ronss Posted December 3, 2007 CID Share Posted December 3, 2007 hi i have Cox cable,and just recently,,,my download speeds during the evning and later at night, am hours...come to a crawl....right now i have 982 Kbps download speed...and i should be getting 5mg/s.....during the day,,its around 5mg/s...i just don,t get it....what the heck does the night time have to do with my speeds???? so getting 5mg/s ,,, during the day tells me the equipment if functioning ok,,,, i have bought a new modem,,,motorola sb5101,,, and that was not the problem,,i have by-passed the splitter,,that is not the problem,,because it does nothing by doing this..have connected directly into the computer from the modem,,by-passing my router,,still not difference...it seems my hardware is ok,,,as i said,,5mg/s during the day hours, but bad during the evening....Cox came last week,,, said he upped the power outside, and then came in and checked my modem readings last week,,he said they were normal.....the problem with Cox is that they are not around during the night time when i have the problem....anyone have thought on this problem???? Cox is coming back out on dec 5, wed. what url address do i need to check the my modem readings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coknuck Posted December 3, 2007 CID Share Posted December 3, 2007 ronss, Welcome to the forum and we hope you enjoy your stay here. Below is the link to read your modem. http://192.168.100.1/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronss Posted December 3, 2007 Author CID Share Posted December 3, 2007 hi...thanks for the welcome looking at my status page,,it reads normal...operational......any other suggestions , i am thinking myself is cox , on there end, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coknuck Posted December 3, 2007 CID Share Posted December 3, 2007 Quote hi...thanks for the welcome looking at my status page,,it reads normal...operational......any other suggestions , i am thinking myself is cox , on there end, More than likely its Cox. You might have a lot more people on your node at night than during the day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronss Posted December 3, 2007 Author CID Share Posted December 3, 2007 that may be,,,but i have never had this slow,,even at night...i have allways being humming around 5mg/s....all times of the day...last night it was down to 125Kbps...twice as fast as a 56k mode,, and it even disconnected...no online light,,it was blinking.....i would take 20 seconds to load a web page..... right now it takes 20 seonds to load this page after responding, my download speed is 325 kbps,,,i can just as well go with a 56k modem provider Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coknuck Posted December 3, 2007 CID Share Posted December 3, 2007 Have you run a tracert to see if your timing out any where or have high pings? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronss Posted December 3, 2007 Author CID Share Posted December 3, 2007 how do i perform a tracert....i know how to get to the command window..but not sure what to type in there Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coknuck Posted December 3, 2007 CID Share Posted December 3, 2007 type>tracert testmy.net> enter. There is a space between tracert and testmy.net Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronss Posted December 3, 2007 Author CID Share Posted December 3, 2007 okay..this is what i got running a tracert on cox.net Tracing route to cox.net [68.1.17.9] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 15 ms 11 ms 10 ms ip68-230-48-1.ph.ph.cox.net [68.230.48.1] 2 * * 13 ms ip68-2-6-85.ph.ph.cox.net [68.2.6.85] 3 11 ms 14 ms 25 ms 68.2.13.94 4 12 ms 14 ms * 68.2.13.9 5 * 19 ms * 68.2.13.5 6 12 ms 15 ms 62 ms 68.2.13.1 7 20 ms 12 ms 16 ms chnddsrj01-ae2.0.rd.ph.cox.net [68.2.14.9] 8 58 ms 61 ms 62 ms dukedsrj02-ge610.tc.at.cox.net [68.1.1.123] 9 55 ms 74 ms 58 ms lkhnsysl02-gex3.at.cox.net [68.1.16.69] 10 56 ms 60 ms 55 ms www.cox.net [68.1.17.9] Trace complete. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coknuck Posted December 3, 2007 CID Share Posted December 3, 2007 Would you run one to here please! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronss Posted December 3, 2007 Author CID Share Posted December 3, 2007 Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. E:Documents and Settingsr sondergaard>tracert testmynet.com Tracing route to testmynet.com [208.73.212.12] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 12 ms 10 ms 9 ms ip68-230-48-1.ph.ph.cox.net [68.230.48.1] 2 13 ms 13 ms 15 ms ip68-2-6-81.ph.ph.cox.net [68.2.6.81] 3 12 ms 14 ms 10 ms 68.2.12.90 4 * 13 ms 10 ms 68.2.12.9 5 14 ms 11 ms 12 ms 68.2.12.5 6 9 ms 14 ms 50 ms 68.2.12.1 7 16 ms 27 ms 13 ms chnddsrj02-ae1.0.rd.ph.cox.net [68.2.14.13] 8 35 ms 32 ms 43 ms paltbbrj01-so200.0.r2.pt.cox.net [68.1.0.237] 9 31 ms * 29 ms ae-1.r20.snjsca04.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.5.3 3] 10 49 ms 32 ms 33 ms ae-0.r21.snjsca04.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.2.9 7] 11 39 ms 38 ms 38 ms as-0.r20.lsanca03.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.4.9 7] 12 54 ms 44 ms 42 ms po-1.r01.lsanca03.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.3.1 26] 13 44 ms 41 ms 45 ms po-2.r00.lsanca17.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.5.2 46] 14 33 ms 32 ms 33 ms ge-2-6.r00.lsanca03.us.ce.gin.ntt.net [198.172.9 0.218] 15 31 ms 32 ms 33 ms ve100.core1.lad.oversee.net [204.13.163.117] 16 34 ms 31 ms 28 ms sp19.information.com [208.73.212.12] Trace complete. E:Documents and Settingsr sondergaard> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronss Posted December 3, 2007 Author CID Share Posted December 3, 2007 i quess there is a lot of info in a tracert, if one knows what to look for Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coknuck Posted December 3, 2007 CID Share Posted December 3, 2007 Looks better than mine. I'm on a 10/1 connection. Tracing route to testmy.net [74.52.182.125] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 11 ms 6 ms 10 ms 74-138-160-1.dhcp.insightbb.com [74.138.160.1] 2 6 ms 7 ms 7 ms 74-128-22-109.dhcp.insightbb.com [74.128.22.109] 3 9 ms 9 ms 9 ms 74-128-16-85.dhcp.insightbb.com [74.128.16.85] 4 13 ms 11 ms 11 ms 74.128.8.233 5 18 ms 18 ms 19 ms te-4-1.car2.Chicago2.Level3.net [4.71.250.1] 6 19 ms 20 ms 18 ms ae-31-51.ebr1.Chicago1.Level3.net [4.68.101.30] 7 46 ms 23 ms 30 ms ae-68.ebr3.Chicago1.Level3.net [4.69.134.58] 8 43 ms 53 ms 53 ms ae-3.ebr2.Denver1.Level3.net [4.69.132.61] 9 49 ms 53 ms 53 ms ae-1-100.ebr1.Denver1.Level3.net [4.69.132.37] 10 52 ms 53 ms 54 ms ae-2.ebr2.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.69.132.106] 11 54 ms 54 ms 54 ms ae-82-82.csw3.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.69.136.146] 12 54 ms 52 ms 57 ms ae-34-89.car4.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.68.19.134] 13 49 ms 48 ms 50 ms THE-PLANET.car4.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.71.122.2] 14 51 ms 49 ms 49 ms te9-2.dsr02.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.87.253.30] 15 50 ms 51 ms 51 ms 7e.fd.5746.static.theplanet.com [70.87.253.126] 16 51 ms 54 ms 55 ms po1.car03.dllstx6.theplanet.com [12.96.160.5] 17 51 ms 50 ms 50 ms 7d.b6.344a.static.theplanet.com [74.52.182.125] Trace complete. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 10642 Kbps about 10.6 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1299 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2007/12/02 - 8:16pm Bottom Line:: 186X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.79 sec Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 9.36 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 96.35 % faster than the average for host (insightbb.com) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-STYOA8KIW User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071127 Firefox/2.0.0.11 [!] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronss Posted December 3, 2007 Author CID Share Posted December 3, 2007 quess i will have to wait for Cox to come out.....469 Kbps is very slow,,,,not close to what i am suppose to be getting..i just don,t understand why the night thing....are you runng b stanard ,,10mg/s Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coknuck Posted December 3, 2007 CID Share Posted December 3, 2007 A lot of times ISP's do their maintenance on weekend nights. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronss Posted December 3, 2007 Author CID Share Posted December 3, 2007 that is possible..why does Cox not tell me about it.......you think i would be better off with qwest dsl...7mg/s the internet in the united states it bad,,,,other countries are getting up to 50mb/s download Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coknuck Posted December 3, 2007 CID Share Posted December 3, 2007 Sweden you can get a 100/100 connection. Japan have some pretty fast stuff also. I can only get cable or dial up where I live. But for $30.00 a month I can't complain. If you want DSL thats up to you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronss Posted December 3, 2007 Author CID Share Posted December 3, 2007 i live in phoenix..az...its really only qwest or cox hsi........thats about it..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted December 4, 2007 CID Share Posted December 4, 2007 ronss - welcome! I'm seeing some packets timing out in the Cox network. Have you called Cox to see what is up with that? Can you also post a speedtest result that you are seeing from the speedtest on this site - do one during the slow hours versus the faster hours. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronss Posted December 4, 2007 Author CID Share Posted December 4, 2007 :::.. testmy.net test results ..::: Download Connection is:: 822 Kbps about 0.82 Mbps (tested with 1013 kB) Download Speed is:: 100 kB/s Upload Connection is:: 532 Kbps about 0.5 Mbps (tested with 1013 kB) Upload Speed is:: 65 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Main) Test Time:: 2007/12/04 - 12:03am D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-CL462E5FA U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-HX6ZOFTQ4 User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30) [!] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronss Posted December 5, 2007 Author CID Share Posted December 5, 2007 well. problem finnally resolved...i live in an apartment complex, and i today i had a message on my answering machine...it was cox cable message, it stated that over half of the people in my complex was have the same problem i had, slow download speeds at night,,...cox said they replaced a part, and thought it would solve my problem......it did,,and now have very good download speeds,,,right. now 6mg/s..... about time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted December 6, 2007 CID Share Posted December 6, 2007 Quote well. problem finnally resolved...i live in an apartment complex, and i today i had a message on my answering machine...it was cox cable message, it stated that over half of the people in my complex was have the same problem i had, slow download speeds at night,,...cox said they replaced a part, and thought it would solve my problem......it did,,and now have very good download speeds,,,right. now 6mg/s..... about time. Nice! Lets see some test -- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronss Posted December 6, 2007 Author CID Share Posted December 6, 2007 GUESS ITS LOOKING BETTER,,,SURE DON,T HAVE THE SLOW SPEED AT NIGHT ANYMORE,,THANK GOD. Download speed 5767 Kbps (socket test) Upload speed 565 Kbps (socket test) Quality of service 75 % Maximum pause 83 ms Round trip time 71 ms Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. E:Documents and Settingsr sondergaard>tracert testmy.net Tracing route to testmy.net [74.52.182.125] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 10.0.0.1 2 15 ms 12 ms 13 ms ip68-3-160-1.ph.ph.cox.net [68.3.160.1] 3 9 ms 12 ms 10 ms ip68-2-6-85.ph.ph.cox.net [68.2.6.85] 4 19 ms 14 ms 26 ms 68.2.13.94 5 20 ms 11 ms 13 ms 68.2.13.9 6 16 ms 14 ms 13 ms 68.2.13.5 7 16 ms 17 ms 17 ms 68.2.13.1 8 15 ms 24 ms 13 ms chnddsrj01-ae2.0.rd.ph.cox.net [68.2.14.9] 9 38 ms 32 ms 39 ms dalsbbrj02-ae0.r2.dl.cox.net [68.1.0.143] 10 36 ms 38 ms 39 ms vl32.dsr02.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.62] 11 36 ms 35 ms 28 ms 7e.fd.5746.static.theplanet.com [70.87.253.126] 12 39 ms 36 ms 61 ms po2.car03.dllstx6.theplanet.com [12.96.160.37] 13 36 ms 38 ms 35 ms 7d.b6.344a.static.theplanet.com [74.52.182.125] Trace complete. E:Documents and Settingsr sondergaard> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronss Posted December 6, 2007 Author CID Share Posted December 6, 2007 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 Kbps ::You:: avg cox.net (6817 Kbps) Typical Cable (256 - 4000) Typical DSL (256 - 1500) Satellite (50 - 1500) ISDN (64 - 128) Dial Up (28.8 - 56) 0 244.1 488.3 732.4 976.6 1221 1465 1709 1953 kB/s Test Result Details Your connection is: 11850 Kbps or 11.9 Mbps You downloaded at: 1447 kB/s You are running: 207 times faster than 56K and can download 1 megabyte in 0.71 second(s) Member Ident:Username:ronss CompID:62648709623 Test Time:: 2007/12/06 - 1:40pm Test Browser and OS info: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30) Test ID: 46JDMW3CR (if this is a screenshot go to testmy.net to see if this is fake) Diagnosis ^info^: Awesome! 20% + : 73.83 % faster than the average for host (cox.net) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted December 6, 2007 CID Share Posted December 6, 2007 My my my....quite an improvement. You must see the difference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.