Bright House Tampa Bay rings in a very Happy New Year to most customers for 2006

[Guest thecableguy]

all of which confirms my point about an open net being a result of ignorace, not trust. implying trust in a case like that would probably be seen as malicious abuse knowing full well consent is not given by any jury.

Agreed and backed up by existing case law in Florida and California.

[amc11890]

now it is way off topic

[Guest thecableguy]

now it is way off topic

Not really....but good info for you..if nothing more than to educate you enough not to be a danger to yourself.    Anyway...been fun...time for bed......

[resopalrabotnick]

Agreed and backed up by existing case law in Florida and California.

[Guest thecableguy]

which is a case of the law actually protecting the citizen with little clue. just because people leave their front door open doesn't mean he wants strangers looking around.

Isn't that the premise of most or at least many laws in existance today.  "Protect the average citizen from himself, for he has no ability to do it for himself".....flaming example....seatbelt laws, anti-smoking laws, jaywalking ordinances, motorcycle helmet laws.

[FallowEarth]

Isn't that the premise of most or at least many laws in existance today.