Jump to content

micwa1

Members
  • Content Count

    38
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Speed Test

    My Results

About micwa1

  • Rank
    Jr. Member
  • Birthday 01/01/1

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  1. If you have other [better] options, that would be the logical thing to do. Good luck!
  2. I'm sorry for my language. I have tried to "sort it out" in the public forum and in private messages. It's a lost cause with this is person. I can't even post my experience to the official forum without it getting copied over to another forum by some cynical stalker to fuel their sicking agenda. Seriously? :- Anyways, yes I am (as is all people on WB) experiencing some heavy congestion (more than usual) during prime time. But to bitch and moan on WBworld? The mods just work for WB, they don't control what goes on in the sky. They are trying to fix this by launching another sat, but it can't be done until 2011. So we must wait til then, and hopefully it tones down the congestion like promised. These birds can only hold so much, and WB does close down beams regularly, but they still have to have more customers to come in, regardless, to pay the bills. I mean duh. Nothing is perfect.
  3. So glad to know I have a f*cking stalker. Get a life. Btw, with HUGHENEEEEEEEEEEEET I hardly EEVEEEEEEEEEEER had connectivity. Piss off dude.
  4. marsh_0x, frankster has a long history baiting people using Wildblue. Just about every post he makes on the Wildblue boards is "post speeds", "Hughesnet is better". That's trollish behavior. He has been blocked numerous times on Wildblueworld.com for doing the exact same thing. So, no it was not uncalled for. Thank you.
  5. Irrelevant. What is relevant is that you're a troll.
  6. No I was comparing the "bucket" to WB and HughesNet. Sorry you missed that. Honestly, I don't know why you're so concern with WB anyways. Doesn't make any sense. You're not the one paying them every month for an unreliable service (for some people that post). Why are you so hot and bothered? You seem to forget that I once had HN, and the FAP and I didn't see eye to eye. That's one reason why I switched.
  7. I would bust that bucket in an hour. Also, just wait until Spaceway 3 starts filling up to the max, then post your speeds and pings.
  8. Prime times speeds are to be expected. It sucks, but it's reality until WB can shoot more sats in the sky (2011 is the current date). Unfortunately they can't just shit them out. Unfortunately.
  9. Just from 5 days of using the free trail (keep in mind that I have had it on and off during browsing, and I have the option to compress the graphics off)
  10. It's through the proxy Propel (and no that's not an accurate speed, just a glitch). See here: http://wildblueworld.com/forum/showthread.php?t=2867. Propel is an accelerator that we are so hoping WIldBlue starts to test it and use it for its customers. It would save on bandwidth (because it compresses data) and faster speed. You all know what my speeds are with wildblue, so there is no point in doing a daily or hourly test on here to further fuel some people's agenda. Satellite currently doesn't ever have a CONSISTENT speed, and thus it would be silly to expect more. Thank you. ::::::::::.. Download Stats ..:::::::::: Download Connection is:: 1074 Kbps about 1.1 Mbps (tested with 1013 kB) Download Speed is:: 131 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2009/11/12 - 2:59pm Bottom Line:: 19X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 7.82 sec Tested from a 1013 kB file and took 7.726 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 22.46 % faster than the average for host (wildblue.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-BT2380GMY User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/4.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; Tablet PC 2.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) w:PACBHO60
  11. Well, well, well.... :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 16520 Kbps about 16.5 Mbps (tested with 25600 kB) Download Speed is:: 2017 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2009/11/12 - 1:43am Bottom Line:: 288X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.51 sec Tested from a 25600 kB file and took 12.695 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 1783.69 % faster than the average for host (wildblue.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-4AWXUKCJ8 User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2b2) Gecko/20091108 Firefox/3.6b2 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729) [!]
  12. mudmanc4, tell your INSANE members to stay away from WildBlue World. I thought you all were adults, but it seems fikester is still bitter, that uh WildBlue gets 'worst' speeds than him? He has spammed over 10 posts with the same crap, linking to this post and my speed results. GIVE. IT. UP. Perhaps the basics of this FORUM is to determine which provider is "better". But I did not create THIS POST to be that way. After seeing fikester show his ass like he is part of 4chan or some S#!t, this why I will not be participating anymore on this forum Thank you.
  13. It's really not that difficulty to find that I live in MS. Yeah, pretty hard to work with a company based in CO. Getting old. Yup, I'm really advertising WB by posting true speeds (speeds that way below the normal range). Really bias there. Needless to say, I'm done here.
×
×
  • Create New...