Wesker

i got 4.10 down 500 up 94% quality service

Zoominternet 5/512 cable Pinging www.testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=49 Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 64ms, Maximum = 67ms, Average = 65ms Tracing route to www.testmy.net [67.18.179.85] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 * 10 ms * dynamic-acs-72-23-41-1.zoominternet.net [72.23.4 1.1] 2 11 ms 12 ms 11 ms dynamic-acs-72-23-4-61.zoominternet.net [72.23.4 .61] 3 16 ms 17 ms 14 ms dynamic-acs-72-23-4-14.zoominternet.net [72.23.4 .14] 4 16 ms 11 ms 12 ms dynamic-acs-72-23-2-41.zoominternet.net [72.23.2 .41] 5 14 ms 11 ms 11 ms lco144.zoominternet.net [63.67.120.144] 6 16 ms 16 ms 16 ms pa2-edge-03.inet.qwest.net [65.123.166.1] 7 34 ms 24 ms 24 ms jfk-core-02.inet.qwest.net [205.171.230.117] 8 25 ms 24 ms 24 ms jfk-brdr-02.inet.qwest.net [205.171.230.21] 9 27 ms 26 ms 23 ms qwest-gw.n54ny.ip.att.net [192.205.32.169] 10 69 ms 70 ms 69 ms tbr2-p032301.n54ny.ip.att.net [12.123.3.110] 11 72 ms 67 ms 70 ms tbr2-cl15.wswdc.ip.att.net [12.122.10.54] 12 70 ms 66 ms 69 ms tbr1-cl17.attga.ip.att.net [12.122.10.70] 13 71 ms 67 ms 82 ms tbr2-cl1835.attga.ip.att.net [12.122.9.158] 14 72 ms 77 ms 72 ms tbr1-cl13.dlstx.ip.att.net [12.122.2.89] 15 70 ms 68 ms 69 ms 12.122.82.37 16 198 ms 68 ms 65 ms 12.119.136.14 17 63 ms 73 ms 62 ms vl32.dsr02.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.62] 18 71 ms 68 ms 65 ms vl41.dsr01.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.83] 19 65 ms 107 ms 65 ms gi1-0-1.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.6 9] 20 72 ms 70 ms 67 ms 85.67-18-179.reverse.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85 ] Trace complete.

:::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 5578 Kbps about 5.6 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 681 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net Test Time:: Wed Feb 15 08:31:24 EST 2006 Bottom Line:: 100X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.5 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 47.14 % faster than the average for host (zoominternet.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-1BHFNRSKL that over the 3mb i got on the smart test

nice iam only 90 miles north of you and i get 5000/512 with zoominternet

ya thats fast very nice

now thats funny but nice speed looking good a slightly illegal form of tweaking is getting an appointment with the manager of your local cable provider and getting his balls in a vicegrip. then you tweak them until he gives you higher speeds. however, if he doesn't have a sense of humor he might try pressing charges against you for assault or so.

wow that sucks at least its not dial-up

nice speed

nice

lol

looks good

cool

cool

looking good

:haha: iam sorry that has to suck to be you

this isnt FOIS its cable 5/512

do an upload test plz

:::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 5264 Kbps about 5.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 643 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Tue Nov 29 08:05:56 EST 2005 Bottom Line:: 94X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.59 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 46.38 % faster than the average for host (zoominternet.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-KONQ2FB13 :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 469 Kbps about 0.5 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Upload Speed is:: 57 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Tue Nov 29 08:06:22 EST 2005 Bottom Line:: 8X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 17.96 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 20.57 % faster than the average for host (zoominternet.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-ZUQOD4ERW

nice

wow noone has an option on this??

Which is better BFG GeForce FX 5500 256MB or the card i have Nvidia GeForce Ti 4200 64MB no matter which one it is it will only be set at 4x AGP. Just wanted to know if its better and if its wroth the $70 i might spend on it?

that has to hurt <a href="http://www.nerdtests.com/ft_loser.php?im"> <img src="http://www.nerdtests.com/images/ft/lsr.php?val=0758" alt="I am 98% loser. What about you? Click here to find out!"> </a>

mines has about 95% uptime their still doing upgrades as far as i know zoominternet offers up to like 15/1 so iam guessing their upgrading to offer that if its cheaper than FOIS iam keeping zoom only thing i dislike about zoom is iam over 15 miles from CO so i get some packet loss its not much like say out of 1000 packets i may lose 1 or it needs to be retransmited. not too bad.

i have to wait till april or june 2006 to get FOIS

nice not bad at all