VanBuren
-
Posts
6,389 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3 -
Speed Test
My Results
Posts posted by VanBuren
-
-
congrats
-
::::::::::.. Upload Stats ..::::::::::
Upload Connection is:: 2006 Kbps about 2.01 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 245 kB/s
Tested From:: http://s2.testmy.net
Test Time:: 2006/09/09 - 12:01am
Bottom Line:: 35X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 4.18 sec
Tested from a 5983 kB file and took 24.43488 seconds to complete
Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 383.37 % faster than the average for host (Comcast.net)
U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-NLCFGYHOA
User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; InfoPath.2; FDM)
Does the following server have a 12MB/20MB upload test? I believe I can get more out of my upload.
Server 2 (secondary server) (upload test) (testmy.net flat-file mirror, hosted on 'testmy.net server 2') Hosted in Downtown Dallas, TX - United States [uNLIMITED BANDWIDTH]
-
:::.. Download Stats ..:::
Download Connection is:: 2950 Kbps about 2.95 Mbps (tested with 3151 kB)
Download Speed is:: 360 kB/s
Tested From:: http://72.36.156.118
Test Time:: 2006/08/30 - 8:57am
Bottom Line:: 51X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 2.84 sec
Tested from a 3151 kB file and took 8.75 seconds to complete
Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 15.99 % of your hosts average (bredbandsbolaget.se)
D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-TCP1FAIQL
User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.8.0.6) Gecko/20060728 Firefox/1.5.0.6 [!]
uploadtest dosent work for me
VanBuren
-
maybe you should take your chair's leg off the network cable...
good point!but since i have great speed against other sites, it must be a issue in the route or server.
most likely a server issue since i have no loss.
VanBuren
tracert www.ddance.fm
Tracing route to www.ddance.fm [193.16.154.138]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.0.1
2 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms ua-85-226-177-2.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se [85.226
.177.2]
3 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms vlan2.dr2.lul10.se.bredband.com [195.54.119.238]
4 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms port-channel3.dr1.lul1.se.bredband.com [195.54.1
19.233]
5 1 ms <1 ms <1 ms ge1-1.cr1.lul1.se.bredband.com [195.54.115.229]
6 20 ms 20 ms 20 ms pos4-0.cr2.svl1.se.bredband.com [195.54.124.26]
7 20 ms 20 ms 20 ms pos6-0.cr1.svl1.se.bredband.com [195.54.124.13]
8 20 ms 20 ms 20 ms pos6-0-0.cr2.sto1.se.bredband.com [195.54.123.18
1]
9 20 ms 20 ms 20 ms tenge9-2.br1.sto1.se.bredband.com [195.54.123.24
6]
10 21 ms 21 ms 20 ms netnod-ix-ge-a-sth-1500.cogent.com [194.68.123.1
55]
11 35 ms 35 ms 35 ms p15-2.core01.ham01.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.0
.129]
12 41 ms 41 ms 41 ms p4-0.core01.dus01.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.1.
177]
13 41 ms 41 ms 41 ms p13-0.core01.ams03.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.1
.125]
14 41 ms 41 ms 41 ms t3-2.mpd01.ams03.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.0.2
38]
15 41 ms 41 ms 41 ms internet-online-ams.demarc.cogentco.com [130.117
.241.234]
16 46 ms 56 ms 46 ms ge-0-1-0-v189.rtr1.ams-rb.io.nl [213.196.0.1]
17 45 ms 45 ms 45 ms fe0-v101.cr0.ams-rb.zylon.net [213.196.0.22]
18 41 ms 41 ms 42 ms hutch.odx.nl [193.16.154.138]
Trace complete.
ping -n 50 www.ddance.fm
Pinging www.ddance.fm [193.16.154.138] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53
Reply from 193.16.154.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53
Ping statistics for 193.16.154.138:
Packets: Sent = 50, Received = 50, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 41ms, Maximum = 48ms, Average = 41ms
-
indeed....Yep, seen it. Very pretty, but not very accurate.
VanBuren
-
:::.. Download Stats ..:::
Download Connection is:: 33627 Kbps about 33.63 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB)
Download Speed is:: 4105 kB/s
Tested From:: http://s1.testmy.net
Test Time:: 2006/08/14 - 9:24am
Bottom Line:: 586X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.25 sec
Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 5.109 seconds to complete
Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 81.31 % faster than the average for host (bredbandsbolaget.se)
D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-9KY6S2Z05
User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.8.0.6) Gecko/20060728 Firefox/1.5.0.6 [!]
:::.. Upload Stats ..:::
Upload Connection is:: 5340 Kbps about 5.34 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 652 kB/s
Tested From:: http://sedpotheadbob.com
Test Time:: 2006/08/27 - 3:24am
Bottom Line:: 93X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 1.57 sec
Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 4.58976 seconds to complete
Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 146.08 % faster than the average for host (bredbandsbolaget.se)
U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-TLSP5YZIN
User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.8.0.6) Gecko/20060728 Firefox/1.5.0.6 [!]
:::.. Upload Stats ..:::
Upload Connection is:: 13608 Kbps about 13.61 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 1661 kB/s
Tested From:: http://hem.bredband.net
Test Time:: 2006/08/27 - 3:28am
Bottom Line:: 237X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 0.62 sec
Tested from a 1496 kB file and took 0.90048 seconds to complete
Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 524.22 % faster than the average for host (bredbandsbolaget.se)
U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-IX8N6HYLV
User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.8.0.6) Gecko/20060728 Firefox/1.5.0.6 [!]
-
This topic has been moved to Make it Faster....
[iurl]http://www.testmy.net/forum/index.php?topic=15814.0[/iurl]
-
speedmeters is not very accurate when it comes to a top speed, averages is more accuratelol im capped at 384Kbps so you got me overcaped lol...
VanBuren
-
average @ 350 Kbps
top @ 421 Kbps
VanBuren
-
hey Radikal and welcome to the forum
if you speak Swedish, you can PM me if you like that better
your score is not bad since your overseas like me
try my Swedish mirror aswell
http://www.testmy.net/tools/test/d_load.php?&st=st&tt=1&ta=1&top=mirror-VanBuren&out_src=20MB
http://www.testmy.net/tools/test/u_load.php?&tt=1&st=st&ta=1&top=mirror-VanBuren&align=center&s=1013
VanBuren
-
yes you can use the same settings with or without router.
but, if you have a crappy router or using wireless, you want to minimize RWIN if you get inconsistent scores.
VanBuren
-
I dont see a problem posting links to other speedtest sites, testmy.net need to be compared and can take it
VanBuren
-
well, you cant go faster then the cap, if you hit 9.04 instead of 8.8, you might need to use a larger testfile to get a more accurate result.If I go into my cable modem it says my upstream cap is 768000bps and my downstream cap is 8800000bps. That would be 750Kbps up and about 8.59Mbps up, but on TCP I have gotten higher than 8.59 up, I have gotten as high as 9.04Mbps. And it makes me mad that I download at the speed you upload
How I would kill for an upstream speed like that!But how can my downstream speed be more than the cap? And the TCP upstream speed on my main PC is about 600-610Kbps, on my server PC it's 528Kbps and downstream about 6.6Mbps. Is there a problem with the server PC? Both are on the same router and modem and both have the NIC set up for 100Mbps full duplex.
Would it still be safe to assume I'm getting 725 up on the server PC via UDP? I'll try that test but if the servers are in sweden I dont know how accurate it will be.
assume your UDP speed is 768 Kbps upstream, the test i provided probl not gonna show that speed overseas.
VanBuren
-
This topic has been moved to Make it Faster....
[iurl]http://www.testmy.net/forum/index.php?topic=15655.0[/iurl]
-
hehe yea my signature shows my speedrecord overseas, i live in Sweden and tested this against Verizon testserver in US.
my cap is 100Mbps down and 13 Mbps up
The only UDP speedtest i know of is Tptest, it only using servers in Sweden, but give it a shot.
UDP speed is usually the same as your cap.
VanBuren
-
use this file, small files can give inconsistent resultsmy speed is really inconsistent ..
VanBuren
-
calculating latency is very hard, it wont be very accurate. So the best way is to test diffrent values..
this is a old guide how to calculate http://www.luwigie.com/tweaks/FAQxp2000.pdf
VanBuren
-
you could try this http://www.download.com/No-IP-DUC-Dynamic-Update-Client-/3000-2165-10055182.html?part=dl-NoIPDUCDy&subj=dl&tag=button
it was a while since i used it myself, but i think you can forward it to 8080 instead of default port 80 in options
you also need to register for a free domain name, and password here
http://www.no-ip.com/services/managed_dns/free_dynamic_dns.html
Try us out for freeNo-IP Free is our entry level service. Use yourname.no-ip.com instead of a hard to remember IP address or URL. Additionally use our dynamic update client to keep track of your dynamic IP address. You will always be able to get to your computer even if you IP address is dynamically assigned.
Applications
No-IP Free DNS has endless uses. Remotely connect to your computer from work. Run a personal website, access your DVR, run a FTP, game, or mail server. The options are endless.
Port 80 Redirects
Many residential ISPs Block port 80, No-IP Free DNS enables you to run a webserver on a non-standard port, yet users accessing your site never have to enter a port number. For example http://yourname.no-ip.com/ can redirect to http://yourname.no-ip.com:8833/
Choose from any of these free subdomains:
* bounceme.net
* hopto.org
* myftp.biz
* myftp.org
* myvnc.com
* no-ip.biz
* no-ip.info
* no-ip.org
* redirectme.net
* servebeer.com
* serveblog.net
* servecounterstrike.com
* serveftp.com
* servegame.com
* servehalflife.com
* servehttp.com
* servemp3.com
* servepics.com
* servequake.com
* sytes.net
* zapto.org
We also have tons of less impacted domains to choose from when upgrading to No-IP
VanBuren
-
hey 003 and welcome to the forum
I also play some q3, reinstalled it a few days ago, great game
I play the mod Urban Terror mainly.quake3 and most multiplayer games using UDP and not TCP protocol, the UDP protocol is faster cos it docent need to send acknowledgepackets, for that less reliable.
we can try to improve TCP speed, thats what this speedtest using.
If you have cablenut installed, open it and set DefaultSendWindow to 64240, now click save to registry and reboot your PC
if you don't have cablenut, download it here http://www.testmy.net/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=1013.0;attach=64
VanBuren
-
hey and welcome to the forum p0rnrh3ttthe advertised speed of my ISP ranges from 256-512Kbps, uncapped, which means i can reach 1Mbps or higher .. but the thing is, i have to use a download manager to achieve that speed .. when i use the "Save Target As ..." option of Opera, the speed would range between 15kB/s-30kB/s ..
speedmeters in browsers is usually not very accurate. You can test this by open taskmanager network graph, and see if it picks up the speed. The reason is that when clicking "save as" browser starts downloading a part of the file before you even clicked "ok". That make speedmeter to jump since it calculate how much you downloaded and split it in time. To use this type of measurement, you need a large file eg 30 MB and download it completely.
your RWIN is very large for that type of bandwidth, i suggest you try cablenut and use
VanBurens_cablenut_settings_version_9CABLE_DSL_FIBER_DIAL-UPWinXP_2K_CABLE_DSLMTU 1500
Cable & DSL 512.ccs or Cable & DSL 1500.ccs
VanBuren
-
you could try this page http://www.j79zlr.com/cablenutXP2k.phpMy ISP advertises download speeds "up to" 20 Mb, and because I am a certain distance from the CO and the quality of my phone line, my router gives me only 9 Mb. But I think that a download speed of 3 Mb is rather bad. I really thnik that this can be improved. I don't know how to because I don't know very much about registry settings, etc.
If you think everything is ok, could you give me al least some advise and values to modify?. I would do tests and compare results on my own.
Thank you, Vanburen.
and try diffrent settings, just make sure to use 1500 as MTU
latency is usually between 150 and 300 ms, try whats best for you.
good luck
VanBuren
-
I don't think there is something else to do, your MTU is correct, the settings is fine, you could try increasing RWIN, but it might backfire when congestion starts ticking in... As larger RWIN you have, the more speed will suffer when a packet is lost.Well, those are the results. What is the new step, Vanburen?
With DSL, speed depends on how far away from CO you are, and the quality on the phonelines. That means you ISP cap modem at a certain rate eg 10 Mbps, but distance and quality on phoneline might only hold 8 Mbps max. Thats part of the reason ISP
-
no problem, are you sure the cap is 1 Mbps? Coz thats great speed 0.67 Mbps above capAt last, my connection's better!!!
It seems the problem was in our modem...it was just too old I guess....After the replacement, I just did what you guys posted, since it was still slow, and now here's the new result
Thank you for your help Van.
:::::::::::::::::.. Download Stats ..:::::::::::::::::
Download Connection is:: 1672 Kbps about 1.67 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)
Download Speed is:: 204 kB/s
Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1)
Test Time:: 2006/08/12 - 12:02am
Bottom Line:: 29X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 5.02 sec
Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 14.657 seconds to complete
Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 171.87 % faster than the average for host (pldt.net)
D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-WUSO8YB9D
User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.6) Gecko/20060728 Firefox/1.5.0.6
-Mark G.
VanBuren
-
welcome to the forum Dragon-EmperorGood job, that's the most detailed "help wanted" post in a while. Unfortunately, I'm not the expert on this. Since you're on cable, it may just be congestion from other people on your node. If nobody here can fix your problem, you should probably call your ISP and have them take a look at it.
i agree with gotmilk, its most likely congestion slowing you down at sometimes.
Instead of using smart test, always use the same testfile to compare speed
use this http://www.testmy.net/dl-5983
and this for upload http://www.testmy.net/ul-1496
you could try my tweakfiles, you should use
VanBurens_cablenut_settings_version_9
CABLE_DSL_FIBER_DIAL-UPWinXP_2K_CABLE_DSLMTU 1500
Cable & DSL 6000.ccs
or Cable & DSL 10000.ccs
try both
VanBuren
good point!
How I would kill for an upstream speed like that!
Anyone see this speed test yet?
in Show off your speed
Posted
the new russian server is pretty accurate for me
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.0.1
2 1 ms <1 ms <1 ms ua-85-226-177-2.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se [85.226
.177.2]
3 20 ms <1 ms <1 ms vlan2.dr2.lul10.se.bredband.com [195.54.119.238]
4 2 ms 1 ms 1 ms port-channel3.dr1.lul1.se.bredband.com [195.54.1
19.233]
5 1 ms <1 ms <1 ms ge1-1.cr1.lul1.se.bredband.com [195.54.115.229]
6 20 ms 20 ms 20 ms pos4-0.cr2.svl1.se.bredband.com [195.54.124.26]
7 20 ms 20 ms 20 ms pos5-0.cr1.svl1.se.bredband.com [195.54.123.97]
8 21 ms 20 ms 20 ms pos6-0-0.cr2.sto1.se.bredband.com [195.54.123.18
1]
9 22 ms 20 ms 20 ms tenge9-2.br1.sto1.se.bredband.com [195.54.123.24
6]
10 21 ms 21 ms 21 ms netnod-ix-ge-a-sth-1500.cogent.com [194.68.123.1
55]
11 22 ms 21 ms 21 ms linx-telecom.demarc.cogentco.com [149.6.80.130]
12 44 ms 44 ms 44 ms linxtelecom-gw.masterhost.ru [217.28.253.38]
13 44 ms 44 ms 44 ms 87.242.73.71
Trace complete.
VanBuren