Sharky2006 Posted February 23, 2006 CID Share Posted February 23, 2006 The following is my results from the SpeedGuide.net TCP/IP Analyzer: TCP options string = 020405ac0103030401010402 MTU = 1492 MTU is optimized for PPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for optimal throughput. MSS = 1452 MSS is optimized for PPPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising your MTU value. Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 1045440 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 4 bits (scale factor of Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 65340 RWIN is a multiple of MSS Other RWIN values that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 511104 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 255552 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4) 127776 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2) 63888 (MSS x 44) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your TCP Window limits you to: 41817.6 Kbps (5227.2 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your TCP Window limits you to: 16727.04 Kbps (2090.88 KBytes/s) @ 500ms MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 56 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 01011100 (92) Precedence (priority) = 010 (immediate) Delay = 1 (low delay) Throughput = 1 (high throughput) Reliability = 1 (high reliability) Cost = 0 (normal cost) Check bit = 0 (correct, 8th checking bit must be zero) DiffServ (RFC 2474) = No valid DiffServ equivalent. See the TCP Optimizer documentation, or RFCs 2474, 2475, 2597, 2598, 2873. Do I have to change something here...? No valid DiffServ Equivalent? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted February 23, 2006 CID Share Posted February 23, 2006 What are your advertised speeds? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharky2006 Posted February 23, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 23, 2006 Verizon DSL 1.5 and 368 (I think?). Sorry for late response. Have a couple of sick children. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharky2006 Posted February 24, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 24, 2006 Do I have the right TOS value? Currently at 92. I previously had it at 240 but I read that this was too high..is this true? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jeffwalker9999 Posted February 24, 2006 CID Share Posted February 24, 2006 I had asked this ?? a few weeks ago and vanb answered with some sites to visit that answered this question see this post http://www.testmy.net/forum/index.php?topic=11410.0 quote from http://www.dslnuts.com/2kxp.shtml also read this thread http://www.broadbandnuts.com/index.php?PHPSESSID=0129428731711f0c451c6edb09cd5dd2&topic=1878.0 VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharky2006 Posted February 24, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 24, 2006 I read all of that and as a matter of fact this is where I read about TOS value and tried the 92 setting. I still don't know if it is right. In laments terms (is that spelled right...?) can you explain what this means and where I should be or how I could figure out the right TOS value (sort of like "TOS for Dummies" for me). I thank you in advance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cholla Posted February 24, 2006 CID Share Posted February 24, 2006 I'm not an expert on this I found this on the web & put it together.I changed mine to 80 it was 92. The IP Type of Service has the following fields: Bits 0-2: Precedence. Bit 3: 0 = Normal Delay, 1 = Low Delay. Bits 4: 0 = Normal Throughput, 1 = High Throughput. Bits 5: 0 = Normal Relibility, 1 = High Relibility. Bit 6-7: Reserved for Future Use. Bit #0-2: [128 64 32] Bit #3: [16] Bit #4: [8] Bit #5: [4] Bit #6-7: [Reserved] Bits 0,1,2 = Priority Control: 111 - Network Control use 128 + 64 + 32 = 224 110 - Internetwork Control 128 +64 + 0 = 192 101 - CRITIC/ECP 128 + 0 + 32 = 160 100 - Flash Override 128 + 0 + 0 = 128 011 - Flash 0 + 64 + 32 = 96 010 - Immediate 0 + 64 + 0 = 64 001 - Priority 0 + 0 + 32 = 32 000 - Routine 0 + 0 + 0= 0 Bit #0-2: [128 64 32] If I understand this 128 is on for bit 0;64 is on for bit 1,32 is on for bit 2. Bit #3: [16] 16= on; 0 = off Bit #4: [8] 8=on; 0 = off Bit #5: [4] 4=on; 0 = off Bit #6-7: [Reserved] Both of these have 0 for value. From what I read on this You can only have either low delay on or High Throughput on not both.If you set both I think your OS uses the default.Quote below: "The TOS value is used to indicate "better". Only one TOS value or property can be requested in any one IP datagram. Generally, protocols which are involved in direct interaction with a human should select low delay, while data transfers which may involve large blocks of data are need high throughput. Finally, high reliability is most important for datagram-based Internet management functions. Application protocols not included in these tables should be able to make appropriate choice of low delay (8 decimal, 1000 binary) or high throughput (4 decimal, 0100 binary)." "Reading RCF 1349, it states you have 5 choices in TOS. 0000 (all normal) Use default metric 1000 (minimize delay) Use delay metric 0100 (maximize throughput) Use default metric 0010 (maximize reliability) Use reliability metric 0001 (minimize monetary cost) Use cost metric other Use default metric" "Anything higher then 010, Immediate, are ment for internal network use. Meaning packets that are not ment to route to the internet." So for most I beleive one of these two would be correct: 72 which is Immediate, High Throughput, 010 010 00 That's64forImmediate+8forHighThroughput 80 which is Immediate, Low Delay, 010 100 00 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.