Jewelz_tx Posted March 2, 2005 CID Share Posted March 2, 2005 Van- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jlester Posted March 2, 2005 CID Share Posted March 2, 2005 Jewels- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jewelz_tx Posted March 2, 2005 CID Share Posted March 2, 2005 well thats what I am on too.... ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh I am so jealous!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted March 2, 2005 Author CID Share Posted March 2, 2005 hey jlester same there estimate = 134.41 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 80.6msec, and loss = 1.0E-6 The theoretical network limit is 134.41 Mbps The NDT server has a 101.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 9.79 Mbps Your PC/Workstation has a 15.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 1.51 Mbps The network based flow control limits the throughput to 1.61 Mbps seems like the test read the data from a server ( NOC? ), showing a RTT of 80.6msec and a RWIN of "Your PC/Workstation has a 15.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 1.51 Mbps" this means that no matter how much tweaks your running, you will always be limited by this low RWIN on the server VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sst45jeff Posted March 3, 2005 CID Share Posted March 3, 2005 So Van does this info tell you that our speed is capped by Direcway and since my info was diffrent than Jlester that it is controlled and varies by the amount of users? Your PC/Workstation has a 15.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 1.51 Mbps The network based flow control limits the throughput to 1.61 Mbps Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted March 3, 2005 Author CID Share Posted March 3, 2005 yea i think your capped, how i do not know, alot of the info from these tests is above my knowledge there is a matematical formula how fast you can go on a certain latency with a certain MSS and a certain RWIN use this calculator and test 81ms 1460 and 1,51 Mbps = 184 KB/s VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bdantz Posted March 5, 2005 CID Share Posted March 5, 2005 Hi Guys, I finally got back to this.. Too busy with work and stuff. Here's my server data from Stanford.edu WEB100 Kernel Variables: Client: localhost/127.0.0.1 AckPktsIn: 1000 AckPktsOut: 0 BytesRetrans: 0 CongAvoid: 0 CongestionOverCount: 0 CongestionSignals: 0 CountRTT: 968 CurCwnd: 33120 CurMSS: 1380 CurRTO: 290 CurRwinRcvd: 32000 CurRwinSent: 5840 CurSsthresh: 2147483647 DSACKDups: 0 DataBytesIn: 0 DataBytesOut: 1349640 DataPktsIn: 0 DataPktsOut: 1009 DupAcksIn: 14 ECNEnabled: 0 FastRetran: 0 MaxCwnd: 48300 MaxMSS: 1380 MaxRTO: 330 MaxRTT: 130 MaxRwinRcvd: 32000 MaxRwinSent: 5840 MaxSsthresh: 0 MinMSS: 690 MinRTO: 290 MinRTT: 80 MinRwinRcvd: 0 MinRwinSent: 5840 NagleEnabled: 1 OtherReductions: 0 PktsIn: 1000 PktsOut: 1009 PktsRetrans: 0 X_Rcvbuf: 65535 SACKEnabled: 3 SACKsRcvd: 0 SendStall: 0 SlowStart: 64 SampleRTT: 90 SmoothedRTT: 90 X_Sndbuf: 65535 SndLimTimeRwin: 9263335 SndLimTimeCwnd: 789184 SndLimTimeSender: 937 SndLimTransRwin: 5 SndLimTransCwnd: 4 SndLimTransSender: 1 SndLimBytesRwin: 1164720 SndLimBytesCwnd: 184920 SndLimBytesSender: 0 SubsequentTimeouts: 0 SumRTT: 97430 Timeouts: 0 TimestampsEnabled: 0 WinScaleRcvd: 2 WinScaleSent: 7 DupAcksOut: 0 StartTimeUsec: 557633 Duration: 10060395 c2sData: 1 c2sAck: 1 s2cData: 6 s2cAck: 6 Checking for mismatch condition (cwndtime > .3) [0.07>.3], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [0>0], (PktsRetrans/sec > 2) [0>2], (estimate > 2) [104.60>2] Checking for mismatch on uplink (speed > 50 [1.07>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [0.03<5] (rwintime > .9) [0.92>.9], (loss < .01) [1.0E<.01] Checking for excessive errors condition (loss/sec > .15) [1.0E>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.07>.6], (loss < .01) [1.0E<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [0>0] Checking for 10 Mbps link (speed < 9.5) [1.07<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [1.07>3.0] (xmitspeed < 9.5) [0.03<9.5] (loss < .01) [1.0E<.01], (link > 0) [100>0] Checking for Wireless link (sendtime = 0) [9.32=0], (speed < 5) [1.07<5] (Estimate > 50 [104.60>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0.92>.90] (RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [5/4=1], (link > 0) [100>0] Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link (speed < 2) [1.07<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0] (SendTime = 0) [9.320178056182869E-5=0], (link > 0) [100>0] Checking for half-duplex condition (rwintime > .95) [0.92>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0.5>30], (SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.10>30], OR (link <= 10) [100<=10] Checking for congestion (cwndtime > .02) [0.07>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0] (MaxSsthresh > 0) [0>0] bw = 104.60 based on packet size = 10Kbits, RTT = 100.65msec, and loss = 1.0E-6 The theoretical network limit is 104.60 Mbps The transmit buffer (63.0 KByte) limits the application to 4.96 Mbps Your receive buffer (31.0 KByte) limits the application to 2.42 Mbps The network based flow control limits the application to 3.66 Mbps Client Data reports link is 'Dial-up', Client Acks report link is 'Dial-up' Server Data reports link is 'OC-12', Server Acks report link is 'OC-12' check out current rwin. Is that me or direcway? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
t1wireless Posted March 7, 2005 CID Share Posted March 7, 2005 Tested Without any changes all default. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1610 Kbps about 1.6 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Download Speed is:: 197 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Sun Mar 06 2005 20:09:20 GMT-0600 (Central America Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 29X faster than 56K 1MB download in 5.2 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 88.52 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/id-GZ7N89M1E :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1576 Kbps about 1.6 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 192 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Sun Mar 06 2005 20:10:37 GMT-0600 (Central America Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 28X faster than 56K 1MB download in 5.33 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 84.54 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/id-7JZ321WPD Imma try the tweaks and see what changes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
t1wireless Posted March 7, 2005 CID Share Posted March 7, 2005 Ok i ran 10 test with default settings . All of my test were between 1500k and 1600k Then i used the tweaks and all of them were between 1500k - 1600k except the DW4000 MTU 1460_VanBuren_test file ran in between 500k-800k max. But all the other dw4000 setups were almost identical. Well im not to sad about my s-peed seems to be stable tonight granted its sunday night lol. But anyways i guess it dun work for me? Anyways thanx Van and everybody for all the input. it's helped a lot of people not me but oh well i will live lol . Good work -Tim- Browser- Mozilla firefox Dw4000 signal strength 87 Satellite Information Longitude: 117 degrees Hemisphere: West Transponder Information Receive Frequency: 1090 MHz Receive Polarization: Horizontal Transmit Polarization: Horizontal 22-KHz LNB Tone: Off Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.