don't understand however why

    What you really should be asking is why are memory manufacturers producing RAM that far exceeds the FSB capabilities of current CPUs.

    One advantage to underclocking high rated RAM is that you can usually tighten up on the timings significantly. If you have DDR2-1066 with default timings of 5-5-5-15 & clock it down to DDR2-677 to run in sync with a 1333MHz FSB CPU, you *may* be able to set the timings as tight as 3-3-3-8. Try to find DDR2-667 with default timings like that!

    I would test the system.  Run stock and record some kind of memory benchmark.  Increase the ram by ratio of cpu:ram (5:6 perhaps) record results.  Underclock the ram by the ratio (6:5) and tighten the latencies, record results.

    It sounds like you took your stock fsb and 1:1 ratio of 200mhz = 200 ram, double data = 400

    then you overclocked fsb = 300mhz = ram 300, double data rate = 600

  11. Well I never looked into it, but heres what I know.

    You would have to pay your ISP for a second cable coming into your home. If there is only one computer in your home you might need:

    Two internet connections (double the montly bill), connected to a pair of modems connected to a dual router capable of load balancing, which is finally connected to your computer.

    OR

    Two internet connections (double the bill), going to a single modem with two internet ports (can't even find the thing exists, but i heard of it), then connected to your computer.

    It sounds like you do some research of dual ethernet adapters

    If there are two or more computers in your home then the dual router can take those two internets and divide it to however many computers you have.

    On another note, my research mostly turned up results from the ancient days of dial-up internet where the physical telephone wire was the limit on bandwidth.  This led the desire for dual dial-up modems effectively giving you 56kb times two!   :cheesy:  But the ethernet cable is not a major bottleneck today.  For that reason ISP's offer multiple speed packages to their customers giving each one the same cable modem and same set of wires.

  12. Had a few problems with the score database this morning as some of you may have noticed.  I'll be working this morning on optimizing it to alleviate the problems and to free up some system resources on the server.  So please bear with us this morning (and most likely this afternoon), the site may lag out for you a few times during the process because the commands I need to run are very resource intensive.

    For the moment the score signature image that some of you are using as your signatures will be disabled, this is because that image is drawn on the fly by the server and a query of the score database is needed to perform that action. 

    At the moment I have no ETA but I'll be working nonstop on this until the database resource choke has been alleviated.  I'll update this post and close the topic once I'm finished. 

    While I'm at it I'll be optimizing the other various databases but since this is preventative maintenance those services will not go down nor will they have issues related to their optimization, although, any and all portions of the site that are database driven (pretty much everything) could have issues if any of the commands I perform in mySQL get bogged down... but I'll try and make sure that my queries are small enough to avoid any further issues.

    Thanks for your patience and patronage.

    - Damon ~ testmy.net owner/admin

    Update:

    Database optimization is done, everything should be fully functional, took longer than expected but it's done now.  Sorry about the downtime folks.

    -Damon

  13. Going from 5Mbps to 10Mbps won't be any improvement (in my opinion) when downloading from web sites.  With any connection you still have to wait for the server to acknowledge your request then send data to you. 

    Lets say:

    msn.com = about 200kByte = 1600kbit,

    1.6Mbit / 5Mbps = 0.32 second

    1.6Mbit / 10Mbps = 0.16 second

    You will only experience a difference if your waiting solely on your internet connection and not on your CPU to open the web browser, store to memory, and display the window.  If that be the case, you can put what ever value you feal appropriate on the 0.16 seconds of your life you saved.

    cnet.com = about 500kByte = 4Mbit          Larger website

    4Mb / 5Mbps = 0.8 second

    4Mb / 10Mbps = 0.4 second

    google.com = about 10kByte = 80kbit        Smaller website

    80kb / 5Mbps = 0.016 second

    80kb / 10Mbps = 0.008 second

    I think ratchet would benefit from hearing the opinion from multiple testmy members.

×
×
  • Create New...