VanBuren Posted February 22, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 22, 2005 I am running the sp1 tweaks on sp1 at the moment. It goes up and down during an NDT test. I get like 750 KB/sec on a download test here now that it is offpeak (it starts at 300 and then goes faster). See how the upload goes up and down? No matter what i put for the sendwin values, it still does it... any ideas? Download is satisfying enough - i think it would be more stable with SP2 and fully take adventage of AFD tweaks, if you erase that DefautSendWindow and click save to registry your upload should be more stable but probl abit slower too, atleast over higher ping routes VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BAF Posted February 22, 2005 CID Share Posted February 22, 2005 tried it and it doesnt work either Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BAF Posted February 22, 2005 CID Share Posted February 22, 2005 putting 8192 as the send window (instead of the 100kb it had) seemd to help stable it a littlebit. What other values are good? (its empty on this pc at the moment) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted February 22, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 22, 2005 putting 8192 as the send window (instead of the 100kb it had) seemd to help stable it a littlebit. What other values are good? (its empty on this pc at the moment) 8192 is the default value for DefaultSendwindow, leaving the field blank is also 8192 even if you dont see it, cos its windows default VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BAF Posted February 22, 2005 CID Share Posted February 22, 2005 i mean on my linux router. It had 100kb by default. Do you have any other ideas? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BAF Posted February 22, 2005 CID Share Posted February 22, 2005 stats on NDT say: WEB100 Enabled Statistics: Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 405.06Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 4.53Mb/s ------ Client System Details ------ OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1 Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.4.2_05 ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ 10 Mbps Ethernet link found. Link set to Full Duplex mode Information: throughput is limited by other network traffic. Good network cable(s) found Normal duplex operation found. Web100 reports the Round trip time = 80.92 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and There were 17 packets retransmitted, 299 duplicate acks received, and 137 SACK blocks received The connection was idle 0 seconds (0%) of the time This connection is network limited 99.9% of the time. Contact your local network administrator to report a network problem Contact your local network admin and report excessive packet reordering Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: ON Packet size is preserved End-to-End Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address Server says [69.169.215.100] but Client says [192.168.0.100] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted February 22, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 22, 2005 i know nothing about tweaking linux, but you might want to check this http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/tcptune/#Linux VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BAF Posted February 22, 2005 CID Share Posted February 22, 2005 yeah i did that. What BDP/send wins should i use? I'm pretty sure those retransmissions are all upload, tweaktest on dslreports says there are no retransmissions on thier download tweaker. Any like that that test uploading ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted February 22, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 22, 2005 yeah i did that. What BDP/send wins should i use? I'm pretty sure those retransmissions are all upload, tweaktest on dslreports says there are no retransmissions on thier download tweaker. Any like that that test uploading ? like i said i know nothing about linux tweaking, CA3LE know more, he has set up this server and my speed increased from max 3.7 Mbps to max 9.2 Mbps hehe anyway for windows use 1024x (your upload cap in KB/s) so if you have a 512 Kbps uploadcap, then use 512/8,192 = 62 KB/s 62x 1024 = 63488 VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BAF Posted February 22, 2005 CID Share Posted February 22, 2005 alright, i'll try that. I think i already treid it, it didnt really help.. http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12738085~mode=flat <-- more info if anybody wants to help Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted February 22, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 22, 2005 alright, i'll try that. I think i already treid it, it didnt really help.. http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12738085~mode=flat <-- more info if anybody wants to help DSLR will recommend Dr.Tcp and that program dosent tweak upload at all i suggest this site instead www.dslnuts.com and make a post in their forum VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BAF Posted February 23, 2005 CID Share Posted February 23, 2005 SP2 gives nice results. TCP/Web100 Network Diagnostic Tool v5.2.0f click START to begin Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 957.34Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 5.60Mb/s The slowest link in the end-to-end path is a 10 Mbps Ethernet subnet click START to re-test Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 940.02Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 5.66Mb/s The slowest link in the end-to-end path is a 10 Mbps Ethernet subnet click START to re-test (keep in mind adelphia is doing an upgrade test, and they chose this area. I was getting 7-8mbit download, the only problem is a dely. It starts at 300-400KB/sec (which makes the testmy tests bad, by the time it his 800-900 KB/sec, the test is over) then works up to 800-900. Upload starts at like 110 and fluctuates between that and 70-80ish. Pretty good Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted February 23, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 23, 2005 yea SP2 is alot better for tweaking VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BAF Posted February 23, 2005 CID Share Posted February 23, 2005 I'm going to guess 6mb/768kb. Can you give me a tweak for cable, 6mb/768kb cablenut that i can try out? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted February 23, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 23, 2005 here is the complete version 5 file have no file for SP1 and 6 Mbps, but try both 5 Mbps file and 8 Mbps file and use the one that works best VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BAF Posted February 23, 2005 CID Share Posted February 23, 2005 oops. i meant sp2. Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BAF Posted February 23, 2005 CID Share Posted February 23, 2005 Blargh. I had to retype this due to it not accepitng ccs, and my browser baleeted what i had typed. I attached my old file, ziped this time. I adjusted the rwins in the 6000/768 sp2 one and it helped some, But i am stuck at like 600 KB/sec. With the attached tweak, the upload didn't lock on as good as it does now, but the download went like 800-900 KB/sec. Can you tell me which values helped the upload, so i can merge them with my old upgrade? thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted February 23, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 23, 2005 i suggest you try to finetune that SP2 file instead, that file you attached is a SP1 tweak anyways here is the definitions of all values http://www.dslnuts.com/2kxp.shtml TcpWindowSize and GlobalMaxTcpWindowsize should always be the same i suggest you load the SP2 file and change DefaultReceiveWindow in steps of 128000 try 128000 first then 256000 and also test 384000 until you reach the point where speed go down, then go back and use the best value the problem with too large DefaultReceiveWindow is that you start retransmitting packets VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BAF Posted February 23, 2005 CID Share Posted February 23, 2005 anything to fix the up and down that the upload does? Im using 150380 for the rwin now, and the dl sucks. Time to go tweak. Teh upload is better than it has been, just sent a file to someone, averaged 80 KB/sec. Of course it was up to 90-100 KB/sec then down to 60... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted February 23, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 23, 2005 leave all settings as they are in 6000 768 SP2 file, only finetune DefaultReceiveWindow like i said in my previous post VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BAF Posted February 23, 2005 CID Share Posted February 23, 2005 alright. thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BAF Posted February 23, 2005 CID Share Posted February 23, 2005 hey man,t hanks. You are a genious running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 739.37Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 5.29Mb/s The slowest link in the end-to-end path is a 10 Mbps Ethernet subnet still tweaking though. Any tweaks for sp2 upload? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted February 23, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 23, 2005 what do you get against testmy.net now? VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BAF Posted February 23, 2005 CID Share Posted February 23, 2005 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3268 Kbps about 3.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 399 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Wed Feb 23 11:12:00 EST 2005 Bottom Line:: 58X faster than 56K 1MB download in 2.57 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 31.46 % faster than the average for host (adelphia.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/id-NMJX2GOKB :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 522 Kbps about 0.5 Mbps (tested with 1013 KB) Upload Speed is:: 64 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Test Time:: Wed Feb 23 11:12:56 EST 2005 Bottom Line:: 9X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 16 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 77.55 % faster than the average for host (adelphia.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/id-58RGBOF6K Only because it takes a couple seconds for me to actually reach the speed... dunno why. NDT tests show better speeds... just ran this one: TCP/Web100 Network Diagnostic Tool v5.3.3a click START to begin Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 745.53Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 3.00Mb/s The slowest link in the end-to-end path is a 10 Mbps Ethernet subnet Information: Other network traffic is congesting the link click START to re-test eeew.... the download stinks. I think something is going on. NetTraf is showing it again as cutting in and out (800 KB/sec, then 200, up and down)..... im using 128000 default rwin, it gave me good results just a minute ago.. 256000 slowed me down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BAF Posted February 23, 2005 CID Share Posted February 23, 2005 do you have any ideas? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.