virtuatrancer Posted February 14, 2005 CID Share Posted February 14, 2005 Hi Van i love this site, but my connection seemingly won't get to at least 90% for the download speed but it does for the upload speed so i need help. I have windows xp with sp2 and i have the p2p fix my provider is access communications in canada this is the dslreports tweak test url http://ttester.broadbandreports.com/tweak/block:4fc3cf4?service=cable&speed=5000&os=winXP&via=normal :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 789 Kbps about 0.8 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Download Speed is:: 96 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Sun Feb 13 2005 18:52:45 GMT-0600 (Canada Central Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 14X faster than 56K 1MB download in 10.67 sec Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/id-8TNVCMIYW the speed is suppose to be 5Mbps according to access :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 782 Kbps about 0.8 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Upload Speed is:: 95 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Sun Feb 13 2005 18:54:48 GMT-0600 (Canada Central Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 14X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 10.78 sec Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/id-EQDWI5V3T and the upload speed is suppose to be 1Mbps Umm i use trend micro pc-cillin internet security 2005 it's antivirus and firewall and i have a Netgear WGT624 v2 wireless router but the computer im doing the tests with is directly connected to it i have used the cablenut program with version 4 of your settings i used this one "Cable & DSL 4400 384.ccs" because the "Cable & DSL 5000 768.ccs" seemed to make it slower oh yeah i have these in the user profle of firefox with the chrome extension dont know if they make a difference, since they supposedly speed up firefox... user_pref("content.max.tokenizing.time", 2250000); user_pref("content.notify.interval", 750000); user_pref("content.notify.ontimer", true); user_pref("content.switch.threshold", 750000); user_pref("network.http.max-connections", 48); user_pref("network.http.max-connections-per-server", 16); user_pref("network.http.max-persistent-connections-per-proxy", 16); user_pref("network.http.max-persistent-connections-per-server", ; user_pref("nglayout.initialpaint.delay", 0); user_pref("browser.cache.memory.capacity", 65536); now i hope you help me out and thank you in advance Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted February 14, 2005 CID Share Posted February 14, 2005 hey virtuatrancer and welcome to the forum test speed here, copy all text you find and paste it here http://nitro.ucsc.edu/ also make a traceroute to testmy.net start-run-cmd-tracert testmy.net rightclick choose all and hit enter now paste it in your post VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
virtuatrancer Posted February 14, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 14, 2005 TCP/Web100 Network Diagnostic Tool v5.2.1e click START to begin Server Busy: Please wait 60 seconds for previous test to finish click START to re-test Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 989.59Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 588.68kb/s Your PC is connected to a Cable/DSL modem Information: Other network traffic is congesting the link click START to re-test Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 1.00Mb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 624.04kb/s Your PC is connected to a Cable/DSL modem Information: Other network traffic is congesting the link click START to re-test Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 1.01Mb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 459.36kb/s Your PC is connected to a Cable/DSL modem Information: Other network traffic is congesting the link click START to re-test Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:Documents and SettingsTony>tracert testmy.net Tracing route to testmy.net [67.19.36.6] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 2 ms 1 ms 1 ms static24-72-79-196.regina.accesscomm.ca [24.72.7 9.196] 2 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms 10.32.1.1 3 10 ms 101 ms 213 ms docsis-interconnect.regina.accesscomm.ca [24.72. 99.249] 4 16 ms 17 ms 20 ms A-p10-0-0-S1.gw2.cal1.sprint-canada.net [204.50. 53.65] 5 16 ms 17 ms 17 ms g11-0-4-S1.bb1.cal1.sprint-canada.net [204.50.25 1.193] 6 28 ms 27 ms 27 ms p9-3-S1.bb2.van1.sprint-canada.net [204.50.128.1 62] 7 31 ms 31 ms 31 ms sl-gw14-sea-5-1.sprintlink.net [144.232.219.237] 8 32 ms 31 ms 32 ms sl-bb20-sea-9-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.6.153] 9 32 ms 33 ms 31 ms sl-bb22-tac-6-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.9.151] 10 38 ms 31 ms 33 ms sl-bb23-tac-15-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.17.182] 11 53 ms 53 ms 53 ms sl-bb22-sj-9-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.20.8] 12 52 ms 54 ms 53 ms sl-bb25-sj-12-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.3.210] 13 65 ms 64 ms 63 ms sl-bb23-ana-6-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.20.158] 14 90 ms 88 ms 89 ms sl-bb23-fw-9-1.sprintlink.net [144.232.18.61] 15 88 ms 89 ms 89 ms sl-bb22-fw-13-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.11.241] 16 89 ms 88 ms 88 ms sl-bb20-fw-15-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.11.226] 17 92 ms 88 ms 89 ms sl-st21-dal-1-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.20.17] 18 92 ms 89 ms 89 ms 144.232.29.97 19 119 ms 119 ms 119 ms sl-theplanet-3-0.sprintlink.net [144.228.250.114 ] 20 120 ms 120 ms 120 ms dist-vlan32.dsr3-1.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85. 127.61] 21 120 ms 119 ms 122 ms dist-vlan21.dsr1-1.dllstx2.theplanet.com [70.85. 127.67] 22 110 ms 110 ms 112 ms dsr2-1-v2.dllstx4.theplanet.com [12.96.160.39] 23 111 ms 112 ms 110 ms gig1-0-1.tp-car9-1.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18. 116.69] 24 122 ms 120 ms 121 ms 6.67-19-36.reverse.theplanet.com [67.19.36.6] Trace complete. thanks i hope this helps Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted February 14, 2005 CID Share Posted February 14, 2005 3 10 ms 101 ms 213 ms docsis-interconnect.regina.accesscomm.ca [24.72. 99.249] that node seems unstable do that nitro speedtest again, after its done click Statistic and More info, copy all text from that and paste it here VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
virtuatrancer Posted February 14, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 14, 2005 WEB100 Enabled Statistics: Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 989.91Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 609.63kb/s ------ Client System Details ------ OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1 Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.5.0 ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found. Link set to Full Duplex mode Information: throughput is limited by other network traffic. Good network cable(s) found Normal duplex operation found. Web100 reports the Round trip time = 76.55 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and There were 26 packets retransmitted, 96 duplicate acks received, and 105 SACK blocks received The connection was idle 0 seconds (0%) of the time This connection is network limited 99.92% of the time. Contact your local network administrator to report a network problem Contact your local network admin and report excessive packet reordering Excessive packet loss is impacting your performance, check the auto-negotiate function on your local PC and network switch Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: ON Packet size is preserved End-to-End Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address Server says [24.72.79.196] but Client says [192.168.0.2] WEB100 Kernel Variables: Client: localhost/127.0.0.1 AckPktsIn: 325 AckPktsOut: 0 BytesRetrans: 37960 CongAvoid: 175 CongestionOverCount: 0 CongestionSignals: 17 CountRTT: 203 CurCwnd: 7300 CurMSS: 1460 CurRTO: 300 CurRwinRcvd: 499712 CurRwinSent: 5840 CurSsthresh: 2920 DSACKDups: 0 DataBytesIn: 0 DataBytesOut: 800080 DataPktsIn: 0 DataPktsOut: 548 DupAcksIn: 96 ECNEnabled: 0 FastRetran: 17 MaxCwnd: 13140 MaxMSS: 1460 MaxRTO: 330 MaxRTT: 220 MaxRwinRcvd: 499712 MaxRwinSent: 5840 MaxSsthresh: 5840 MinMSS: 1460 MinRTO: 250 MinRTT: 50 MinRwinRcvd: 62464 MinRwinSent: 5840 NagleEnabled: 1 OtherReductions: 0 PktsIn: 325 PktsOut: 548 PktsRetrans: 26 X_Rcvbuf: 103424 SACKEnabled: 3 SACKsRcvd: 105 SendStall: 0 SlowStart: 27 SampleRTT: 50 SmoothedRTT: 80 X_Sndbuf: 103424 SndLimTimeRwin: 0 SndLimTimeCwnd: 10204419 SndLimTimeSender: 7734 SndLimTransRwin: 0 SndLimTransCwnd: 1 SndLimTransSender: 1 SndLimBytesRwin: 0 SndLimBytesCwnd: 800080 SndLimBytesSender: 0 SubsequentTimeouts: 0 SumRTT: 15540 Timeouts: 0 TimestampsEnabled: 0 WinScaleRcvd: 3 WinScaleSent: 7 DupAcksOut: 0 StartTimeUsec: 5986 Duration: 10238948 c2sData: 2 c2sAck: 2 s2cData: 9 s2cAck: 2 Checking for mismatch condition (cwndtime > .3) [0.99>.3], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [5840>0], (PktsRetrans/sec > 2) [2.59>2], (estimate > 2) [0.82>2] Checking for mismatch on uplink (speed > 50 [0.62>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [0.98<5] (rwintime > .9) [0>.9], (loss < .01) [0.03<.01] Checking for excessive errors condition (loss/sec > .15) [0.00>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.99>.6], (loss < .01) [0.03<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [5840>0] Checking for 10 Mbps link (speed < 9.5) [0.62<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [0.62>3.0] (xmitspeed < 9.5) [0.98<9.5] (loss < .01) [0.03<.01], (link > 0) [100>0] Checking for Wireless link (sendtime = 0) [7.57=0], (speed < 5) [0.62<5] (Estimate > 50 [0.82>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0>.90] (RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [0/1=1], (link > 0) [100>0] Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link (speed < 2) [0.62<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0] (SendTime = 0) [7.573329541772435E-4=0], (link > 0) [100>0] Checking for half-duplex condition (rwintime > .95) [0>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0>30], (SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.10>30], OR (link <= 10) [100<=10] Checking for congestion (cwndtime > .02) [0.99>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0] (MaxSsthresh > 0) [5840>0] bw = 0.82 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 76.55msec, and loss = 0.031021898612380028 The theoretical network limit is 0.82 Mbps The transmit buffer (101.0 KByte) limits the application to 10.30 Mbps Your receive buffer (488.0 KByte) limits the application to 49.80 Mbps The network based flow control limits the application to 1.30 Mbps Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'T1' Server Data reports link is '10 Gig', Server Acks report link is 'T1' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted February 14, 2005 CID Share Posted February 14, 2005 you have some loss try this go to start-run-cmd type this pathping testmy.net and hit enter it will take a while to complete when done, right click choose all and hit enter paste all here VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
virtuatrancer Posted February 15, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 15, 2005 alright sorry i took so long to reply i was really busy, and i wanna thank you for taking the time out of your day to help me and i guess this is the pathping to testmy.net... Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:Documents and SettingsTony>pathping testmy.net Tracing route to testmy.net [67.19.36.6] over a maximum of 30 hops: 0 Desktop [192.168.0.2] 1 static24-72-79-196.regina.accesscomm.ca [24.72.79.196] 2 10.32.1.1 3 docsis-interconnect.regina.accesscomm.ca [24.72.99.249] 4 A-p10-0-0-S1.gw2.cal1.sprint-canada.net [204.50.53.65] 5 g11-0-4-S1.bb1.cal1.sprint-canada.net [204.50.251.193] 6 p9-3-S1.bb2.van1.sprint-canada.net [204.50.128.162] 7 sl-gw14-sea-5-1.sprintlink.net [144.232.219.237] 8 sl-bb20-sea-9-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.6.153] 9 sl-bb22-tac-6-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.9.151] 10 sl-bb23-tac-15-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.17.182] 11 sl-bb22-sj-9-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.20.8] 12 sl-bb25-sj-12-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.3.210] 13 sl-bb23-ana-6-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.20.158] 14 sl-bb23-fw-9-1.sprintlink.net [144.232.18.61] 15 sl-bb22-fw-13-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.11.241] 16 sl-bb20-fw-15-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.11.226] 17 sl-st21-dal-1-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.20.17] 18 144.232.29.97 19 sl-theplanet-3-0.sprintlink.net [144.228.250.114] 20 dist-vlan32.dsr3-1.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.61] 21 dist-vlan21.dsr1-1.dllstx2.theplanet.com [70.85.127.67] 22 dsr2-1-v2.dllstx4.theplanet.com [12.96.160.39] 23 gig1-0-1.tp-car9-1.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.69] 24 6.67-19-36.reverse.theplanet.com [67.19.36.6] Computing statistics for 600 seconds... Source to Here This Node/Link Hop RTT Lost/Sent = Pct Lost/Sent = Pct Address 0 Desktop [192.168.0.2] 0/ 100 = 0% | 1 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% static24-72-79-196.regina.accessco mm.ca [24.72.79.196] 0/ 100 = 0% | 2 12ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 10.32.1.1 0/ 100 = 0% | 3 22ms 1/ 100 = 1% 1/ 100 = 1% docsis-interconnect.regina.accessc omm.ca [24.72.99.249] 0/ 100 = 0% | 4 31ms 4/ 100 = 4% 4/ 100 = 4% A-p10-0-0-S1.gw2.cal1.sprint-canad a.net [204.50.53.65] 0/ 100 = 0% | 5 22ms 1/ 100 = 1% 1/ 100 = 1% g11-0-4-S1.bb1.cal1.sprint-canada. net [204.50.251.193] 0/ 100 = 0% | 6 34ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% p9-3-S1.bb2.van1.sprint-canada.net [204.50.128.162] 0/ 100 = 0% | 7 36ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% sl-gw14-sea-5-1.sprintlink.net [14 4.232.219.237] 0/ 100 = 0% | 8 38ms 2/ 100 = 2% 2/ 100 = 2% sl-bb20-sea-9-0.sprintlink.net [14 4.232.6.153] 0/ 100 = 0% | 9 36ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% sl-bb22-tac-6-0.sprintlink.net [14 4.232.9.151] 0/ 100 = 0% | 10 38ms 1/ 100 = 1% 1/ 100 = 1% sl-bb23-tac-15-0.sprintlink.net [1 44.232.17.182] 0/ 100 = 0% | 11 58ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% sl-bb22-sj-9-0.sprintlink.net [144 .232.20.8] 0/ 100 = 0% | 12 58ms 3/ 100 = 3% 3/ 100 = 3% sl-bb25-sj-12-0.sprintlink.net [14 4.232.3.210] 0/ 100 = 0% | 13 70ms 1/ 100 = 1% 1/ 100 = 1% sl-bb23-ana-6-0.sprintlink.net [14 4.232.20.158] 0/ 100 = 0% | 14 95ms 3/ 100 = 3% 3/ 100 = 3% sl-bb23-fw-9-1.sprintlink.net [144 .232.18.61] 0/ 100 = 0% | 15 95ms 3/ 100 = 3% 3/ 100 = 3% sl-bb22-fw-13-0.sprintlink.net [14 4.232.11.241] 0/ 100 = 0% | 16 94ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% sl-bb20-fw-15-0.sprintlink.net [14 4.232.11.226] 0/ 100 = 0% | 17 95ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% sl-st21-dal-1-0.sprintlink.net [14 4.232.20.17] 0/ 100 = 0% | 18 96ms 1/ 100 = 1% 1/ 100 = 1% 144.232.29.97 0/ 100 = 0% | 19 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% sl-theplanet-3-0.sprintlink.net [1 44.228.250.114] 0/ 100 = 0% | 20 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% dist-vlan32.dsr3-1.dllstx3.theplan et.com [70.85.127.61] 0/ 100 = 0% | 21 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% dist-vlan21.dsr1-1.dllstx2.theplan et.com [70.85.127.67] 0/ 100 = 0% | 22 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% dsr2-1-v2.dllstx4.theplanet.com [1 2.96.160.39] 0/ 100 = 0% | 23 118ms 3/ 100 = 3% 3/ 100 = 3% gig1-0-1.tp-car9-1.dllstx4.theplan et.com [67.18.116.69] 0/ 100 = 0% | 24 125ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 6.67-19-36.reverse.theplanet.com [ 67.19.36.6] Trace complete. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted February 15, 2005 CID Share Posted February 15, 2005 hey again 4 31ms 4/ 100 = 4% 4/ 100 = 4% A-p10-0-0-S1.gw2.cal1.sprint-canad a.net [204.50.53.65] that node has 4% packetloss and thats too much try this, start-run-cmd ping -n 100 204.50.53.65 and hit enter see if loss change during the day, it might be a busy node VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xs1 Posted February 15, 2005 CID Share Posted February 15, 2005 Hop 19 - 24 all have 100 % loss lol.... wow Almost all the hops listed have some loss.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
virtuatrancer Posted February 15, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 15, 2005 Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:Documents and SettingsTony>ping-n 100 204.50.53.65 'ping-n' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. C:Documents and SettingsTony>ping -n 100 204.50.53.65 Pinging 204.50.53.65 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=148ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=100ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=144ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=53ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=252 Reply from 204.50.53.65: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=252 Ping statistics for 204.50.53.65: Packets: Sent = 100, Received = 100, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 16ms, Maximum = 148ms, Average = 28ms so why i still get this: :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 787 Kbps about 0.8 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Download Speed is:: 96 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Tue Feb 15 2005 15:10:48 GMT-0600 (Canada Central Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 14X faster than 56K 1MB download in 10.67 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 37.14 % of your hosts average (accesscomm.ca) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/id-B9NK6ZRPE is because of a bad node? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted February 15, 2005 CID Share Posted February 15, 2005 yea packetloss and alot of nodes kill the speed do a new pathping to testmy.net and lets see if it changed VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
virtuatrancer Posted February 15, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 15, 2005 Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:Documents and SettingsTony>pathping testmy.net Tracing route to testmy.net [67.19.36.6] over a maximum of 30 hops: 0 Desktop [192.168.0.2] 1 static24-72-79-196.regina.accesscomm.ca [24.72.79.196] 2 10.32.1.1 3 docsis-interconnect.regina.accesscomm.ca [24.72.99.249] 4 A-p10-0-0-S1.gw2.cal1.sprint-canada.net [204.50.53.65] 5 g11-0-4-S1.bb1.cal1.sprint-canada.net [204.50.251.193] 6 p9-3-S1.bb2.van1.sprint-canada.net [204.50.128.162] 7 sl-gw14-sea-5-1.sprintlink.net [144.232.219.237] 8 sl-bb20-sea-9-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.6.153] 9 sl-bb22-tac-6-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.9.151] 10 sl-bb23-tac-15-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.17.182] 11 sl-bb22-sj-9-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.20.8] 12 sl-bb25-sj-12-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.3.210] 13 sl-bb23-ana-6-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.20.158] 14 sl-bb23-fw-9-1.sprintlink.net [144.232.18.61] 15 sl-bb22-fw-13-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.11.241] 16 sl-bb20-fw-15-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.11.226] 17 sl-st21-dal-1-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.20.17] 18 144.232.29.97 19 sl-theplanet-3-0.sprintlink.net [144.228.250.114] 20 dist-vlan32.dsr3-1.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.61] 21 dist-vlan21.dsr1-1.dllstx2.theplanet.com [70.85.127.67] 22 dsr2-1-v2.dllstx4.theplanet.com [12.96.160.39] 23 gig1-0-1.tp-car9-1.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.69] 24 6.67-19-36.reverse.theplanet.com [67.19.36.6] Computing statistics for 600 seconds... Source to Here This Node/Link Hop RTT Lost/Sent = Pct Lost/Sent = Pct Address 0 Desktop [192.168.0.2] 0/ 100 = 0% | 1 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% static24-72-79-196.regina.accessco mm.ca [24.72.79.196] 0/ 100 = 0% | 2 14ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 10.32.1.1 0/ 100 = 0% | 3 16ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% docsis-interconnect.regina.accessc omm.ca [24.72.99.249] 0/ 100 = 0% | 4 25ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% A-p10-0-0-S1.gw2.cal1.sprint-canad a.net [204.50.53.65] 0/ 100 = 0% | 5 23ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% g11-0-4-S1.bb1.cal1.sprint-canada. net [204.50.251.193] 0/ 100 = 0% | 6 34ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% p9-3-S1.bb2.van1.sprint-canada.net [204.50.128.162] 0/ 100 = 0% | 7 37ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% sl-gw14-sea-5-1.sprintlink.net [14 4.232.219.237] 0/ 100 = 0% | 8 37ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% sl-bb20-sea-9-0.sprintlink.net [14 4.232.6.153] 0/ 100 = 0% | 9 37ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% sl-bb22-tac-6-0.sprintlink.net [14 4.232.9.151] 0/ 100 = 0% | 10 36ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% sl-bb23-tac-15-0.sprintlink.net [1 44.232.17.182] 0/ 100 = 0% | 11 58ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% sl-bb22-sj-9-0.sprintlink.net [144 .232.20.8] 0/ 100 = 0% | 12 60ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% sl-bb25-sj-12-0.sprintlink.net [14 4.232.3.210] 0/ 100 = 0% | 13 70ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% sl-bb23-ana-6-0.sprintlink.net [14 4.232.20.158] 0/ 100 = 0% | 14 95ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% sl-bb23-fw-9-1.sprintlink.net [144 .232.18.61] 0/ 100 = 0% | 15 95ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% sl-bb22-fw-13-0.sprintlink.net [14 4.232.11.241] 0/ 100 = 0% | 16 95ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% sl-bb20-fw-15-0.sprintlink.net [14 4.232.11.226] 0/ 100 = 0% | 17 95ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% sl-st21-dal-1-0.sprintlink.net [14 4.232.20.17] 0/ 100 = 0% | 18 95ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 144.232.29.97 0/ 100 = 0% | 19 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% sl-theplanet-3-0.sprintlink.net [1 44.228.250.114] 0/ 100 = 0% | 20 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% dist-vlan32.dsr3-1.dllstx3.theplan et.com [70.85.127.61] 0/ 100 = 0% | 21 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% dist-vlan21.dsr1-1.dllstx2.theplan et.com [70.85.127.67] 0/ 100 = 0% | 22 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% dsr2-1-v2.dllstx4.theplanet.com [1 2.96.160.39] 0/ 100 = 0% | 23 120ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% gig1-0-1.tp-car9-1.dllstx4.theplan et.com [67.18.116.69] 0/ 100 = 0% | 24 127ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 6.67-19-36.reverse.theplanet.com [ 67.19.36.6] Trace complete. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted February 15, 2005 CID Share Posted February 15, 2005 that looks alot better try these 2 speedtests and post result http://speedtest.cogeco.net/ http://nyc.speakeasy.net/ VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
virtuatrancer Posted February 15, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 15, 2005 http://speedtest.cogeco.net/ 2005-02-15 17:00:51 EST: 1069 / 684 Your download speed : 1094812 bps, or 1069 kbps. A 133.6 KB/sec transfer rate. Your upload speed : 701385 bps, or 684 kbps. http://nyc.speakeasy.net/ 2005-02-15 17:02:08 EST: 770 / 792 Your download speed : 788598 bps, or 770 kbps. A 96.2 KB/sec transfer rate. Your upload speed : 811907 bps, or 792 kbps. http://speedtest.accesscomm.ca/ 2005-02-15 17:02:51 EST: 4137 / 702 Your download speed : 4236809 bps, or 4137 kbps. A 517.1 KB/sec transfer rate. Your upload speed : 719769 bps, or 702 kbps. Well even though the last result there was good, shouldn't it be a little more consistent? :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 756 Kbps about 0.8 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 92 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Tue Feb 15 2005 16:08:51 GMT-0600 (Canada Central Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 13X faster than 56K 1MB download in 11.13 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 36.56 % of your hosts average (accesscomm.ca) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/id-MSGIK1HBU Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted February 15, 2005 CID Share Posted February 15, 2005 do you have a router? If so bypass it and connect direct to modem and test speed again, also power cycle your modem for 30 seconds VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
virtuatrancer Posted February 15, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 15, 2005 alright well i did what you said to do and this is the results... http://speedtest.cogeco.net/ 2005-02-15 17:33:06 EST: 222 / 795 Your download speed : 228316 bps, or 222 kbps. A 27.8 KB/sec transfer rate. Your upload speed is much faster than down.. have you tweaked? Your upload speed : 814608 bps, or 795 kbps. http://nyc.speakeasy.net/ 2005-02-15 17:31:58 EST: 105 / 748 Your download speed : 107753 bps, or 105 kbps. A 13.1 KB/sec transfer rate. Your upload speed is much faster than down.. have you tweaked? Your upload speed : 766283 bps, or 748 kbps. http://speedtest.accesscomm.ca/ 2005-02-15 17:34:38 EST: 3246 / 638 Your download speed : 3324411 bps, or 3246 kbps. A 405.8 KB/sec transfer rate. Your upload speed : 653701 bps, or 638 kbps. so is this as good as it gets for me? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted February 15, 2005 CID Share Posted February 15, 2005 have you forced your NIC to 100 Mbps full duplex? If so, only use it when your connecting to your router when connecting direct to your modem, use 10 Mbps half duplex VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
virtuatrancer Posted February 15, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 15, 2005 alright well i set it too 10 half duplex and these are the results http://speedtest.accasscomm.ca 2005-02-15 17:45:15 EST: 4631 / 740 Your download speed : 4743100 bps, or 4631 kbps. A 578.9 KB/sec transfer rate. Your upload speed : 758150 bps, or 740 kbps. http://nyc.speakeasy.net/ 2005-02-15 17:47:05 EST: 3529 / 715 Your download speed : 3614193 bps, or 3529 kbps. A 441.1 KB/sec transfer rate. Your upload speed : 732779 bps, or 715 kbps. http://speedtest.cogeco.net/ 2005-02-15 17:48:11 EST: 3459 / 641 Your download speed : 3542448 bps, or 3459 kbps. A 432.4 KB/sec transfer rate. Your upload speed : 656491 bps, or 641 kbps. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 4001 Kbps about 4 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 488 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Tue Feb 15 2005 16:52:12 GMT-0600 (Canada Central Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 71X faster than 56K 1MB download in 2.1 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 102.28 % faster than the average for host (accesscomm.ca) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/id-84ESC0723 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted February 15, 2005 CID Share Posted February 15, 2005 looks alot better now load this file and test again VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
virtuatrancer Posted February 15, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 15, 2005 alright i applied the file, and restarted... http://speedtest.accesscomm.ca 2005-02-15 18:21:37 EST: 4757 / 776 Your download speed : 4871544 bps, or 4757 kbps. A 594.6 KB/sec transfer rate. Your upload speed : 795070 bps, or 776 kbps. :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 721 Kbps about 0.7 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Upload Speed is:: 88 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Tue Feb 15 2005 17:20:22 GMT-0600 (Canada Central Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 13X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 11.64 sec Diagnosis: Looks Great : 15.18 % faster than the average for host (accesscomm.ca) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/id-H2BC5WNL6 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3648 Kbps about 3.6 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Download Speed is:: 445 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Tue Feb 15 2005 17:19:35 GMT-0600 (Canada Central Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 65X faster than 56K 1MB download in 2.3 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 80.86 % faster than the average for host (accesscomm.ca) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/id-TX2M0OAZK http://nyc.speakeasy.net/ 2005-02-15 18:20:00 EST: 1624 / 774 Your download speed : 1663941 bps, or 1624 kbps. A 203.1 KB/sec transfer rate. Your upload speed : 793440 bps, or 774 kbps. http://speedtest.cogeco.net/ 2005-02-15 18:20:57 EST: 4305 / 803 Your download speed : 4408532 bps, or 4305 kbps. A 538.1 KB/sec transfer rate. Your upload speed : 823158 bps, or 803 kbps. Well now it's a lot better, but am i gonna need to quit using my router to get speeds like this, i mean its like almost brand new shouldn't it not cause any slow down? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted February 15, 2005 CID Share Posted February 15, 2005 when using router ALWAYS, force your NIC to 100 Mbps full duplex EDIT: also update to latest firmware also you can try to finetune TcpWindowSize and GlobalMaxTcpWindowSize i suggest to try change them from 64240 to 128480 and set Tcp1323Opts to 1 if that didnt help just reload the file i attached before VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
virtuatrancer Posted February 15, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 15, 2005 okay thank you for all your help and as soon as i try it out i'll post some results. Tony Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted February 15, 2005 CID Share Posted February 15, 2005 would a 100-1000 Ethernet PCI card be better, the cards are out now, and going to try one. Will let you know. the most important is to not use USB 10 Mbps is fine, i use 10 Mbps full duplex on my fiber optic connection and pull 9,2 Mbps overseas, so it wont help using 100 or 1000 but if you use a router, you want to run the LAN at your house with 100 Mbps or 1000 Mbps and the router handle the half duplex to modem on its WAN port, so even if your using full duplex at your NIC, the router will use half duplex against your modem. VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
virtuatrancer Posted February 16, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 16, 2005 hmm so with the router i should always have it set to 100Mbps full duplex? what difference would it make if i had it at 100 half or 10 full? sorry for being stupid and not knowing but im curious... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted February 16, 2005 CID Share Posted February 16, 2005 hmm so with the router i should always have it set to 100Mbps full duplex? what difference would it make if i had it at 100 half or 10 full? sorry for being stupid and not knowing but im curious... your NIC communicate better with the router when using full duplex, that helps your speed on the internet if you using 10 Mbps or 100 Mbps or 1000 mbps dosent change your internet speed, but it change the speed on your LAN, you dont want to transfer files on your LAN in 10 Mbps speed when you can use 100 Mbps VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.