BAF Posted February 24, 2005 CID Share Posted February 24, 2005 WEB100 Enabled Statistics: Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 476.93Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 5.03Mb/s ------ Client System Details ------ OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1 Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.4.2_05 ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ 10 Mbps Ethernet link found. Link set to Full Duplex mode Information: throughput is limited by other network traffic. Good network cable(s) found Normal duplex operation found. Web100 reports the Round trip time = 130.26 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and There were 29 packets retransmitted, 228 duplicate acks received, and 130 SACK blocks received The connection was idle 0 seconds (0%) of the time This connection is network limited 99.97% of the time. Contact your local network administrator to report a network problem Contact your local network admin and report excessive packet reordering Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: ON Packet size is preserved End-to-End Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address Server says [69.169.215.xxx] but Client says [192.168.0.100] i get better upload speesd to: http://miranda.ctd.anl.gov:7123/ WEB100 Enabled Statistics: Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 607.60Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 3.98Mb/s ------ Client System Details ------ OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1 Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.4.2_05 ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ 10 Mbps Ethernet link found. Link set to Half Duplex mode Information: throughput is limited by other network traffic. Good network cable(s) found Normal duplex operation found. Web100 reports the Round trip time = 145.87 msec; the Packet size = 1380 Bytes; and There were 46 packets retransmitted, 322 duplicate acks received, and 224 SACK blocks received The connection was idle 0 seconds (0%) of the time This connection is network limited 99.97% of the time. Contact your local network administrator to report a network problem Contact your local network admin and report excessive packet reordering Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: ON Information: Network Middlebox is modifying MSS variable Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address Server says [69.169.215.xxx] but Client says [192.168.0.100] duplicate acks, no pl though. I think the duplicates may be my problem. If i crank up my send window, i get like 960 on the ndt tests, yet i cant go over around 70 KB/sec. Duplicate acks must slow it down.... so if i get it adjusted to where there aren't any dups, do you think it'll be faster? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BAF Posted February 24, 2005 CID Share Posted February 24, 2005 hmm... the anl test under more details says: (the 5mbit test) estimate = 3.1 based on packet size = 10Kbits, RTT = 145.87msec, and loss = 5.41419E-4 The theoretical network limit is 3.1 Mbps The NDT server has a 8192.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 438.74 Mbps Your PC/Workstation has a 252.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 13.49 Mbps The network based flow control limits the throughput to 10.32 Mbps Nitro gives me 3.08 dl and says: estimate = 3.01 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 135.67msec, and loss = 7.45712E-4 The theoretical network limit is 3.01 Mbps The NDT server has a 8192.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 471.71 Mbps Your PC/Workstation has a 250.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 14.44 Mbps The network based flow control limits the throughput to 10.75 Mbps Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted February 24, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 24, 2005 i dont really know how this packet reordering work, but i think your right you have alot of dup acks, and loss on the other test, make a traceroute and post it here VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BAF Posted February 24, 2005 CID Share Posted February 24, 2005 I have a fan blowing under my bed where the modem + linux firewall and my server are, as the modem + wireless router felt a little warm. I consistantly get 600 kbit upload (download needs to be retweaked i guess, 3-4 mbit) now that i have cool air blwoing on the stuff.... maybe it was too warm to do good or something. Tracing route to testmy.net [67.19.36.6] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms smoothwall [192.168.0.1] 2 28 ms 14 ms 14 ms 69.169.208.1 3 15 ms 18 ms 11 ms 69.160.186.181 4 19 ms 14 ms 20 ms 24.48.204.217 5 14 ms 32 ms 19 ms unk-426d0e99.adelphiacom.net [66.109.14.153] 6 17 ms 35 ms 27 ms p1-00-00-00.a0.cdp00.adelphiacom.net [66.109.1.4 6] 7 26 ms 23 ms 37 ms p3-02-00-00.r0.nyc90.adelphiacom.net [66.109.1.2 1] 8 66 ms 62 ms 64 ms p3-02-00-00.c1.chi75.adelphiacom.net [66.109.0.1 01] 9 82 ms 82 ms 84 ms p3-01-01-00.c1.dfw91.adelphiacom.net [66.109.0.6 6] 10 83 ms 91 ms 87 ms g1-03-02-00.p0.dfw91.adelphiacom.net [66.109.3.7 8] 11 87 ms 94 ms 83 ms eq-dallas-1000M.theplanet.com [206.223.118.3] 12 88 ms 84 ms 87 ms dist-vlan31.dsr3-1.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85. 127.29] 13 124 ms 222 ms 76 ms dist-vlan21.dsr1-1.dllstx2.theplanet.com [70.85. 127.67] 14 89 ms 78 ms 88 ms dsr2-1-v1.dllstx4.theplanet.com [12.96.160.7] 15 95 ms 80 ms 87 ms gig1-0-1.tp-car9-1.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18. 116.69] 16 81 ms 87 ms 88 ms 6.67-19-36.reverse.theplanet.com [67.19.36.6] Trace complete. Tracing route to miranda.ctd.anl.gov [146.137.222.101] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms smoothwall [192.168.0.1] 2 26 ms 11 ms 23 ms 69.169.208.1 3 18 ms 13 ms 21 ms 69.160.186.181 4 52 ms 20 ms 16 ms 24.48.204.221 5 37 ms 14 ms 23 ms unk-426d0e99.adelphiacom.net [66.109.14.153] 6 25 ms 24 ms 19 ms p1-00-00-00.a0.cdp00.adelphiacom.net [66.109.1.4 6] 7 32 ms 25 ms 34 ms p3-02-00-00.r0.nyc90.adelphiacom.net [66.109.1.2 1] 8 55 ms 70 ms 53 ms p3-02-00-00.c1.chi75.adelphiacom.net [66.109.0.1 01] 9 60 ms 59 ms 64 ms a1-01-00-00.p0.chi75.adelphiacom.net [66.109.3.1 4] 10 62 ms 67 ms 59 ms ge-6-2.car2.Chicago1.Level3.net [67.72.124.29] 11 53 ms 67 ms 63 ms ae-1-52.bbr2.Chicago1.Level3.net [4.68.101.33] 12 82 ms 72 ms 75 ms ae-0-0.bbr1.Washington1.Level3.net [64.159.0.229 ] 13 88 ms 83 ms 75 ms ge-1-1-51.car3.Washington1.Level3.net [4.68.121. 14] 14 80 ms 75 ms 70 ms eqx-ash-level3.es.net [198.124.196.5] 15 141 ms 134 ms 133 ms dccr1-eqx-ash.es.net [134.55.207.10] 16 130 ms 129 ms 140 ms aoacr1-oc48-dccr1.es.net [134.55.209.61] 17 131 ms 138 ms 152 ms chicr1-oc192-aoacr1.es.net [134.55.209.57] 18 136 ms 144 ms 131 ms anl-oc12-chicr1.es.net [134.55.209.202] 19 138 ms 136 ms 132 ms guava-esnet.anchor.anl.gov [192.5.170.77] 20 137 ms 128 ms 136 ms 130.202.222.65 21 * * * Request timed out. 22 * ^C Tracing route to nitro.ucsc.edu [128.114.1.5] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms smoothwall [192.168.0.1] 2 22 ms 11 ms 24 ms 69.169.208.1 3 20 ms 45 ms 11 ms 69.160.186.181 4 56 ms 12 ms 21 ms 24.48.204.217 5 13 ms 19 ms 20 ms unk-426d0e99.adelphiacom.net [66.109.14.153] 6 27 ms 23 ms 12 ms p1-00-00-00.a0.cdp00.adelphiacom.net [66.109.1.4 6] 7 22 ms 22 ms 23 ms p3-02-00-00.r0.nyc90.adelphiacom.net [66.109.1.2 1] 8 24 ms 23 ms 29 ms p3-00-01-00.c1.nyc90.adelphiacom.net [66.109.0.2 50] 9 38 ms 31 ms 63 ms p3-02-00-00.c0.dca91.adelphiacom.net [66.109.0.7 8] 10 87 ms 99 ms 138 ms p3-01-00-00.c1.lax91.adelphiacom.net [66.109.0.2 01] 11 108 ms 91 ms 87 ms p3-00-01-00.c0.lax91.adelphiacom.net [66.109.0.1 97] 12 93 ms 113 ms 96 ms a1-00-00-00.p0.lax91.adelphiacom.net [66.109.3.1 30] 13 94 ms 99 ms 95 ms lax-cenic-equinix-exch.cenic.org [206.223.123.7] 14 124 ms 115 ms 114 ms dc-sac-dc1--lax-dc1-pos.cenic.net [137.164.22.12 7] 15 115 ms 151 ms 111 ms dc-oak-dc2--csac-dc1-ge.cenic.net [137.164.22.11 0] 16 119 ms 116 ms 127 ms ucsc-ucsc1--dc-oak-dc1-egm.cenic.net [137.164.23 .13] 17 119 ms 123 ms 119 ms comm-g-GE3-5.ucsc.edu [128.114.0.214] 18 114 ms 119 ms 115 ms nitro.ucsc.edu [128.114.1.5] Trace complete. Ping statistics for 128.114.1.5: Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 110ms, Maximum = 127ms, Average = 119ms Control-C thanks for the help so far. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BAF Posted February 24, 2005 CID Share Posted February 24, 2005 Also, my network card is an integrated intel pro/e 100mbit card, on my asus p4p800... should I try putting a different card in? The WAN card in my firweall is integrated, and the lan card is a 3com 3c905b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted February 24, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 24, 2005 try this start-run-cmd type ping -n 100 66.109.1.46 and hit enter see if you have any loss, try both without network load and also while downloading VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted February 24, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 24, 2005 Also, my network card is an integrated intel pro/e 100mbit card, on my asus p4p800... should I try putting a different card in? The WAN card in my firweall is integrated, and the lan card is a 3com 3c905b. if you have another card, test it VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BAF Posted February 24, 2005 CID Share Posted February 24, 2005 w/o load: Ping statistics for 66.109.1.46: Packets: Sent = 100, Received = 100, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 11ms, Maximum = 89ms, Average = 26ms w/ full download: Ping statistics for 66.109.1.46: Packets: Sent = 100, Received = 100, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 11ms, Maximum = 83ms, Average = 39ms Also that has an additional 5 KB/sec upload, as my mom picked up the phone in the middle of the loaded ping test and QoS/traffic shaper is off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted February 24, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 24, 2005 try another NIC, and see if it helps it might have been loss just on the route to that testsite VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BAF Posted February 24, 2005 CID Share Posted February 24, 2005 You know, i've been thinking. I read somewhere that the 2.3.1.3 firmware for the sb5100 was buggy. I think it was that. I have that same firmware.... some bug about uploading. Come to think of it, i got ~200kbit on my 256kbb cap, ~400 on my 512kb cap, and now ~600 on the 920 kb cap.... i posted on dslreports.com. My laptops upload (which is wireless) is only slightly better. prolly not the nic, aren't intel nics good? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted February 24, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 24, 2005 Intels NIC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BAF Posted February 24, 2005 CID Share Posted February 24, 2005 yeah, the only problem is a) i can get motorola's firmware, and i cant update it. For cable modems, the firmware is controlled by your isp. I would have to get adelphia to push the update :/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted February 24, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 24, 2005 ask your ISP if you can lend a modem with a working firmware to test with VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BAF Posted February 24, 2005 CID Share Posted February 24, 2005 that's not so easy, i am 15 and i have to rely on my parents to do this stuff. they "dont know anything about this stuff" so they are hesitant to do anything Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted February 24, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 24, 2005 i understand, well you have very good speed even tho you dont max out, by now you probl know what settings that works best with your modem. VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BAF Posted February 24, 2005 CID Share Posted February 24, 2005 hanks... Ill let you know what comes out of my post about firmware on dslreports. A bunch of techs for adelphia read/post in the foruns, so maybe there has the power to get me a new firmware too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted February 24, 2005 Author CID Share Posted February 24, 2005 good luck BAF VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.