Niccko_tyme Posted June 7, 2006 CID Share Posted June 7, 2006 my download is good my upload could use some work but im getting really high pings in games around 210 to 350 in bf2. my internet is staticly assigned i have 3 different ips i can use and they all do about the same thing. C:Documents and SettingsNiccko>tracert 205.171.3.65 Tracing route to resolver.qwest.net [205.171.3.65] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 28 ms 68 ms 73 ms 10.225.1.1 2 75 ms 110 ms 91 ms 192.168.2.1 3 48 ms 33 ms 62 ms boi-edge-02.inet.qwest.net [67.134.58.29] 4 59 ms 129 ms 43 ms bse-core-01.inet.qwest.net [205.171.155.17] 5 64 ms 132 ms 69 ms boi-edge-03.inet.qwest.net [205.171.155.46] 6 113 ms 93 ms 87 ms resolver.qwest.net [205.171.3.65] Trace complete. i dont have a router and i dont know what the 192.168.2.1 is my modem is 192.168.100.1 C:Documents and SettingsNiccko> my pings for the dsn i caught it at really high points and dropping down C:Documents and SettingsNiccko>ping 205.171.3.65 Pinging 205.171.3.65 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 205.171.3.65: bytes=32 time=172ms TTL=59 Reply from 205.171.3.65: bytes=32 time=141ms TTL=59 Reply from 205.171.3.65: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=59 Reply from 205.171.3.65: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=59 Ping statistics for 205.171.3.65: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 51ms, Maximum = 172ms, Average = 112ms C:Documents and SettingsNiccko> ::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1890 Kbps about 1.89 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 231 kB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ (Server 2)Test Time:: 2006/06/06 - 11:14pm Bottom Line:: 33X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 4.43 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 12.969 seconds to complete Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; en) Opera 8.54 Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 140.76 % faster than the average for host (tetonwireless.com) Validation Link:: http://www.testmy.net/stats/id-K1Y84LUGA :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 240 Kbps about 0.24 Mbps (tested with 386 kB) Upload Speed is:: 29 kB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ (Server 1)Test Time:: 2006/06/06 - 9:18pm Bottom Line:: 4X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 35.31 sec Tested from a 386 kB file and took 13.16928 seconds to complete Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; en) Opera 8.54 Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 135.29 % faster than the average for host (tetonwireless.com) Validation Link:: http://www.testmy.net/stats/id-WXHRKCNYJ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimPawlak Posted June 7, 2006 CID Share Posted June 7, 2006 those arent the best speeds.... especially for gaming try tweaking it with cablenut thanks, Tim i am sure u will get help Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Niccko_tyme Posted June 7, 2006 Author CID Share Posted June 7, 2006 yeah i know there not the BEST speeds but better than the 256 and all upload socks foreal but meh ill try that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimPawlak Posted June 7, 2006 CID Share Posted June 7, 2006 if ur on 256 upload, ur prolyl gettin all u can get Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amc11890 Posted June 7, 2006 CID Share Posted June 7, 2006 Since it is wirless your pings are not going to be good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xylem Posted June 7, 2006 CID Share Posted June 7, 2006 That's about the same latency I get in bf2 on 756/256k, but it's as low as 60 in other games. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
just- Posted June 7, 2006 CID Share Posted June 7, 2006 hi Niccko_tyme 1st of all hello and let me welcome you to the forum if no one has done yet it looks like you have a wireless ISP have u ever had pings different from what you are reporting now on your current ISP? what technology does your ISP use to provide you with internet? wi-fi? wi-max? microwave? sat dish ? as far as i know and i am not a specialist i can tell you that with wi-fi and satelitle you will not be able to do anything about those pings, sorry if you are using microwave or wi-max it is a different story please elaborate on your set up thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dlewis23 Posted June 7, 2006 CID Share Posted June 7, 2006 Niccko_tyme welcome to the forum. any wireless connection in general is not going to be good for gaming. in your case bandwidth is not the problem its because you are on wireless. as much as i hate to say it, there isnt much you can do about your ping times becuase you are on wireless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Niccko_tyme Posted June 8, 2006 Author CID Share Posted June 8, 2006 if u can beleive this i work for my wireless internet provider and i cannot tell u what type of signal it is as far as microwave or anything else, unless you can tell me by description of our service. We have a butte that has an antenna that shoots out signal it has television and internet. we have to staticly assign private or public ips. we put planar transevers and transever down converters on masts that grab the signal. i talked to our main IT guy and he said he was coming down in a couple weeks to add somthign that will make our pings better, what that is hes doin i have no idea. hope this helps sorry i cant tell you more ive been with the company for 4 months so im still learning Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Niccko_tyme Posted June 8, 2006 Author CID Share Posted June 8, 2006 things are looking better ive been playing with new equipment and there seems to be much improvment. Pinging 205.171.3.65 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 205.171.3.65: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=59 Reply from 205.171.3.65: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=59 Reply from 205.171.3.65: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=59 Reply from 205.171.3.65: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=59 Ping statistics for 205.171.3.65: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 55ms, Maximum = 73ms, Average = 63ms C:Documents and SettingsNicckoDesktop>tracert 205.171.3.65 Tracing route to resolver1.qwest.net [205.171.3.65] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 34 ms 81 ms 82 ms 10.225.1.1 2 48 ms 49 ms 51 ms 192.168.2.1 3 55 ms 48 ms 97 ms boi-edge-02.inet.qwest.net [67.134.58.29] 4 63 ms 64 ms 34 ms bse-core-01.inet.qwest.net [205.171.155.17] 5 66 ms 54 ms 95 ms boi-edge-03.inet.qwest.net [205.171.155.46] 6 54 ms 91 ms 42 ms resolver1.qwest.net [205.171.3.65] Trace complete. we shall see what happens from here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amc11890 Posted June 9, 2006 CID Share Posted June 9, 2006 things are looking better ive been playing with new equipment and there seems to be much improvment. Pinging 205.171.3.65 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 205.171.3.65: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=59 Reply from 205.171.3.65: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=59 Reply from 205.171.3.65: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=59 Reply from 205.171.3.65: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=59 Ping statistics for 205.171.3.65: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 55ms, Maximum = 73ms, Average = 63ms C:Documents and SettingsNicckoDesktop>tracert 205.171.3.65 Tracing route to resolver1.qwest.net [205.171.3.65] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 34 ms 81 ms 82 ms 10.225.1.1 2 48 ms 49 ms 51 ms 192.168.2.1 3 55 ms 48 ms 97 ms boi-edge-02.inet.qwest.net [67.134.58.29] 4 63 ms 64 ms 34 ms bse-core-01.inet.qwest.net [205.171.155.17] 5 66 ms 54 ms 95 ms boi-edge-03.inet.qwest.net [205.171.155.46] 6 54 ms 91 ms 42 ms resolver1.qwest.net [205.171.3.65] Trace complete. we shall see what happens from here. lookin pretty good Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.