mbrainerd Posted January 21, 2005 CID Share Posted January 21, 2005 My ISP updated my connection, I did a tweak test here is what it stated. http://ttester.broadbandreports.com/tweak/block:32b2ac5?service=dsl&speed=2048&os=winXP&via=normal 2048/1024 Connection. Need to know what to set rwin to. Thanx. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 21, 2005 CID Share Posted January 21, 2005 heyas mbrainerd download and install cablenut 4.08 https://testmy.net/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=1013.0;id=64 download the attached file, unzip it to C:ProgramCablenut open cablenut adjuster, in top left corner you see file, click load custom settings file, browse to C:ProgramCablenut and dubbleclick on Cable & DSL 2048 1024.ccs now you have some values set in adjuster, click save to registry and reboot your pc, also reboot your modem and router make speedtest and post a new tweaktest result good luck VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbrainerd Posted January 21, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 21, 2005 Did not see file for XP. Just 2000. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MICROWAVE Posted January 21, 2005 CID Share Posted January 21, 2005 Did not see file for XP. Just 2000. Thats the correct one to use... Microwave Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbrainerd Posted January 21, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 21, 2005 I used that one but speeds dropped down to 1400, uninstalled cable nut set rwin to 20440 last speed test was 1878 down. With my isp probably will not get anymore than that. Still would like to get more of my upload. Testmy averages around 530, other places dslrepo.cogece.speakeasy I am getting about 750 up. Will go tech support tomorrow see if I can get them to bump me up another notch to at least get 90% of speed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MICROWAVE Posted January 21, 2005 CID Share Posted January 21, 2005 mbrainerd Hmmm maybe VanBuren will have another idea, he is really good at this and if its possible he will find the right combo 4u.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbrainerd Posted January 21, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 21, 2005 Hey Micro. I have been trying to find the website in the forums that you went to to see if your settings were configured right. I remember one of the screenshots said with your rwin settings your download speed are only capable of a certain speed. Hope you know what I am talking about or maybe someone will. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 21, 2005 CID Share Posted January 21, 2005 I used that one but speeds dropped down to 1400, uninstalled cable nut set rwin to 20440 last speed test was 1878 down. With my isp probably will not get anymore than that. Still would like to get more of my upload. Testmy averages around 530, other places dslrepo.cogece.speakeasy I am getting about 750 up. Will go tech support tomorrow see if I can get them to bump me up another notch to at least get 90% of speed. Heya mbrainerd you uninstalled it too fast, i havent finetuned anything yet..... its impossible to make the perfect file that fit all connections without some tuning. I suggest you re-install cablenut so i can help you VanBuren btw Cablenut is the only tweakprogram that can boost your upload Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbrainerd Posted January 21, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 21, 2005 I still have it just undid the changes. My best download last night was 1.9. My upload is where I need it. If you think of s/thing let me know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 21, 2005 CID Share Posted January 21, 2005 heya mbrainerd i updated the file, download the attached file and overwrite the old one load it and click save to registry reboot your pc, and reboot modem router for 30 seconds then make a new speedtest and tweaktest good luck VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbrainerd Posted January 21, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 21, 2005 My upload. :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 689 Kbps about 0.7 Mbps (tested with 1013 KB) Upload Speed is:: 84 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 12 times faster than 56K you can upload 1MB in 12.19 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=CBYKIEOPZ :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1514 Kbps about 1.5 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 185 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 27 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 5.54 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=L1BQ4F7VU Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 21, 2005 CID Share Posted January 21, 2005 ok cool, we getting closer also try this file, might speed up your download too VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbrainerd Posted January 21, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 21, 2005 :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 701 Kbps about 0.7 Mbps (tested with 1013 KB) Upload Speed is:: 86 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 13 times faster than 56K you can upload 1MB in 11.91 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=OJ40NTAFE :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1289 Kbps about 1.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 157 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 23 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 6.52 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=O94KUV012 Upload is looking better download suffering a little Do not know if this will help you but here is a tweak test http://ttester.broadbandreports.com/tweak/block:2b0e461?service=dsl&speed=2048&os=winXP&via=normal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 21, 2005 CID Share Posted January 21, 2005 also run this speedtest http://nitro.ucsc.edu/ and copy all text and paste it here VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbrainerd Posted January 21, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 21, 2005 WEB100 Enabled Statistics: Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 837.60Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 143.80kb/s ------ Client System Details ------ OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1 Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.4.2_06 ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found. Link set to Full Duplex mode Information: throughput is limited by other network traffic. Good network cable(s) found Normal duplex operation found. Web100 reports the Round trip time = 155.90 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and There were 42 packets retransmitted, 1 duplicate acks received, and 42 SACK blocks received The connection was idle 0 seconds (0%) of the time This connection is network limited 99.97% of the time. Contact your local network administrator to report a network problem Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: ON Packet size is preserved End-to-End Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address Server says [66.117.105.128] but Client says [172.25.25.2] uration: 13200843 c2sData: 2 c2sAck: 2 s2cData: 9 s2cAck: 1 Checking for mismatch condition (cwndtime > .3) [0.99>.3], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [30660>0], (PktsRetrans/sec > 2) [3.23>2], (estimate > 2) [0.94>2] Checking for mismatch on uplink (speed > 50 [0.15>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [0.83<5] (rwintime > .9) [0>.9], (loss < .01) [0.00<.01] Checking for excessive errors condition (loss/sec > .15) [4.42>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.99>.6], (loss < .01) [0.00<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [30660>0] Checking for 10 Mbps link (speed < 9.5) [0.15<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [0.15>3.0] (xmitspeed < 9.5) [0.83<9.5] (loss < .01) [0.00<.01], (link > 0) [100>0] Checking for Wireless link (sendtime = 0) [2.56=0], (speed < 5) [0.15<5] (Estimate > 50 [0.94>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0>.90] (RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [0/1=1], (link > 0) [100>0] Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link (speed < 2) [0.15<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0] (SendTime = 0) [2.567246261959715E-4=0], (link > 0) [100>0] Checking for half-duplex condition (rwintime > .95) [0>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0>30], (SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.07>30], OR (link <= 10) [100<=10] Checking for congestion (cwndtime > .02) [0.99>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0] (MaxSsthresh > 0) [30660>0] bw = 0.94 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 155.90msec, and loss = 0.005747126415371895 The theoretical network limit is 0.94 Mbps The transmit buffer (101.0 KByte) limits the application to 5.06 Mbps Your receive buffer (256.0 KByte) limits the application to 12.82 Mbps The network based flow control limits the application to 3.07 Mbps Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'T1' Server Data reports link is '10 Gig', Server Acks report link is 'Dial-up' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 21, 2005 CID Share Posted January 21, 2005 this is what slowing you down Web100 reports the Round trip time = 155.90 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and There were 42 packets retransmitted, 1 duplicate acks received, and 42 SACK blocks received The connection was idle 0 seconds (0%) of the time This connection is network limited 99.97% of the time. Contact your local network administrator to report a network problem all the re transmissions, have you set your NIC duplexmode manually? If you not using a router and connect directly to modem, run NIC in Autosense if you using a router force 100 Mbps full duplex EDIT: here is how you set duplex mode, ignore the suggestion of half duplex, use Autosense instead quote from http://dslnuts.com/tips_tricks.shtml "Windows 2000 or XP: to change to half-duplex: * Open Control Panel. * Double-click Network and Dial-up Connections. * Identify the icon for your cable modem connection: usually Local Area Connection. * Right-click that icon and select Properties. * Under the ethernet adapter icon, click the button Configure. * Click the tab Advanced to bring it to the front: * In the Property box, the property name to be selected varies according to model of ethernet card. Examples are: Network Link Selection, Media Type, Connection Type, Duplex Mode, or any similarly-named property which can have Values looking like Auto-Negotiation, or 10BT, or 10BaseT. * In the Value box, select a value which either (a) explicitly says half-duplex or semi-duplex, or ( at least does not say full-duplex [e.g. 10BaseT on its own is OK]. If there is a choice between 10 and 100 with half-duplex, choose the 10. Do not choose 10Base5, 10Base2, or AUI. * Click OK to exit the Adapter settings. * Click OK to exit the Connection properties. " VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbrainerd Posted January 21, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 21, 2005 this is what slowing you down Web100 reports the Round trip time = 155.90 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and There were 42 packets retransmitted, 1 duplicate acks received, and 42 SACK blocks received The connection was idle 0 seconds (0%) of the time This connection is network limited 99.97% of the time. Contact your local network administrator to report a network problem all the re transmissions, have you set your NIC duplexmode manually? If you not using a router and connect directly to modem, run NIC in Autosense if you using a router force 100 Mbps full duplex VanBuren I have the Lingo router for voip! How do I change the setting? I lowered my rwin to 20440 and got this result :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1649 Kbps about 1.6 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 201 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 29 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 5.09 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=C2GF7TZX8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 21, 2005 CID Share Posted January 21, 2005 then manually set your NIC to 100 Mbps full duplex and try this file, i lowered TcpWindowSize abit more.... VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbrainerd Posted January 21, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 21, 2005 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1718 Kbps about 1.7 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 210 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 31 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 4.88 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=85T017BCV :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 734 Kbps about 0.7 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Upload Speed is:: 90 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 13 times faster than 56K you can upload 1MB in 11.38 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=BMTOPWC8V How do I manual;ly do the nic? : Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 21, 2005 CID Share Posted January 21, 2005 here is how you set duplex mode, ignore the suggestion of half duplex, use Autosense instead quote from http://dslnuts.com/tips_tricks.shtml "Windows 2000 or XP: to change to half-duplex: * Open Control Panel. * Double-click Network and Dial-up Connections. * Identify the icon for your cable modem connection: usually Local Area Connection. * Right-click that icon and select Properties. * Under the ethernet adapter icon, click the button Configure. * Click the tab Advanced to bring it to the front: * In the Property box, the property name to be selected varies according to model of ethernet card. Examples are: Network Link Selection, Media Type, Connection Type, Duplex Mode, or any similarly-named property which can have Values looking like Auto-Negotiation, or 10BT, or 10BaseT. * In the Value box, select a value which either (a) explicitly says half-duplex or semi-duplex, or ( at least does not say full-duplex [e.g. 10BaseT on its own is OK]. If there is a choice between 10 and 100 with half-duplex, choose the 10. Do not choose 10Base5, 10Base2, or AUI. * Click OK to exit the Adapter settings. * Click OK to exit the Connection properties. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 21, 2005 CID Share Posted January 21, 2005 also test this file, should give you less retransmissions let me know how it works, thanks VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbrainerd Posted January 21, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 21, 2005 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1676 Kbps about 1.7 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 205 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 30 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 5 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=VA7EM1NH9 :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 706 Kbps about 0.7 Mbps (tested with 1013 KB) Upload Speed is:: 86 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 13 times faster than 56K you can upload 1MB in 11.91 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=M3J1T7WGA I was on my Lingo phone during tests. I gues that might suck up some of my speed. I also have a call into my isp, to see if they actually bumbed me to the 2048/1024 and not the 1.5/768. Getting better! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 21, 2005 CID Share Posted January 21, 2005 cool, try again later without Lingo and post score, also run this test again and post all text http://nitro.ucsc.edu/ VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbrainerd Posted January 21, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 21, 2005 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1720 Kbps about 1.7 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 210 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 31 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 4.88 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=G6PDU8BJW :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 695 Kbps about 0.7 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Upload Speed is:: 85 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 12 times faster than 56K you can upload 1MB in 12.05 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=EBJQ4Z1WO TCP/Web100 Network Diagnostic Tool v5.2.1e click START to begin Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 528.35Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 1.12Mb/s Your PC is connected to a Cable/DSL modem Link set to Full Duplex mode No network congestion discovered. Good network cable(s) found Normal duplex operation found. Web100 reports the Round trip time = 132.77 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and There were 1 packets retransmitted, 12 duplicate acks received, and 13 SACK blocks received The connection was idle 0 seconds (0%) of the time This connection is receiver limited 69.03% of the time. Increasing the current receive buffer (19.0 KB) will improve performance This connection is network limited 30.92% of the time. Contact your local network administrator to report a network problem Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: OFF Packet size is preserved End-to-End Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address Server says [66.117.105.128] but Client says [172.25.25.2] (SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.10>30], OR (link <= 10) [100<=10] Checking for congestion (cwndtime > .02) [0.30>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0] (MaxSsthresh > 0) [10220>0] bw = 2.60 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 132.77msec, and loss = 0.001038421643897891 The theoretical network limit is 2.60 Mbps The transmit buffer (101.0 KByte) limits the application to 5.94 Mbps Your receive buffer (19.0 KByte) limits the application to 1.17 Mbps The network based flow control limits the application to 1.25 Mbps Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'T1' Server Data reports link is '10 Gig', Server Acks report link is 'T1' Hope you understand all of this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 21, 2005 CID Share Posted January 21, 2005 hmm Your receive buffer (19.0 KByte) limits the application to 1.17 Mbps what tweaks are you using now? that recive buffer should be over 200 KByte with the latest file i posted to you. also run this http://www.dslreports.com/tweaks and post result URL adress VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.