mbrainerd Posted January 24, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 Just a few. http://ttester.broadbandreports.com/tweak/block:11a68a6?service=dsl&speed=2048&os=winXP&via=normal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 24, 2005 CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 Retransmitted data packets: 0 try this file aswell make a speedtest up and down and tweaktest VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbrainerd Posted January 24, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 http://ttester.broadbandreports.com/tweak/block:49a1c18?service=dsl&speed=2048&os=winXP&via=normal :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1458 Kbps about 1.5 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 178 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 26 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 5.75 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=FZ8WS0ABQ :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 701 Kbps about 0.7 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Upload Speed is:: 86 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 13 times faster than 56K you can upload 1MB in 11.91 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=36BQZJ2VL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 24, 2005 CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 dern, the re transmissions killing the speed try this file aswell VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbrainerd Posted January 24, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1320 Kbps about 1.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 161 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 24 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 6.36 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=4EX5G3KY6 :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 680 Kbps about 0.7 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Upload Speed is:: 83 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 12 times faster than 56K you can upload 1MB in 12.34 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=7R10BI3PZ http://ttester.broadbandreports.com/tweak/block:2f4d5ba?service=dsl&speed=2048&os=winXP&via=normal I ran this test to do not know if it will help you. TCP/Web100 Network Diagnostic Tool v5.2.1e click START to begin Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 734.82Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 1.72Mb/s Your PC is connected to a Cable/DSL modem ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found. Link set to Full Duplex mode No network congestion discovered. Good network cable(s) found Normal duplex operation found. Web100 reports the Round trip time = 126.08 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and No packet loss - but packets arrived out-of-order 0.13% of the time This connection is receiver limited 93.95% of the time. Increasing the current receive buffer (27.0 KB) will improve performance This connection is network limited 6.00% of the time. Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: OFF Packet size is preserved End-to-End Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address Server says [66.117.105.128] but Client says [172.25.25.2] Duration: 10155701 c2sData: 2 c2sAck: 2 s2cData: 9 s2cAck: 3 Checking for mismatch condition (cwndtime > .3) [0.06>.3], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [0>0], (PktsRetrans/sec > 2) [0>2], (estimate > 2) [88.34>2] Checking for mismatch on uplink (speed > 50 [1.71>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [0.73<5] (rwintime > .9) [0.93>.9], (loss < .01) [1.0E<.01] Checking for excessive errors condition (loss/sec > .15) [1.0E>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.06>.6], (loss < .01) [1.0E<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [0>0] Checking for 10 Mbps link (speed < 9.5) [1.71<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [1.71>3.0] (xmitspeed < 9.5) [0.73<9.5] (loss < .01) [1.0E<.01], (link > 0) [100>0] Checking for Wireless link (sendtime = 0) [3.72=0], (speed < 5) [1.71<5] (Estimate > 50 [88.34>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0.93>.90] (RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [1/1=1], (link > 0) [100>0] Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link (speed < 2) [1.71<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0] (SendTime = 0) [3.722435512743827E-4=0], (link > 0) [100>0] Checking for half-duplex condition (rwintime > .95) [0.93>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0.10>30], (SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.10>30], OR (link <= 10) [100<=10] Checking for congestion (cwndtime > .02) [0.06>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0] (MaxSsthresh > 0) [0>0] bw = 88.34 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 126.08msec, and loss = 1.0E-6 The theoretical network limit is 88.34 Mbps The transmit buffer (101.0 KByte) limits the application to 6.25 Mbps Your receive buffer (27.0 KByte) limits the application to 1.67 Mbps The network based flow control limits the application to 1.76 Mbps Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'T1' Server Data reports link is '10 Gig', Server Acks report link is 'Ether Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 24, 2005 CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 dern do like this, open cavlenut adjuster, click delete cablenut tweaks and click save to registry after that load this file, reboot your modem for 30 seconds and try again i will now make a file based on windows default settings VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbrainerd Posted January 24, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 Just came back up. It is slow as molasses now, could not even get a speed test done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 24, 2005 CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 its basicly windows default values.... make a tweaktest and post it VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbrainerd Posted January 24, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 http://ttester.broadbandreports.com/tweak/block:2ee3849?service=dsl&speed=2048&os=winXP&via=normal Site must have been busy. Tried again! :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1596 Kbps about 1.6 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 195 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 28 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 5.25 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=ZAF7RQGPD :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 710 Kbps about 0.7 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Upload Speed is:: 87 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 13 times faster than 56K you can upload 1MB in 11.77 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=LDAMKGQN0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 24, 2005 CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 looking good now, Retransmitted data packets: 0 i dont think you can get faster down, cos then you start re transmit packets but you can try to finetune Default Send Window its 16384 now add 8192 each time, so next value you can test with is 24576 and next 32768 and so on, untill you get 90 % of 1024 Kbps = 0,9 x 1024 = 921 Kbps good luck VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbrainerd Posted January 24, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 thanx ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 24, 2005 CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 no problem atleast now we know that it wont get faster then this VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbrainerd Posted January 24, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 I figured when my isp changed to fastapath I would gain a little not lose a little. I will keep adjusting maybe I can get it back up to where it was. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 24, 2005 CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 yea you can try increase TcpWindowSize and GlobalMaxTcpWindowSize use this calculator so you get MSS multiple with TcpWindowsize MSS = 1460 Bandwidth = 2048 Kbps = 2048 / 8 = 256 Latency = try 100 to 200 ms http://www.dslnuts.com/bitsbytes.shtml VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbrainerd Posted January 24, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 I have been messing with the numbers nad still cannot get back to what I had before they switched me to fastpath. I normally averaged 1.7 down and at least 740 up. Now I am getting 1.3, 1.2, 1.4 on download. My uploads are around 700. I guess it is safe to assume that the first hop really don't matter . I will keep trying!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 24, 2005 CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 try this,after that run tweaktester, and if you have re transmissions then lower TcpWindowSize and GlobalMaxTcpWindowSize by 1460 each step if you dont have re transmissions, increase them instead in steps of 1460 until you reach the braking point where you start getting re transmissoins VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbrainerd Posted January 25, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 25, 2005 I finally got it back up to where it ws before they switched me to fastpath. I was hoping for a little more bump in speed, but I guess the ping do not effect it so much. I am going to call ISP tomorrow and see if they bumped my speed down to 1.5/768.. I will let you know! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 25, 2005 CID Share Posted January 25, 2005 good luck mbrainerd yea with the settings we used you should have been able to get closer to your cap, you also have a nice route to testmy.net VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbrainerd Posted January 25, 2005 Author CID Share Posted January 25, 2005 I emailed my ISP I am going to have them put me back on interleave instead of fastpath. When I was on interleave at least my up and down speeds were consistent. Not back and forth. I can live with the higher ping time. Thank for all the help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.